广义Burgers方程声爆传播模型高阶格式离散

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.24916

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

广义Burgers方程声爆传播模型高阶格式离散

王迪^1,2, 钱战森^1,2, 冷岩^1,2

1. 中国航空工业空气动力研究院, 沈阳 110034;
2. 高速高雷诺数气动力航空科技重点实验室, 沈阳 110034

收稿日期:2020-10-23 修回日期:2021-01-22 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2021-01-21
通讯作者: 钱战森 E-mail:qianzs@avicari.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11672280）

High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation

WANG Di^1,2, QIAN Zhansen^1,2, LENG Yan^1,2

1. AVIC Aerodynamics Research Institute, Shenyang 110034, China;
2. Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on High Speed and High Reynolds Number Aerodynamic Force Research, Shenyang 110034, China

Received:2020-10-23 Revised:2021-01-22 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2021-01-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11672280)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 声爆预测技术是研制新一代环保型超声速民机的关键技术之一。针对当前基于广义Burgers方程的声爆远场传播模型的数值求解格式精度较低的情况，开展了高阶格式离散方法研究。通过分析该模型中各效应项的物理性质，应用合适的高阶精度格式对各项分别进行离散求解，并采用经典几何声学射线法计算声爆传播路径，实现了对地面声爆波形的精准预测。通过对美国F-5E机型的声爆飞行试验和第二届国际声爆预测研讨会的典型算例进行数值模拟，验证了本文高阶离散方法的可靠性。进一步的结果分析表明，采用高阶离散格式的预测方法相比传统二阶精度预测方法具有明显的低耗散特性，在同等网格数目上可获得更高分辨率的计算结果，且其网格收敛性远优于传统二阶精度格式，同时在计算效率上也有一定优势；在Burgers方程的各效应项中，非线性项的影响更为明显，因而采用高阶离散格式时其优势更为突出；热黏性吸收项对数值结果影响较小，采用高阶离散格式对计算精度的提升效果也不明显，实际计算中仍可以采用传统离散格式，甚至忽略该项的贡献。

关键词: 超声速民机, 广义 Burgers方程, 声爆预测, 高阶格式, 计算流体力学

Abstract: The sonic boom prediction is one of the key technologies in the development of the new generation low-boom supersonic transport aircraft. In view of the low accuracy of the numerical scheme for the far-field propagation model of sonic boom based on the augmented Burgers equation, we study the discretization method for high-order scheme. After the physical properties of each effect term in the model is analyzed, an appropriate high-order accuracy scheme is used to discretize each term, and the classical geometric acoustic ray tracing method is adopted to calculate the propagation path of sonic boom, so as to realize the accurate prediction of ground waveform. The reliability of the high-order discrete method used in this paper is verified by the numerical simulation of the sonic boom flight test of F-5E aircraft and the standard numerical examples of the 2nd AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop on sonic boom prediction. Further results show that the high-order scheme has lower dissipation than the traditional second-order scheme, and thus can obtain higher resolution results with the same number of grids, with the grid convergence much higher than that of the traditional second-order scheme. Meanwhile, the high-order scheme also has advantages in computational efficiency. Among the effect terms of the augmented Burgers equation, the influence of the nonlinear term is more noticeable, explaining the prominence of the advantages of the adopted high-order scheme. The influence of the thermoviscous absorption term on the numerical results is small, and the improvement of calculation accuracy by using high-order scheme is not obvious. Therefore, the traditional discrete scheme can still be used in actual calculations, and the contribution of this term can even be ignored.

Key words: supersonic civil aircraft, augmented Burgers equation, sonic boom prediction, high-order scheme, computational fluid dynamics

中图分类号:

V211.3

王迪, 钱战森, 冷岩. 广义Burgers方程声爆传播模型高阶格式离散[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.

WANG Di, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.

