高超声速流场等离子体合成射流逆向喷流特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27747

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the flow field characteristics of the reverse plasma synthetic jet under hypersonic conditions， experimental and numerical studies were carried out. In the hypersonic incoming flow with Mach number 8， the flow field variation of the reverse plasma synthetic jet was analyzed by comparing the schlieren and exciter outlet pressure monitoring results in the experiment and simulation. It is verified that under hypersonic conditions， the outlet pressure oscillation of the reverse plasma synthesis jet actuator is caused by multiple jets generated by multiple backfilling in the cavity， causing multiple shocks to sweep over the actuator outlet. The plasma synthesis jet increases the mass flow of the gas outside the jet area， while the precursor shock propagating upstream merges with the bow shock wave into a single shock. The vortex rings produced under the action of high-momentum jets， the low-pressure regions created by counter-currents， and the high-temperature low-density plasma jets reduce the local Mach number， resulting in an increase in the shock penetration depth.

Key words: plasma synthetic jet, flow control, hypersonic incoming flow, reverse jet, penetration depth

CLC Number:

V211.3

Zhengxue MA, Zhenbing LUO, Aihong ZHAO, Yan ZHOU, Wei XIE, Qiang LIU, Yinxin ZHU, Wenqiang PENG. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 2

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

References 33

1	罗振兵, 夏智勋, 王林. 高超声速飞行器内外流主动流动控制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 3-38.
	LUO Z B, XIA Z X, WANG L. Hypersonic aircraft internal and external flow active flow control [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 3-38 (in Chinese).
2	周岩. 新型等离子体合成射流及其激波控制特性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018: 1-9.
	ZHOU Y. Novel plasma synthetic jet and its application in shock wave control[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018: 1-9 (in Chinese).
3	王林. 等离子体高能合成射流及其超声速流动控制机理研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2014: 1-21.
	WANG L. Principle of plasma high-energy synthetic jet and supersonic flow control[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014: 1-21 (in Chinese).
4	AHMED M Y M, QIN N. Recent advances in the aerothermodynamics of spiked hypersonic vehicles[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(6): 425-449.
5	HUANG W, CHEN Z, YAN L, et al. Drag and heat flux reduction mechanism induced by the spike and its combinations in supersonic flows: A review[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 105: 31-39.
6	KNIGHT D. Survey of aerodynamic drag reduction at high speed by energy deposition[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(6): 1153-1167.
7	HONG Y J, WANG D K, LI Q, et al. Interaction of single-pulse laser energy with bow shock in hypersonic flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27(2): 241-247.
8	VENKATACHARI B S, ITO Y, CHENG G, et al. Numerical investigation of the interaction of counterflowing jets and supersonic capsule flows[C]∥42nd AIAA Thermophysics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
9	GUO J H, LIN G P, BU X Q, et al. Sensitivity analysis of flowfield modeling parameters upon the flow structure and aerodynamics of an opposing jet over a hypersonic blunt body[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(1): 161-175.
10	FINLEY P J. The flow of a jet from a body opposing a supersonic free stream[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1966, 26(2): 337-368.
11	CHEN L W, WANG G L, LU X Y. Numerical investigation of a jet from a blunt body opposing a supersonic flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 684: 85-110.
12	SHARMA K, NAIR M T. Combination of counterflow jet and cavity for heat flux and drag reduction[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(5): 056107.
13	LU H B, LIU W Q. Investigation of thermal protection system by forward-facing cavity and opposing jet combinatorial configuration[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(2): 287-293.
14	MARLEY C D, RIGGINS D W. Numerical study of novel drag reduction techniques for hypersonic blunt bodies[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(9): 1871-1882.
15	JU S J, SUN Z X, YANG G W, et al. Parametric study on drag reduction with the combination of the upstream energy deposition and the opposing jet configuration in supersonic flows[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 171: 300-310.
16	何琨, 陈坚强, 董维中. 逆向喷流流场模态分析及减阻特性研究[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38(4): 438-445.
	HE K, CHEN J Q, DONG W Z. Penetration mode and drag reduction research in hypersonic flows using a counter-flow jet[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38(4): 438-445 (in Chinese).
17	MENG X S, HU H Y, LI C, et al. Mechanism study of coupled aerodynamic and thermal effects using plasma actuation for anti-icing[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(3): 037103.
18	毛枚良, 邓小刚, 陈亮中, 等. 常气压辉光放电等离子体对边界层流动的影响[J]. 计算物理, 2009, 26(1): 57-63.
	MAO M L, DENG X G, CHEN L Z, et al. Boundary layer flows with one atmosphere uniform glow discharge plasma[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 26(1): 57-63 (in Chinese).
19	吴云, 李应红. 等离子体流动控制研究进展与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 381-405.
	WU Y, LI Y H. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 381-405 (in Chinese).
20	张攀峰, 王晋军, 冯立好. 零质量射流技术及其应用研究进展[J]. 中国科学(E辑: 技术科学), 2008, 38(3): 321-349.
	ZHANG P F, WANG J J, FENG L H. Research progress of zero-mass jet technology and its application [J]. Science in China (Series E: Technological Sciences), 2008, 38(3): 321-349 (in Chinese).
21	王林, 罗振兵, 夏智勋, 等. 高速流场主动流动控制激励器研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2012, 42(10): 1103-1119.
	WANG L, LUO Z B, XIA Z X, et al. Review of actuators for high speed active flow control [J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2012, 42(10): 1103-1119 (in Chinese).
22	GROSSMAN K R, CYBYK B Z, VANWIE D M. SparkJet actuators for flow control[C]∥41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
23	HARDY P, BARRICAU P, CARUANA D, et al. Plasma synthetic jet for flow control[C]∥ 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
24	ZONG H H, Formation KOTSONIS M., evolution and scaling of plasma synthetic jets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 837: 147-181.
25	单勇, 张靖周, 谭晓茗. 火花型合成射流激励器流动特性及其激励参数数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(3): 551-557.
	SHAN Y, ZHANG J Z, TAN X M. Numerical study of the flow characteristics and excitation parameters for the sparkjet actuator[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(3): 551-557 (in Chinese).
26	CHEDEVERGNE F, LÉON O, BODOC V, et al. Experimental and numerical response of a high-Reynolds-number M=0.6 jet to a Plasma Synthetic Jet actuator[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2015, 56: 1-15.
27	NARAYANASWAMY V, RAJA L L, CLEMENS N T. Characterization of a high-frequency pulsed-plasma jet actuator for supersonic flow control[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(2): 297-305.
28	JIN D, LI Y H, JIA M, et al. Experimental characterization of the plasma synthetic jet actuator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(10): 1034-1040.
29	陈加政, 胡国暾, 樊国超, 等. 等离子体合成射流对钝头激波的控制与减阻[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124773.
	CHEN J Z, HU G T, FAN G C, et al. Bow shock wave control and drag reduction by plasma synthetic jet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 124773 (in Chinese).
30	WANG H Y, LI J, JIN D, et al. High-frequency counter-flow plasma synthetic jet actuator and its application in suppression of supersonic flow separation[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 142: 45-56.
31	XIE W, LUO Z B, ZHOU Y, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on opposing plasma synthetic jet for drag reduction[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(8): 75-91.
32	瞿章华, 曾明, 刘伟, 等. 高超声速空气动力学[M]. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 1999.
	QU Z H, ZENG M, LIU W, et al. Hypersonic aerodynamics [M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 1999 (in Chinese).
33	XIE W, LUO Z B, HOU L, et al. Characterization of plasma synthetic jet actuator with Laval-shaped exit and application to drag reduction in supersonic flow[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(9): 096104.

