航空燃油类型对催化惰化系统性能的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0344

Abstract

Abstract:

A novel catalytic inerting system is designed and its working principle is described in detail. The outflow rates of each gas component passing through the catalytic reactor are derived in which the molar flow rate of suction gas is used as a baseline. A mathematical model to calculate the concentrations of all gas components on ullage of the fuel tank is set up via the mass conservation equations. Three different aviation jet fuels including RP-3, RP-5 and RP-6 are chosen to calculate the variation of the oxygen concentration on ullage under various fuel loads and efficiencies of the catalytic reactor via the given mathematical model. The study reveals that owning to the disparate vapor pressure of the chosen aviation jet fuels, the flow rates of the supplemental air from the atmospheric environment and the produced mixed inerting gas entering into the fuel tank are extremely different. Hence, the difference of the variation of the oxygen concentration on ullage adopting these there jet fuels in the catalytic inerting system is larger than that in the hollow fiber membrane based on-board inert gas generation system. It is suggested that the influence of the type of aviation jet fuels should be considered carefully during the design of a catalytic inerting system.

Key words: aviation jet fuel, inert gas, catalysis, reactor, simulation

CLC Number:

V228
TQ032.4

FENG Shiyu, SHAO Lei, LI Chaoyue, CHEN Wu, LIU Weihua. Performance of catalytic inerting system affected by various aviation jet fuels[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(6): 1819-1826.

References

[1] GRENICH A F, JOHNSON A M, DESMARAIS L A, et al. Vulnerability methodology and protctive measures for aircraft fire and explosion hazards:AFWAL-TR-85-2060[R]. Seattle:Boeing Military Airplane Company, 1986.
[2] JOHNSON R L, GILLERMAN J B. Aircraft fuel tank inerting system:ADA141863[R]. Torrance:Air Research Manufacturing Company, 1983.
[3] LANGTON R, CLARK C, HEWITT M, et al. Aircraft fuel systems[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 2010:225-237.
[4] SMITH D E. Fuel tank inerting systems for civil aircraft[D]. Colorado:Colorado State University, 2014.
[5] 刘小芳, 刘卫华. 飞机供氧和燃油箱惰化技术概况[J]. 北华航天工业学院学报,2008, 18(3):4-7. LIU X F, LIU W H. Outline of airborne oxygen supplied and its fuel tanks inerted[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, 2008, 18(3):4-7(in Chinese).
[6] JOHNSON R W, ZAKI R, YATES S F. Advanced carbon dioxide fuel tank inerting system:7905259 B2[P]. 2011-03-15.
[7] LIMAYE S, KOENIG D. Catalytic reactive component reduction system and methods for the use thereof:2008/0199376 A1[P]. 2008-08-21.
[8] LIMAYE S Y, ROBERTSON S, KOENIG D, et al. Reactive component reduction system and methods for the use thereof:7896292[P]. 2011-01-13.
[9] ROBERT J R, MORRIS W, MILLER J, et al. Fuel deoxygenation and aircraft thermal management:AIAA-2006-4027[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[10] STUART R, WESLEY J, DONALD K, et al. Development of green on-board inert gas generation system (GOBIGGS^TM)[EB/OL]. (2007-03-21)[2015-06-25]. http://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/2007conference/files/Fuel_Tank_Safety/ThursPM/LimayeGOBIGGS/LimayeGOBIGGS-Abs.pdf.
[11] STUART R. Announces successful FAA testing of its fuel tank safety system, to prevent TWA 800 type explosions[EB/OL]. (2007-05-15)[2015-06-25]. http://www.phyre.net/uploads/3/7/5/7/37579581/phyre_faa_testing_press_release.pdf.
[12] WALKER S, JUNG W, ROBERTSON S. Demonstration of a novel catalyst based green on board inert gas generation system (GOBIGGS^TM) for fuel tank inerting[C]//69th American Helicopter Society International Annual Forum. Alexandria:The AHS International, Inc., 2013:550-559.
[13] 刘夙春, 邱献双. 一种新型的飞机油箱催化惰化系统[J]. 航空科学技术, 2011(4):27-29. LIU S C, QIU X S. A new fuel tank catalytically inerting system[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2011(4):27-29(in Chinese).
[14] 冯诗愚, 卢吉, 刘卫华, 等. 机载制氮系统中空纤维膜分离特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(6):1332-1339. FENG S Y, LU J, LIU W H, et al. Separation performance of hollow fiber membrane for on-board inerting gas generating system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(6):1332-1339(in Chinese).
[15] 薛勇, 刘卫华, 冯诗愚, 等. 机载惰化系统中空纤维膜分离性能的实验研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2011, 45(3):107-111. XUE Y, LIU W H, FENG S Y, et al. Experimental study on separation performance of hollow fiber membrane for onboard inert gas generating system[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2011, 45(3):107-111(in Chinese).
[16] 王志伟, 王学德, 刘卫华, 等. 不同进气方式对某民机中央翼油箱惰化性能的影响[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2012,12(3):172-176. WANG Z W, WANG X D, LIU W H, et al. Influence of different distribution methods on the inerting process of a civil airplane center wing tank[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2012, 12(3):172-176(in Chinese).
[17] 冯晨曦, 刘卫华, 冯诗愚, 等. 气体分配方式对多隔仓燃油箱地面惰化的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(11):2528-2533. FENG C X, LIU W H, FENG S Y, et al. Study on ground-based inerting process influenced by different gas distribution for multi-bay fuel tank[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(11):2528-2533(in Chinese).
[18] CAI Y, BU X, LIN G, et al. Experimental study of an aircraft fuel tank inerting system[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(2):394-402.
[19] BURNS M, CAVAGE W M, MORRISON R, et al. Evaluation of fuel tank flammability and the FAA inerting system on the NASA 747 SCA:DOT/FAA/AR-04/41[R]. Washington:Office of Aviation Research, 2004.
[20] 冯诗愚, 刘卫华, 黄龙, 等. 飞机燃油箱气相空间平衡氧浓度理论研究[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 43(4):556-560. FENG S Y, LIU W H, HUANG L, et al. Theoretical study of equilibrium oxygen concentrationon ullage in aircraft fuel tank[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 43(4):556-560(in Chinese).
[21] 童升华. 国产燃油理化性能与易燃性研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2013. TONG S H. Research on physicochemical characteristics & flammability of domestic fuels[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013(in Chinese).
[22] 汪明明, 冯诗愚, 蒋军昌, 等. 飞机燃油箱冲洗与洗涤惰化技术比较分析[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 42(5):614-619. WANG M M, FENG S Y, JIANG J C, et al. Comparative analysis of fuel washing and scrubbing in aircraft fuel tank[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010, 42(5):614-619(in Chinese).
[23] American National Standard. Standard test method for estimation of solubility of gases in petroleum liquids:Standard A D2779-92[S]. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM, 2007.

Performance of catalytic inerting system affected by various aviation jet fuels

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Lizhi SHENG, Wei ZHENG, Tong SU, Dapeng ZHANG, Yidi WANG, Xianghui YANG, Neng XU, Zhize LI. Ground test bench for X-ray pulsar navigation dynamic simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(3): 526656-526656.
[2]	Jinsheng LIU, Bo WANG, Juan SONG, Wencong WANG, Jingjing LI, Zhenhua XU. Estimation of space radiation background of Wolter‑I X‑ray pulsar detector [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(3): 526599-526599.
[3]	Fangcheng SHI, Zhenxun GAO, Yuyan TIAN, Chongwen JIANG, Tiantian WANG, Chun-Hian LEE. Large eddy simulation of ideally expanded supersonic jet noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[4]	Binbin ZHAO, Heng ZHANG, Jie LI. Review of numerical simulation on complex separated flow of iced airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[5]	WANG Xiaoyue, WANG Xun, WANG Yongzhen, FEI Teng, LIU Dawei. Evaluation method for combat effectiveness of task-based simulated UAV swarm system [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726937-726937.
[6]	LIU Chuang, YU Xiaojun, ZHANG Ting, ZHU Haokun. Research status and trend of key technologies for simulation test of unmanned swarm equipment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726919-726919.
[7]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[8]	JI Honglei, SU Junjie, CHEN Renliang, KONG Weihong. Highland atmospheric turbulence model for helicopter flight simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 126564-126564.
[9]	GUO Qiong, LIU Wei, PEI Lianjie, GUO Junhao. Static and fatigue test technology for full-scale composite fuselage barrels [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 525816-525816.
[10]	WANG Binwen, NIE Xiaohua, WAN Chunhua, WU Cunli. Research and application of virtual test technology for static strength of full scale aircraft structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526273-526273.
[11]	ZHANG Junduo, ZUO Qinghai, LIN Mengda, HUANG Weixi, PAN Weijun, CUI Guixiang. Numerical simulation on near-field evolution of wake vortices of ARJ21 plane with crosswind [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 125043-125043.
[12]	WU Qiang, XU Haojun, PEI Binbin, WEI Yang, ZHANG Yang. Quantitative evaluation of flight risk of icing aircraft based on theory of region of attraction and binary extreme value [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 125137-125137.
[13]	WANG Jiaming, LI Zhigang, LIANG Fangzheng, LIU Wanting, LIAO Jiu, CHEN Fangyu, LI Meng, SHAO Teli. Design, simulation and theoretical study on novel cored octagon honeycomb for helicopter crashworthiness [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225244-225244.
[14]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[15]	ZHANG Juchen, LI Shicheng, LIU Yang, LI Xinglin. Multi-physical field analysis of tunnel ECM employed Realizable k-ε model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525670-525670.