透气性对盘帆伞充气性能和气动特性的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30373

Abstract

Abstract:

The supersonic parachute is one of the key parts of successful soft landing of the Mars probe； however， the mainstream parachute type used in the landing mission of Mars exploration， the disk-gap-band parachute， has reached the size limit of the deceleration capacity of this type of parachute. Due to the requirement of the heavier payload of Mars exploration missions in the future， NASA has carried out special research on supersonic disksail parachutes. However， all the flying tests of disksail parachute have failed， and the reason is probably related to the air permeability of the parachute （fabric permeability and geometric porosity）. In this paper， the fluid-structure interaction method is used to design different combination schemes of air permeability of the supersonic disksail parachute. The influence mechanism of different geometric porosity/fabric permeability distribution ratios on the flow field structure and aerodynamic characteristics in the process of parachute opening is analyzed under the premise of the same total porosity. In addition， a disk-gap-band parachute with the same porosity as that of the G5F5 and G7F3 disksail models are designed， and its opening characteristics are analyzed. The results show that for the supersonic disksail parachute with a total porosity of 12%， when the contribution ratio of geometric porosity/fabric permeability is 5∶5， the fluctuation amplitude of the bow shock ahead of the canopy is small， the stability performance of the parachute has obvious advantages over that of the parachute with the air permeability of other combinations， and the inflating time is the longest under the joint action of geometric porosity and fabric permeability； when the contribution ratio of geometric porosity/fabric permeability is 7∶3， the drag performance of the parachute is the best， and the drag performance of the disksail parachute shows a downward trend as the contribution of fabric permeability increases from 30% to 70%； when the contribution ratio of geometric porosity/fabric permeability is 6∶4， the parachute has the largest oscillation angle and the worst stability. By comparing the opening processes of the disksail and disk-gap-band parachutes， it is found that disk-gap-band parachutes exhibit a common “disk-style” inflation sequence， while disksail parachutes exhibit a “band style” inflation sequence， that is， the airflow first inflates from the canopy band and then gradually spreads to the entire canopy surface. The results of this study can provide a theoretical reference for the design of a new generation of Mars parachutes.

Key words: Mars parachute, geometric porosity/fabric permeability, inflation performance, fluid-structure interaction, aerodynamic characteristic

CLC Number:

V411.3

Tianqi ZOU, Xiaopeng XUE, Dangjun ZHAO, Degui YANG, Buge LIANG. Influence of air permeability on inflation process and aerodynamic characteristics of disksail parachutes[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 630373.

Figures/Tables 22

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Parachute dimensions［17］

伞衣模型

伞带高度/m

伞盘高度/m

G 1

宽度/m

G 2

宽度/m

带缝

高度比

SSDS

0.167 8

0.507 8

0.063 5

0.022 2

DGB-a

0.102 7

0.502 0

0.025 8

4.21

DGB-b

0.140 0

0.539 3

0.036 0

3.89

Table 1

Table 2

Freestream conditions［6-7，19-20］

马赫数

M a

来流速度

$v ∞$ /（m·s^-1）

来流静压

$P ∞$ /Pa

来流密度

$ρ$ /（kg·m^-³）

1.6

381.514

332.104

0.007 47

Table 2

Table 3

Air permeability combination schemes［13，37］

模型	$λ T$ /%	$C e$ /%	$a$ /10³	$b$ /10⁴	$λ g$ /%	伞面开缝隙方式
G7F3	12.0	4.1	20.14	9.829	12.0	G1+G2+S10~14+S16~18
G6F4	12.0	5.4	14.28	6.972	10.3	G1+G2+S10~14
G5F5	12.0	6.6	10.88	5.311	8.6	G1+S10~14+S16~17
G4F6	12.0	7.7	8.689	4.242	6.9	G1+S10~S13
G3F7	12.0	8.9	7.174	3.512	5.1	G1+S10

Table 3

Fig.3

Table 4

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Table 5

Shock standoff distances of permeability parachutes of different combinations

组合透气性	$(λ / D P) m a x$	$(λ / D P) m i n$	$Δ (λ / D P)$
G3F7	0.563	0.528	0.035
G4F6	0.521	0.487	0.034
G5F5	0.501	0.492	0.009
G6F4	0.604	0.510	0.094
G7F3	0.481	0.457	0.024

Table 5

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Table 6

Shock standoff distances of different canopy models

伞衣模型	$(λ / D 0) m a x$	$(λ / D 0) m i n$	$Δ (λ / D 0)$
G5F5	0.370	0.220	0.150
G7F3	0.403	0.236	0.167
DGB-a	0.393	0.189	0.204
DGB-b	0.481	0.196	0.285

Table 6

Fig.16

References 37

1	XUE X P， WEN C Y. Review of unsteady aerodynamics of supersonic parachutes［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2021， 125： 100728.
2	CRUZ J R， WAY D， SHIDNER J， et al. Parachute models used in the Mars science laboratory entry， descent， and landing simulation［C］∥AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems （ADS） Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2013： 1276-1303.
3	CRUZ J R， WAY D， SHIDNER J， et al. Reconstruction of the Mars science laboratory parachute performance and comparison to the descent simulation［C］∥Proceedings of the AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems （ADS） Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2013： 1185-1196.
4	SENGUPTA A， WITKOWSKI A， ROWAN J， et al. Overview of the Mars science laboratory parachute decelerator system［C］∥19th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Reston： AIAA， 2007： 2007-2578.
5	于莹潇，田佳林. 火星探测器降落伞系统综述［J］. 航天返回与遥感， 2007， 28（4）： 12-16.
	YU Y X， TIAN J L. Mars explorer’s parachute system overview［J］. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing， 2007， 28（4）： 12-16 （in Chinese）.
6	JIANG L L， JIA H， XU X， et al. Numerical study on aerodynamic performance of Mars parachute models with geometric porosities［J］. Space： Science and Technology， 2022， 2022： 1-15.
7	JIANG L L， JIA H， XU X， et al. Effect of different geometric porosities on aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic parachutes［J］. Space： Science & Technology， 2023， 3： 0062.
8	徐欣，贾贺，陈雅倩，等.织物透气性对火星用降落伞气动特性影响机理研究［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（12）： 126289.
	XU X， JIA H， CHEN Y Q， et al. Influence mechanism of fabric permeability of canopy on aerodynamic performance of Mars parachute［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（12）： 126289 （in Chinese）.
9	SHEN C. Flow field characteristics around bluff parachute canopies［D］. Leicester： University of Leicester， 1987.
10	GREATHOUSE J， SCHWING A. Study of geometric porosity on static stability and drag using computational fluid dynamics for rigid parachute shapes［C］∥Proceedings of the 23rd AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2015： 500-521.
11	GOGLIA M J， LAVIER H W S， BROWN C D. Air permeability of parachute cloths［J］. Textile Research Journal， 1955， 25（4）： 296-313.
12	TAGUCHI M， SEMBA N， MORI K. Effects of flexibility and gas permeability of fabric to supersonic performance of flexible parachute［C］∥Proceedings of the 23rd AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2015： 543-549.
13	XU X， XUE X P， ZOU T Q， et al. Numerical study on aerodynamic characteristics of Mars parachute systems with different combinations of fabric permeability and geometric porosity［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2024， 153： 109449.
14	ZOU T Q， JIA H， RONG W， et al. Numerical study on the influence of fabric permeability on the inflation process and aerodynamic characteristics of disk-gap-band parachute［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2024， 150： 108856.
15	SONNEVELDT B S， CLARK I G， O’FARRELL C. Summary of the advanced supersonic parachute inflation research experiments （ASPIRE） sounding rocket tests with a disk-gap-band parachute［C］∥AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2019.
16	KANDIS M， WITKOWSKI A. Comparison of Mars and earth high altitude supersonic disk-gap-band parachute system performance［C］∥AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2019.
17	CLARK I G， GALLON J C， WITKOWSKI A. Parachute decelerator system performance during the low density supersonic decelerator program’s first supersonic flight dynamics test［C］∥23rd AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2015： 471-499.
18	姜璐璐. 火星用超声速盘帆伞系统透气性影响及气动特性数值研究［D］. 长沙：中南大学， 2021.
	JIANG L L. Numerical study on permeability effect and aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic disksail parachute system for Mars‍［D］. Changsha： Central South University， 2021 （in Chinese）.
19	夏元清. 火星探测器进入、下降与着陆过程的导航、制导与控制—“恐怖”七分钟［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2017.
	XIA Y Q. Navigation， guidance and control of the Mars rover during entry， descent and landing - seven minutes of terror［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2017 （in Chinese） .
20	HALL N. Mars atmosphere model ［EB/OL］. （2021-05-13）［2021-07-27］. .
21	连亮，王中阳，张红英，等. 基于ALE方法的群伞稳降阶段的数值模拟［J］. 航天返回与遥感， 2014， 35（1）： 21-28.
	LIAN L， WANG Z Y， ZHANG H Y， et al. Numerical simulation of cluster parachute system during steady-state descent phase based on ALE method［J］. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing， 2014， 35（1）： 21-28 （in Chinese）.
22	ADAMS D， RIVELLINI T. Mars science laboratory’s parachute qualification approach［C］∥20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Reston： AIAA， 2009.
23	HOU X Y， HU J， YU Y. Numerical study on ring slot parachute finite mass inflation process and wake recontact phenomenon［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2022， 128： 107763.
24	ZHANG S Y， YU L， WU Z H， et al. Numerical investigation of ram-air parachutes inflation with fluid-structure interaction method in wind environments［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2021， 109： 106400.
25	包文龙，贾贺，薛晓鹏，等. 开 “窗” 结构对环帆伞开伞过程影响［J］. 航空学报， 2023， 44（5）： 226936.
	BAO W L， JIA H， XUE X P， et al. Influence of ‘windows’ structure on inflation process of ringsail parachute［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2023， 44（5）： 226936 （in Chinese）.
26	XUE X P， KOYAMA H， NAKAMURA Y， et al. Effects of suspension line on flow field around a supersonic parachute［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2015， 43： 63-70.
27	XUE X P， NAKAMURA Y， MORI K， et al. Numerical investigation of effects of angle-of-attack on a parachute-like two-body system［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2017， 69： 370-386.
28	FAN J H， HAO J A， WEN C Y， et al. Numerical investigation of supersonic flow over a parachute-like configuration including turbulent flow effects［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2022， 121： 107330.
29	贾贺，邹天琪，荣伟，等.不同行星大气下直径比对降落伞气动特性的影响研究［J］. 航天返回与遥感， 2023， 44（1）： 70-83.
	JIA H， ZOU T Q， RONG W， et al. Influence of diameter ratio on the aerodynamic performance of parachute system under different atmospheric conditions［J］. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing， 2023， 44（1）： 70-83 （in Chinese） .
30	杨雪，余莉，李允伟，等. 环帆伞稳降阶段织物透气性影响数值模拟［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2015， 33（5）： 714-719.
	YANG X， YU L， LI Y W， et al. Numerical simulation of the effect of the permeability on the ringsail parachute in terminal descent stage［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2015， 33（5）： 714-719 （in Chinese）.
31	宁雷鸣，张红英，童明波. 一种伞衣织物透气性快速预测算法［J］. 航天返回与遥感， 2016， 37（5）： 10-18.
	NING L M， ZHANG H Y， TONG M B. A fast permeability estimation method for parachute fabric［J］. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing， 2016， 37（5）： 10-18 （in Chinese）.
32	WANG J， AQUELET N， TUTT B， et al. Porous euler-lagrange coupling： application to parachute dynamics［C］∥9th International LS-DYNA Users Conference. Detroit： Environmental Engineering Science， 2006： 1-12.
33	WITKOWSKI A， KANDIS M， SENGUPTA A， et al. Comparison of subscale versus full-scale wind tunnel tests of MSL disk gap band parachutes［C］∥Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Reston： AIAA， 2009.
34	CRUZ J R， O’FARRELL C， HENNINGS E， et al. Permeability of two parachute fabrics-measurements， modeling， and application［C］∥Proceedings of the 24th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2017： 605-631.
35	CRUZ J R， SNYDER M L. Estimates for the aerodynamic coefficients of ringsail and disk-gap-band parachutes operating on Mars［C］∥24th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Reston， Virginia： AIAA， 2017： 1-28.
36	YU L， CHENG H， ZHAN Y N， et al. Study of parachute inflation process using fluid-structure interaction method［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2014， 27（2）： 272-279.
37	徐欣. 超声速火星降落伞织物透气性影响机理及其气动性能研究［D］. 长沙：中南大学， 2022.
	XU X. Study on influence mechanism and aerodynamic performance of fabric permeability of supersonic Mars parachute［D］. Changsha： Central South University， 2022 （in Chinese）.

