支柱柔性对起落架缓冲器摩擦力的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0003

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

支柱柔性对起落架缓冲器摩擦力的影响

魏小辉^1,2, 宋晓晨², 聂宏^1,2, 颜晓峰², 李利荣²

1. 南京航空航天大学机械结构力学及控制国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210016;
2. 南京航空航天大学飞行器先进设计技术国防重点学科实验室, 江苏南京 210016

收稿日期:2013-06-24 修回日期:2014-02-27 出版日期:2014-06-25 发布日期:2014-03-17
通讯作者: 魏小辉，Tel.：025-84892384 E-mail：wei_xiaohui@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:wei_xiaohui@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:魏小辉男，博士，副教授。主要研究方向：飞行器起落装置设计。Tel：025-84892384 E-mail：wei_xiaohui@nuaa.edu.cn；宋晓晨女，硕士研究生。主要研究方向：起落架缓冲器防卡滞技术。 E-mail：songxc122@163.com；聂宏男，博士，教授，博士生导师。主要研究方向：飞行器起落装置设计，结构疲劳与断裂，航天器软着陆装置设计。 E-mail：hnie@nuaa.edu.cn；颜晓峰男，硕士研究生。主要研究方向：起落架静强度试验。 E-mail：yxf1063@126.com；李利荣女，硕士研究生。主要研究方向：起落架缓冲器防卡滞技术。 E-mail：lilirong926@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51105197，11372129，51305198）；江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Effect of Shock Strut Flexibility on Landing Gear Shock Absorber Friction Force

WEI Xiaohui^1,2, SONG Xiaochen², NIE Hong^1,2, YAN Xiaofeng², LI Lirong²

1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicles, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2013-06-24 Revised:2014-02-27 Online:2014-06-25 Published:2014-03-17
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51105197, 11372129, 51305198); The Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在通过缓冲支柱柔性对起落架缓冲器摩擦力的影响研究，为起落架缓冲器摩擦力建模方法和柔性起落架防卡滞设计提供技术指导。伴随着超高强度钢的逐步应用，刚度问题成为起落架设计中日益突出的矛盾问题，传统的缓冲支柱刚性假设可能并不适用于一些新类型起落架的分析。本文结合某无人机飞行试验中出现的主起落架缓冲器卡滞问题，首次建立了考虑支柱柔性影响的起落架缓冲器摩擦力模型，计算了最严重工况下的摩擦力值，并与缓冲支柱刚性假设计算得到的摩擦力值进行了对比分析。分析表明在考虑支柱柔性和理想平面滑动轴承约束的情况下，摩擦力大小为原来的6倍，缓冲器发生卡滞。分析了平面滑动轴承的实际约束情况，提出了轴承支承变形协调系数的概念，并分析了其与摩擦力和卡滞的关系，进而研究了支柱外筒和活塞杆刚度对于缓冲器摩擦力的影响。研究表明在变形协调系数不小于0.53时，缓冲器发生卡滞；适当改变活塞杆和外筒的刚度使其相匹配可以降低缓冲器的摩擦力。

关键词: 起落架, 缓冲器, 支柱柔性, 摩擦力, 卡滞

Abstract:

In order to provide a new modeling method of the landing gear shock absorber friction force and offer technical advice about shock absorber binding, influence of the shock strut flexibility on landing gear shock absorber friction force is researched. With the use of high-strength steel, stiffness becomes an ever more serious issue. Traditional rigid shock strut presupposition may not be suitable for analysis of new types of aircraft landing gear. To address the binding occurring to an unmanned aircraft, a landing gear shock absorber friction force model is established with the shock strut flexibility taken into consideration. The friction force under the most serious case is calculated, and is compared with the force calculated without taking shock strut flexibility into account. The study shows that in the case when the shock strut flexibility is considered and under the ideal planar slide constraint, the friction force is 6 times that of the rigid model. The friction force thus can lead to shock absorber binding. Furthermore, the actual constraint forms are analyzed, and the coefficient of bearing deformation consistency is presented. The relationships of this coefficient with the friction force and shock absorber binding are analyzed. The influence is studied of the flexibility of the shock strut inner cylinder and outer cylinder on the value of the friction force. The study shows that the shock absorber will get stuck as the coefficient of bearing deformation consistency becomes no less than 0.53. Decreasing the inner cylinder's flexibility or increasing the outer cylinder's flexibility can decrease the shock absorber friction force.

Key words: landing gear, shock absorber, shock strut flexibility, friction force, binding

中图分类号:

V226
TH122

魏小辉, 宋晓晨, 聂宏, 颜晓峰, 李利荣. 支柱柔性对起落架缓冲器摩擦力的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(6): 1604-1611.

WEI Xiaohui, SONG Xiaochen, NIE Hong, YAN Xiaofeng, LI Lirong. Effect of Shock Strut Flexibility on Landing Gear Shock Absorber Friction Force[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(6): 1604-1611.

参考文献

[1] Nie H. Dynamic behavior analysis and design as well as life prediction method of landing gear. Nanjing: College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1990. (in Chinese) 聂宏. 起落架的缓冲性能分析与设计及其寿命计算方法. 南京: 南京航空航天大学航空宇航学院, 1990.

[2] Chester D H. Aircraft landing impact parametric study with emphasis on nose gear landing conditions[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2002, 39(3): 394-403.

[3] Evans P, Perhinschi M G, Mullins S. Modeling and simulation of a tricycle landing gear at normal and abnormal conditions, AIAA-2010-7618. Reston: AIAA, 2010.

[4] Batterbee D C, Sims N D, Stanway R, et al. Design and performance optimization of magneto rheological oleo pneumatic landing gear//Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 5760. Bellingham: WA, 2005.

[5] Gerardi A G. Digital simulation of flexible aircraft response to symmetrical and asymmetrical runway roughness, AFFDL-TR-77-37. Dayton, OH: Wright-Patterson AFB, 1977.

[6] Gu H B. Dynamic model of aircraft ground handling[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2001, 22(2): 163-167. (in Chinese) 顾宏斌. 飞机地面运行的动力学模型[J]. 航空学报, 2001, 22(2): 163-167.

[7] Yuan D. Establishment method of a landing gear simulation model[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2002, 20(4): 44-47. (in Chinese) 袁东. 飞机起落架仿真数学模型建立方法[J]. 飞行力学, 2002, 20(4): 44-47.

[8] Ro K. A descriptive modeling and simulation of aircraft-runway dynamics, AIAA-2003-1895. Reston: AIAA, 2003.

[9] Jia Y H, He Q Z, Yang G Z. Taxiing performance analysis of active control of landing gear[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1999, 20(6): 545-548. (in Chinese) 贾玉红, 何庆芝, 杨国柱. 主动控制起落架滑行性能分析[J]. 航空学报, 1999, 20(6): 545-548.

[10] Mu R K, Luo J J. Effect of aircraft structure flexibility on the shock-absorber behavior of landing gears[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1995, 16(2): 205-208. (in Chinese) 牟让科, 罗俊杰. 飞机结构弹性对起落架缓冲性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 1995, 16(2): 205-208.

[11] Milwitzky B, Cook F E. Analysis of landing-gear behavior, NACA Report 1154. Washington D.C.: NACA, 1953.

[12] Cook F E, Milwitzky B. Effect of interaction on landing-gear behavior and dynamic loads in a flexible airplane structure, NACA Report 1278. Washington D.C.: NACA, 1955.

[13] Wahi M. Oleopneumatic shock strut dynamic analysis and its real-time simulation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1976, 13(4): 303-308.

[14] Wei X H, Nie H. Dynamic analysis of aircraft landing impact using landing-region-based model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(6): 1631-1637.

[15] Wei X H, Liu C L, Nie H, et al. Study on dynamics and test method of carrier-based aircraft nose landing gear sudden extension[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(6): 1363-1369. (in Chinese) 魏小辉, 刘成龙, 聂宏, 等. 舰载机前起落架突伸动力学分析及试验方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(6): 1363-1369.

[16] Khapane P D. Simulation of asymmetric landing and typical ground maneuvers for large transport aircraft[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2003, 7(8): 611-619.

[17] Daniels J N. A method for landing gear modeling and simulation with experimental validation, NASA Contractor Report 201601. Washington D.C.: NASA, 1976.

[18] Clark A B. An investigation of classical dynamic scaling techniques applied to an oleo-pneumatic landing gear strut, AFWAL-TR-86-3058. Dayton, OH: Wright-Patterson AFB, 1987.

[19] Sui F C, Lu H. Mathematical model research on aircraft landing gear damper[J]. Aircraft Design, 2001(2): 44-51. (in Chinese) 隋福成, 陆华. 飞机起落架缓冲器数学模型研究[J]. 飞机设计, 2001(2): 44-51.

[20] Peng W W, Zeng W D, Kang C, et al. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and properties of 300M ultrahigh strength steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2012, 33(3): 94-98. (in Chinese) 彭雯雯, 曾卫东, 康超, 等. 热处理工艺对300M 超高强度钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报,2012, 33(3): 94-98.

[21] Liu P, Wang X D, Cai J P, et al. Corrosion behavior of low hydrogen brittleness brush plating cadmium on A100 steel in marine environment[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2013(6): 54-58. (in Chinese) 刘鹏, 王旭东, 蔡健平, 等. A100钢低氢脆刷镀镉镀层海洋环境腐蚀行为研究[J]. 材料工程, 2013(6): 54-58.

[22] The Chief Committee of Aircraft Design Manual. Aircraft design manual: takeoff and landing system design[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2002: 152-168. (in Chinese) 飞机设计手册总编委会. 飞机设计手册: 起飞着陆系统设计[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2002: 152-168.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

支柱柔性对起落架缓冲器摩擦力的影响

Effect of Shock Strut Flexibility on Landing Gear Shock Absorber Friction Force

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李文龙, 吴波, 谢帅. 有起落架布置的翼身整体结构机翼载荷测量技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 229525-229525.
[2]	郭丞皓, 于劲松, 宋悦, 尹琦, 李佳璇. 基于数字孪生的飞机起落架健康管理技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(11): 227629-227629.
[3]	王新光, 毛枚良, 何琨, 陈琦, 万钊. 壁面函数在超声速湍流模拟中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126153-126153.
[4]	赵鲲, 梁俊彪, Ivan BELYAEV, Victor KOPIEV, Gareth BENNETT. 民用飞机起落架噪声及其控制技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 26996-026996.
[5]	李跃明, 李晓云, 柴怡君, 杨雄伟. 飞机新牵引滑出方式下前起落架动响应分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526915-526915.
[6]	杜晓琼, 李斌, 罗琳胤. 水陆两栖飞机高支柱起落架的刹车振动行为[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526199-526199.
[7]	刘小川, 刘冲冲, 牟让科. 飞机起落架系统摆振动力学研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 527063-527063.
[8]	李跃明, 李晓云, 柴怡君, 杨雄伟. 飞机新牵引滑出方式下前起落架动响应分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526915-526915.
[9]	鄢荣, 何逸文, 李凯翔, 李鹏, 牟让科, 史爱明. 起落架开舱构型自激振荡预测公式改进与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 226140-226140.
[10]	彭一明, 张钊, 魏小辉, 聂宏, 谢朋朋. 结构参数对拦阻钩碰撞反弹动力学影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 224406-224406.
[11]	杨易鑫, 印寅, 聂宏, 魏小辉. 基于分岔理论的起落架撑杆式锁机构设计[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 223958-223958.
[12]	梁勇, 陈迎春, 赵鲲, 孙静, 卢翔宇, 赵昱. 锯齿单元对起落架/舱体耦合噪声抑制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 122932-122932.
[13]	杜金柱, 孟凡星, 卢学峰. 基于能量法的起落架落震试验评定准则[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4): 221375-221375.
[14]	吴靖, 胡国才, 柳泉, 刘湘一. 基于直升机地面共振要求的起落架刚度及阻尼优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 222027-222027.
[15]	房兴波, 聂宏, 张钊, 魏小辉, 张明. 计及弹射滑车质量的某舰载无人机弹射动态响应分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 222237-222237.