参考文献

[1] 钱战森, 韩忠华. 声爆研究的现状与挑战[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 601-619. QIAN Z S, HAN Z H. Progress and challenges of sonic boom research[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 601-619(in Chinese).
[2] 韩忠华, 乔建领, 丁玉临, 等. 新一代环保型超声速客机气动相关关键技术与研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 620-635. HAN Z H,QIAO J L, DING Y L, et al. Key technologies for next-generation environmentally-friendly supersonic transport aircraft: a review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 620-635(in Chinese).
[3] 朱自强, 兰世隆. 超声速民机和降低音爆研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(8): 2507-2528. ZHU Z Q, LAN S L. Study of supersonic commercial transport and reduction of sonic boom[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 2507-2528(in Chinese).
[4] 黄江涛, 张绎典, 高正红, 等. 基于流场/声爆耦合伴随方程的超声速公务机声爆优化[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(5): 122505. HUANG J T, ZHANG Y D, GAO Z H, et al. Sonic boom optimization of supersonic jet based on flow/sonic boom coupledadjoint equations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(5): 122505(in Chinese).
[5] 王刚, 马博平, 雷知锦, 等. 典型标模音爆的数值预测与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(1): 121458. WANG G, MA B P, LEI Z J, et al. Simulation and analysis for sonic boom on several benchmark cases[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(1): 121458(in Chinese).
[6] 钱战森, 刘中臣, 冷岩, 等. OS-X0试验飞行器声爆特性飞行测量与数值模拟分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 675-682. QIAN Z S, LIU Z C, LENG Y, et al. Flight measurement and numerical simulation of sonic boom signature of OS-X0 experimental aircraft[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 675-682(in Chinese).
[7] WHITHAM G B. The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile[J]. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1952, 5(3): 301-348.
[8] WALKDEN F. The shock pattern of a wing-body combination, far from the flight path[J]. Aeronautical Quarterly, 1958, 9(2): 164-194.
[9] CARLSON H W. Simplified sonic-boom prediction: TP-1978-1122[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1978.
[10] PLOTKIN K. A rapid method for the computation of sonic booms[C]//15th Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1993.
[11] YAMASHITA R, SUZUKI K. Full-field sonic boom simulation in real atmosphere[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2014.
[12] YAMASHITA R, SUZUKI K. Full-field sonic boom simulation in stratified atmosphere[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10): 3223-3231.
[13] KANDIL O, YANG Z, BOBBITT P. Prediction of sonic boom signature using Euler-full potential CFD with grid adaptation and shock fitting[C]//8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference & Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2002.
[14] OZCER I. Sonic boom prediction using Euler /full potential methodology[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2007.
[15] CARLSON H W. An investigation of some aspects of the sonic boom by means of wind-tunnel measurements of pressures about several bodies of revolution at a Mach number of 2.01: NASA TND-161[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1959.
[16] CLIFF S, ELMILIGGUI A, AFTOSMIS M, et al. Design and evaluation of a pressure rail for sonic boom measurement in wind tunnels[C]//7th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7). Washington, D.C.: NASA, 2012.
[17] 刘中臣, 钱战森, 冷岩. 声爆近场空间压力分布风洞试验精确测量技术研究[C]//首届中国空气动力学大会, 2018. LIU Z C, QIAN Z S, LENG Y. Research on accurate measurement techniques of pressure distribution in wind tunnel near field sonic boom test[C]//The First Chinese Conference of Aerodynamics, 2018(in Chinese).
[18] PAWLOWSKI J, GRAHAM D, BOCCADORO C, et al. Origins and overview of the shaped sonic boom demonstration program[C]//43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2005.
[19] 徐悦, 宋万强. 典型低音爆构型的近场音爆计算研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2016, 27(7): 12-16. XU Y, SONG W Q. Near field sonic boom calculation on typical LSB configurations[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2016, 27(7): 12-16(in Chinese).
[20] PARK M A, NEMEC M.Nearfield summary and statistical analysis of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 56(3): 851-875.
[21] THOMAS C L. Extrapolation of sonic boom pressure signatures by waveform parameter method: NASA-TN-D-6832[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1972.
[22] LENG Y, QIAN Z S. Sonic boom signature analysis for a type of hypersonic long-range civil vehicle[C]//21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2017.
[23] KANG J. Nonlinear acoustic propagation of shock waves through the atmosphere with molecular relaxation[D]. Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University, 1991.
[24] ROBINSON L D. Sonic boom propagation through an inhomogeneous, windy atmosphere[D]. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, 1991.
[25] CLEVELAND R O. Propagation of sonic booms through a real, stratified atmosphere[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 1995.
[26] RALLABHANDI S K. Advanced sonic boom prediction using the augmented Burgers equation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(4): 1245-1253.
[27] YAMAMOTO M, HASHIMOTO A, TAKAHASHI T, et al. Long-range sonic boom prediction considering atmospheric effects[C]//INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings. Reston: INCE-USA, 2011: 2282-2289.
[28] YAMAMOTO M, HASHIMOTO A, TAKAHASHI T, et al. Numerical Simulation for sonic boom propagation through an Inhomogeneous atmosphere with winds[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, 1474(1): 339-342.
[29] YAMAMOTO M, HASHIMOTO A, AOYAMA T, et al. A unified approach to an augmented Burgers equation for the propagation of sonic booms[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 137(4): 1857-1866.
[30] 张绎典, 黄江涛, 高正红. 基于增广Burgers方程的音爆远场计算及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(7): 122039. ZHANG Y D, HUANG J T, GAO Z H. Far field simulation and applications of sonic boom based on augmented Burgers equation[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(7): 122039(in Chinese).
[31] 乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 等. 基于广义Burgers方程的超声速客机远场声爆高精度预测方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 663-674. QIAO J L, HAN Z H, DING Y L, et al. Sonic boom prediction method for supersonic transports based on augmented Burgers equation[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 663-674(in Chinese).
[32] LIU X D, OSHER S, CHAN T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 115(1): 200-212.
[33] JIANG G S, SHU C W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 126(1): 202-228.
[34] BALSARA D S, SHU C W. Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 160(2): 405-452.
[35] LELE S K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 103(1): 16-42.
[36] COCKBURN B, SHU C W. Nonlinearly stable compact schemes for shock calculations[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1994, 31(3): 607-627.
[37] 冷岩, 钱战森, 刘中臣. 超声速条件下旋成体声爆典型影响因素分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 655-662, 689. LENG Y, QIAN Z S, LIU Z C. Analysis on typical parameters of bodies of revolution affecting the sonic boom[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 655-662, 689(in Chinese).
[38] 冷岩, 钱战森, 杨龙. 均匀各向同性大气湍流对声爆传播特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(2): 123290. LENG Y, QIAN Z S, YANG L. Homogeneous isotropic atmospheric turbulence effects on sonic boom propagation[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 123290(in Chinese).
[39] PARK M. 2nd AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[EB/OL]. (2017-01-17)[2020-07-22]. https://lbpw.larc.nasa.gov/sbpw2/S.
[40] RALLABHANDI S K, LOUBEAU A. Summary of propagation cases of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 56(3): 876-895.
[41] BASS H E, SUTHERLAND L C, ZUCKERWAR A J, et al. Atmospheric absorption of sound: Further developments[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995, 97(1): 680-683.
[42] PIERCE D A. Acoustics-an introduction to its physical principles and applications[M]. New Youk: Acoustical Society of America, 1989: 587-588.
[43] VAN LEER B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1974, 14(4): 361-370.
[44] ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2): 357-372.
[45] HARTEN A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1983, 49(3): 357-393.
[46] SHU C W, OSHER S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 77(2): 439-471.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

广义Burgers方程声爆传播模型高阶格式离散

High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王迪, 冷岩, 杨龙, 韩忠华, 钱战森. 基于广义Burgers方程的声爆传播特性大气湍流影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626318-626318.
[2]	丁玉临, 韩忠华, 乔建领, 聂晗, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 超声速民机总体气动布局设计关键技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626310-626310.
[3]	乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 分层大气湍流场对远场声爆传播的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[4]	罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[5]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[6]	陈广强, 豆国辉, 魏昊功, 邹昕, 李齐, 刘周, 周伟江. 火星探测器大气数据测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[7]	张力文, 宋文萍, 韩忠华, 钱战森, 宋笔锋. 声爆产生、传播和抑制机理研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 25649-025649.
[8]	奕建苗, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 快速预测跨声速流场的深度学习方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[9]	杨体浩, 白俊强, 段卓毅, 史亚云, 邓一菊, 周铸. 喷气式客机层流翼气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527016-527016.
[10]	袁吉森, 孙爵, 李玲玉, 于晟浩, 聂晗, 高亮杰, 韩忠华, 钱战森. 超声速飞机层流布局设计与评估技术进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526316-526316.
[11]	聂晗, 宋文萍, 韩忠华, 陈坚强, 段茂昌, 万兵兵. 面向超声速民机层流机翼设计的转捩预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526342-526342.
[12]	鲍俊, 王瑜, 牛潜, 朱锡冬, 程建杰. 喷雾液滴撞击液膜影响参数及流动机理分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[13]	王子航, 吕宏强. 基于CFD高精度算法的雷电电磁场研究[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726366-726366.
[14]	陈坚强, 吴晓军, 张健, 李彬, 贾洪印, 周乃春. FlowStar:国家数值风洞(NNW)工程非结构通用CFD软件[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[15]	李左飙, 温风波, 唐晓雷, 苏良俊, 王松涛. 基于深度学习的单排孔气膜冷却性能预测[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524331-524331.