大型客机增升构型缝翼除冰状态失速特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27077

Abstract

Abstract:

Under the working condition of the anti-icing/de-icing system， the influence of residual ice on the stall performance of aircraft is the direct basis for evaluating whether the system efficiency meets the design standard. Aiming at the protection scheme of the outboard wing for a high-lift configuration of large civil aircraft， we compare the stall and separation characteristics under the conditions of slat without icing/icing/de-icing with the numerical simulation method. Despite the reduction of the protection area scheme of outboard wing for a high-lift configuration compared with similar civil aircraft， the current scheme can still keep the separation pattern occurring from inboard， ensure the longitudinal moment stability near the critical angle of attack， and effectively expand the stall boundary. The aerodynamic basis for canceling the local protection is the inherent comprehensive effect of downwash and spanwise flow outside the nacelle， which will weaken the impact of the angle of attack and inhibit the flow separation induced by local icing. The conclusions of this paper provide a theoretical basis for the design optimization of protection area and the icing certification of large civil aircraft.

Key words: large civil aircraft, ice, high-lift configuration, slat, anti-icing/de-icing, stall performance

CLC Number:

V211.4

Xiong HUANG, Shiru QU, Heng ZHANG, Xiantiao CHEN. Stall performance of high-lift configuration of large civil aircraft with slat de-icing[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627077-627077.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

References 34

1	LYNCH F T， KHODADOUST A. Effects of ice accretions on aircraft aerodynamics［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2001， 37（8）： 669-767.
2	CAO Y H， WU Z L， SU Y， et al. Aircraft flight characteristics in icing conditions［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2015， 74： 62-80.
3	LEADER R， TAKAHASHI T T. Frosty weather： the regulatory history of aircraft operations in freezing conditions［C］∥ AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2019： 2019-1958.
4	THOMAS S K， CASSONI R P， MACARTHUR C D. Aircraft anti-icing and de-icing techniques and modeling［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 1996， 33（5）： 841-854.
5	孔满昭，段卓毅，马玉敏. 机翼展向不同部位结冰对飞机气动力特性影响研究［J］. 实验流体力学， 2016， 30（2）： 32-37.
	KONG M Z， DUAN Z Y， MA Y M. Study on aerodynamic characteristics of ice accretion in different wing span sections［J］. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics， 2016， 30（2）： 32-37 （in Chinese）.
6	BRAGG M， PERKINS W， SARTER N， et al. An interdisciplinary approach to inflight aircraft icing safety［C］∥ 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 1998： 1998-95.
7	禹志龙，李颖晖，郑无计，等. 复杂结冰环境下飞机鲁棒飞行安全包线分析［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（1）： 123223.
	YU Z L， LI Y H， ZHENG W J， et al. Robust flight safe envelope analysis for aircraft under complex icing conditions［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（1）： 123223 （in Chinese）.
8	赵宾宾，黎先平，李杰，等. 基于容冰概念的民机结冰保护系统设计方法研究综述［J］. 西北工业大学学报， 2021， 39（4）： 731-738.
	ZHAO B B， LI X P， LI J， et al. Research review on design method of ice protection system for civil aircraft based on ice-tolerant concept［J］. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University， 2021， 39（4）： 731-738 （in Chinese）.
9	STEBBINS S J， LOTH E， BROEREN A P， et al. Review of computational methods for aerodynamic analysis of iced lifting surfaces［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2019， 111： 100583.
10	SANKAR L， PHAENGSOOK N， BANGALORE A. Effects of icing on the aerodynamic performance of high lift airfoils［C］∥ 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 1993： 1993-26.
11	RAKOWITZ M， PATEL K， KAFYEKE F. Numerical validation of a transport aircraft high-lift configuration including ice［C］∥ 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2008： 2008-334.
12	PRINCE RAJ L， LEE J W， MYONG R S. Ice accretion and aerodynamic effects on a multi-element airfoil under SLD icing conditions［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2019， 85： 320-333.
13	LEE Y M， LEE J H， RAJ L P， et al. Large-eddy simulations of complex aerodynamic flows over multi-element iced airfoils［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2021， 109： 106417.
14	SANG W M， LI F W， SHI Y Y. Icing effect study for wing/body and high-lift wing configurations［C］∥ 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2007： 2007-1077.
15	桑为民，李凤蔚，施永毅. 结冰对翼型和多段翼型绕流及气动特性影响研究［J］. 西北工业大学学报， 2005， 23（6）： 729-732.
	SANG W M， LI F W， SHI Y Y. Icing research on airfoil and multi-element airfoil based on flow field and aerodynamic performance［J］. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University， 2005， 23（6）： 729-732 （in Chinese）.
16	ZHANG C， WANG F X， KONG W L， et al. The characteristics of SLD icing accretions and aerodynamic effects on high-lift configurations［C］∥ 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2015： 2015-3385.
17	ZHANG C， LIU H， WANG F X， et al. Supercooled large droplet icing accretion and its unsteady aerodynamic characteristics on high-lift devices［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part G： Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2018， 232（10）： 1985-1997.
18	李冬，张辰，王福新，等. 多段翼型的大粒径过冷水滴结冰特征及气动影响分析［J］. 上海交通大学学报， 2017， 51（8）： 921-931.
	LI D， ZHANG C， WANG F X， et al. An investigation on the characteristics of supercooled large droplet icing accretions and aerodynamic effects on high-lift configuration［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University， 2017， 51（8）： 921-931 （in Chinese）.
19	张恒，李杰，龚志斌. 多段翼型缝翼前缘结冰大迎角分离流动数值模拟［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（2）： 520746.
	ZHANG H， LI J， GONG Z B. Numerical simulation of separated flow around a multi-element airfoil at high angle of attack with iced slat［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2017， 38（2）： 520746 （in Chinese）.
20	XIAO M C， ZHANG Y F， ZHOU F. Numerical investigation of the unsteady flow past an iced multi-element airfoil［J］. AIAA Journal， 2020， 58（9）： 3848-3862.
21	STEBBINS S， LOTH E， BROEREN A， et al. Aerodynamics of a common research model wing with leading-edge ice shape［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2021， 58（4）： 894-906.
22	陈迎春，张美红，张淼，等. 大型客机气动设计综述［J］. 航空学报， 2019， 40（1）： 522759.
	CHEN Y C， ZHANG M H， ZHANG M， et al. Review of large civil aircraft aerodynamic design［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2019， 40（1）： 522759 （in Chinese）.
23	李浩然，段玉宇，张宇飞，等. 结冰模拟软件AERO-ICE中的关键数值方法［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（S1）： 107-122.
	LI H R， DUAN Y Y， ZHANG Y F， et al. Numerical method of ice-accretion software AERO-ICE［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（S1）： 107-122 （in Chinese）.
24	陈迎春，李亚林，叶军科，等. C919飞机增升装置工程应用技术研究进展［J］. 航空工程进展， 2010， 1（1）： 1-5.
	CHEN Y C， LI Y L， YE J K， et al. Study progress about high-lift system of C919 airplane［J］. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering， 2010， 1（1）： 1-5 （in Chinese）.
25	JAMESON A， SCHMIDT W， TURKEL E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes［C］∥ 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 1981： 1981-1259.
26	ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers， parameter vectors， and difference schemes［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 1981， 43（2）： 357-372.
27	VAN LEER B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 1997， 135（2）： 229-248.
28	SPALART P， ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows［C］∥ 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 1992： 1992-439.
29	JAMESON A. Time dependent calculations using multigrid， with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings［C］∥ 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 1991： 1991-1596.
30	RUMSEY C L， SLOTNICK J P， LONG M， et al. Summary of the first AIAA CFD high-lift prediction workshop［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2011， 48（6）： 2068-2079.
31	倪章松，刘森云，王桥，等. 3m×2m结冰风洞试验技术研究进展［J］. 实验流体力学， 2019， 33（6）： 46-53.
	NI Z S， LIU S Y， WANG Q， et al. Research progress of test technologies for 3m × 2m icing wind tunnel［J］. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics， 2019， 33（6）： 46-53 （in Chinese）.
32	WOODARD B S， BROEREN A P， LEE S， et al. Summary of ice shape geometric fidelity studies on an iced swept wing［C］∥ 2018 Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2018： 2018-3494.
33	OBERT E. Aerodynamic design of transport aircraft［M］. Amsterdam： IOS Press Inc， 2009.
34	BROEREN A P， LEE S， SHAH G H， et al. Aerodynamic effects of simulated ice accretion on a generic transport model： NASA/TM-2012-217246［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 2012.

[1]	Heng ZHANG, Jie LI, Binbin ZHAO. Improvement mechanism of ice-tolerance capacity for iced airfoil with variable camber of drooping leading edge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627114-627114.
[2]	Binbin ZHAO, Heng ZHANG, Jie LI. Review of numerical simulation on complex separated flow of iced airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[3]	Yijian MA, Delin CHAI, Qiang WANG, Xian YI, Manzhao KONG. Phase change and adhesion characteristics of ice crystal movements in wing icing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627817-627817.
[4]	Xiangrong JING, Pan CHENG, Zhenbing LUO, Tianxiang GAO, Yan ZHOU, Xiong DENG. Ice breaking characteristics and crack propagation law of arc discharge plasma actuator [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 204-213.
[5]	CHEN Zhiyuan, LI Luyi. Efficient methods for reliability sensitivity analysis of inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[6]	LIU Xuecheng, LIANG Hua, ZONG Haohua, XIE Like, SU Zhi. Experiment on plasma ice shape modulation based on NACA0012 airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126283-126283.
[7]	FAN Yongsheng, YANG Xiaoguang, SHI Duoqi, TAN Long, HUANG Weiqing. Rafting-waste judgement of serviced turbine blades: quantitative characterization and threshold determination [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 625100-625100.
[8]	NIU Guangyue, DUAN Fajie, ZHOU Qi, LIU Zhibo. A dynamic measurement method of blade tip clearance based on microwave phase difference ranging [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 625396-625396.
[9]	LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin. Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[10]	CUI Ming, FENG Jianmin, MI Zheng, GUO Junhao. Loading technology for main structure of large UAV durability test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 525887-525887.
[11]	HUANG Ping, BU Xueqin, LIU Yiming, LIN Guiping, YANG Kun. Mixed phase/glaciated ice accretion: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 25178-025178.
[12]	LEI Shiying, SUN Jianzhong, LIU He. Cumulative damage index model and service reliability evaluation of turbine blade [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 225064-225064.
[13]	SONG Xinkang, ZHAO Shanghong, WANG Xiang. Aviation information network slicing strategy supporting differentiated services [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 325123-325123.
[14]	XUE Shuyan, JIA Yang, ZHANG Bingqiang, XIANG Yanchao, DAI Chenghao, WANG Xue, ZHENG Kai. Design of nano-aerogel thermal insulation device and its application in Zhurong Mars Rover [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626586-626586.
[15]	LI Chaolong, XIA Zhixun, MA Likun, ZHAO Xiang, LUO Zhenbing, DUAN Yifan. Experiment on performance of solid rocket scramjet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 126075-126075.

Stall performance of high-lift configuration of large civil aircraft with slat de-icing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 34

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments