一种基于短时机动试飞数据的动力学辨识优化方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0293

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

一种基于短时机动试飞数据的动力学辨识优化方法

王保印¹, 张曙光¹, 贾晓鹏²

1. 北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国飞行试验研究院飞机所, 西安 710089

收稿日期:2016-09-26 修回日期:2016-11-09 出版日期:2017-06-15 发布日期:2016-11-21
通讯作者: 张曙光,E-mail:gnahz@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:gnahz@buaa.edu.cn

An optimization method for dynamic identification based on short-duration maneuvering flight test data

WANG Baoyin¹, ZHANG Shuguang¹, JIA Xiaopeng²

1. School of Transportations Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Institute of Aircraft, Chinese Flight Test Establishment, Xi'an 710089, China

Received:2016-09-26 Revised:2016-11-09 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2016-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

飞行动力学辨识算法的一个关键问题是，如何通过简单的机动获取所关心频率范围的响应特性。短时倍脉冲是一种易于实施的激励信号，兼顾试飞安全性与经济性，但与频域辨识法通常使用的扫频输入激励相比，短时机动频谱范围窄、信噪比低，一般难以得到准确的辨识结果。对如何基于短时机动飞行试验数据，提高辨识结果准确性的问题进行了研究。首先分析了经典Welch谱估计进行时域-频域转换过程中，影响非参数模型辨识精度的主要因素，提出了削减窗函数边缘缩减效应的数据预处理方法，并结合多窗口综合技术，提高频域特性辨识结果的精度。在参数化模型辨识过程中，针对有限频谱范围，提出了利用相干函数和功率谱密度加权综合，确定等效拟配的频率范围和频率节点的自适应方法，使得低阶等效拟配与输入激励信号高度相关，提高参数化模型辨识的精度、一致性和适应性。通过不同类型飞机的大量短时机动和少量扫频飞行试验数据模型辨识的工程应用示例，验证了动力学辨识优化方法算法稳定、结果准确，可满足飞行品质模态特性评价等应用需求。

关键词: 辨识, 飞行试验, 短时机动, 有限频谱, Welch谱估计, 自适应, 低阶等效

Abstract:

How to generate the accurate response at the frequency range of interest from the maneuvering is one of the significant problems for dynamic identification. Although short-duration doublet is commonly used in flight test activities and is easy to implement with a good consideration of both security and economy, it is difficult to get the accurate estimation due to its limited spectrum and lower signal to noise ratio. Thus, a method focusing on improving estimation accuracy based on the short-duration maneuvering flight test data is developed in this paper. The main factors that affect the accuracy of the non-parametric model identification in the classical Welch method of spectrum estimate are analyzed. A novel data pre-processing method which can taper the window function edge is presented, and the multi-window composite technology is integrated to improve the identification accuracy. Regarding the limited frequency spectrum, an adaptive low-order equivalent matching method is developed to select the frequency range and node based on a weighted function of coherence function and power spectral density. This method make the low-order equivalent matching highly correlated with the maneuvering input signal, and improve the accuracy, consistency and adaptability of the model parameter identification. The dynamic identification optimization technique is applied to a large amount of short-duration maneuvering and several sweeping flight test data for various types of aircrafts. The results meet the accuracy requirement for flight quality evaluation application, while the algorithm is stable and reliable.

Key words: identification, flight test, short-duration maneuver, limited frequency spectrum, Welch method of spectrum estimate, adaptive, lower-order equivalent

中图分类号:

V212.1

王保印, 张曙光, 贾晓鹏. 一种基于短时机动试飞数据的动力学辨识优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 120815-120815.

WANG Baoyin, ZHANG Shuguang, JIA Xiaopeng. An optimization method for dynamic identification based on short-duration maneuvering flight test data[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(6): 120815-120815.

参考文献

[1] JATEGAONKAR R V. Flight vehicle system identification: A time domain methodology[M]. Reston: AIAA, 2006: 9-14.
[2] HAMEL P G, JATEGAONKAR R V. Evolution of flight vehicle system identification[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1996, 33(1): 9-28.
[3] MORELLI E A. Identification of low order equivalent system models from flight test data: NASA/TM-2000-210117[R].Washington, D.C.: NASA, 2000.
[4] KLEIN V, MORELLI E A. Aircraft system identification: Theory and practice[M]. Reston: AIAA, 2006: 1-4.
[5] TISCHLER M B, REMPLE R K. Aircraft and rotorcraft system identification: Engineering methods with flight test examples[M]. Reston: AIAA, 2006:1-35, 135-190.
[6] 蔡金狮, 汪清, 王文正, 等. 飞行器系统辨识学[M]. 北京: 国防出版社, 2003: 221-245. CAI J S, WANG Q, WANG W Z, et al. Aircraft system identification[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2003:221-245 (in Chinese).
[7] KLYDE D H, BACHELDER E N, THOMPSON P M, et al. Flying qualities parameter identification using short duration flight test inputs[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2007: 1-13.
[8] WANG K C, ILIFF K W. Retrospective and recent examples of aircraft parameter identification at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(4): 752-764.
[9] MORELLI E A, KLEIN V. Application of system identification to aircraft at NASA Langley Research Center[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(1): 12-25.
[10] JATEGAONKAR R V, FISCHENBERG D, GRUENHAGEN W. Aerodynamic modeling and system identification from flight data-recent applications at DLR[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(4): 681-691.
[11] 胡广书. 数字信号处理理论、算法与实现[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012: 507-590. HU G S. Theory, algorithm and implementation of digital signal processing[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2012: 507-590 (in Chinese).
[12] HAMEL P G, JATEGAONKAR R V. The role of system identification for flight vehicle applications-revisited[C]//Proceedings of RTO-SCI Symposium on "System Identification for Integrated Aircraft Development and Flight Testing", RTO-MP. Neuilly-Sur-Seine: RTO/NATO, 1999: 2.1-2.12.
[13] NETO N S B, HEMERLY E M. Parameter estimation flight test maneuver optimization considering measurement colored residuals[C]//25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Hamburg: ICAS, 2006: 1-10.
[14] MORELLI E A. Flight test validation of optimal input design and comparison to conventional inputs[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1997: 11-13.
[15] THEODORE C R, IVLER C M, TISCHLER M B, et al. System identification of large flexible transport aircraft[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2008: 6894.
[16] 李雅静, 刘旭华. 频域响应辨识优化方法研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2014, 32(4): 342-346. LI Y J, LIU X H. Optimization technique of frequency domain response identification[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2014, 32(4): 342-346 (in Chinese).
[17] 周自全. 飞行试验工程[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2010: 4-10. ZHOU Z Q. Flight test engineering[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2010: 4-10 (in Chinese).
[18] BACHELDER E, THOMPSON P, KLYDE D, et al. A new system identification method using short duration flight test inputs[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2011: 4059-4081.
[19] KLYDE D H, BACHELDER E N, MCMAHON R, et al. Use of in-flight simulation to create a flying qualities database: AIAA-2008-1624[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[20] BACHELDER E N, KLYDE D H, LEE D, et al. Dynamic detection of actuator frequency response[C]//43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences. Reston: AIAA, 2007: 1-13.
[21] BOGGESS A, NARCOWICH F J. A first course in wavelets with Fourier analysis[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015: 234-268.
[22] HODGKINSON J. A history of low order equivalent systems for aircraft handling qualities analysis and design[C]//2003 AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2003: 11-14.
[23] STANDARD M. Flying qualities of piloted aircraft: MIL-STD-1797A[R]. Langley: Department of Defense, 2004: 183-280.
[24] DOROBANTU A, MURCH A, METTLER B, et al. System identification for small, low-cost, fixed-wing unmanned aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 50(4): 1117-1130.
[25] CARNDUFF S D. System identification of unmanned aerial vehicles[D]. Canfield: Canfield University, 2008.
[26] 谭文倩, 张曙光. 飞机横航向等效拟配模型的对比研究[J].飞行力学, 2003, 21(4): 14-18. TAN W Q, ZHANG S G. Research on the models of lateral and directional equivalent matching for an aircraft[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2003, 21(4): 14-18 (in Chinese).
[27] 张曙光, 方振平, 高立华. 纵向大迎角飞行品质对参数的灵敏度分析[J]. 飞行力学, 1999, 17(2): 1-6. ZHANG S G, FANG Z P, GAO L H. Analysis on sensitivity of high angles of attack longitudinal flying qualities to variation of parameters[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1999, 17(2): 1-6 (in Chinese).
[28] LENNART L. MATLAB R2012b system identification toolbox reference[M/OL]. Natick: MathWorks, 2012: 131-139 (2012-09)[2016-08-15]. www.mathworks.com.36]Mathworks, System identification toolbox reference, www.mathworks.com

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

一种基于短时机动试飞数据的动力学辨识优化方法

An optimization method for dynamic identification based on short-duration maneuvering flight test data

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郑峰婴, 沈志敏, 李雅琴, 徐楷钊, 王新华. 共轴高速直升机增益自适应多模式切换控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529088-529088.
[2]	仇钰清, 李俨, 郎金溪, 刘育衔, 王重. 高速直升机过渡模态鲁棒自适应姿态控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529927-529927.
[3]	聂博文, 王亮权, 黄志银, 何龙, 杨仕鹏, 颜鸿涛, 章贵川. 复合式高速无人直升机飞行动力学建模与控制策略设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529848-529848.
[4]	龚煜廉, 张建国, 吴志刚, 褚光远, 范晓铎, 黄赢. 主动学习基自适应PC⁃Kriging模型的复合材料结构可靠度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 228982-228982.
[5]	蔡章博, 张征宇, 余皓, 占书恒. 荧光油膜速度场的自适应快速光流解法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128047-128047.
[6]	童晟翔, 史志伟, 耿玺, 王力爽, 孙志坤, 陈其昌. 组合式仿枫树子飞行器与空中分体技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629590-629590.
[7]	马瑞卿, 陈鹏. 永磁同步电机初始位置辨识方法研究与进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 28776-028776.
[8]	王一凡, 陈浩颖, 张海波. 面向巡航任务的自适应循环发动机进/发匹配[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128637-128637.
[9]	李海, 李勇军, 刘元皓, 赵卫虎, 李信, 赵尚弘. 基于ESWO的敏捷对地观测卫星任务调度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 329370-329370.
[10]	宁铠, 吴宝林. 基于事件驱动的航天器星下点轨迹维持控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 329412-329412.
[11]	肖冰, 张海朝. 航天器姿态稳定强化学习鲁棒最优控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 628890-628890.
[12]	李文龙, 吴波, 谢帅. 有起落架布置的翼身整体结构机翼载荷测量技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 229525-229525.
[13]	段广全, 刘国平. 基于全驱系统方法的组合航天器位姿自适应预设性能控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 628837-628837.
[14]	方乐言, 蒙晗, 侯明哲. 带有参数精确估计的迭代学习滑模控制及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 628889-628889.
[15]	刘哲, 张羲格, 韦常柱, 崔乃刚. 亚轨道飞行器再入轨迹高精度自适应凸规划[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729430-729430.