利用上游槽道对角区马蹄涡的控制

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0304

Abstract

Abstract:

Two and three dimensional cavities have been studied by experimental and numerical simulation to control horseshoe vortex formed when the flow passes a cylinder-flat plate junction. The cavity is located on the flat plate upstream of the cylinder. The results indicate that both two and three dimensional cavities can delay boundary layer separation and weaken the horseshoe vortex. At the same time, the upstream surface pressure and adverse pressure gradient of cavity are both reduced, and at the downstream the pressure is increased while the global adverse pressure gradient is reduced. The study also indicates that the two dimensional cavity can reduce about 61.15%-66.51%, while the three dimensional cavity can reduce 66.65%-80.93%, of the horseshoe vortex strength. The effect of cavity geometry parameters, including distance, width and depth, is discussed. It is shown that the cavity distance plays major role in weakening the horseshoe vortex. The mechanism for controlling the horseshoe vortex by cavity is discussed. It is shown that the sub-layer of the incoming boundary layer which contains high vorticity is swallowed into the cavity to form the cavity vortex. The cavity vortex is transported to the downstream of the junction. As the cavity gets closer to the cylinder, more sub-layer of boundary layer will be swallowed into cavity. It is this cavity-effect that reduces the surface adverse pressure gradient upstream of the cylinder and diminishes the horseshoe vortex and separation region.

Key words: junction flow, horseshoe vortex, flow control, upstream cavity, particle image velocimetry test

CLC Number:

V211

LI Jian, ZHANG Hua, WU Xinggang. Junction flow horseshoe vortex control based on upstream cavity[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(6): 120796-120796.

References

[1] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. Turbulence structure near the nose of a wing-body junction[C]//19th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1987.
[2] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. Time-dependent and time-averaged turbulence structure near the nose of a wing-body junction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1990, 210(2): 23-55.
[3] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. LDV measurements in the flow past a wing-body junction[C]//4th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Anemometry to Fluid Mechanics. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Tecnico, 1988: 2-3.
[4] GRAZIANI R A, BLAIR M F, TAYLOR J R, et al. An experimental study of endwall and airfoil surface heat transfer in a large scale turbine blade cascade[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1980, 102(2): 257-267.
[5] BLAIR M F. Heat transfer in the vicinity of a large-scale obstruction in a turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1985, 1(2): 158-160.
[6] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. Time-dependent structure in wing-body junction flows[M]. Turbulent Shear Flows 6. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 1989: 232-248.
[7] LIU Z H, XIONG Y, TU C X. Numerical simulation and control of horseshoe vortex around an appendage-body junction[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(1): 23-42.
[8] LIU Z H, XIONG Y. Numerical simulation on the horseshoe vortex formation around the hull-sail junction of submarine[C]//2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing (ICOIP). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2010, 2: 51-54.
[9] SEAL C V, SMITH C R, ROCKWELL D. Dynamics of the vorticity distribution in endwall junctions[J]. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(6): 1041-1047.
[10] KHAN M J, AHMED A. Topological model of flow regime in the plane of symmetry of a surface-mounted obstacle[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(4): 1089-1109.
[11] GRECO J J. The flow structure in the vicinity of a cylinder-flat plate junction: Flow regimes, periodicity, and vortex interactions[D]. Bethlehem: Lehigh University, 1990.
[12] PHILIPS D B, CIMBALA J M, TREASTER A L. Suppression of the wing-body junction vortex by body surface suction[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1992, 29(1): 118-123.
[13] JOHNSON M J, RAVINDRA K, ANERS R. Comparative study of the elimination of the wing fuselage junction vortex by boundary layer suction and blowing[C]//32nd Aerosapce Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 1994: 10-13.
[14] 徐向南, 张华, 胡波. DBD涡流发生器及其在角区流动控制中的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6):1743-1752. XU X N, ZHANG H, HU B. Numerical study of DBD vortex generator and application in junction flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(6): 1743-1752 (in Chinese).
[15] DEVENPORT W J, DEWITZ M B, AGARWAL N K, et al. Effects of a fillet on the flow past a wing body junction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(12): 2017-2024.
[16] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L, DEWITZ M B, et al. Effects of a leading-edge fillets on the flow past an appendage-body junction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1991, 30(9): 2177-2183.
[17] NELSON R, GEORGE E, HAMID R. Effects of an upstream ribbed surface on the flow past a cylinder-flat plate junction[C]//AIAA 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
[18] KAIROUZ K A, RAHAI H R. Turbulent junction flow with an upstream ribbed surface[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2005, 26(5): 771-779.
[19] HORSTEN B, VELDHUIS L. Experimental and numerical results on cavity effects in juncture flow[C]//AIAA 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[20] KANG K J, KIM T, SONG S J. Strengths of horseshoe vortices around a circular cylinder with an upstream cavity[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2009, 23(7): 1773-1778.
[21] ZAW ZAW O O. The investigation and control of 3D separated structures in juncture flow[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2011.
[22] ANSYS Inc. ANSYS FLUENT user's guide[M]. 2012.