参数	数值
喷管出口直径/m	0.5
风洞马赫数	5， 6， 7， 8
流量/（kg∙s^-1）	0.29~15.50
总压/MPa	0.04~1.0
总温/K	288~685
单位雷诺数/m^-1	6.47×10⁵~2.24×10⁷
模拟飞行高度/km	27~59
风洞运行时间/s	10
模型最大底部直径/mm	120
气源容积/m³	32
真空容积/m³	650

工况	总压 /atm	激励器腔体压力/Pa	总温 /℃	放电能量/J	电容 /μF
1	7.5	558.75	228	0.69	0.64
2	7.4	551.3	236	1.44	0.96
3	7.4	551.3	238	1.29	0.96
4	7.4	551.3	246	4.42	2.28

[1]	Yating FENG, Hui ZHANG. Aerodynamic drag reduction device based on rear wind energy harvesting [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 180-191.
[2]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[3]	Xudong ZHANG, Zheng LI, Hao DONG, Siyuan GAO, Zubi JI, Kaixin LI, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[4]	Xiangrong JING, Pan CHENG, Zhenbing LUO, Tianxiang GAO, Yan ZHOU, Xiong DENG. Ice breaking characteristics and crack propagation law of arc discharge plasma actuator [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 204-213.
[5]	Zheng LI, Cong XU, Jian ZHANG, Mengmeng LI, Yilei MA, Guanghui BAI. Reverse jet flow control by plasma synthetic jet actuator in high speed flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 225-232.
[6]	Kai LUO, Qiu WANG, Jinping LI, Wei ZHAO. Magnetohydrodynamic flow control of double-cone under high temperature real gas effect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 76-88.
[7]	HAN Luyang, WANG Bin, PU Liang, CHEN Qing, ZHENG Haibin. Research progress on mechanism and related problems of energy deposition drag reduction technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 26032-026032.
[8]	LIU Rubing, WEI Wentao, LI Fei, LIN Qi. Working mechanism of air-supplemented plasma synthetic jet actuator [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125854-125854.
[9]	LIU Qiang, TU Guohua, LUO Zhenbing, CHEN Jianqiang, ZHAO Rui, YUAN Xianxu. Progress in hypersonic boundary layer transition delay control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 25357-025357.
[10]	ZHOU Yan, LUO Zhenbing, WANG Lin, XIA Zhixun, GAO Tianxiang, XIE Wei, DENG Xiong, PENG Wenqiang, CHENG Pan. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.
[11]	WEI Ziyan, LI Jie, ZHANG Heng, YANG Zhao. Improved aerodynamic design of laminar wing section of laminar verifying aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526760-526760.
[12]	JIANG Lihong, RAO Hanyue, LAN Xiayu, YANG Tihao, GENG Jianzhong, BAI Junqiang. Aerodynamic design and comprehensive benefit impact of hybrid laminar flow wing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526791-526791.
[13]	ZHANG Shenghua, DENG Feng, QIN Ning, LIU Xueqiang. Numerical study on impact of shock control bump on transonic buffet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526806-526806.
[14]	WANG Yiwen, LAN Xiayu, SHI Yayun, HUA Jun, BAI Junqiang, ZHOU Zhu. Gradient optimization design for laminar airfoil considering inspiration effect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527323-527323.
[15]	WANG Hongyu, YANG Yanguang, HU Weibo, CHEN Zhi, FENG Liming, ZHOU Youtian. Experimental study on unsteadiness characteristics of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by high-frequency microsecond pulse discharge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625905-625905.

Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 33

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments