动基座近舰面流场数值模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22131

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

动基座近舰面流场数值模拟

李旭^1,2, 祝小平², 周洲^1,2, 郭佳豪^1,2

1. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072;
2. 西北工业大学无人机特种技术重点实验室, 西安 710065

收稿日期:2018-03-09 修回日期:2018-06-19 出版日期:2018-12-15 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 周洲 E-mail:zhouzhou@nwpu.edu.cn

Numerical simulation of flow field during landing for carrier-based aircraft near a moving base

LI Xu^1,2, ZHU Xiaoping², ZHOU Zhou^1,2, GUO Jiahao^1,2

1. College of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
2. Science and Technology on UAV Laboratory, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710065, China

Received:2018-03-09 Revised:2018-06-19 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 航母尾迹流场对舰载机的着舰有较大影响，所以需要对其流场特点进行研究，分析不同状态下舰载机气动特性的变化。采用嵌套网格技术对航母处于垂荡状态下无人机的着舰进行了模拟。首先，利用SFS2舰船进行数值计算，验证了舰船流场的数值模拟方法。然后，对比了单独无人机定常与非定常计算结果，表明所建立的嵌套网格适用于无人机流场的模拟。接着，对航母单相流和两相流的流场结果进行了分析，结果显示甲板下方的流动对甲板上方流场没有大的影响。因此，忽略了水的影响只对航母在空气流场中的特性进行研究，结果表明航母尾迹非定常特性明显，静止航母下滑轨迹上的速度均处于周期性波动状态，且波动幅值随着远离航母而逐渐衰减；而在垂荡情况下航母尾迹变得更加紊乱，水平方向速度波动的周期性减弱，但垂向速度的波动幅值进一步增大。对于静止航母，无人机在不同时刻着舰气动特性的变化也存在差异；当航母处于垂荡状态时，无人机的升力和俯仰力矩在短时间内会有更大的波动。

关键词: 舰船尾迹, 嵌套网格, 垂荡, 非定常气动力, 着舰

Abstract: The major influence of ship awake on the landing for the carrier-based aircraft calls for studies on the characteristics of its flow field, and the analyses of the aerodynamic change of carrier-based aircraft in different airwakes. Thus, adopting overset mesh technique, a numerical simulation of UAV's landing in the heave of aircraft carrier is carried out. Firstly, the appropriate calculation method for the ship flow field is verified by comparing the simulation results of SFS2 with the experiment data. Secondly, by comparing the flow fields of single UAV in steady and unsteady conditions, the feasibility of overset mesh method for the landing of the UAV is verified. Next, the velocities of aircraft carrier's flow field at single phase flow and two-phase flow are compared. The results indicate that the flow under the deck does not significantly affect the velocity above the deck. Thus, the influence of water for aircraft carrier can be neglected and only the flow field in air is analyzed. The simulations show that the airwake of the aircraft carrier is significantly unsteady; the velocities of the landing track for a stationary ship shows more periodic fluctuation; and the fluctuation amplitude weakens with the increase of the distance from the ship. For the heave case, ship airwake becomes more complicated that the the periodic fluctuation of horizontal velocity fades, but the fluctuation amplitude of vertical velocity strengthens significantly. Meanwhile, for the stationary ship, the aerodynamic change of the UAV is different when landing at different times; for the ship in the heave motion, the lift and pitch moments of the UAV will demonstrate more fluctuations in a short period of time.

Key words: ship airwake, overset mesh, heave, unsteady aerodynamics, carrier landing

中图分类号:

V211

李旭, 祝小平, 周洲, 郭佳豪. 动基座近舰面流场数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 122131-122131.

LI Xu, ZHU Xiaoping, ZHOU Zhou, GUO Jiahao. Numerical simulation of flow field during landing for carrier-based aircraft near a moving base[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(12): 122131-122131.

参考文献

[1] 贺少华, 刘东岳, 谭大力, 等. 载机舰船气流场相关研究综述[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2014, 36(2):1-7. HE S H, LIU D Y, TAN D L, et al. A review of researches on ship airwakes[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2014, 36(2):1-7(in Chinese).
[2] 江永泉. 舰载机设计特点与技术性能分析[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2013. JIANG Y Q. Design feature and technical performance analysis of carrier-based aircraft[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2013(in Chinese).
[3] 贾忠湖,高永,韩维. 航母纵摇对舰载机弹射起飞的限制研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2002, 20(2):19-21. JIA Z H, GAO Y, HAN W. Research on the limitation of vertical toss to the warship-based aircraft's catapult-assisted take-off[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2002, 20(2):19-21(in Chinese).
[4] 段萍萍, 聂宏, 魏小辉. 航母运动对无人机着舰拦阻性能的影响分析[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 26(1):53-60. DUAN P P, NIE H, WEI X H. Effect of carrier movement on aircraft's landing and arresting performance[J]. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Natural Sciences), 2012, 26(1):53-60(in Chinese).
[5] POLSKY S. CFD prediction of airwake flow fields for ships experiencing beam winds[C]//AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2003.
[6] POLSKY S, NAYLOR S. CVN airwake modeling and integration:Initial steps in the creation and implementation of a virtual burble for F-18 carrier landing simulations[C]//AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2005.
[7] POLSKY S A. A computational study of unsteady ship airwake[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[8] 王金玲, 郜冶, 刘长猛. 适用于复杂船型的网格类型研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015(11):99-103. WANG J L, GAO Y, LIU C M. Research on mesh type for complex ship[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015(11):99-103(in Chinese).
[9] 郜冶, 刘长猛, 贺征. 风向变化产生的航母甲板涡结构特征研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2013, 31(3):310-315. GAO Y, LIU C M, HE Z. Research on CVN deck vortices structure characteristics caused by wind direction changes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(3):310-315(in Chinese).
[10] 刘长猛. 大尺度船舶构造物湍流风场数值研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2014. LIU C M. Numerical simulation of turbulent wind field around large-scale marine structures[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2014(in Chinese).
[11] 王伟. 大型舰船流场的数值计算[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2010. WANG W. The numerical calculation of flow field around large naval vessel[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2010(in Chinese).
[12] 安军. 航母尾流模拟及舰载机着舰控制的初步研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2012. AN J. Numerical simulation of aircraft carrier airwake and preliminary study on control law for automatic carrier landing[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2012(in Chinese).
[13] CASTIGLIONE T, STERN F, BOVA S, et al. Numerical investigation of the seakeeping behavior of a catamaran advancing in regular head waves[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(16):1806-1822.
[14] HUANG J, CARRICA P M, STERN F. A geometry-based level set method for curvilinear overset grids with application to ship hydrodynamics[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2012, 68(4):494-521.
[15] 郜冶, 谢辉松. 滑跃起飞过程舰体周围流场的数值模拟[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2008, 26(4):513-518. GAO Y, XIE H S. The numerical simulation of flow around the warship during ramp ski-jump take-off[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2008, 26(4):513-518(in Chinese).
[16] CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Numerical study of helicopter rotors in ship airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6):1813-1832.
[17] 苏大成, 史勇杰, 徐国华, 等. 直升机/舰船耦合流场的数值模拟研究[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7):75-86. SU D C, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Numerical study of the coupled flowfield of ship/helicopter[D]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7):75-86(in Chinese).
[18] RAJMOHAN N, ZHAO J, KIM JEE W, et al. An efficient POD technique to model rotor/ship airwake interaction[C]//American Helicopter Society 68th Annual Forum, 2012.
[19] RAJMOHAN N, HE C. A VPM/CFD coupling methodology to study rotor/ship aerodynamic interaction[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2016.
[20] 吉洪蕾, 陈仁良, 李攀. 耦合POD重构舰面流场的直升机舰面起降数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(3):771-779. JI H L, CHEN R L, LI P. Numerical simulation of a helicopter operating in a reconstructed ship airwake based on the POD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(3):771-779(in Chinese).
[21] 段萍萍. 舰载无人机着舰过程动力学性能分析[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2011. DUAN P P. Investigation on dynamic performance analysis for carrier-based aircraft during landing process[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011(in Chinese).
[22] FORREST J S, OWEN I. An investigation of ship airwakes using detached-eddy simulation[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 39(4):656-673.
[23] MENTER F R. Two equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1598-1605.
[24] HUNT J C R, WRAY A A, MOIN P. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows[R]. Center for Turbulence Research Report, 1988:193-208.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

动基座近舰面流场数值模拟

Numerical simulation of flow field during landing for carrier-based aircraft near a moving base

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡伟, 万文章, 陈谋. 基于神经网络和干扰观测器的UAV自动着舰控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726963-726963.
[2]	罗炯, 李志宏, 陈科, 向欢. 基于嵌套网格变几何轴对称进气道非定常数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 627028-627028.
[3]	王永庆. 固定翼舰载战斗机关键技术与未来发展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525859-525859.
[4]	梁磊, 肖静, 詹光, 苏大林. 考虑杆臂效应与挠曲变形的全自动着舰技术[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525841-525841.
[5]	张志冰, 张秀林, 王家兴, 史静平. 一种基于多操纵面控制分配的IDLC人工着舰精确控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525840-525840.
[6]	陈志强, 刘战合, 苗楠, 冯伟. 基于增量学习的非定常气动力参数化降阶模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 125103-125103.
[7]	王延灵, 卜忱, 杨文, 沈彦杰, 冯帅. 小展弦比飞翼大迎角状态空间气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124539-124539.
[8]	罗飞, 张军红, 王博, 唐瑞琳, 唐炜. 基于直接升力与动态逆的舰尾流抑制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 124770-124770.
[9]	陈森林, 高正红, 朱新奇, 庞超, 杜一鸣, 陈树生. 非稳定动态过程非定常气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(8): 123675-123675.
[10]	岑飞, 李清, 刘志涛, 蒋永, 张磊. 民机极限飞行状态的动态气动力试验与建模[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(8): 123664-123664.
[11]	沈霖, 黄达, 吴根兴, 展京霞. 战斗机大迎角非定常气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523440-523440.
[12]	向欢, 杨应凯, 谢锦睿, 吴永胜. 战斗机大迎角/过失速机动下的进气道气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523460-523460.
[13]	卢丛玲, 祁浩天, 徐国华, 史勇杰. 共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(12): 123055-123055.
[14]	左宪帅, 王立新, 刘海良, 王云, 张钰. 缩比模型模拟全尺寸飞机自动着舰的相似关系[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(12): 123005-123005.
[15]	卢丛玲, 祁浩天, 徐国华. 升力偏置对共轴刚性旋翼前飞气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(11): 122906-122906.