禁飞区影响下的空天飞机可达区域计算方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25771

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

禁飞区影响下的空天飞机可达区域计算方法

章吉力¹, 周大鹏², 杨大鹏², 刘然², 刘凯¹

1. 大连理工大学航空航天学院, 大连 116024;
2. 航空工业沈阳飞机设计研究所, 沈阳 110035

收稿日期:2021-04-15 修回日期:2021-05-08 发布日期:2021-05-21
通讯作者: 刘凯 E-mail:carsonliu@dlut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61603363）；航空科学基金（2019ZC063001）

Computation method for reachable domain of aerospace plane under the influence of no-fly zone

ZHANG Jili¹, ZHOU Dapeng², YANG Dapeng², LIU Ran², LIU Kai¹

1. School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
2. AVIC Shenyang Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Shenyang 110035, China

Received:2021-04-15 Revised:2021-05-08 Published:2021-05-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61603363);Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2019ZC063001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对禁飞区影响空天飞机再入可达区域问题，基于极限绕飞轨迹提出一种不限禁飞区位置的可达区域求解方法。首先，考虑空天飞机规避禁飞区后的剩余飞行能力评估，从极限绕飞轨迹与禁飞区的切点出发，提出绕过禁飞区后的子可达区域计算方法，在此基础上获得禁飞区影响下的可达区域和不可达区域的边界。然后，考虑禁飞区在经度/纬度剖面内可能出现的位置，分类讨论不同情形并给出对应子区域的求解算法，使用射线法判定目标点是否位于可达区域内，并应用分段预测校正制导方法实现面向可行目标点的导引。最后，在仿真中，给出了对经度/纬度剖面内散布的圆形禁飞区分类结果，并针对每一分类的禁飞区开展了可达区域求解计算分析。仿真结果表明，对不同种类的禁飞区情况，均能稳定实现可达区域求解，同时对于可达区域以内的目标点，通过应用分段预测校正方法可以满足再入制导精度要求。

关键词: 空天飞机, 禁飞区, 规避制导, 可达区域, 预测校正

Abstract: The no-fly zone influences the reachable domain of the aerospace plane in the reentry phase. An ultimate circumnavigation based method is proposed to obtain the reachable area no matter where the no-fly zone is. First, considering the residual flight capability of the aerospace plane after avoidance of the no-fly zone, the sub-reachable domain of the plane is derived from the tangent point between the ultimate circumnavigation trajectory and the no-fly zone. On this basis, the boundary of the reachable domain and the unreachable domain is obtained. Then, classifying and solving algorithms for the possible positions of the no-fly zone within the longitude-latitude profile are given to acquire the sub-reachable domains in different situations. The ray method is used to judge whether the target point is located in the reachable domain. The piecewise predictor-corrector guidance method is applied to realize the feasible target point. Finally, classification results of circular no-fly zones dispersed in the longitude/latitude profile are given in simulation. The influenced reachable domain for each class is also obtained. Simulation results show that regardless of the position of the no-fly zone, the proposed method has good stability in terms of obtaining the reachable domain at any situation. For the target points within the reachable domain, the precision requirement can be satisfied by using the piecewise predictor-corrector guidance method.

Key words: aerospace plane, no-fly zone, avoid guidance, reachable domain, predictor-corrector

中图分类号:

V11
V249.1

章吉力, 周大鹏, 杨大鹏, 刘然, 刘凯. 禁飞区影响下的空天飞机可达区域计算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525771-525771.

ZHANG Jili, ZHOU Dapeng, YANG Dapeng, LIU Ran, LIU Kai. Computation method for reachable domain of aerospace plane under the influence of no-fly zone[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525771-525771.

