定黏假设

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25512

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

定黏假设"对伴随系统求解和梯度精度影响

吴航空, 王丁喜, 黄秀全, 徐慎忍

西北工业大学动力与能源学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2021-03-17 修回日期:2021-04-22 发布日期:2021-04-21
通讯作者: 王丁喜,E-mail:dingxi_wang@nwpu.edu.cn E-mail:dingxi_wang@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2017-Ⅱ-009-0023);西北工业大学博士论文创新基金(CX2022045)

Influence of “frozen viscosity assumption” on solution and gradient accuracy of adjoint system

WU Hangkong, WANG Dingxi, HUANG Xiuquan, XU Shenren

School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2021-03-17 Revised:2021-04-22 Published:2021-04-21
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Major Project (2017-Ⅱ-009-0023); Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University (CX2022045)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 定黏假设"的引入能简化伴随方程的推导及流场求解器的子程序微分过程,但同时会引起灵敏度计算误差,有时甚至导致求解的不稳定性。为了探讨层流和湍流黏性系数对伴随灵敏度计算精度的影响程度,分别研究了3种不同定黏方法:冻结层流黏性系数方法(FLV),冻结湍流黏性系数方法(FEV)和同时冻结层流及湍流黏性系数方法(FLEV)。首先基于代数形式的主方程和目标函数详细推导了完全湍流及3种不同定黏方法所对应的伴随方程;然后介绍如何利用自动微分软件开发相应离散伴随求解器并给出流程图;最后以跨声速NASA Rotor 67为研究对象,通过与线化求解器和完全湍流伴随求解器的结果进行对比,分析研究不同工况(最高效率点及近失速点)下"定黏假设"方法对离散伴随系统求解稳定性、灵敏度收敛性、灵敏度精度及残差的渐近收敛率的影响。

关键词: 伴随方法, 定黏假设, 冻结层流黏性系数方法, 冻结湍流黏性系数方法, 冻结层流及湍流黏性系数方法, 自动微分

Abstract: The introduction of the "frozen viscosity assumption" can simplify the derivation of the adjoint equation and the differentiation of flow solver subroutines, but can also lead to computational errors of sensitivities and sometimes even solution instability. To investigate the effect of laminar viscosity and eddy viscosity on computational accuracy of sensitivities, this paper presents a study on three different frozen viscosity approaches:the Frozen Laminar Viscosity approach(FLV), Frozen Eddy Viscosity approach(FEV) and Frozen Laminar and Eddy Viscosity approach(FLEV). First, the adjoint equations corresponding to full turbulence and three different frozen viscosity approaches are derived based upon the nonlinear flow equations and the objective function in an algebraic form. Then, we introduce how to use the algorithm differentiation tool to develop the discrete adjoint solver and provide the corresponding flow charts. Finally, the transonic NASA Rotor 67 is used to study the effects of different frozen viscosity approaches on solution stability, sensitivity convergence, sensitivity accuracy and asymptotic convergence rate of residual at different operating points(a peak efficiency point and a near stall point) of the adjoint solver. The results are compared with those of the linear solver and the adjoint solver with full turbulence.

Key words: adjoint solver, frozen viscosity assumption, frozon laminar viscosity approach, frozen eddy viscosity approach, frozen laminer and eddy viscosity approach, algorithm differentiationhttp

中图分类号:

V231.3
O354

吴航空, 王丁喜, 黄秀全, 徐慎忍. 定黏假设"对伴随系统求解和梯度精度影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125512-125512.

WU Hangkong, WANG Dingxi, HUANG Xiuquan, XU Shenren. Influence of “frozen viscosity assumption” on solution and gradient accuracy of adjoint system[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125512-125512.

