后缘小翼对旋翼气动特性的控制机理及参数分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.21671

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

后缘小翼对旋翼气动特性的控制机理及参数分析

马奕扬, 招启军

南京航空航天大学直升机旋翼动力学国家级重点实验室, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2017-08-14 修回日期:2018-01-16 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-01-16
通讯作者: 招启军,E-mail:zhaoqijun@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:zhaoqijun@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11272150，11572156）；江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目（KYLX15_0244）

Control mechanism and parameter analyses of aerodynamic characteristics of rotor via trailing-edge flap

MA Yiyang, ZHAO Qijun

National Key Laboratory of Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2017-08-14 Revised:2018-01-16 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-01-16
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11272150, 11572156); Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (KYLX15_0244)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对后缘小翼（TEF）的典型运动参数对旋翼气动特性的控制进行了分析研究。为克服变形网格方法可能导致网格畸变的不足，发展了一套适用于前飞状态带后缘小翼旋翼的运动嵌套网格方法。基于非定常雷诺平均Navier-Stokes（URANS）方程、k-ω剪切应力输运（SST）湍流模型和Roe-MUSCL插值格式，采用含LU-SGS隐式推进的双时间方法及并行技术，建立了一套适用于带有后缘小翼控制的旋翼前飞非定常流动特性模拟的高效CFD方法。以带后缘小翼的SMART旋翼为算例，对比了桨叶剖面等效法向力的计算结果，验证了CFD方法的有效性。着重开展了前飞状态旋翼后缘小翼的控制分析，在操纵量不变的情况下，分别研究了后缘小翼偏转幅值、偏转频率、安装位置及宽度等参数对旋翼气动力的影响特性，获得了典型参数对旋翼气动特性的控制规律。进一步研究了配平状态下后缘小翼对旋翼气动特性的参数影响。结果表明：后缘小翼可以充分发挥旋翼在前行侧的升力潜能，同时降低后行侧动态失速过程中旋翼的阻力和扭矩；在相同的旋翼拉力情况下，通过安装后缘小翼可以将旋翼阻力系数和扭矩系数分别降低17%和29%，升阻比提高14%。

关键词: 旋翼, 气动特性, 后缘小翼, 前飞状态, 参数分析, URANS方程

Abstract: Control effects of typical motion parameters of Trailing-Edge Flap (TEF) on the dynamic stall characteristics of the rotor are investigated. To overcome the shortcoming of the deformable grid approach, which may result in distortion of grid, a moving-embedded grid method is developed to predict the flowfield of the rotor with TEF control in the forward flight. Based on Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations, k-ω Shear Stress Transport (SST)turbulence model, Roe-MUSCL scheme, implicit LU-SGS scheme, parallel techniques and dual-time method, a high-efficiency CFD method is developed to predict the unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of rotor with TEF control. A comparison of calculation and experiment results of the normal force of the forward flight of the SMART rotor with TEF demonstrates validity of the proposed CFD method. Control effects of the forward flight of the rotor via trailing-edge flap are analyzed. Effects of the parameters including the angular amplitude, non-dimensional frequency, location and width of the trailing-edge flap on the aerodynamic characteristics of the rotor are explored with the same maneuvering. Parametric analyses of rotor aerodynamic characteristics are further investigated in the trimming condition. The results indicate that with TEF, rotors can reach their full lift potential in the advancing side, and the drag and torque of the rotor caused by dynamic stall in retreating blades can be reduced. With the same rotor thrust, the drag and torque coefficients of the rotor can be reduced by about 17% and 29% respectively control and the lift-to-drag ratio is increased by 14% via TEF.

Key words: rotor, aerodynamic characteristics, trailing-edge flap, forward flight, parametric analysis, URANS equations

中图分类号:

马奕扬, 招启军. 后缘小翼对旋翼气动特性的控制机理及参数分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5): 121671-121671.

MA Yiyang, ZHAO Qijun. Control mechanism and parameter analyses of aerodynamic characteristics of rotor via trailing-edge flap[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(5): 121671-121671.

参考文献

[1] YU Y H, LEE S, MCALISTER K W, et al. Dynamic stall control for advanced rotorcraft application[J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(2):289-295.
[2] ZHAO G Q, ZHAO Q J. Experimental investigations for parametric effects of dual synthetic jets on delaying stall of a thick airfoil[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(2):346-357.
[3] VISWAMURTHY S R, GANGULI R. Effect of piezoelectric hysteresis on helicopter vibration control using trailing-edge flaps[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(5):1201-1209.
[4] HASSAN A, STRAUB F, NOONAN K. Experimental/numerical evaluation of integral trailing edge flaps for helicopter rotor applications[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2005, 50(1):3-17.
[5] DIETERICH O, ENENKL B, ROTH D. Trailing edge flaps for active rotor control aeroelastic characteristics of the ADASYS rotor system[C]//American Helicopter Society 62nd Annual Forum Proceedings. Alexandria, VA:The AHS International, Inc., 2006.
[6] ROTH D, ENEKL B, DIETERICH O. Active rotor control by flaps for vibration reduction-full scale demonstrator and first flight test results[C]//Proceedings of 32nd European Rotorcraft Forum, 2006.
[7] RABOURDIN A, MAURICH J, DIETERICH O, et al. Blue Pulse active rotor control at Airbus Helicopters-New EC145 demonstrator and flight test results[C]//American Helicopter Society 70th Annual Forum Proceedings. Alexandria, VA:The AHS International, Inc., 2009.
[8] SHEN J, CHOPRA I. Aeroelastic stability of trailing-edge flap helicopter rotors[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2003, 48(1):236-243.
[9] STRAUB F K, CHARLES B D. Aeroelastic analysis of rotors with trailing edge flaps using comprehensive codes[C]//55th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society International. Alexandria, VA:The AHS International, Inc., 1999.
[10] MISHRA A, SITARAMAN J, BAEDER J, et al. Computational investigation of trailing edge flap for control of vibration[C]//AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2007:1-12.
[11] MISHRA A, ANANTHAN S, BAEDER J. Coupled CFD/CSD prediction of the effects of trailing edge flaps on rotorcraft dynamic stall alleviation[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2013:423-429.
[12] JAIN R, YEO H, CHOPRA I. Computational fluid dynamics-computational structural dynamics analysis of active control of helicopter rotor for performance improvement[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2010, 55:42004.
[13] RAVICHANDRAN K, FALLS J, ANANTHAN S, et al. Active rotor controls for vibration reduction and performance enhancement[C]//Proceedings of the AHS Specialists' Conference on Aeromechanics. Alexandria, VA:The AHS International, Inc., 2010.
[14] 刘洋, 向锦武. 后缘襟翼对直升机旋翼翼型动态失速特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(5):1028-1035. LIU Y, XIANG J W. Effect of the trailing edge flap on dynamic stall performance of helicopter rotor airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(5):1028-1035(in Chinese).
[15] 马奕扬, 招启军, 赵国庆. 基于后缘小翼的旋翼翼型动态失速控制分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(3):120312. MA Y Y, ZHAO Q J, ZHAO G Q. Dynamic stall control of rotor airfoil via trailing-edge flap[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(3):120312(in Chinese).
[16] 赵国庆, 招启军, 王清. 旋翼翼型非定常动态失速特性的CFD模拟及参数分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(1):72-81. ZHAO G Q, ZHAO Q J, WANG Q. Simulations and parametric analyses on unsteady dynamic stall characteristics of rotor airfoil based on CFD method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(1):72-81(in Chinese).
[17] ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2):357-372.
[18] VAN LEER B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 32(1):101-136.
[19] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1598-1605.
[20] SRINIVASAN G R, BAEDER J D. Flowfield of lifting rotor in hover:A Navier-Stokes simulation[J]. AIAA Journal, 1992, 30(10):2371-2378.
[21] KIM J W, PARK S H, YU Y H. Euler and Navier-Stokes simulations of helicopter rotor blade in forward flight using an overlapped grid solver:AIAA-2009-4268[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2009.
[22] ANANTHAN S, BAEDER J, SIM B W, et al. Prediction and validation of the aerodynamics, structure dynamics, and acoustics of the SMART rotor using a loosely-coupled CFD-CSD analysis[C]//American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum. Alexandria, VA:The AHS International, Inc., 2010:2031-2057.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

后缘小翼对旋翼气动特性的控制机理及参数分析

Control mechanism and parameter analyses of aerodynamic characteristics of rotor via trailing-edge flap

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨明月, 寿莹鑫, 唐勇, 刘畅, 许斌. 多四旋翼无人机编队保持与避碰控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726913-726913.
[2]	李晖, 吕海宇, 邹泽煜, 罗忠, 马辉, 韩清凯. 热环境下纤维增强复合材料圆柱壳非线性振动分析与验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425642-425642.
[3]	罗圣峰, 王光健, 马小斌, 郑丽丽, 汪瑞军. 钛液滴作用下钛合金薄片火蔓延的数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425652-425652.
[4]	孙杨, 昌敏, 白俊强. 微小型四旋翼无人机垂面栖停轨迹规划与控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325756-325756.
[5]	周伟, 马培洋, 郭正, 王道平, 周睿孙. 基于翼尖链翼的组合固定翼无人机研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325946-325946.
[6]	伍强, 徐浩军, 魏扬, 裴彬彬, 薛源. 结冰条件下飞机气动/运动耦合特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125566-125566.
[7]	谭剑锋, 何龙, 于领军, 周国臣. 基于黏性涡粒子/沙粒DEM的直升机沙盲建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125536-125536.
[8]	费钟阳, 蒋相闻, 招启军. 基于动态RCS特征相似的直升机靶机旋翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125465-125465.
[9]	张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云. 桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225264-225264.
[10]	李霞, 齐国元, 郭曦彤, 赵旭. 高阶微分反馈控制及在四旋翼飞行器中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 326047-326047.
[11]	刘佳豪, 李高华, 王福新. 倾转过渡状态旋翼-机翼气动干扰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 126097-126097.
[12]	徐欣, 贾贺, 陈雅倩, 荣伟, 蒋伟, 薛晓鹏. 织物透气性对火星用降落伞气动特性影响机理[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 126289-126289.
[13]	丁希仑, 金雪莹. 旋翼无人机交互作业动力学建模研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527388-527388.
[14]	张阳, 周洲, 郭佳豪. 分布式涵道风扇喷流对后置机翼的气动性能影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224977-224977.
[15]	郭洪振, 陈谋. 基于预设性能的四旋翼无人机编队安全控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525789-525789.