钛合金螺旋铣孔孔径偏差研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23841

材料工程与机械制造

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

钛合金螺旋铣孔孔径偏差研究

董志刚, 高宇, 康仁科, 杨国林, 鲍岩

大连理工大学机械工程学院, 大连 116024

收稿日期:2020-01-15 修回日期:2020-02-03 发布日期:2020-03-26
通讯作者: 康仁科 E-mail:kangrk@dlut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2017YFB1301701）；上海飞机制造有限公司科研项目（COMAC-SFGS-2018-2783）

Hole diameter deviation in helical milling of titanium alloy

DONG Zhigang, GAO Yu, KANG Renke, YANG Guolin, BAO Yan

School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2020-01-15 Revised:2020-02-03 Published:2020-03-26
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Project (2017YFB1301701); Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Aircraft Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (COMAC-SFGS-2018-2783)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 螺旋铣孔是航空航天领域新出现的制孔技术，其切削过程中会产生径向切削力，从而引起刀具变形并造成孔径偏差。针对该问题开展了钛合金螺旋铣孔孔径偏差试验，分析了包括进给方向在内的不同加工参数对孔径偏差的影响规律；基于螺旋铣孔运动学原理对不同进给方向下的材料去除过程和径向切削力方向进行了研究，分析了不同进给方向下的孔径偏差变化规律及形成原因，并设计切削力试验进行了验证；通过分析不同加工参数下的未变形切屑形状及径向切削力变化情况，研究了各加工参数对孔径变化趋势的影响规律。研究结果表明，当进给方向为顺时针时，刀具受背离孔心的径向切削力的作用向孔径外侧发生挠曲变形，导致所加工孔径大于理论孔径；当进给方向为逆时针时则相反。进给速度和导程的增加将加剧孔径偏差，切削速度的增加则会减弱孔径偏差。

关键词: 螺旋铣孔, 孔径偏差, 径向切削力, 刀具变形, 进给方向, 钛合金

Abstract: Helical milling is a newly developed hole-making technology in aircraft assembly. The radial cutting force generated in the process of helical milling causes deflection deformation of the tool, resulting in hole diameter deviation. To overcome this problem, the hole diameter deviation test of helical milling is performed on titanium alloy, and the effect of different processing parameters including feed direction on hole diameter deviation is analyzed. Based on the kinematic principle of helical milling, the material removal mechanism and the radial cutting force direction are studied, and variation rules and the formation reasons of hole diameter deviation are analyzed in different feed directions, which is further verified by the cutting force test of helical milling. In addition, the shape of undeformed chip and the change of radial cutting force were examined with different processing parameters, followed by the study of the parameter effect on the change trend of the hole diameter. Results show that the tool is affected by radial cutting force in directions away from the hole center, leading to deflection deformation away from the hole center, and further resulting in hole diameter being larger than the nominal hole diameter in a clockwise feed direction. The opposite is true when the feed direction is counterclockwise. The hole diameter deviation is aggravated with the increase of feed speed and pitch, while weakened with that of the cutting speed.

Key words: helical milling, hole diameter deviation, radial cutting force, deflection deformation of tool, feed direction, titanium alloy

中图分类号:

V261.2⁺2

董志刚, 高宇, 康仁科, 杨国林, 鲍岩. 钛合金螺旋铣孔孔径偏差研究[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 423841-423841.

DONG Zhigang, GAO Yu, KANG Renke, YANG Guolin, BAO Yan. Hole diameter deviation in helical milling of titanium alloy[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(3): 423841-423841.

参考文献

[1] 王黎明, 冯潼能. 数字化自动钻铆技术在飞机制造中的应用[J]. 航空制造技术, 2008(11):42-45. WANG L M, FENG T N. Application of digital automatic drill-riveting technology in aircraft manufacture[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2008(11):42-45(in Chinese).
[2] 康仁科, 杨国林, 董志刚, 等. 飞机装配中的先进制孔技术与装备[J]. 航空制造技术, 2016, 59(10):16-24. KANG R K, YANG G L, DONG Z G, et al. Advanced hold machining technology and equipment for aircraft assembly[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 59(10):16-24(in Chinese).
[3] 刘刚, 陈祖朋, 高凯晔, 等. 基于机器人载体的螺旋铣制孔精度研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(5):1047-58. LIU G, CHEN Z P, GAO K Y, et al. Borehole accuracy study on a robotic orbital drilling system[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(5):1047-58(in Chinese).
[4] 杨国林, 董志刚, 康仁科, 等. 螺旋铣孔技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2020,41(7):623311. YANG G L, DONG Z G, KANG R K, et al. Research progress of helical milling[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020,41(7):623311(in Chinese).
[5] 王欢, 董志刚, 康仁科, 等. 钛合金螺旋铣孔的切削力和切削温度试验研究[J]. 航空制造技术, 2016(9):91-97. WANG H, DONG Z G, KANG R K, et al. Experimental investigation of cutting force and cutting temperature on helical milling of titanium alloy[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2016(9):91-97(in Chinese).
[6] BRINKSMEIER E, FANGMANN S, RENTSCH R. Drilling of composites and resulting surface integrity[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 60(1):57-60.
[7] VOSS R, HENERICHS M, KUSTER F. Comparison of conventional drilling and orbital drilling in machining carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP)[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 65(1):137-140.
[8] SADEK A, MESHREKI M, ATTIA M H. Characterization and optimization of orbital drilling of woven carbon fiber reinforced epoxy laminates[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 61(1):123-126.
[9] QIN X D, SUN X T, WANG Q, et al. Comparative study on helical milling and drilling of Ti-6Al-4V[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2012, 499:200-204.
[10] PEREIRA R B D, BRANDÃO L C, PAIVA A P D, et al. A review of helical milling process[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2017, 120:27-48.
[11] DENKENA B, BOEHNKE D, DEGE J H. Helical milling of CFRP-titanium layer compounds[J]. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2008, 1(2):64-69.
[12] ZHOU L, KE Y L, DONG H Y, et al. Hole diameter variation and roundness in dry orbital drilling of CFRP/Ti stacks[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 87(1-4):811-824.
[13] 陈祖朋. 难加工材料螺旋铣孔加工质量研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2015. CHEN Z P. Study on hole-making quality for hard-machining material in orbital drilling[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2015(in Chinese).
[14] 李士鹏, 田利成, 秦旭达, 等. 基于螺旋铣孔柔性切削力建模的孔径误差补偿[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2017,50(2):147-153. LI S P, TIAN L C, QIN X D, et al. Diameter deviation compensation based on flexible cutting force model in hole helical milling process[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2017, 50(2):147-153(in Chinese).
[15] 潘泽民. CFRP/Ti复合结构螺旋铣孔自动控制技术研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2016. PAN Z M. Study on automatic control technology of hecal milling on CFRP/Ti composite structures[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2016(in Chinese).
[16] 吉春辉, 田利成, 秦旭达, 等. 钛合金螺旋铣孔与传统钻孔的加工质量对比[J]. 机械工程材料, 2015, 39(5):9-11. JI C H, TIAN L C, QIN X D, et al. Processing quality comparison of holes in titanium alloy made by helical milling and traditional drilling[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 39(5):9-11(in Chinese).
[17] BRINKSMEIER E, FANGMANN S, MEYER I. Orbital drilling kinematics[J]. Production Engineering, 2008, 2(3):277-283.
[18] 许君. C/E复合材料螺旋铣孔加工试验研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2017. XU J. The Research on helical milling experiments of C/E composites[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2017(in Chinese).
[19] 谢海龙, 董志刚, 康仁科, 等. C/E复合材料螺旋铣孔切屑形状与切削温度研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017,43(2):328-334. XIE H L, DONG Z G, KANG R K, et al. Chip shape and cutting temperature of helical milling of C/E composites[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017,43(2):328-334(in Chinese).
[20] OZTURK O M, KILIC Z M, ALTINTAS Y. Mechanics and dynamics of orbital drilling operations[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2018, 129:37-47.
[21] LI Z L, DING Y, ZHU L M. Accurate cutting force prediction of helical milling operations considering the cutter runout effect[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 92:4133-44.
[22] WANG H Y, QIN X D, REN C Z, et al. Prediction of cutting forces in helical milling process[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 58:849-859.
[23] REY P A, LEDREF J, SENATORE J, et al. Modelling of cutting forces in orbital drilling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2016, 106:75-88.
[24] DENKENA B, NESPOR D, REHE M, et al. Process force prediction in orbital drilling of TiAl6V4[C]//9th International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 2016:113-128.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

钛合金螺旋铣孔孔径偏差研究

Hole diameter deviation in helical milling of titanium alloy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	盛方怡, 杨国林, 孟凡通, 董志刚, 康仁科. 沉头孔螺旋铣削加工有限元仿真分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 428690-428690.
[2]	李晖, 吕海宇, 邹泽煜, 罗忠, 马辉, 韩清凯. 热环境下纤维增强复合材料圆柱壳非线性振动分析与验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425642-425642.
[3]	罗圣峰, 王光健, 马小斌, 郑丽丽, 汪瑞军. 钛液滴作用下钛合金薄片火蔓延的数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425652-425652.
[4]	赵静波, 徐正扬, 刘强. 扩压器扭曲型面电解加工阴极进给方向优化及试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525570-525570.
[5]	肖贵坚, 刘帅, 贺毅, 刘岗, 朱升旺, 宋沙雨. 钛合金激光砂带加工的离焦控制与表面形貌[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525603-525603.
[6]	彭振龙, 张翔宇, 张德远. 航空航天难加工材料高速超声波动式切削方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525587-525587.
[7]	陈波, 孟正, 马程远, 席鑫, 王昕欣, 檀财旺, 宋晓国. 扫描振镜激光TC4钛合金焊接性能及熔池流动行为[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525223-525223.
[8]	刘浩, 陈玉华, 章文滔. Ti/Al无针搅拌摩擦搭接点焊接头组织特征[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 624680-624680.
[9]	邹祺, 叶逸云, 焦俊科, 吴志生, 徐子法, 张文武. 碳纤维增强热固性复合材料-钛合金激光连接接头性能分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 625037-625037.
[10]	杨换平, 庄唯, 王耀勉, 剡文斌. 剧烈塑性变形对钛合金热氧化的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 424656-424656.
[11]	张志强, 杨凡, 张宏伟, 张天刚. 含稀土TiC_x增强钛基激光熔覆层组织与耐磨性[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 624115-624115.
[12]	郭怡东, 马玉娥, 李佩谣. 增材制造钛合金微桁架夹芯板低速冲击响应[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 423820-423820.
[13]	袁经纬, 李卓, 汤海波, 程序. 热处理对激光增材制造TC4合金耐蚀性及室温压缩蠕变性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 524390-524390.
[14]	李远霄, 焦锋, 张世杰, 张顺, 王雪, 童景琳. 高低频复合振动钻削CFRP/钛合金叠层结构试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 524802-524802.
[15]	张纪奎, 孔祥艺, 马少俊, 刘栋, 王新波, 冯军, 王华明. 激光增材制造高强高韧TC11钛合金力学性能及航空主承力结构应用分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 525430-525430.