参考文献

[1] SAMAD A, KIM K, GOEL T, et al. Multi-objective optimization of transonic compressor blade using evolutionary algorithm[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(2):302-310.
[2] NIELSEN E, KLEB B. Efficient construction of discrete adjoint operators on unstructured grids using complex variables[J]. AIAA Journal, 2005, 44(4):44-60.
[3] JAMESON A. A perspective on computational algorithms for aerodynamic analysis and design[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(2):197-243.
[4] IOLLO A, FERLAUTO M, ZANNETTI L. An aerodynamic optimization method based on the inverse problem adjoint equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 173(1):87-115.
[5] JAMESON A. Aerodynamic design via control theory[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1988, 3(3):233-260.
[6] JAMESON A, MARTINELLI L, PIERCE N A. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1998, 10(1-4):213-237.
[7] WANG D X, HE L. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines-part I:Methodology and verification[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021011.1-021011.14.
[8] WANG D X, HE L, LI Y S, et al. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines-part II:Validation and application[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021012.1-021012.11.
[9] LUO J Q, ZHOU C, LIU F. Multipoint design optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint method[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(5):051005.1-051005.10.
[10] DWIGHT R P, BREZILLON J. Efficient and robust algorithms for solution of the adjoint compressible Navier-Stokes equations with applications[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 60(4):365-389.
[11] KIM H, NAKAHASHI K, OBAYASHI S, et al. Aerodynamic optimization of supersonic transport wing using unstructured adjoint method[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(6):1011-1020.
[12] MAVRIPLIS D J. Multigrid solution of the discrete adjoint for optimization problems on unstructured meshes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(1):42-50.
[13] NADARAJAH S, JAMESON A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2013, 43(43):1445-1466.
[14] MA C, SU X R, YUAN X. An efficient unsteady adjoint optimization system for multistage turbomachinery[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2017, 139(1):011003.1-011003.11.
[15] HUANG H, EKICI K. A discrete adjoint harmonic balance method for turbomachinery shape optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 39(1):481-490.
[16] VITALE S, PINI M, COLONNA P. Multistage turbomachinery design using the discrete adjoint method within the open-source software SU₂[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2020, 36(3):465-478.
[17] RUBINO A, VITALE S, COLONNA P, et al. Fully-turbulent adjoint method for the unsteady shape optimization of multi-row turbomachinery[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 106(1):132-144.
[18] ALBRING T A, SAGEBAUM M, GAUGER N R. Efficient aerodynamic design using the discrete adjoint method in SU₂[C]//17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2016:3518.
[19] GILES M B, DUTA M C, MULLER J D, et al. Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(2):198-205.
[20] 张朝磊,厉海涛,丰镇平.基于离散伴随方法的透平叶栅气动优化设计[J].工程热物理学报, 2012, 33(1):47-50. ZHANG C L, LI H T, FENG Z P. Aerodynamic optimization design of turbomachinery cascade based on discrete adjoint method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2012, 33(1):47-50(in Chinese).
[21] 罗佳奇,杨婧.基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(5):623368. LUO J Q, YANG J. Aerodynamic design optimization of a single low-speed compressor stage by an adjoint method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5):623368(in Chinese).
[22] 马灿,苏欣荣,袁新.单级跨音压气机非定常伴随气动优化[J].工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(3):504-508. MA C, SU X R, YUAN X. Unsteady adjoint aerodynamic optimization of a transonic compressor stage[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2017, 38(3):504-508(in Chinese).
[23] STRAZISAR A, POWELL J. Laser anemometer measurements in a transonic axial flow compressor rotor:NASA Technical Report 2879[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1989.
[24] DENTON J D. The calculation of three-dimensional viscous flow through multistage turbomachines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1992, 114(1):18-26.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

定黏假设"对伴随系统求解和梯度精度影响

Influence of “frozen viscosity assumption” on solution and gradient accuracy of adjoint system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈树生, 冯聪, 张兆康, 赵轲, 张新洋, 高正红. 基于全局/梯度优化方法的宽速域乘波-机翼布局气动设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629596-629596.
[2]	周琳, 陈宪, 黄江涛, 邓俊, 高正红. 基于伴随方程和自动微分的雷达散射截面表面灵敏度计算[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(22): 128508-128508.
[3]	高昌, 李正洲, 黄江涛, 贺元元, 吴颖川, 乐嘉陵, 桂丰. 基于连续伴随方法的高超声速飞行器高精度气动优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124490-124490.
[4]	刘峰博, 蒋城, 马涂亮, 梁益华. 伴随压力分布反设计方法在大型客机气动优化中的初步探索[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623372-623372.
[5]	罗佳奇, 杨婧. 基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623368-623368.
[6]	黄江涛, 刘刚, 高正红, 周铸, 陈作斌, 江雄. 飞行器多学科耦合伴随体系的现状与发展趋势综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623404-623404.
[7]	李润泽, 张宇飞, 陈海昕. 超临界机翼多目标气动优化设计的策略与方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623409-623409.
[8]	张亦知, 程诚, 范钇彤, 李高华, 李伟鹏. 基于物理知识约束的数据驱动式湍流模型修正及槽道湍流计算验证[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 123282-123282.
[9]	罗佳奇, 陈泽帅, 曾先. 考虑几何设计参数不确定性影响的涡轮叶栅稳健性气动设计优化[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(10): 123826-123826.
[10]	徐希海, 李晓东. 远场假设对喷流噪声预测中格林函数求解的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(9): 2699-2710.
[11]	屈崑, 李记超, 蔡晋生. CFD数学模型的线性化方法及其应用[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(10): 3218-3227.
[12]	徐林程, 王刚, 武洁, 叶正寅. 翼型风洞试验中不确定性分析的自动微分方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(8): 2102-2111.
[13]	熊俊涛;乔志德;杨旭东;韩忠华. 基于黏性伴随方法的跨声速机翼气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(2): 281-285.