超声速下盘缝带伞不同收口方式的气动特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28811

Abstract

Abstract:

With the development of aerospace engineering， the demand for the application of high-performance supersonic parachute with large area， high strength， low opening shock， and low weight and volume is becoming more and more prominent. Supersonic reefing technology is a possible way to meet the future demand， but research in this field remains limited both domestically and internationally. This paper studies the aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic disk-gap-band parachute in different reefing ways and different reefing ratios using the fluid-structure interaction method. The results show that when the mid-gore reefing parachute breaths， the disk keeps full and the band part expands and contracts irregularly. However， for the skirt reefing parachute， the band and disk part expand and contract together. For the aerodynamic characteristics of the parachute reefing， the drag coefficient and the projected area of the mid-gore reefing grow with the increase of reefing ratio， but the skirt reefing shows no obvious change.

Key words: disk-gap-band parachute, reefing technology, fluid-structure interaction, drag characteristics, aerodynamic characteristics

CLC Number:

V445.2⁺3

Yurou DAI, Jian LI, Xiaopeng XUE, Wei RONG. Aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic disk-gap-band parachute with different reefing ways[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(7): 128811-128811.

Figures/Tables 27

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Table 5

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Table 6

Fig.21

References 29

1	《降落伞技术导论》编写组. 降落伞技术导论［M］. 北京：国防工业出版社， 1977： 113-117.
	“Introduction to Parachute Technology” Writing Group. Introduction to parachute technology［M］.Beijing： National Defense Industry Press， 1977： 113-117 （in Chinese）.
2	WITKOWSKI A， BRUNO R. Mars exploration rover parachute decelerator system program overview［C］∥Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Reston： AIAA， 2003.
3	ADAMS D S， WITKOWSKI A， KANDIS M. Phoenix Mars Scout parachute flight behavior and observations［C］∥2011 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2011： 1-8.
4	CRUZ J R， WAY D W， SHIDNER J D， et al. Reconstruction of the Mars science laboratory parachute performance［J］. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 2014， 51（4）： 1185-1196.
5	STEINBERG S Y， SIEMERS P M III， SLAYMAN R G. Velopment of the Viking parachute configuration by wind-tunnel investigation［J］. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 1974， 11（2）： 101-107.
6	李健，房冠辉，吕智慧，等. 天问一号火星探测器伞系减速分系统设计与验证［J］. 中国科学：技术科学， 2022， 52（2）： 264-277.
	LI J， FANG G H， LÜ Z H， et al. Design and verification of parachute deceleration subsystem of Tianwen-1 Mars probe［J］. Scientia Sinica （Technologica）， 2022， 52（2）： 264-277 （in Chinese）.
7	荣伟，高树义，李健，等. 神舟飞船降落伞系统减速策略及其可靠性验证［J］. 中国科学：技术科学， 2014， 44（3）： 251-260.
	RONG W， GAO S Y， LI J， et al. The deceleration strategy and reliability validation of the parachute system on the Shenzhou spacecraft［J］. Scientia Sinica （Technologica）， 2014， 44（3）： 251-260 （in Chinese）.
8	PREISSER J S， GROW R B. High-altitude flight test of a reefed 12.2-meter-diameter disk-gap-band parachute with deployment at a Mach number of 2.58［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1971.
9	ECKSTROM C， BRANSCOME D R. High altitude flight test of a disk gap band parachute deployed behind a bluff body at a Mach number of 2.69［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1973.
10	WITKOWSKI A， KANDIS M. Reefing the Mars Science Laboratory parachute［C］∥2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2010： 1-6.
11	WITKOWSKI A， KANDIS M， REUTER J， et al. Design of subscale parachute models for MSL supersonic wind tunnel testing［C］∥Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Reston： AIAA， 2009.
12	贾贺，荣伟. ExoMars 2016火星探测计划进入、减速、着陆的验证任务分析［J］. 航天器工程， 2013， 22（4）： 109-115.
	JIA H， RONG W. Review and analysis of EDL demonstrator module of ExoMars 2016 mission［J］. Spacecraft Engineering， 2013， 22（4）： 109-115 （in Chinese）.
13	余莉. 气动减速技术［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2018.
	YU L. Aerodynamic deceleration technology［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2018 （in Chinese）.
14	夏元清. 火星探测器进入、下降与着陆过程的导航、制导与控制—“恐怖”七分钟［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2017：34-38.
	XIA Y Q. Navigation， guidance and control of Mars rover entry， descent and landing—seven minutes of terror［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2017：34-38 （in Chinese）.
15	HALL N. Mars atmosphere model［EB/OL］. （2021-05-13）［2021-07-27］. .
16	刘凯欣，王景焘，王刚，等. 时-空守恒元解元（CE/SE）方法综述［J］. 力学进展， 2011， 41（4）： 447-461.
	LIU K X， WANG J T， WANG G， et al. A review on the CE/SE method［J］. Advances in Mechanics， 2011， 41（4）： 447-461 （in Chinese）.
17	CHANG S C. The method of space-time conservation element and solution element—a new approach for solving the Navier-Stokes and Euler equations［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 1995， 119（2）： 295-324.
18	CHANG S C， WANG X Y， CHOW C Y. The space-time conservation element and solution element method： A new high-resolution and genuinely multidimensional paradigm for solving conservation laws［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 1999， 156（1）： 89-136.
19	刘海涛，徐建中. 求解Euler方程的空间—时间守恒格式［J］. 工程热物理学报， 1997， 18（3）： 294-299.
	LIU H T， XU J Z. A space-time conservation scheme for solving the two-dimensional Euler equations［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 1997， 18（3）： 294-299 （in Chinese）.
20	张德良，谢巍，郭长铭，等. 气相爆轰胞格结构和马赫反射数值模拟［J］. 爆炸与冲击， 2001， 21（3）： 161-167.
	ZHANG D L， XIE W， GUO C M， et al. Numerical simulation of cellar structures and Mach reflection of gaseous detonation waves［J］. Explosion and Shock Waves， 2001， 21（3）： 161-167 （in Chinese）.
21	张增产，沈孟育. 改进的时空守恒元和解元方法［J］. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）， 1997， 37（8）： 67-70.
	ZHANG Z C， SHEN M Y. Improved space-time conservation element and solution element method［J］. Journal of Tsinghua University （Science and Technology）， 1997， 37（8）： 67-70 （in Chinese）.
22	辛春亮，朱星宇，王凯，等. LS-DYNA有限元建模、分析和优化设计［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社， 2022.
	XIN C L， ZHU X Y， WANG K， et al. LS-DYNA finite element modeling， analysis and optimization design［M］. Beijing： Tsinghua University Press， 2022 （in Chinese）.
23	SOTIROPOULOS F， YANG X L. Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid-structure interaction［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2014， 65： 1-21.
24	杨璐瑜，张红英，陆伟伟，等. 盘缝带伞超声速开伞过程研究［J］. 航天返回与遥感， 2016， 37（3）： 29-38.
	YANG L Y， ZHANG H Y， LU W W， et al. Study on the deployment of disk-gap-band parachute in supersonic flow［J］. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing， 2016， 37（3）： 29-38 （in Chinese）.
25	杨璐瑜，陆伟伟，张红英，等. 速度对火星用盘缝带伞超声速开伞性能影响［J］. 航空计算技术， 2016， 46（5）： 34-37.
	YANG L Y， LU W W， ZHANG H Y， et al. Effect of velocity on performance of Mars disk-gap-band parachutes in supersonic flow［J］. Aeronautical Computing Technique， 2016， 46（5）： 34-37 （in Chinese）.
26	王祁，曹义华. 盘-缝-带伞超声速充气过程仿真研究［J］. 航天返回与遥感， 2018， 39（1）： 35-44.
	WANG Q， CAO Y H. Study on the simulation of the inflating process of disk-gap-band parachute in supersonic flow［J］. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing， 2018， 39（1）： 35-44 （in Chinese）.
27	ADAMS D， RIVELLINI T. Mars science laboratory’s parachute qualification Approach［C］∥20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Reston： AIAA， 2009.
28	SONNEVELDT B S， CLARK I G， O’FARRELL C. Summary of the advanced supersonic parachute inflation research experiments （ASPIRE） sounding rocket tests with a disk-gap-band parachute［C］∥Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2019.
29	CLINTON V E， JOHN S P. Flight test of a 40 foot nominal diameter disk-gap-band parachute deployed at a Mach number of 2.72 and a dynamic pressure of 9.7 pounds per square foot［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1968.

马赫数	收口方式	收口比
1.6	带收口	30%、40%、50%
1.6	盘收口	30%、40%、50%
1.8	带收口	30%、35%、40%、50%
1.8	盘收口	30%、35%、40%、50%

马赫数	来流速度/（m·s^-1）	静压/Pa	密度/（kg·m^-3）	温度/K
1.6	381.54	332.10	0.007 47	231.39
1.8	429.13	330.56	0.007 44	231.28

单位长度/m	阻力系数	与0.02 m网格的阻力系数误差/%
0.05	0.584	6.71
0.04	0.612	2.16
0.03	0.627	0.169
0.02	0.626

参数	投影面积比/%	阻力系数比/%
误差	5.2	4.6
空投试验结果	50.0	39.4
数值模拟结果	52.6	37.6

参数		不收口降落伞	带收口降落伞
参数		不收口降落伞	30%收口比	35%收口比	40%收口比
投影面积半径/m	N1点位	0.172 9	0.164 1	0.166 8	0.167 6
	N2点位	0.192 3	0.169 9	0.174 4	0.179 5
	N3点位	0.206 3	0.164 4	0.173 6	0.181 0
	N4点位	0.223 2	0.148 5	0.162 9	0.178 0
	N5点位	0.233 6	收口绳位	收口绳位	收口绳位
与名义直径的比值/%	N1点位	42.54	40.37	41.04	41.22
	N2点位	47.31	41.79	42.91	44.15
	N3点位	50.76	40.43	42.70	44.52
	N4点位	54.91	36.55	40.07	43.78
	N5点位	57.46

Aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic disk-gap-band parachute with different reefing ways

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 27

References 29

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Dazhi SUN, Xi CHEN, Weicheng BAO, Wei BIAN, Qijun ZHAO. Interferences of high-speed helicopter fuselage on aerodynamic and aeroacoustic source characteristics of propeller [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529142-529142.
[2]	Siyuan CHANG, Yao XIAO, Guangli LI, Zhongwei TIAN, Kaikai ZHANG, Kai CUI. Effect of wing dihedral and anhedral angles on hypersonic aerodynamic characteristics of high-pressure capturing wing configuration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 127349-127349.
[3]	Wenlong BAO, He JIA, Xiaopeng XUE, Xuejiao HUANG, Shuyi GAO, Wei RONG, Qi WANG, Zhuangzhi WU. Influence of ‘windows’ structure on inflation process of ringsail parachute [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 226936-226936.
[4]	Lei HE, Weiqi QIAN, Kangsheng DONG, Xian YI, Congcong CHAI. Aerodynamic characteristics modeling of iced airfoil based on convolution neural networks [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 126434-126434.
[5]	Chang LIU, Yunlong ZHANG, Zhijiang YAN, Lei ZHAO, Chen JI. Wind tunnel test of fluctuating pressure on aeroelastic scaled model of hammerhead launch vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(23): 128384-128384.
[6]	Jianqiao LUO, Chunlei XIE, Zehua JIN, Junhui MENG. Water-skipping fluid-structure interaction simulation and slippable area study of trans-medium vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(21): 528632-528632.
[7]	Qiulin LI, Li ZHOU, Peng SUN, Jingwei SHI, Zhanxue WANG. Influence mechanism of aspect ratio on fluid-structure interaction characteristics of serpentine nozzle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(14): 628204-628204.
[8]	ZHOU Wei, MA Peiyang, GUO Zheng, WANG Daoping, ZHOU Ruisun. Research of combined fixed-wing UAV based on wingtip chained [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325946-325946.
[9]	AN Liping, WANG Hao, WANG Yangang, ZHU Zihuan. Wet compression performance and flow characteristics of transonic compressor [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126024-126024.
[10]	WU Qiang, XU Haojun, WEI Yang, PEI Binbin, XUE Yuan. Aerodynamics/flight dynamics coupling characteristics of aircraft under icing conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125566-125566.
[11]	XU Xin, JIA He, CHEN Yaqian, RONG Wei, JIANG Wei, XUE Xiaopeng. Influence mechanism of fabric permeability of canopy on aerodynamic performance of Mars parachute [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 126289-126289.
[12]	JIA Hongyin, ZHANG Peihong, ZHAO Wei, ZHOU Guiyu, WU Xiaojun. Aerodynamic characteristics of vertical recovery of rocket sub-stage and influence of engine nozzle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 623995-623995.
[13]	ZHANG Yujia, ZUO Guang, XU Yizhe, DU Ruofan, ZHAO Fei, QU Feng. Numerical simulation on aerodynamic characteristics of new type control surface of Starship [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 624058-624058.
[14]	LI Jin, GENG Xiangren, CHEN Jianqiang, JIANG Dingwu, LI Hongzhe. Application of DSMC quantum kinetic model in re-entry flow of Mars [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 123240-123240.
[15]	ZHAO Zhenshan, FENG Jian, MIAO Shuming, DU Yu. Blended-wing-body aircraft overhanging engine layout technology based on numerical simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 623051-623051.