远场假设对喷流噪声预测中格林函数求解的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0127

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

远场假设对喷流噪声预测中格林函数求解的影响

徐希海, 李晓东

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-01-13 修回日期:2016-04-08 出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2016-06-03
通讯作者: 李晓东男, 博士, 教授。主要研究方向:气动声学、计算气动声学、流体力学。 Tel.: 010-82318579 E-mail: lixd@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:lixd@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:徐希海男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向:气动声学、喷流噪声、计算流体力学。 E-mail: xuxihai@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家“973”计划（2012CB720201）；国家自然科学基金（51476005）

Effect of farfield assumption on calculation of Green's function for predicting jet noise

XU Xihai, LI Xiaodong

School of Energy and power engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-01-13 Revised:2016-04-08 Online:2016-09-15 Published:2016-06-03
Supported by:
National Key Basic Research Program of China (2012CB720201); National Natural Science Foundation of China(51476005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目前基于雷诺平均Navier-Stokes（RANS）的喷流噪声预测方法在格林函数求解时，为简化求解过程，通常对喷流流动做平行流假设，对观测点做远场假设。随着格林函数求解方法发展，近年来的研究表明平行流假设对下游观测点格林函数的计算会引起较大偏差，而目前远场假设对格林函数求解的影响仍不清楚。为研究远场假设对喷流格林函数求解的影响，以二维喷流为例，采用计算气动声学方法（CAA）分别数值求解了观测点远场假设条件与实际条件下90°~150°方向喷流内伴随格林函数，进而分析远场假设对格林函数求解的影响。研究结果表明，对于不同方向的观测点，由观测远场假设导致的伴随格林函数求解偏差不尽相同，且对于越靠近喷流中心线方向的观测点，远场假设导致的偏差越大，其中150°方向观测点，采用远场假设后，格林函数计算结果最大偏差达到-15 dB以上。因此，对于靠近喷流中心线方向的噪声观测点而言，为避免预测偏差，应采用实际观测条件求解喷流格林函数。

关键词: 气动声学, 剪切流, 散射波, 格林函数, 伴随方法, 计算流体力学, 计算气动声学

Abstract:

To simplify the solution procedure of Green's function, most popular Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based jet noise prediction methods suggest to make the assumption that the jet flow is parallel and the observers are located at the infinity farfield. With the development of the solution method of Green's function, the effect of parallel flow assumption on calculation of the Green's function has been studied recently. However, the effect of farfield assumption on calculation of the Green's function has not yet been studied. To study the effect of farfield assumption, the adjoint method is used to calculate the Green's function in this paper. For actual observer 90°-150°and assumed farfield observer, the adjoint Green's functions are solved separately by a computational aeroacoustics (CAA) method. Comparison of calculation results of Green's function for actual observer and for assumed farfield observer are given in this paper. It is found that for different observation angle, the calculated deviation caused by farfield assumption is different. It is also found that there is a greater derivation of calculation results of Green's function to the point farther away from the nozzle exit. For the observer at 150°, the deviations of calculation results of Green's function caused by farfield assumption at some point are as large as -15 dB. Consequently, for observers close to the jet axis, calculation of adjoint Green's function should avoid farfield assumption to reduce the prediction error.

Key words: aeroacoustics, shear flow, refraction waves, Green's function, adjoint technique, computational fluid dynamics, computational aeroacoustics

中图分类号:

V231.1

徐希海, 李晓东. 远场假设对喷流噪声预测中格林函数求解的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(9): 2699-2710.

XU Xihai, LI Xiaodong. Effect of farfield assumption on calculation of Green's function for predicting jet noise[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(9): 2699-2710.