Junction flow horseshoe vortex control based on upstream cavity

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yating FENG, Hui ZHANG. Aerodynamic drag reduction device based on rear wind energy harvesting [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 180-191.
[2]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[3]	Xudong ZHANG, Zheng LI, Hao DONG, Siyuan GAO, Zubi JI, Kaixin LI, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[4]	Zheng LI, Cong XU, Jian ZHANG, Mengmeng LI, Yilei MA, Guanghui BAI. Reverse jet flow control by plasma synthetic jet actuator in high speed flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 225-232.
[5]	Zhengxue MA, Zhenbing LUO, Aihong ZHAO, Yan ZHOU, Wei XIE, Qiang LIU, Yinxin ZHU, Wenqiang PENG. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[6]	Kai LUO, Qiu WANG, Jinping LI, Wei ZHAO. Magnetohydrodynamic flow control of double-cone under high temperature real gas effect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 76-88.
[7]	HAN Luyang, WANG Bin, PU Liang, CHEN Qing, ZHENG Haibin. Research progress on mechanism and related problems of energy deposition drag reduction technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 26032-026032.
[8]	LIU Qiang, TU Guohua, LUO Zhenbing, CHEN Jianqiang, ZHAO Rui, YUAN Xianxu. Progress in hypersonic boundary layer transition delay control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 25357-025357.
[9]	ZHOU Yan, LUO Zhenbing, WANG Lin, XIA Zhixun, GAO Tianxiang, XIE Wei, DENG Xiong, PENG Wenqiang, CHENG Pan. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.
[10]	WEI Ziyan, LI Jie, ZHANG Heng, YANG Zhao. Improved aerodynamic design of laminar wing section of laminar verifying aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526760-526760.
[11]	JIANG Lihong, RAO Hanyue, LAN Xiayu, YANG Tihao, GENG Jianzhong, BAI Junqiang. Aerodynamic design and comprehensive benefit impact of hybrid laminar flow wing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526791-526791.
[12]	ZHANG Shenghua, DENG Feng, QIN Ning, LIU Xueqiang. Numerical study on impact of shock control bump on transonic buffet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526806-526806.
[13]	WANG Yiwen, LAN Xiayu, SHI Yayun, HUA Jun, BAI Junqiang, ZHOU Zhu. Gradient optimization design for laminar airfoil considering inspiration effect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527323-527323.
[14]	WANG Hongyu, YANG Yanguang, HU Weibo, CHEN Zhi, FENG Liming, ZHOU Youtian. Experimental study on unsteadiness characteristics of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by high-frequency microsecond pulse discharge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625905-625905.
[15]	SHI Xiaotian, LYU Meng, ZHAO Yuan, TAO Shancong, HAO Le, YUAN Xiangjiang. Flow control technique for shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625929-625929.