[1]	Lulu JIANG, Xin PAN, Wei JIANG, Rui FENG, Gang CHEN. Optimization shape design of capsule-supersonic parachute system based on fusion surrogate strategy [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 630471-630471.
[2]	He JIA, Wei JIANG, Wenlong BAO, Xin XU, Wei RONG, Li YU. Transonic/supersonic aerodynamic characteristics and fluid-structure interaction mechanism of flexible parachutes for planetary exploration [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 630369-630369.
[3]	Xiaopeng XUE, He JIA, Wei RONG, Wei JIANG, Wenlong BAO, Zhen WANG, Tianqi ZOU, Yurou DAI, Yiwei ZHOU. Review of high-speed flexible aerodynamic decelerators key technologies [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 631677-631677.
[4]	Dazhi SUN, Xi CHEN, Weicheng BAO, Wei BIAN, Qijun ZHAO. Interferences of high-speed helicopter fuselage on aerodynamic and aeroacoustic source characteristics of propeller [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529142-529142.
[5]	Yurou DAI, Jian LI, Xiaopeng XUE, Wei RONG. Aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic disk-gap-band parachute with different reefing ways [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(7): 128811-128811.
[6]	Xiayang ZHANG, Chencheng GAO, Qijun ZHAO, Jiahui LIANG. Aerodynamic characteristics of variable-camber airfoil/rotor in forward flight [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630609-630609.
[7]	Bin LI, Zenan ZHANG, Fei JIA, Jian SUN, Yanju LIU, Jinsong LENG. Research status and development trend of morphing wingtip technology [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 30042-030042.
[8]	Yihui HAN, Jun HU, Yong YU, Jianqiao YU. Wind tunnel experimental verification of aerodynamic control force of cross⁃shaped flexible control surface [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(13): 129280-129280.
[9]	Siyuan CHANG, Yao XIAO, Guangli LI, Zhongwei TIAN, Kaikai ZHANG, Kai CUI. Effect of wing dihedral and anhedral angles on hypersonic aerodynamic characteristics of high-pressure capturing wing configuration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 127349-127349.
[10]	Xin ZOU, Minglei LI, Daiyin ZHU, Wei RAO, Chengzhi HAN, Ying LI. Application of morphological parameter identification for Mars parachute during opening process [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 227007-227007.
[11]	Wenlong BAO, He JIA, Xiaopeng XUE, Xuejiao HUANG, Shuyi GAO, Wei RONG, Qi WANG, Zhuangzhi WU. Influence of ‘windows’ structure on inflation process of ringsail parachute [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 226936-226936.
[12]	Lei HE, Weiqi QIAN, Kangsheng DONG, Xian YI, Congcong CHAI. Aerodynamic characteristics modeling of iced airfoil based on convolution neural networks [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 126434-126434.
[13]	Chang LIU, Yunlong ZHANG, Zhijiang YAN, Lei ZHAO, Chen JI. Wind tunnel test of fluctuating pressure on aeroelastic scaled model of hammerhead launch vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(23): 128384-128384.
[14]	Jianqiao LUO, Chunlei XIE, Zehua JIN, Junhui MENG. Water-skipping fluid-structure interaction simulation and slippable area study of trans-medium vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(21): 528632-528632.
[15]	Qiulin LI, Li ZHOU, Peng SUN, Jingwei SHI, Zhanxue WANG. Influence mechanism of aspect ratio on fluid-structure interaction characteristics of serpentine nozzle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(14): 628204-628204.

Influence of air permeability on inflation process and aerodynamic characteristics of disksail parachutes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 37

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments