CRM翼身组合体模型高阶精度数值模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0185

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

CRM翼身组合体模型高阶精度数值模拟

王运涛¹, 孙岩², 孟德虹¹, 王光学¹

1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力学研究所, 绵阳 621000;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心空气动力学国家重点实验室, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2016-04-07 修回日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2016-06-15
通讯作者: 孟德虹,E-mail:mdh157@163.com E-mail:mdh157@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFB0200700）

High-order numerical simulation of CRM wing-body model

WANG Yuntao¹, SUN Yan², MENG Dehong¹, WANG Guangxue¹

1. Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2016-04-07 Revised:2016-06-06 Online:2017-03-15 Published:2016-06-15
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFB0200700)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于五阶空间离散精度的WCNS格式，开展了CRM翼身组合体模型的高阶精度数值模拟，以评估WCNS格式对复杂外形的模拟能力以及典型运输机巡航构型阻力预测的精度。首先依照DPW组委会提出的网格生成指导原则，利用ICEM软件生成了粗、中、细、极细四套网格，网格规模从"粗网格"的2 578 687个网格点逐渐扩展到"极细网格"的65 464 511个网格点。研究了设计升力系数下，网格规模对气动特性、压力分布和翼根后缘局部分离区的影响，采用"中等网格"开展了抖振特性的数值模拟研究。通过与二阶精度的计算结果、DPW V统计结果和部分试验结果的对比分析，高阶精度数值模拟结果表明，阻力系数计算结果与DPW V统计平均结果吻合较好；网格密度对机翼上表面的激波位置和翼身结合部后缘局部分离区略有影响；迎角为4°时，升力系数下降的主要原因是机翼上表面激波诱导分离区和翼身结合部后缘局部分离区的增加。

关键词: RANS方程, WCNS格式, CRM模型, 流场模拟, 网格密度, 气动特性

Abstract:

High-order numerical simulation on CRM wing-body model is presented with the fifth-order WCNS scheme to assess the ability of high-order WCNS scheme on complex configuration simulation and the precision in predicating cruise drag of transonic configuration. Four grids (coarse, medium, fine, and extra fine) are created with software ICEM according to the gridding guidelines provided by DPW organizing committee, and the grid sizes range from 2 578 687 cells for the "Coarse" level to 65 464 511 cells for the "Extra-fine" level. Computation and analysis on four grids are carried out to investigate the grid effect on aerodynamic characteristics, pressure distribution and the local separation bubble at the wing root trailing edge, and the "Medium" grid is used in the numerical simulation and study of buffet onset. Compared to second-order numerical results, the statistic results submitted by DPW V participants and some experimental data, the high-order numerical results show that the drag coefficient computational results agree well with statistic data from DPW V participants; the grid density has some influence on the location of the shock wave and the size of the local separation bubble at the wing root trailing edge; the enlargement of the size of the separation zone due to shock wave and the local separation bubble at the wing root trailing edge on the upper surface of the wing is the main reason of the lift lift curve break at 4° angle of attack.

Key words: RANS equations, WCNS scheme, CRM model, flow simulation, grid density, aerodynamic characteristics

中图分类号:

V211.7

王运涛, 孙岩, 孟德虹, 王光学. CRM翼身组合体模型高阶精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(3): 120298-120298.

WANG Yuntao, SUN Yan, MENG Dehong, WANG Guangxue. High-order numerical simulation of CRM wing-body model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(3): 120298-120298.

参考文献

[1] LEVY D W, VASSBERG J C, WAHLS R A, et al. Summary of data from the first AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(5):875-882.
[2] LAFLIN K R, VASSBERG J C, WAHLS R A, et al. Summary of data from the second AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(5):1165-1178.
[3] VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M, et al. Abridged summary of the third AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(3):781-798.
[4] VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M, et al. Summary of the fourth AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(4):1070-1089.
[5] LEVY D W, LAFLIN K R, TINOCO E N, et al. Summary of data from the fifth computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(4):1194-1213.
[6] VASSBERG J C, DEHAAN M A, RIVERS S M, et al. Development of a common research model for applied CFD validation studies:AIAA-2008-6919[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[7] SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD vision 2030 study:A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences:NASA/CR-2014-218178[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2014.
[8] DENG X G, ZHANG H X. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 165:24-44.
[9] DENG X G, MIN R B, MAO M L, et al. Further studies on geometric conservation law and application to high-order finite difference scheme with stationary grid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 239:90-111.
[10] 王运涛, 孙岩, 王光学, 等. DLR-F6翼身组合体的高阶精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9):2923-2929. WANG Y T, SUN Y, WANG G X, et al. High-order numerical simulation of DLR-F6 wing-body configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9):2923-2929(in Chinese).
[11] WANG Y T, ZHANG Y L, LI S, et al. Calibration of a γ-Re_θ transition model and its validation with high-order numerical method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(3):704-711.
[12] 王运涛, 孟德虹, 孙岩, 等. DLR-F6/FX2B翼身组合体构型高阶精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(2):484-490. WANG Y T, MENG D H, SUN Y, et al. High-order numerical simulation of DLR-F6/FX2B wing-body configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(2):484-490(in Chinese).
[13] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering application[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1598-1605.
[14] CHEN R F, WANG Z J. Fast, block lower-upper symmetric Gauss-Seidel scheme for arbitrary grids[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(12):2238-2245.
[15] 王光学, 张玉伦, 王运涛, 等. BLU-SGS方法在WCNS高阶精度格式上的数值分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(6):733-739. WANG G X, ZHANG Y L, WANG Y T, et al. Numerical analysis of BLU-SGS method in WCNS high-order scheme[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(6):733-739(in Chinese).
[16] VAN LEER B. Towards the ultimate conservation difference scheme II, monoticity and conservation combined in a second order scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1974, 14:361-370.
[17] RIVERS M B, DITTBERNER A. Experimental investigation of the NASA common research model (invited):AIAA-2010-4218[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[18] RIVERS M B, HUNTER C A. Support system effects on the NASA common research model:AIAA-2012-0707[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2012.
[19] RIVERS M B, HUNTER C A, CAMPBELL R L. Further investigation of the support system effects and wing twist on the NASA common research model:AIAA-2012-3209[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2012.
[20] SCLAFANI A J, VASSBERG J C, WINKLER C, et al. DPW-5 analysis of the CRM in a wing-body configuration using structured and unstructured meshes:AIAA-2013-0048[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

CRM翼身组合体模型高阶精度数值模拟

High-order numerical simulation of CRM wing-body model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周伟, 马培洋, 郭正, 王道平, 周睿孙. 基于翼尖链翼的组合固定翼无人机研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325946-325946.
[2]	伍强, 徐浩军, 魏扬, 裴彬彬, 薛源. 结冰条件下飞机气动/运动耦合特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125566-125566.
[3]	徐欣, 贾贺, 陈雅倩, 荣伟, 蒋伟, 薛晓鹏. 织物透气性对火星用降落伞气动特性影响机理[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 126289-126289.
[4]	张阳, 周洲, 郭佳豪. 分布式涵道风扇喷流对后置机翼的气动性能影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224977-224977.
[5]	陈坚强, 吴晓军, 张健, 李彬, 贾洪印, 周乃春. FlowStar:国家数值风洞(NNW)工程非结构通用CFD软件[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[6]	彭连松, 郑孟宗, 潘天宇, 苏冠廷, 李秋实. 翼间干涉效应对蜻蜓悬停气动性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124571-124571.
[7]	范振伟, 杨凤田, 李亚东, 项松, 赵为平. 某型双座电动飞机设计与试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 623972-623972.
[8]	贾洪印, 张培红, 赵炜, 周桂宇, 吴晓军. 火箭子级垂直回收布局气动特性及发动机喷管影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 623995-623995.
[9]	张宇佳, 左光, 徐艺哲, 杜若凡, 赵飞, 屈峰. Starship新型舵面形式气动特性数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 624058-624058.
[10]	李锦, 耿湘人, 陈坚强, 江定武, 李红喆. DSMC量子动理学模型在火星再入流动中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 123240-123240.
[11]	魏中成, 王海峰, 袁兵, 李盈盈. 鸭式飞机矢量喷流对大迎角气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 124434-124434.
[12]	赵振山, 冯剑, 苗树明, 杜羽. 基于数值模拟的翼身融合布局飞机上悬式发动机布置技术[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623051-623051.
[13]	洪俊武, 王运涛, 李伟, 杨小川. HiLiftPW-3高升力构型数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(3): 122391-122391.
[14]	孟德虹, 李伟, 王运涛, 孙岩. CRM-WBPN风洞试验模型数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522402-522402.
[15]	卢丛玲, 祁浩天, 徐国华. 升力偏置对共轴刚性旋翼前飞气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(11): 122906-122906.