定黏假设

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25512

Abstract

Abstract: The introduction of the "frozen viscosity assumption" can simplify the derivation of the adjoint equation and the differentiation of flow solver subroutines, but can also lead to computational errors of sensitivities and sometimes even solution instability. To investigate the effect of laminar viscosity and eddy viscosity on computational accuracy of sensitivities, this paper presents a study on three different frozen viscosity approaches:the Frozen Laminar Viscosity approach(FLV), Frozen Eddy Viscosity approach(FEV) and Frozen Laminar and Eddy Viscosity approach(FLEV). First, the adjoint equations corresponding to full turbulence and three different frozen viscosity approaches are derived based upon the nonlinear flow equations and the objective function in an algebraic form. Then, we introduce how to use the algorithm differentiation tool to develop the discrete adjoint solver and provide the corresponding flow charts. Finally, the transonic NASA Rotor 67 is used to study the effects of different frozen viscosity approaches on solution stability, sensitivity convergence, sensitivity accuracy and asymptotic convergence rate of residual at different operating points(a peak efficiency point and a near stall point) of the adjoint solver. The results are compared with those of the linear solver and the adjoint solver with full turbulence.

Key words: adjoint solver, frozen viscosity assumption, frozon laminar viscosity approach, frozen eddy viscosity approach, frozen laminer and eddy viscosity approach, algorithm differentiationhttp

CLC Number:

V231.3
O354

WU Hangkong, WANG Dingxi, HUANG Xiuquan, XU Shenren. Influence of “frozen viscosity assumption” on solution and gradient accuracy of adjoint system[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125512-125512.

References

[1] SAMAD A, KIM K, GOEL T, et al. Multi-objective optimization of transonic compressor blade using evolutionary algorithm[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(2):302-310.
[2] NIELSEN E, KLEB B. Efficient construction of discrete adjoint operators on unstructured grids using complex variables[J]. AIAA Journal, 2005, 44(4):44-60.
[3] JAMESON A. A perspective on computational algorithms for aerodynamic analysis and design[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(2):197-243.
[4] IOLLO A, FERLAUTO M, ZANNETTI L. An aerodynamic optimization method based on the inverse problem adjoint equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 173(1):87-115.
[5] JAMESON A. Aerodynamic design via control theory[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1988, 3(3):233-260.
[6] JAMESON A, MARTINELLI L, PIERCE N A. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1998, 10(1-4):213-237.
[7] WANG D X, HE L. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines-part I:Methodology and verification[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021011.1-021011.14.
[8] WANG D X, HE L, LI Y S, et al. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines-part II:Validation and application[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021012.1-021012.11.
[9] LUO J Q, ZHOU C, LIU F. Multipoint design optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint method[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(5):051005.1-051005.10.
[10] DWIGHT R P, BREZILLON J. Efficient and robust algorithms for solution of the adjoint compressible Navier-Stokes equations with applications[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 60(4):365-389.
[11] KIM H, NAKAHASHI K, OBAYASHI S, et al. Aerodynamic optimization of supersonic transport wing using unstructured adjoint method[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(6):1011-1020.
[12] MAVRIPLIS D J. Multigrid solution of the discrete adjoint for optimization problems on unstructured meshes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(1):42-50.
[13] NADARAJAH S, JAMESON A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2013, 43(43):1445-1466.
[14] MA C, SU X R, YUAN X. An efficient unsteady adjoint optimization system for multistage turbomachinery[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2017, 139(1):011003.1-011003.11.
[15] HUANG H, EKICI K. A discrete adjoint harmonic balance method for turbomachinery shape optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 39(1):481-490.
[16] VITALE S, PINI M, COLONNA P. Multistage turbomachinery design using the discrete adjoint method within the open-source software SU₂[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2020, 36(3):465-478.
[17] RUBINO A, VITALE S, COLONNA P, et al. Fully-turbulent adjoint method for the unsteady shape optimization of multi-row turbomachinery[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 106(1):132-144.
[18] ALBRING T A, SAGEBAUM M, GAUGER N R. Efficient aerodynamic design using the discrete adjoint method in SU₂[C]//17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2016:3518.
[19] GILES M B, DUTA M C, MULLER J D, et al. Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(2):198-205.
[20] 张朝磊,厉海涛,丰镇平.基于离散伴随方法的透平叶栅气动优化设计[J].工程热物理学报, 2012, 33(1):47-50. ZHANG C L, LI H T, FENG Z P. Aerodynamic optimization design of turbomachinery cascade based on discrete adjoint method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2012, 33(1):47-50(in Chinese).
[21] 罗佳奇,杨婧.基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(5):623368. LUO J Q, YANG J. Aerodynamic design optimization of a single low-speed compressor stage by an adjoint method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5):623368(in Chinese).
[22] 马灿,苏欣荣,袁新.单级跨音压气机非定常伴随气动优化[J].工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(3):504-508. MA C, SU X R, YUAN X. Unsteady adjoint aerodynamic optimization of a transonic compressor stage[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2017, 38(3):504-508(in Chinese).
[23] STRAZISAR A, POWELL J. Laser anemometer measurements in a transonic axial flow compressor rotor:NASA Technical Report 2879[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1989.
[24] DENTON J D. The calculation of three-dimensional viscous flow through multistage turbomachines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1992, 114(1):18-26.

Influence of “frozen viscosity assumption” on solution and gradient accuracy of adjoint system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Numerical Study of Elliptic Flow Noise Problems by an Improved Ghost-cell Immersed Boundary Method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[2]	. Unsteady simulation of stall process in a transonic compressor with total temperature distortion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[3]	. Experimental data driven cascade flow field prediction based on data assimilation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[4]	Qiu-Lin LI Peng SUN Jingwei SHi WANG Zhan-Xue. Investigation on Influence Mechanism of Aspect Ratio on Fluid-Structure Interaction Characteristic of Serpentine Nozzle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[5]	. Flow Measurement and Analysis of a Turbine Blade With Multiple Cooling Structures Based on Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[6]	WEI Yongbin, DUAN Zhuoyi, GUO Zhaodian, YANG Chengfeng. Parameterization investigation method for nacelle aerodynamic performance [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526742-526742.
[7]	DU Jianjian, PAN Xiande, LIU Tianyi. Indirect measurement method for axial load of aero-engine angular contact ball bearing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 625457-625457.
[8]	AN Liping, WANG Hao, WANG Yangang, ZHU Zihuan. Wet compression performance and flow characteristics of transonic compressor [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126024-126024.
[9]	. Design of inward turning inlet with controlled Mach number under non-uniform inflow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[10]	. Experimental study on cut-off frequency of a certain type of domestic fast response PSP [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	. Investigation of the Flow Mechanism of Swept and Bowed Blades with Considera-tion of the Circumferential Fluctuation Source Term before Blade Leading Edge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[12]	YAN Qun, XUE Dongwen, GAO Xiang, YANG Jiafeng, HUANG Wenchao. Acoustic performance experimental technology of aircraft nacelle acoustic liner [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526810-526810.
[13]	. Statistical Study on the Geometric Uncertainties of Casting Blades in a Low-Pressure Turbine [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[14]	ZHAO Le, WANG Wei, ZHANG Lefu, WANG Weichao, LU Jinling, CHU Wuli. Coupling method for stability improvement for transonic compressor at variable speed [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124942-124942.
[15]	. Experimental study on composite rim seal with deep cavity in the static disc and modified platform [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.