一种飞机修理级别经济性分析模型

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0012

Abstract

Abstract:

Level of repair analysis (LORA) plays a significant role in the supportability analysis of aircraft. In view of the fact that the existing economic evaluation model for LORA is not suitable for aircraft maintenance and the complexity of decision making, a concept of LORA decision flow is raised. Then a general multi-echelon-multi-indenture mathematical model for economic evaluation based on the LORA decision flow is presented. In addition, taking into consideration the maintenance characteristics of an aircraft, an LORA economic analysis model suitable for aircraft is built with different constraint conditions. On the basis of the study above, the model is solved by using the CPLEX optimization algorithm bag to minimize maintenance cost. Finally, the LORA analysis model is proved to be valid by a comparison of numerical examples.

Key words: aircraft, maintenance, maintenance planning, maintenance cost, level of repair analysis (LORA), decision flow

CLC Number:

V267
TH164

XUE Tao, FENG Yunwen, XUE Xiaofeng, FENG Yuansheng. An Aircraft Economic Evaluation Model for Level of Repair Analysis[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(1): 97-103.

References

[1] Wu H, Zuo H F, Sun W. A new level of repair analysis optimization model for civil aircraft maintenance. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(2): 46-49. (in Chinese)

吴昊, 左洪福, 孙伟. 一种新的民用飞机修理级别优化模型. 航空学报, 2009, 30(2): 46-49.

[2] Li L F, Chen B S, Wang X W, et al. Compare research on level of repair analysis both in China and abroad. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2011(8): 140-142. (in Chinese)

李良峰, 陈柏松, 王晓伟,等. 国内外修理级别分析对比研究. 装备制造技术, 2011(8): 140-142.

[3] Barros L L. The optimization of repair decisions using life cycle cost parameters. Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications Journal, 1998, 9(4): 403-413.

[4] Barros L L, Riley M. A combinatorial approach to level of repair analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1): 242-251.

[5] Gutin G, Rafieya A, Yeo A, et al. Level of repair analysis and minimum cost homomorphisms of graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2006, 154(6): 881-889.

[6] Gutin G, Hell P, Rafiey A, et al. A dichotomy for minimum cost graph homomorphisms. European Journal of Combinatorics, 2008, 29(4): 900-911.

[7] Saranga H, Dinesh Kumar U. Optimization of aircraft maintenance/support infrastructure using genetic algorithms-level of repair analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 143(1): 91-106.

[8] Basten R J I, Schutten J M J, van der Heijden M C. An efficient model formulation for level of repair analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 2009, 172(1): 119-142.

[9] Commission of Science Technology and Industry for National Defense. GJB 2961—97. Level of repair analysis. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 1997. (in Chinese)

国防科学技术工业委员会. GJB 2961—97. 修理级别分析. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1997.

[10] Basten R J I, van der Heijden M C, Schutten J M J. A minimum cost flow model for level of repair analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 133(1): 233-242.

[11] Basten R J I, Schutten J M J, van der Heijden M C. Level of repair analysis: a generic model. BETA Working Paper Series. Enschede: University of Twente, 2008.

[12] Ahuja R K, Magnanti T L, Orlin J B. Network flows. Working Paper Series. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988.

[13] ILOG S A and ILOG Inc. ILOG CPLEX 10.0 User’s Manual. [2012-01-05]. http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~liberti/teaching/xct/cplex/usrcplex.pdf.

[14] Vamanan M, Wang Q, Batta R, et al. Integration of COTS software products ARENA & CPLEX for an inventory/logistics problem. Computers & Operations Research, 2004, 31(4): 533-547.

[15] Melo M T, Nickel S, Saldanha da Gama F. Dynamic multi-commodity capacitated facility location: a mathematical modeling framework for strategic supply chain planning. Computers & Operations Research, 2006, 33(1): 181-208.

An Aircraft Economic Evaluation Model for Level of Repair Analysis

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Di WANG, Yan LENG, Long YANG, Zhonghua HAN, Zhansen QIAN. Atmospheric turbulence effects on sonic boom propagation based on augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626318-626318.
[2]	Jianling QIAO, Zhonghua HAN, Yulin DING, Wenping SONG, Bifeng SONG. Effects of stratified atmospheric turbulence on farfield sonic boom propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[3]	Yahui SONG, Gaoyu FAN, Lixia QU, Yuelin ZHANG, Yue XU, Shuo HAN. Progress of aircraft sonic boom flight test measurement technology: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626186-626186.
[4]	Zeyong YIN, Yancheng YOU, Chengxiang ZHU, Jianfeng ZHU, Liaoni WU, Yue HUANG. Multi-ducted twin-turbines ejector-ramjet/scramjet combined cycle engine for hypersonic civil vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 627181-627181.
[5]	Xiong HUANG, Shiru QU, Heng ZHANG, Xiantiao CHEN. Stall performance of high-lift configuration of large civil aircraft with slat de-icing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627077-627077.
[6]	Jun SHU, Dongguang XU, Zhirong HAN, Si LI, Xiong HUANG. Hybrid wing design of icing wind tunnel supercooled large droplet icing test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[7]	Junjie NIU, Weimin SANG, Dong LI, Lian HAO, Zelin WANG. Icing test flight area determination method based on surrogated model of water droplet collection [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627697-627697.
[8]	Xiangrong JING, Pan CHENG, Zhenbing LUO, Tianxiang GAO, Yan ZHOU, Xiong DENG. Ice breaking characteristics and crack propagation law of arc discharge plasma actuator [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 204-213.
[9]	ZHENG Shuai, WANG Zihan, ZHAO Haoran, YANG Pengtao, HONG Jun. Layout optimization method of aircraft fuel gauging sensor based on differential evolution algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125809-125809.
[10]	WU Qiang, XU Haojun, WEI Yang, PEI Binbin, XUE Yuan. Aerodynamics/flight dynamics coupling characteristics of aircraft under icing conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125566-125566.
[11]	CEN Fei, LIU Zhitao, JIANG Yong, GUO Tianhao, ZHANG Lei, KONG Yinan. Unsteady aerodynamics modeling of civil transport configuration under extreme flight conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125582-125582.
[12]	SU Ning, HUANG Wenxin. Parallel power generation system based on dual-stator winding induction generator for electric propulsion aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 325409-325409.
[13]	NIE Tongpan, ZENG Jiyan, CHENG Yujie, MA Liang. Knowledge graph construction technology and its application in aircraft power system fault diagnosis [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 625499-625499.
[14]	ZHENG Tan, YANG Xiaohe, YE Jun, FENG Jinzhang. Influence of various core working conditions on twin-duct matching in fan booster [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125477-125477.
[15]	ZHANG Bendong, JIANG Jun, LI Zhi, LI Shimin, ZHANG Chaohai. Partial discharge characteristics of future more electric aircraft under low air pressure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 325374-325374.