基于不确定微分方程的疲劳可靠性建模

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25820

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于不确定微分方程的疲劳可靠性建模

李晓阳^1,2, 陶昭^1,2, 张慰^1,2

1. 北京航空航天大学可靠性与系统工程学院, 北京 100083;
2. 北京航空航天大学可靠性与环境工程技术国防重点实验室, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-05-17 修回日期:2021-08-18 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2021-08-17
通讯作者: 李晓阳,E-mail:leexy@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:leexy@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51775020,51875019);科学挑战计划(TZ2018007);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(YWF-21-BJ-J-515)

Reliability modelling for fatigue based on uncertain differential equation

LI Xiaoyang^1,2, TAO Zhao^1,2, ZHANG Wei^1,2

1. School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Science and Technology on Reliability and Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-05-17 Revised:2021-08-18 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2021-08-17
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51775020,51875019);Science Challenge Project (TZ2018007);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (YWF-21-BJ-J-515)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了合理量化疲劳裂纹扩展过程中时间维度的不确定性的动态变化特征,从小时间尺度(即宏观上相对较小的时间单位)出发,介绍了不确定理论中的不确定微分方程来刻画不确定性的动态变化特征。具体地,在不确定理论的框架下,针对考虑裂纹闭合和高载迟滞效应的裂纹扩展过程,考虑时间维度的不确定性的动态变化特征以及物理属性、外界载荷和裂纹阈值的不确定性的静态特征并分别进行量化描述,进而给出小时间尺度下基于不确定微分方程的疲劳裂纹扩展模型;以裂纹长度为性能参数,构建出裕量方程,并推导出确信可靠度函数,完成疲劳可靠性建模。通过开展疲劳裂纹扩展实验,对建立的模型进行应用,给出了确信可靠度评估结果和裂纹扩展预测结果。此外,通过模型的讨论分析,表明了小时间尺度下进行疲劳裂纹扩展建模以及对不确定性进行细致分类和科学量化的重要意义。

关键词: 疲劳裂纹扩展, 不确定性, 动态变化, 小时间尺度, 不确定微分方程, 可靠性

Abstract: To quantify the dynamic characteristic of uncertainty in the fatigue crack growth process in the time dimension, the uncertain differential equation of uncertainty theory is introduced to describe the dynamic characteristic of uncertainty from a small time scale (i.e., smaller time unit macroscopically). Specifically, for the crack growth process considering the crack closure and the retardation effect caused by overloads, the dynamic characteristic of the uncertainty in the time dimension and the static characteristic of the uncertainties in the physical properties, the external load and the crack threshold are considered and quantified in the framework of uncertainty theory. A fatigue crack growth model based on the uncertain differential equation is built from the small time scale. The margin equation is constructed regarding the crack length as the performance parameter, and the reliability function is deduced for the fatigue reliability modelling. The proposed model is applied to a case of fatigue crack growth experiment, and the reliability evaluation and the prediction of crack growth are obtained. The discussion and analysis of the proposed model shows that the modelling of fatigue crack growth from the small time scale and the careful classification and scientific quantification of the uncertainties are significant.

Key words: fatigue crack growth, uncertainty, dynamic change, small time scale, uncertain differential equation, reliability

中图分类号:

李晓阳, 陶昭, 张慰. 基于不确定微分方程的疲劳可靠性建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225820-225820.

LI Xiaoyang, TAO Zhao, ZHANG Wei. Reliability modelling for fatigue based on uncertain differential equation[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225820-225820.

参考文献

[1] VIRKLER D A, HILLBERRY B M, GOEL P K. The statistical nature of fatigue crack propagation[J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1979, 101(2): 148-153.
[2] 邢修三. 疲劳断裂非平衡统计理论: Ⅰ.疲劳微裂纹长大的位错机理和统计特性[J]. 中国科学 (A辑), 1986, 16(5): 501-510. XING X S. Nonequilibrium statistical theory of fatigue fracture——Ⅰ. Dislocation mechanism and statistical properties of fatigue microcrack growth[J]. Science in China, SerA, 1986, 16(5): 501-510 (in Chinese).
[3] KRAUSZ A S. Fracture Kinetics of crack growth [M]. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
[4] BOGDANOFF J L, KOZIN F. Probabilistic models of cumulative damage[M]. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1985.
[5] BEN ABDESSALEM A, AZAÏS R, TOUZET-CORTINA M, et al. Stochastic modelling and prediction of fatigue crack propagation using piecewise-deterministic Markov processes[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2016, 230(4): 405-416.
[6] HAO S H, YANG J, BERENGUER C. Nonlinear step-stress accelerated degradation modelling considering three sources of variability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018, 172: 207-215.
[7] SI X S, WANG W B, HU C H, et al. Remaining useful life estimation-A review on the statistical data driven approaches[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 213(1): 1-14.
[8] LIN Y K, YANG J N. On statistical moments of fatigue crack propagation[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1983, 18(2): 243-256.
[9] LIN Y K, YANG J N. A stochastic theory of fatigue crack propagation[J]. AIAA Journal, 1985, 23(1): 117-124.
[10] LI Y Z, ZHU S P, LIAO D, et al. Probabilistic modeling of fatigue crack growth and experimental verification[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 118: 104862.
[11] SOBCZYK K. Modelling of random fatigue crack growth[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1986, 24(4): 609-623.
[12] SPENCER B F, TANG J, ARTLEY M E. Stochastic approach to modeling fatigue crack growth[J]. AIAA Journal, 1989, 27(11): 1628-1635.
[13] SHARIFF A A. A stochastic paris-erdogan model for fatigue crack growth using two-state model[J]. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Society, 2008, 1(1): 97-108.
[14] EROGLU E, GUNEY I, GUNES I. Fatigue test with stochastic differential equation modeling[J]. Acta Physica Polonica A, 2012, 121(1): 36-38.
[15] ALLEN E J. SDE models with exponential drift and diffusion for approximating fatigue crack growth dynamics[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 200: 75-85.
[16] GARDINER C W. Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985.
[17] LIU B D. Uncertainty theory[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.
[18] LIU B D. Fuzzy process, hybrid process and uncertain process[J]. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 2008, 2(1): 3-16.
[19] LI X Y, TAO Z, WU J P, et al. Uncertainty theory based reliability modeling for fatigue[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 119: 104931.
[20] WOLF E. Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1970, 2(1): 37-45.
[21] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料疲劳试验疲劳裂纹扩展方法: GB/T 6398—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Metallic materials—Fatigue testing—Fatigue crack growth method: GB/T 6398—2017[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017 (in Chinese).
[22] ZHANG W, LIU Y M. SEM testing for crack closure investigation and virtual crack annealing model development[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 43: 188-196.
[23] HU D Y, SU X, LIU X, et al. Bayesian-based probabilistic fatigue crack growth evaluation combined with machine-learning-assisted GPR[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 229: 106933.
[24] 康锐. 确信可靠性理论与方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2020. KANG R. Belief reliability theory and methodology[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2020 (in Chinese).
[25] LIU Z. Generalized moment estimation for uncertain differential equations[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2021, 392: 125724.
[26] LI X Y, CHEN W B, LI F R, et al. Reliability evaluation with limited and censored time-to-failure data based on uncertainty distributions[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2021, 94: 403-420.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于不确定微分方程的疲劳可靠性建模

Reliability modelling for fatigue based on uncertain differential equation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜峰, 李华聪, 符江锋, 洪林雄. 基于RBF和主动学习的非概率可靠度求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[2]	陈志远, 李璐祎. 参数不确定性下高效的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[3]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[4]	罗佳奇, 傅文豪, 曾先, 夏志恒. 雷诺数对高负荷低压涡轮叶栅流动损失的不确定性影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125427-125427.
[5]	王秋懿, 吴彦增, 鲍蕊. 疲劳裂纹扩展过程中的CTOD相关参量分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526632-526632.
[6]	何勇, 王红, 李晶, 齐彦昆. 基于振动监测的部件状态维修与备件订购联合决策[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225304-225304.
[7]	王天帅, 贺小帆, 王金宇, 李玉海. 基于双峰对数正态分布模型的DED-TA15钛合金DFR值估计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 225013-225013.
[8]	雷世英, 孙见忠, 刘赫. 涡轮叶片累积损伤指数模型及服役可靠性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 225064-225064.
[9]	康锐, 王自力. 可靠性系统工程理论研究回顾与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527505-527505.
[10]	蔡睿妍, 刘艳红, 魏德宾. 基于QoS的卫星网络k端可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 326020-326020.
[11]	胡政文, 张保强, 邓振鸿. 概率盒全局灵敏度和活跃子空间跨层降维[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224582-224582.
[12]	魏科鹏, 胡健, 姚建勇, 邢浩晨, 乐贵高. 航空机电作动器神经网络快速终端滑模控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 624540-624540.
[13]	贾庆轩, 段嘉琪, 陈钢. 机器人在轨装配无标定视觉伺服对准方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 424063-424063.
[14]	段佳桐, 隋福成, 刘汉海, 解放, 欧阳天, 鲍蕊. 弯曲载荷下薄壁结构疲劳裂纹扩展性能[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524326-524326.
[15]	冯蕴雯, 潘维煌, 刘佳奇, 路成, 薛小锋, 冷佳醒. 基于机器学习的飞机动力装置运行可靠性[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524732-524732.