CFD中统计误差的数值精度分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23554

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

CFD中统计误差的数值精度分析

闵耀兵, 马燕凯, 李松

中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2019-10-09 修回日期:2019-11-29 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2019-11-28
通讯作者: 李松 E-mail:lisonic@foxmail.com

Accuracy analysis of numerical error with statistical forms in CFD

MIN Yaobing, MA Yankai, LI Song

China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2019-10-09 Revised:2019-11-29 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2019-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在计算流体力学（CFD）的算法研究中经常会对离散误差进行数值精度分析，通常以统计误差的各范数为研究对象，最常用的统计误差范数为L₁范数、L₂范数和L_∞范数，一般认为各范数在数值精度上具有等价性。实际上，由于流场局部存在间断、网格局部不连续或者是在极值点附近采用非线性加权插值等可能使数值方法存在局部降阶问题，导致统计误差各范数所表达的数值精度并不一致。通过详细的理论分析，揭示了统计误差各范数所表达的数值精度之间的关系，并通过相应的数值试验予以验证。研究结果不仅能够指导CFD算法的数值精度验证工作，而且也可为更为复杂流动模拟的数值精度判定提供理论依据。

关键词: 统计误差, 误差范数, 数值精度, 精度分析, 降阶

Abstract: Generally, the accuracy of an algorithm should be validated numerically in Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD), and the research object is composed by statistical norms of numerical error, which is usually represented by the L₁ norm, the L₂ norm, and the L_∞ norm based on the hypothesis that each norm is equivalent in accuracy order. In reality, there are locally discontinuities of flow variables, non-smoothness of mesh, and nonlinear interpolations near critical points that will result in the loss in accuracy of numerical algorithm, causing different numerical orders of accuracy of each norm of numerical error. By carrying out detailed theoretical analysis, the relationship of different error norms in accuracy order is exhibited in this paper and is soon validated by numerical experiments. The research results in this paper can not only serve as a guide to the validation of the accuracy order in a CFD algorithm, but also theoretically support the judgement of numerical simulation order with more complex flow.

Key words: statistical error, norm of error, numerical accuracy, analysis of accuracy, loss in accuracy

中图分类号:

V211.3

闵耀兵, 马燕凯, 李松. CFD中统计误差的数值精度分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(4): 123554-123554.

MIN Yaobing, MA Yankai, LI Song. Accuracy analysis of numerical error with statistical forms in CFD[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 123554-123554.

参考文献 19

[1]	DENG X G, MAEKAWA H. Compact high-order accurate nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 130:77-91.
[2]	DENG X G, MAO M L, TU G H, et al. Extending weighted compact nonlinear schemes to complex grids with characteristic-based interface conditions[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(12):2840-2851.
[3]	DENG X G, ZHANG H X. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 165:22-44.
[4]	JIANG G S, SHU C W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 126:202-228.
[5]	CASPER J, ATKINS H L. A finite-volume high order ENO scheme for two dimensional hyperbolic systems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993, 106:62-76.
[6]	CASPER J, SHU C W, ATKINS H. Comparison of two formulations for high-order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(10):1970-1977.
[7]	宫兆新,鲁传敬,黄华雄.虚拟解法分析浸入边界法的精度[J].应用数学和力学,2010, 31(10):1141-1151. GONG Z X, LU C J, HUANG H X. Accuracy analysis of the immersed boundary method using the method of manufactured solutions[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2010, 31(10):1141-1151(in Chinese).
[8]	CARPENTER M H, CASPER J. The accuracy of shock capturing in two spatial dimensions:AIAA-1997-2107[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1997.
[9]	SVARD M, NORDSTROM J. Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial-boundary-value problems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 268:17-38.
[10]	ABARBANEL S, DITKOWSKI A, GUSTAFSSON B. On error bounds of finite difference approximations to partial differential equations-temporal behavior and rate of convergence[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2000, 15(1):79-116.
[11]	赵秉新.一维非定常对流扩散方程的高阶组合紧致迎风格式[J].数值计算与计算机应用,2012, 33(2):138-148. ZHAO B X. A high-order combined compact upwind difference scheme for solving 1D unsteady convection-diffusion equation[J]. Journal on Numerical Methods and Computer Applications, 2012, 33(2):138-148(in Chinese).
[12]	涂国华,邓小刚,闵耀兵,等. CFD空间精度分析方法及4种典型畸形网格中WCNS格式精度测试[J].空气动力学学报,2014, 32(4):425-432. TU G H, DENG X G, MIN Y B, et al. Method for evaluating spatial accuracy order of CFD and applications to WCNS scheme on four typically distorted meshes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(4):425-432(in Chinese).
[13]	MAO M L, ZHU H J, DENG X G, et al. Effect of geometric conservation law on improving spatial accuracy for finite difference schemes on two-dimensional nonsmooth grids[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2015, 18(3):673-706.
[14]	HENRICK A K, ASLAM T D, POWERS J M. Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes:Achieving optimal order near critical points[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 207:542-567.
[15]	DENG X G, MAO M L, TU G H, et al. Geometric conservation law and applications to high-order finite difference schemes with stationary grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230:1100-1115.
[16]	STEGER J L. Implicit finite difference simulation of flow about arbitrary geometrics with application to airfoils:AIAA-1977-0665[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1977.
[17]	STEGER J L. Implicit finite difference simulation of flow about arbitrary two-dimensional geometries[J]. AIAA Journal, 1978, 16(7):679-686.
[18]	YAN Z G, LIU H Y, MAO M L, et al. New nonlinear weights for improving accuracy and resolution of weighted compact nonlinear scheme[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2016, 127:226-240.
[19]	YAN Z G, LIU H Y, MA Y K, et al. Further improvement of weighted compact nonlinear scheme using compact nonlinear interpolation[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2017, 156:135-145.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

CFD中统计误差的数值精度分析

Accuracy analysis of numerical error with statistical forms in CFD

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋海浪, 张建东, 史国庆, 杨啟明, 张耀中. 航空火控系统试飞综合评估技术与方法探讨[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529687-529687.
[2]	张桂玮, 刘召庆, 朱镭, 张衡, 田玮, 李伟光, 杨智春. 地面颤振模拟试验技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 29229-029229.
[3]	张宏岩, 王伟, 陈仕伟, 纪毅, 刘佳琪. 基于全驱系统方法的制导控制一体化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 628891-628891.
[4]	曹文博, 刘溢浪, 张伟伟. 基于降阶模型和梯度优化的流场加速收敛方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127090-127090.
[5]	王梓伊, 张伟伟, 刘磊, 杨肖峰. 适用于复杂流动的热气动弹性降阶建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126807-126807.
[6]	武宇飞, 龙腾, 史人赫, 张尧. 跨域变体飞行器气动力热非层次多模型融合降阶方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528259-528259.
[7]	师妍, 万志强, 吴志刚, 杨超. 基于气动力降阶的弹性飞机阵风响应仿真分析及验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 125474-125474.
[8]	陈志强, 刘战合, 苗楠, 冯伟. 基于增量学习的非定常气动力参数化降阶模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 125103-125103.
[9]	任峰, 高传强, 唐辉. 机器学习在流动控制领域的应用及发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524686-524686.
[10]	王怡星, 韩仁坤, 刘子扬, 张扬, 陈刚. 流体力学深度学习建模技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524779-524779.
[11]	董雷霆, 周轩, 赵福斌, 贺双新, 卢志远, 冯建民. 飞机结构数字孪生关键建模仿真技术[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 23981-023981.
[12]	张伟伟, 高弈奇, 全金楼, 苏丹. 失谐叶栅的受迫振动响应特性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(9): 521018-521018.
[13]	祁俊威, 王春洁, 丁建中. 基于降维算法和等效杆长的可展结构精度分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 220590-220590.
[14]	王梓伊, 张伟伟. 适用于参数可调结构的非定常气动力降阶建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 220829-220829.
[15]	柴国钟, 吕君, 鲍雨梅, 姜献峰, 丁浩. 表面裂纹疲劳扩展和寿命计算的高效高精度数值分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12): 221291-221291.