快速交叉验证改进的运载火箭近似建模方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25967

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

快速交叉验证改进的运载火箭近似建模方法

文谦, 杨家伟, 武泽平, 杨希祥, 赵海龙, 王志祥

国防科技大学空天科学学院,长沙 410073

收稿日期:2021-06-16 修回日期:2021-07-06 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2021-08-17
通讯作者: 武泽平,E-mail:zeping123@nudt.edu.cn E-mail:zeping123@nudt.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52005502)；湖南省科技创新计划(2020RC2035)；国防科技大学科研计划(ZK19-11)

An approximation modeling method of launch vehicles improved by fast cross-validation

WEN Qian, YANG Jiawei, WU Zeping, YANG Xixiang, ZHAO Hailong, WANG Zhixiang

College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received:2021-06-16 Revised:2021-07-06 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2021-08-17
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52005502); Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2020RC2035); Research Project of National University of Defense Technology (ZK19-11)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对运载火箭智能化设计对近似模型计算效率及精度提出的更高要求,提出快速交叉验证改进的径向基函数(RBF)近似建模方法。RBF是非线性多峰耗时模型近似建模的重要方法之一,其基函数形状参数的合理确定可大幅提升RBF近似模型预测精度。针对现有RBF形状参数确定中待求变量多和计算复杂等问题,提出基于样本局部密度的形状参数表征方法。将多个形状参数的复杂域优化问题转化为缩放系数确定的单变量优化问题,实现形状参数优化与训练样本数量解耦。提出通用快速K-折交叉验证算法合理确定缩放系数,推导出通用交叉验证误差求解过程中高阶矩阵快速求逆和交叉验证误差快速求解公式,将径向基函数形状参数确定的计算复杂度从n³降低为(n/k)³,提升了径向基函数近似建模效率和精度。采用数值算例和工程算例进行校验,结果表明本文方法具有较好的预测精度和通用性,在飞行器设计领域有一定的工程应用价值。

关键词: 运载火箭, 智能化设计, 近似模型, 交叉验证, 径向基函数, 局部密度

Abstract: The intelligent design of launch vehicles requires the high calculation efficiency and accuracy of the approximation model, hence a fast cross-validation improved RBF approximation modeling method is proposed. Radial Basis Function (RBF) is one of the most widely-used approximation metamodeling methods for nonlinear multi-peak time-consuming models. Reasonable determination of the shape parameters could greatly improve the prediction accuracy of the RBF approximation model. To solve the problems that many variables are to be determined for RBF with multiple shape parameters and the calculations are complex, a shape parameters characterization method based on the local density of sampling points is proposed. With the proposed method, the determination of multiple RBF shape parameters is transformed into the determination of a single scale factor based on the local density of sampling points. Therefore, the shape parameters optimization problem in RBF is decoupled from the number of training samples. Furthermore, a general fast K-fold cross-validation algorithm is proposed to determine the scale factor of RBF. The fast higher-order inverse matrices formula and fast solution of cross-validation errors formula are derived, which further reduces the computational complexity of shape parameters determination of RBF from n³ to (n/k)³, and improves the efficiency and accuracy of the RBF approximation model. Different numerical examples and engineering examples are used to verify that the proposed method not only has competitive prediction accuracy and versatility but also has application value in the field of flight vehicle design.

Key words: launch vehicles, intelligent design, approximation model, cross-validation, radial basis function, local density

中图分类号:

文谦, 杨家伟, 武泽平, 杨希祥, 赵海龙, 王志祥. 快速交叉验证改进的运载火箭近似建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 225967-225967.

WEN Qian, YANG Jiawei, WU Zeping, YANG Xixiang, ZHAO Hailong, WANG Zhixiang. An approximation modeling method of launch vehicles improved by fast cross-validation[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 225967-225967.

参考文献

[1] HARDY R L. Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1971, 76(8): 1905-1915.
[2] CHEN W, TANAKA M. A meshless, integration-free, and boundary-only RBF technique[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2002, 43(3-5): 379-391.
[3] JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 23(1): 1-13.
[4] WU Z P. Study on sequential approximate optimization and its application[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013: 20-22 (in Chinese). 武泽平. 序列近似优化方法及其应用研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2013: 20-22.
[5] KITAYAMA S, YAMAZAKI K. Simple estimate of the width in Gaussian kernel with adaptive scaling technique[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11(8): 4726-4737.
[6] MU W Y, WANG C L, ZHAO X. A space filling-based cross-validation method and its applications[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(2): 382-388 (in Chinese). 牟唯嫣, 王春玲, 赵昕. 基于空间填充准则的交叉验证方法及其应用[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(2): 382-388.
[7] FAN Y D. A summary of cross-validation in model selection[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2013: 19-20 (in Chinese). 范永东. 模型选择中的交叉验证方法综述[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2013: 19-20.
[8] WOLD S. Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models[J]. Technometrics, 1978, 20(4): 397-405.
[9] LI Y. The method of fundamental solution with LOOCV for boundary value problems in complicated domains[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2015: 13 (in Chinese). 李燕. 基于交叉验证的基本解法求复杂区域边界值问题[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2015: 13.
[10] VAN GESTEL T, SUYKENS J A K, BAESENS B, et al. Benchmarking least squares support vector machine classifiers[J]. Machine Learning, 2004, 54(1): 5-32.
[11] DEVROYE L, WAGNER T. Distribution-free performance bounds for potential function rules[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1979, 25(5): 601-604.
[12] GEISSER S. The predictive sample reuse method with applications[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1975, 70(350): 320-328.
[13] STONE M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1974, 36(2): 111-133.
[14] ZHANG Y T, MA C, LI Z N, et al. Online modeling of kernel extreme learning machine based on fast leave-one-out cross-validation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014, 48(5): 641-646 (in Chinese). 张英堂, 马超, 李志宁, 等. 基于快速留一交叉验证的核极限学习机在线建模[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2014, 48(5): 641-646.
[15] LIU X Y, LI P, GAO C H. Fast leave-one-out cross-validation algorithm for extreme learning machine[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2011, 45(8): 1140-1145 (in Chinese). 刘学艺, 李平, 郜传厚. 极限学习机的快速留一交叉验证算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2011, 45(8): 1140-1145.
[16] LI J, DUAN P, LYU H Y, et al. RBF shape parameter optimization approach based on ILOOCV and its spatial interpolation experiments[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2016, 32(3): 39-42, 48 (in Chinese). 李佳, 段平, 吕海洋, 等. 基于改进的逐点交叉验证的RBF形态参数优化方法及其空间插值实验[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2016, 32(3): 39-42, 48.
[17] RIPPA S. An algorithm for selecting a good value for the parameter c in radial basis function interpolation[J]. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 1999, 11(2):193-210.
[18] LI X, WANG X P. Study on shape parameter selection for surrogate model constructed by using radial basis function[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(3): 688-692 (in Chinese). 李响, 王晓鹏. 径向基代理模型中形状参数对精度的影响[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(3): 688-692.
[19] WU Z P, WANG D H, OKOLO N P, et al. Unified estimate of Gaussian kernel width for surrogate models[J]. Neurocomputing, 2016, 203: 41-51
[20] ZHANG Z C, GAO T Y, ZHANG L, et al. Aeroheating agent model based on radial basis function neural network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524167 (in Chinese). 张智超, 高太元, 张磊, 等. 基于径向基神经网络的气动热预测代理模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524167.
[21] KLEIJNEN J P C. Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(3): 707-716.
[22] ZHANG X, YANG X X, ZHANG W H, et al. An improved CoKriging modeling method and its application[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2021, 60(4):136-145 (in Chinese). 张锡, 杨希祥, 张为华, 等. 一种改进的CoKriging建模方法及其应用[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 60(4):136-145.
[23] WANG Z X, WU Z P, WANG J, et al. Approximation modeling method for cylindrical stiffened shells in large launch vehicles[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41(10): 1267-1279 (in Chinese). 王志祥, 武泽平, 王婕, 等. 大型运载火箭加筋柱壳近似建模方法[J]. 宇航学报, 2020, 41(10): 1267-1279.
[24] WANG Z X, LEI Y J, WU Z P, et al. Lightweight design of cylindrical stiffened shells in launch vehicles by a dual-elite population sequential approximation optimization approach[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2021, 53(6): 984-1004.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

快速交叉验证改进的运载火箭近似建模方法

An approximation modeling method of launch vehicles improved by fast cross-validation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜峰, 李华聪, 符江锋, 洪林雄. 基于RBF和主动学习的非概率可靠度求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[2]	王志祥, 雷勇军, 段静波, 欧阳兴, 张大鹏, 王婕. 重型运载火箭集中力扩散舱段多区域联合设计与优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 225135-225135.
[3]	刘君, 韩芳, 魏雁昕. 特定条件下高阶WENO格式计算结果误差[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 124940-124940.
[4]	刘智侃, 刘深深, 刘骁, 曾磊, 代光月. 基于物理量梯度修正的RBF数据传递方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124506-124506.
[5]	孙岩, 江盟, 孟德虹, 庞宇飞. 交互式棱柱网格生成中翘曲现象形成机制及消除算法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124443-124443.
[6]	梁小辉, 胡昌华, 周志杰, 王青. 基于自适应动态规划的运载火箭智能姿态容错控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524915-524915.
[7]	张智超, 高太元, 张磊, 拓双芬. 基于径向基神经网络的气动热预测代理模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524167-524167.
[8]	马宗占, 许志, 唐硕, 张迁. 一种改进的运载火箭迭代制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 324218-324218.
[9]	包为民. 航天智能控制技术让运载火箭“会学习”[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 525055-525055.
[10]	赵剑, 黄悦琛, 李海阳, 何湘粤. 垂直起降运载火箭返回轨迹不确定性优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524829-524829.
[11]	王莉, 戴泽华, 杨善水, 毛玲, 严仰光. 电气化飞机电力系统智能化设计研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522405-522405.
[12]	田继超, 宋强, 洪刚, 张然. 常规运载火箭解决落区安全问题的方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(S1): 722302-722302.
[13]	杨一雄, 杨体浩, 白俊强, 史亚云, 卢磊. HLFC后掠翼优化设计的若干问题[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(1): 121448-121448.
[14]	杨体浩, 白俊强, 史亚云, 杨一雄, 卢磊. 考虑吸气分布影响的HLFC机翼优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12): 121158-121158.
[15]	张晓晨, 林朝光, 王振峰, 于明星, 谈和平. 飞行器热天线热电联合计算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(S1): 66-72.