参考文献

[1] BENITO J, MEASE K D. Reachable and controllable sets for planetary entry and landing[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(3):641-654.
[2] HSU F K, KUO T S, CHERN J S. Landing domain analysis of shuttle re-entry vehicles[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 1991, 22(7):1145-1158
[3] CHEN S Y. The longitudinal and lateral range of hypersonic glide vehicles with constant bank angle[EB/OL]. (1966-01-15)[2021-04-15].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235011911_THE_LONGITUDINAL_AND_LATERAL_RANGE_OF_HYPERSONIC_GLIDE_VEHICLES_WITH_CONSTANT_BANK_ANGLE
[4] NYLAND F S. Hypersonic turning with constant bank angle control[EB/OL]. (1965-01-16)[2021-04-15].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253771278_Hypersonic_Turning_with_Constant_Bank_Angle_Control
[5] 曾夕娟, 钟范俊, 丁学良, 等. 一种可重复使用再入飞行器的覆盖区求解方法[J]. 载人航天, 2017, 23(1):14-20,32. ZENG X J, ZHONG F J, DING X L, et al. Method for landing footprint generation in reusable vehicles[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2017, 23(1):14-20,32(in Chinese).
[6] 王涛, 张洪波, 李永远, 等. Gauss伪谱法的再入可达域计算方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2016, 38(3):75-80. WANG T, ZHANG H B, LI Y Y, et al. Landing footprint generation of entry vehicle based on Gauss pseudospectral method[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2016, 38(3):75-80(in Chinese).
[7] 傅瑜, 杨卫丽, 崔乃刚. 升力式再入飞行器覆盖范围计算分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2012, 44(11):13-19. FU Y, YANG W L, CUI N G. Calculation of reachable landing locations of lift entry vehicle[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012, 44(11):13-19(in Chinese).
[8] 傅瑜. 升力式天地往返飞行器自主制导方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2012. FU Y. Autonomous guidance method for lift transportation vehicle[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012(in Chinese).
[9] 汪雷, 刘欣, 杨涛, 等. 高超声速滑翔式飞行器目标覆盖范围的计算方法[J]. 弹道学报, 2014, 26(1):50-55. WANG L, LIU X, YANG T, et al. Footprint calculation for hypersonic glide vehicle[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2014, 26(1):50-55(in Chinese).
[10] 冯必鸣, 聂万胜, 李柯. 再入飞行器可达区域近似算法及地面覆盖研究[J]. 航天控制, 2012, 30(6):43-49. FENG B M, NIE W S, LI K. Research on closest-aproach of footprint and coverage for reentry vehicle[J]. Aerospace Control, 2012, 30(6):43-49(in Chinese).
[11] 樊朋飞, 郭云鹤, 凡永华, 等. HGV平衡滑翔式轨迹可达区域计算方法研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2019, 27(5):136-140. FAN P F, GUO Y H, FAN Y H, et al. Footprint calculation of HGV with equilibrium gliding trajectory[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2019, 27(5):136-140(in Chinese).
[12] 边九州. 组合动力天基对地打击飞行器轨迹设计与覆盖范围分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2014. BIAN J Z. Trajectory design and coverage aera analysis of the space-based strike aircraft vehicle powered by combined cycle engine[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014(in Chinese).
[13] GAO C S, JIANG C W, JING W X. Optimization of projectile state and trajectory of reentry body considering attainment of carrying aircraft[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(1):137-144.
[14] ARSLANTAŞ Y E, OEHLSCHLÄGEL T, SAGLIANO M. Safe landing area determination for a Moon lander by reachability analysis[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2016, 128:607-615.
[15] 赵江, 周锐. 基于粒子群优化的再入可达区计算方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(9):1680-1687. ZHAO J, ZHOU R. Landing footprint computation based on particle swarm optimization[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(9):1680-1687(in Chinese).
[16] 蔺君, 何英姿, 黄盘兴. 基于差分进化算法的再入可达域快速计算[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2020, 40(4):54-60. LIN J, HE Y Z, HUANG P X. Fast reentry landing footprint calculation using differential evolution algorithm[J]. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2020, 40(4):54-60(in Chinese).
[17] WEI X, WANG Y J, LIU L, et al. A method for entry vehicle's maneuver capacity analysis and evaluation[C]//Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Modelling, Identification & Control. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2014:326-331.
[18] 吴楠, 王锋, 赵敏, 等. 高超声速滑翔再入飞行器的可达区快速预测[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2021, 43(1):1-6. WU N, WANG F, ZHAO M, et al. Fast prediction for footprint of hypersonic glide reentry vehicle[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43(1):1-6(in Chinese).
[19] 赵泽端, 崔平远, 朱圣英. 火星大气进入段纵向可达区生成的解析同伦法[J]. 宇航学报, 2019, 40(9):1024-1033. ZHAO Z D, CUI P Y, ZHU S Y. An analytical homotopic method to generate the reachable longitudinal area for Mars entry[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2019, 40(9):1024-1033(in Chinese).
[20] LIANG Z X, CHEN J, REN Z. Feasible zone for planetary entry vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 79:459-467.
[21] XIANG Y, KUN L. A design method for constellation of lifting reentry vehicles[C]//11th Asian Conference on Chemical Sensors, 2017.
[22] XUE S B, LU P. Constrained predictor-corrector entry guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(4):1273-1281.
[23] 王光伦. 高超声速飞行器再入段预测校正制导研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2010. WANG G L. Predictor-corrector reentry guidance for hypersonic vehicles[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010(in Chinese).
[24] PAN L, PENG S C, XIE Y, et al. 3D guidance for hypersonic reentry gliders based on analytical prediction[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 167:42-51.
[25] LIANG Z X, ZHU S Y. Constrained predictor-corrector guidance via bank saturation avoidance for low L/D entry vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 109:106448.
[26] 章吉力, 刘凯, 樊雅卓, 等. 考虑禁飞区规避的空天飞行器分段预测校正再入制导方法[J]. 宇航学报, 2021, 42(1):122-131. ZHANG J L, LIU K, FAN Y Z, et al. A piecewise Predictor-corrector Re-entry guidance algorithm with No-fly zone avoidance[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2021, 42(1):122-131(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

禁飞区影响下的空天飞机可达区域计算方法

Computation method for reachable domain of aerospace plane under the influence of no-fly zone

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘子超, 王江, 何绍溟, 李宇飞. 基于预测校正的落角约束计算制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 325433-325433.
[2]	胡军, 李毛毛. 航天器进入制导方法综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 525048-525048.
[3]	尤志鹏, 杨勇, 刘刚, 曹晓瑞, 郑宏涛. 基于Kalman滤波的空天飞行器再入制导算法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524608-524608.
[4]	高杨, 蔡光斌, 徐慧, 杨小冈, 张胜修. 虚拟多触角探测的高超声速滑翔飞行器再入机动制导[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 623703-623703.
[5]	张远龙, 谢愈. 滑翔飞行器弹道规划与制导方法综述综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 23377-023377.
[6]	王肖, 郭杰, 唐胜景, 祁帅. 基于解析剖面的时间协同再入制导[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(3): 322565-322565.
[7]	方科, 张庆振, 倪昆, 程林, 黄云涛. 高超声速飞行器时间协同再入制导[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5): 321958-321958.
[8]	钱佳淞, 齐瑞云. 基于NFTET的高超声速飞行器再入容错制导[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(10): 3370-3381.