参考文献

[1] LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1952, 211: 564-587.
[2] LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically. Part II. Turbulence as a source of sound[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1954, 222: 1-34.
[3] PRIDMORE-BROWN D C. Sound propagation in a fluid flowing through an attenuating duct[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 4(4): 393-406.
[4] PHILLIPS O M. The intensity of aeolian tones[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1956, 1(6): 607-624.
[5] MANI R. The influence of flow on jet noise[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 73: 753-793.
[6] GOLDSTEIN M E. The low frequency sound from multiple sources in axisymmetric shear flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 70: 595-604.
[7] BALSA T F. The farfield of high frequency convected singularities in sheared flows with anapplication to jet noise prediction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 74(2): 193-208.
[8] GOLDSTEIN M E. High frequency sound emission from moving point multiple sources embedded in arbitrary transversely sheared mean flows[J]. Journal of Sound Vibration, 1982, 80: 499-522.
[9] SCHUBERT L K. Numerical study of sound refraction by a jet flow. I. Rayacoustics[J]. Journal Acoustic Society of America, 1972, 51: 439-446.
[10] DURBIN P A. High frequency Green's function for aerodynamic noise in movingmedia[J]. Journal of Sound Vibration, 1983, 91(4): 519-525.
[11] KHAVARAN A. Refraction and shielding of noise in non-axisymmetric jet: AIAA-1996-1780[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1996.
[12] KHAVARAN A, KREJSA E A. Propagation of high frequency jet noise using geometric acoustics: AIAA-1993-0147[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1993.
[13] KHAVARAN A, KREJSA E A. Refraction of high frequency noise in an arbitrary jet flow: AIAA-1994-0139[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1994.
[14] KHAVARAN A, KREJSA E A. On the role of anisotropy in turbulent mixing noise: AIAA-1998-2289[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1998.
[15] TAM C K W, AURIAULT L.Mean flow refraction effects on sound radiated from localized sources in a jet[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 370: 149-174.
[16] TAM C K W, AURIAULT L. Jetmixing noise from fine-scale turbulence[J]. AIAA Journal, 1999, 37(2): 145-153.
[17] TAM C K W, PASTOUCHENKO N N. Noise from fine-scale turbulence of nonaxisymmetric jets[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(3): 456-464.
[18] FRATE F, KHAVARAN A. Anaerodynamic and acoustic assessment of convergent-divergent nozzles with chevrons: AIAA-2011-0976[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[19] CHEUNG L, PASTOUCHENKO N, MANI R, et al. Fine-scale turbulent noise predictions from non-axisymmetric jet: AIAA-2013-2037[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2013.
[20] SIMMONS S P, HENDERSONAND B, ABBAS KHAVARAN A. Flow field and acoustic predictions for three-stream jets: AIAA-2014-3741[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2014.
[21] XU X H, HE J Y, LI X D,et al. 3-D jet noise prediction for separate flow nozzles with pylon interaction: AIAA-2015-0512[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015.
[22] KARABASOV S A, BOGEY C, HYNES T P. Computation of noise of initially laminar jets using a statistical approach for the acoustic analogy: Application and discussion: AIAA-2011-2929[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[23] GOLDSTEIN M E, ADRIAN S, AFSAR M Z. Effect of non-parallel mean flow on the Green's function for predicting the low-frequency sound from turbulent air jets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 695: 199-234.
[24] THIES A T, TAM C K W. Computation of turbulent axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric jet flows using the K-e model[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(2): 309-316.
[25] POPE S B. An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/plane-jet anomaly[J]. AIAA Journal, 1978, 16(3): 279-281.
[26] SARKAR S, LAKSHMANAN B. Application of a Reynolds stress turbulence model to the compressible shear layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29(5): 743-749.
[27] SARKAR S, ERLEBACHER G, HUSSAINI M Y,et al. The analysis and modeling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence: NASA CR181959[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1989.
[28] HU F Q. A stable perfectly matched layer for linearized Euler equations in unsplit physical variables[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 173(2): 455-480.
[29] TAM C K W, WEBB J C.Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993, 107(2): 262-281.
[30] HU F Q, HUSSAINI M Y, MANTHEY J L. Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 124(1): 177-191.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

远场假设对喷流噪声预测中格林函数求解的影响

Effect of farfield assumption on calculation of Green's function for predicting jet noise

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	施方成, 高振勋, 田雨岩, 蒋崇文, 王田天, 李椿萱. 超声速理想膨胀喷流噪声的大涡模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[2]	乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 分层大气湍流场对远场声爆传播的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[3]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[4]	罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[5]	吴航空, 王丁喜, 黄秀全, 徐慎忍. 定黏假设"对伴随系统求解和梯度精度影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125512-125512.
[6]	陈广强, 豆国辉, 魏昊功, 邹昕, 李齐, 刘周, 周伟江. 火星探测器大气数据测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[7]	奕建苗, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 快速预测跨声速流场的深度学习方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[8]	杨体浩, 白俊强, 段卓毅, 史亚云, 邓一菊, 周铸. 喷气式客机层流翼气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527016-527016.
[9]	王迪, 钱战森, 冷岩. 广义Burgers方程声爆传播模型高阶格式离散[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.
[10]	鲍俊, 王瑜, 牛潜, 朱锡冬, 程建杰. 喷雾液滴撞击液膜影响参数及流动机理分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[11]	王子航, 吕宏强. 基于CFD高精度算法的雷电电磁场研究[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726366-726366.
[12]	陈坚强, 吴晓军, 张健, 李彬, 贾洪印, 周乃春. FlowStar:国家数值风洞(NNW)工程非结构通用CFD软件[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[13]	高昌, 李正洲, 黄江涛, 贺元元, 吴颖川, 乐嘉陵, 桂丰. 基于连续伴随方法的高超声速飞行器高精度气动优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124490-124490.
[14]	李左飙, 温风波, 唐晓雷, 苏良俊, 王松涛. 基于深度学习的单排孔气膜冷却性能预测[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524331-524331.
[15]	杨肖峰, 李芹, 杜雁霞, 刘磊, 桂业伟. 高超声速飞行器界面多相催化数值研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 625908-625908.