民机四维航迹/姿态一体化自适应控制

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.22437

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

民机四维航迹/姿态一体化自适应控制

樊垚¹, 邵兴悦², 李清东³, 任章³

1. 中国船舶工业系统工程研究院信息系统研究所, 北京 100094;
2. 北京机电工程总体设计部, 北京 100854;
3. 北京航空航天大学自动化科学与电气工程学院, 北京 100083

出版日期:2019-02-15 发布日期:2019-03-02
通讯作者: 樊垚 E-mail:vandoc@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61503009，61333011，61421063）；航空科学基金（2016ZA51005）；上海民用飞机健康监控工程技术研究中心基金（SAST2016003）

Integrated 4D trajectory and attitude adaptive controller for civil aircraft

FAN Yao¹, SHAO Xingyue², LI Qingdong³, REN Zhang³

1. Information System Research Department, System Engineering Research Institute, Beijing 100094, China;
2. Beijing System Design Institute of Electro-Mechanic, Beijing 100854, China;
3. School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-03-02
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61503009, 61333011 and 61421063); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China(2016ZA51005); Fund of Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Civil Aircraft Health Monitoring(SAST2016003)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 出于运营效率和飞行安全的考虑，民用飞机在航路终端区需有效减少飞行总系统误差（TSE），提高空域资源利用率。在此航段中，飞行技术误差（FTE）是最主要的组成部分，需采用引导控制一体化的设计思想，实现民机起飞/着陆段四维航迹精确跟踪，有效减小飞行技术误差。基于回路传递函数恢复（LTR）技术协调设计随机线性系统状态观测器和最优控制器，解决大气紊流作用下的民机飞行控制系统设计问题。在此基础上，引入自适应投影算子估计大气扰动导致的气动参数不确定性，并对其作用效果进行补偿。仿真结果表明，基于LQG/LTR（Linear Quadratic Gaussian/Loop Transfer Recovery）控制技术的自适应飞行控制律可以有效抑制气动参数不确定性影响，能够实现民机四维航迹/姿态一体化高精度控制的目标。

关键词: 新航行体系, 基于性能导航, 飞行技术误差, 航迹控制, 一体化控制, 自适应控制

Abstract: Considering operating efficiency and flight safety, it is necessary to reduce the Total System Error (TSE) to improve the airspace resource utilization in the terminal area of the air route. During this route segment, Flight Technology Error (FTE) is the main composition. By proposing guidance and control integration design according to accurate tracking problem of four-dimensional trajectory during take-off and landing stage to reduce the flight technology error effectively. Considering the atmosphere turbulence, Loop Transfer Recovery (LTR) has been used to design state observer and optimal control and has realized the flight controller of civil aircraft. Based on that, the adaptive projection operator has been used to estimate the aerodynamic parameter uncertainties in inhomogeneous wind field and the uncertainties have been compensated. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the adaptive controller based on Linear Quadratic Gaussian/Loop Transfer Recovery (LQG/LTR) control technology can restrain the effect caused by uncertainty of aerodynamic parameters and atmospheric turbulence, and an integration controller of four-dimensional trajectory and attitudes for civil aircraft has been achieved.

Key words: future air navigation systems, performance based navigation, flight technology error, trajectory control, integration control, adaptive control

中图分类号:

V249.122

樊垚, 邵兴悦, 李清东, 任章. 民机四维航迹/姿态一体化自适应控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522437-522437.

FAN Yao, SHAO Xingyue, LI Qingdong, REN Zhang. Integrated 4D trajectory and attitude adaptive controller for civil aircraft[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522437-522437.

参考文献

[1] PETER D S, KARL R H, CHARLES A S. Validation of an integrated flight and propulsion control design for fighter aircraft[C]//23rd Joint Propulsion Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1987:1928.
[2] LAMBERT H H, GILYARD G B, CHISHOLM J D, et al. Preliminary flight evaluation of an engine performance optimization algorithm[C]//27th Joint Propulsion Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1991:1998.
[3] SMITH R H, CHISHOLM J D, STEWART J F. Optimizing aircraft performance with adaptive integrated flight/propulsion control[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1991, 113(1):87-94.
[4] WILLIAMS D E, RICHMAN J, FRIEDLAND B. Design of an integrated strapdown guidance and control system for a tactical missile[C]//AIAA Guidance and Control Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1983:2169.
[5] IDAN M, SHIMA T. Integrated sliding mode guidance and control for a missile with on-off actuators[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(4):1081-1089.
[6] SHTESSEL Y B, SHKOLNIKOV I A, LEVANT A. Guidance and control of missile interceptor using second-order sliding modes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2009, 45(1):110-124.
[7] KIM B S, CALISE A J, SATTIGERI R. Adaptive integrated guidance and control design for line-of-sight based formation flight[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamic, 2007, 30(5):1386-1398.
[8] KIM B, KIM J, KIM B, et al. Adaptive integrated guidance and control design for automatic landing of a fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 25(4):490-500.
[9] SHARMA M, RICHARDS N. Adaptive integrated guidance and control for missile interceptors[C]//AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2004:4880.
[10] MENON K, OHLMEYER E J. Integrated design of agile missile guidance and autopilot systems[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2001(9):1095-1106.
[11] MENON K, OHLMEYER E J. Nonlinear integrated guidance-control laws for homing missiles[C]//AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2001:4160.
[12] MENON K, OHLMEYEN E J. Optimal fixed-interval integrated guidance-control laws for hit-to-kill missiles[C]//AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2003:5579.
[13] 张杨, 吴文海, 汪杰. 舰载无人机横侧向着舰控制律设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1):721489. ZHANG Y, WU W H, WANG J. Design of carrier UAV lateral/directional landing control law[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(S1):721489(in Chinese).
[14] TIAN Y, LI Y, REN Z. Vision-based adaptive guidance law for intercepting a manoeuvring target[J]. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2011, 5(3):421-428.
[15] CHOI H, KIM Y. UAV guidance using a monocular-vision sensor for aerial target tracking[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2014, 22(1):10-19.
[16] MEHTA S S, TON C, KAN Z, et al. Vision-based navigation and guidance of a sensorless missile[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2015, 352(12):5569-5598.
[17] WEN L, TAO G, YANG H, et al. Aircraft turbulence compensation using adaptive multivariable disturbance rejection techniques[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 38(5):954-962.
[18] 肖业伦, 金长江. 大气扰动中的飞行力学[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1991:11-89. XIAO Y L, JIN C J. Flight dynamics in atmospheric disturbance[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 1991:11-89(in Chinese).
[19] 肖业伦. 飞行器运动方程[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 1987:62-89. XIAO Y L. Kinematic equation of aviation aircraft[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 1987:62-89(in Chinese).
[20] 秦永元. 卡尔曼滤波与组合导航原理[M]. 西安:西北工业大学出版社, 2012:170-175. QIN Y Y. Theory of Kalman filter and integrated navigation[M]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2012:170-175(in Chinese).
[21] DOYLE J C. Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1978, 23(4):756-757.
[22] DOYLE J C, STEIN G. Multivariable feedback design:Concepts for a classical/modern synthesis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1981, 26(1):4-16.
[23] RIDGELY D B, BANDA S S, MCQUADE T E, et al. Linear-quadratic-gaussian with loop-transfer recovery methodology for an unmanned aircraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1987, 10(1):82-89.
[24] ZHOU K, REN Z. A new controller architecture for high performance robust and fault-tolerant Control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2001, 46(10):1613-1618.
[25] 韩京清. 自抗扰控制技术[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2009:183-207. HAN J Q. Active disturbance rejection control technique[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2009:183-207(in Chinese).
[26] CHEN X, LI D H, GAO Z Q, et al. Tuning method for second-order active disturbance rejection control[C]//Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2011:6322-6327.
[27] 李杰, 齐晓慧, 夏元清, 等. 线性/非线性自抗扰切换控制方法研究[J]. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(2):202-212. LI J, QI X H, XIA Y Q, et al. On linear/nonlinear active disturbance rejection switching control[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(2):202-212(in Chinese).
[28] STEPANYAN V, HOVAKIMYAN N. Adaptive disturbance rejection controller for visual tracking of a maneuvering target[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(4):1090-1106.
[29] SASTRY S, BODSON M. Adaptive control:Stability, convergence and robustness[M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1989:18-19.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

民机四维航迹/姿态一体化自适应控制

Integrated 4D trajectory and attitude adaptive controller for civil aircraft

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨晓伟, 葛曜文, 邓文翔, 姚建勇, 周宁. 航空发动机导叶控制机构作动筒主动容错控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625464-625464.
[2]	吴宝海, 张阳, 郑志阳, 张莹, 张思琪. 数控加工进给速度参数优化研究现状与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525467-525467.
[3]	石忠佼, 朱化杰, 赵良玉, 刘志杰. 考虑舵机动力学的旋转弹自适应解耦控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 325068-325068.
[4]	黄旭星, 李爽, 杨彬, 孙盼, 刘学文, 刘新彦. 人工智能在航天器制导与控制中的应用综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524201-524201.
[5]	张普, 薛惠锋, 高山. 基于分布式自适应的多智能体容错一致性控制[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 323539-323539.
[6]	张佳龙, 闫建国, 张普. 基于自适应方法的多无人机编队队形控制[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 323385-323385.
[7]	陈弈澄, 齐瑞云, 张嘉芮, 王焕杰. 混合小推力航天器轨道保持高性能滑模控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(7): 322827-322827.
[8]	冯宜明, 王建中, 施家栋. 基于自适应的变形式陆空机器人转域过程飞行控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6): 322691-322691.
[9]	刘将辉, 李海阳, 张政, 李晓超. 相对失控翻滚目标悬停的自适应模糊滑模控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(5): 322430-322430.
[10]	李晓宝, 赵国荣, 张友安, 郭志强. 自适应严格收敛非奇异终端滑模制导律[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(5): 322569-322569.
[11]	易科, 陈建, 梁子璇, 任章, 李清东. 半捷联位标器稳定跟踪与弹体姿态一体化控制[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3752-3763.
[12]	陈炳龙, 耿云海. 对失控航天器在轨服务的自适应滑模控制器设计[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(5): 1639-1649.
[13]	孟中杰, 黄攀峰, 王东科. 空间绳系机器人捕获目标后的面内自适应回收方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12): 4035-4042.
[14]	朱旭, 张逊逊, 尤谨语, 闫茂德, 屈耀红. 基于信息一致性的无人机紧密编队集结控制[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12): 3919-3929.
[15]	肖地波, 陆宇平, 刘燕斌, 许晨. 应用保护映射理论的高超声速飞行器自适应控制律设计[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(10): 3327-3337.