定常吹气对无缝襟翼翼型地面效应影响的数值模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.120751

Abstract

Abstract:

With growing requirements for the manufacturing cost, performance and reliability, and environment, the transport aircraft with bigger payload, shorter taking off and landing distance, and lower fuel consumption and aerodynamic noise is the development object of the future transport aircraft. Therefore, simple and efficient lift enhancement method is urgently needed. The method using blowing to enhance the lift is proved to be one of the most promising technologies. In the analysis of the performance of taking off and landing, ground effect must be considered, and it is thus essential to investigate the ground effect of the airfoil using blowing to enhance lift. The aerodynamic characteristics of slot-less flap airfoil with steady blowing in ground effect are investigated by numerical simulation. The results show that the lift and lift slope of the airfoil decrease obviously with steady blowing at small ride height compared with that far from the ground. The results also indicate that at small angles of attack, the lift increases firstly and then decreases with the decrease of ride height when blowing momentum coefficient is 0.005, but the lift monotonously decreases with the decrease of ride height when blowing momentum coefficient is 0.01. The phenomenon that the lift of the slot-less flap airfoil varies with the moment coefficients and the ride heights can directly affect the performance of taking off and landing, so it must be taken into consideration when applying blowing to increase the lift.

Key words: steady blowing, ground effect, numerical simulation, flow control, lift enhancement

CLC Number:

V211.4

JIANG Yubiao, WANG Wanbo, CHANG Zhiqiang, HUANG Yong. Numerical simulation of effect of steady blowing slot-less flap airfoil in ground effect[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(6): 120751-120751.

References

[1] GARNER P L, MEREDITH P T, STONER R C. Areas for future CFD development as illustrated by transport aircraft applications: AIAA-1991-1527[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1991.
[2] BURNET V, DANDOIS J, VERBEKE C. Recent Onera flow control research on high-lift configuration[J]. Journal Aerospace Lab, 2013(6): 1-12.
[3] HANSEN H, THIEDE P, MOENS F, et al. Overview about the European high lift research programme EUROLIFT: AIAA-2004-0767[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.
[4] MCLEAN J D, CROUCH J D, STONER R C, et al. Study of the application of separation control by unsteady excitation to civil transport aircraft: CR-1999-209338[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1999.
[5] RUDNIK R, GEYR H V. The European high lift project EUROLIFT Ⅱ-objectives, approach, and structure: AIAA-2007-4296[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2007.
[6] SMITH D M, DICKEY E, VONKLEIN T. The ADVINT program: AIAA-2006-2854[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.
[7] PETZ R, NITSCHE W. Active separation control on the flap of a two-dimensional generic high-lift configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(3): 865-874.
[8] HAUCKE F, NITCHE W. Active separation control on a 2D high-lift wing section towards high Reynolds number application: AIAA-2013-2514[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2013.
[9] 米百刚, 詹浩, 朱军. 二维干净翼型、增升构型地面效应的数值模拟研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2013, 30(6): 822-827. MI B G, ZHAN H, ZHU J. Numerical simulation on aerodynamic characteristic of clean and multi-element airfoils in ground effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(6): 822-827 (in Chinese).
[10] AHMED M R, TAKASAKI T, KOHAMA Y. Aerodynamics of a NACA4412 airfoil in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(1): 37-47.
[11] QU Q L, WANG W, LIU P Q, et al. Airfoil aerodynamics in ground effect for wide range of angles of attack[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(4): 1048-1061.
[12] QU Q L, WANG W, LIU P Q, et al. Aerodynamics and flow mechanics of a two-element airfoil in ground effect: AIAA-2015-0550[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015.
[13] 秦绪国, 刘沛清, 屈秋林, 等. 多段翼型地面效应数值模拟与分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(4): 890-896. QIN X G, LIU P Q, QU Q L, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis on aerodynamics of three-element airfoil in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(4): 890-896 (in Chinese).
[14] 应成炯, 杨韡, 杨志刚. 地面效应下的机翼失速数值模拟[J]. 飞行力学, 2010, 28(5): 9-12. YING C J, YANG W, YANG Z G. Numerical simulation on stall of wing in ground effect[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2010, 28(5): 9-12 (in Chinese).
[15] 秦绪国, 刘沛清, 屈秋林, 等. 三维多段机翼地面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(2): 257-264. QIN X G, LIU P Q, QU Q L, et al. Numerical simulation on 3D multi-element wings in ground effect[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(2): 257-264 (in Chinese).
[16] 肖涛, 代钦. Gurney襟翼对机翼地面效应气动特性和流动结构的影响实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2013, 31(5): 572-578. XIAO T, DAI Q. The experimental study of aerodynamics and flow structures of a wing with Gurney flaps in ground effect[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinca, 2013, 31(5): 572-578 (in Chinese).
[17] ZERIHAN J, ZHANG X. Aerodynamics of Gurney flaps on a wing in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(5): 772-780.
[18] PATTERSON B W, ANGLE G M, SMITH J E. Lift enhancement of circulation control as influenced by ground effect: AIAA-2011-3652[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[19] PATTERSON B W, ANGLE G M, SMITH J E. Circulation control lifting surface argument by ground effect: AIAA-2012-0860[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2012.
[20] GALBRAITH M C. Numerical simulations of a high-lift airfoil employing active flow control: AIAA-2006-0147[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006

Numerical simulation of effect of steady blowing slot-less flap airfoil in ground effect

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yating FENG, Hui ZHANG. Aerodynamic drag reduction device based on rear wind energy harvesting [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 180-191.
[2]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[3]	Xudong ZHANG, Zheng LI, Hao DONG, Siyuan GAO, Zubi JI, Kaixin LI, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[4]	Zheng LI, Cong XU, Jian ZHANG, Mengmeng LI, Yilei MA, Guanghui BAI. Reverse jet flow control by plasma synthetic jet actuator in high speed flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 225-232.
[5]	Zhengxue MA, Zhenbing LUO, Aihong ZHAO, Yan ZHOU, Wei XIE, Qiang LIU, Yinxin ZHU, Wenqiang PENG. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[6]	Hai DU, Lejie YANG, Zheng LI, Yue XU, Jingyang SUN, Yuhang WANG. Lifting mechanism and energy efficiency analysis of multistage circulation control technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 54-66.
[7]	Kai LUO, Qiu WANG, Jinping LI, Wei ZHAO. Magnetohydrodynamic flow control of double-cone under high temperature real gas effect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 76-88.
[8]	HAN Luyang, WANG Bin, PU Liang, CHEN Qing, ZHENG Haibin. Research progress on mechanism and related problems of energy deposition drag reduction technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 26032-026032.
[9]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[10]	LIU Qiang, TU Guohua, LUO Zhenbing, CHEN Jianqiang, ZHAO Rui, YUAN Xianxu. Progress in hypersonic boundary layer transition delay control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 25357-025357.
[11]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[12]	CHEN Xian, CHEN Cheng, HUANG Jiangtao, CHEN Qisheng, YU Longzhou, ZHONG Shidong. Effects of belly flap on take-off and landing characteristics of a flying-wing vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 125028-125028.
[13]	ZHOU Yan, LUO Zhenbing, WANG Lin, XIA Zhixun, GAO Tianxiang, XIE Wei, DENG Xiong, PENG Wenqiang, CHENG Pan. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.
[14]	WEI Ziyan, LI Jie, ZHANG Heng, YANG Zhao. Improved aerodynamic design of laminar wing section of laminar verifying aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526760-526760.
[15]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.