高超声速气动力试验模拟参数选取准则

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0186

Abstract

Abstract:

Validity issue on simulation criterion for hypersonic aerodynamic test has hindered the development of ability on aerodynamic performance prediction for hypersonic aircraft. Scaling method is applied in the field of experimental aerodynamics within continuous flow regime. Various parametric scales are selected due to dual scale of flow characteristics and different parameters are applied to scaling the equation. Based on the assessment of the order of magnitude for each parameter, the simulation parameter and its weight are obtained for typical flight conditions. Results indicate that the analytical method supports the existing criterion of selective simulation parameters and provides suggestions to improve the simulation criterion. What is more, this paper illustrates that selective simulation parameters vary significantly as flight environment changes, and the ranking of simulation parameters is given by various flight conditions. By applying theoretical method, it is verified that viscous interaction parameter is one of the most significant simulation factors for hypersonic aerodynamic test, which coincides with conclusions of scholars abroad.

Key words: simulation parameters, scaling method, aerodynamic test, hypersonic, viscous interaction, wind tunnel test

CLC Number:

V411.7

WANG Gang, YANG Yanguang, TANG Zhigong. Criterion of selective simulation parameters for hypersonic aerodynamic test[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(3): 789-796.

References

[1] Frank K L. Advanced hypersonic test facilities[M]. Virginia: AIAA, 2002: 17-27.

[2] Tang Z Z. Hypersonic aerodynamic test[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2004: 45-53 (in Chinese). 唐志共. 高超声速气动力试验[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2004: 45-53.

[3] Kenneth W W, Mary F S. A comparison of hypersonic vehicle flight and prediction results, NASA/TM-104313[R]. Hampton.: NASA Langleg Resarch Center, 1995.

[4] Dinesh K P, Periklis E P, Carol B D, et al. Shuttle orbiter contingency abort aerodynamics: real gas effects and high angles of attack[C]//41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2003.

[5] Lin J Q. Deterministic problems applied to mathematics in natural science[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 238-256 (in Chinese). 林家翘. 自然科学中确定性问题的应用数学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 238-256.

[6] Tan Q M. Dimensional analysis[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2007: 152-167 (in Chinese). 谈庆明. 量纲分析[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2007: 152-167.

[7] Wu W Y. Fluid mechanics[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2006: 171-179 (in Chinese). 吴望一. 流体力学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006: 171-179.

[8] White F M. Viscous fluid flow[M]. 2nd ed. New York: MaGraw-Hill Inc. Press, 1991: 233-253.

[9] Chen M Z. Fundamentals of viscous fluid dynamics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002: 24-27 (in Chinese). 陈懋章. 黏性流体动力学基础[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002: 24-27.

[10] Anderson J D. Hypersonic and high temperature gas dynamics[M]. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: AIAA, 2006: 266-271.

[11] Bowcutt K G. Hypersonic vehicle systems integration:vehicle aerothermodynamic analysis and thermal management design[R]. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Aerospace, 2007.

[12] Maus J R, Griffith B J, Szema K Y. Hypersonic Mach number and real gas effects on space shuttle orbiter aerodynamics[C]//21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1983.

[13] White A W, Arrington J P, McCandless R S. Performance aerodynamics of aero-assisted orbital transfer vehicles[C]//AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1984.

[14] Maus J R, Griffith B J, Tolbert D G. Understanding space shuttle flight data by use of wind tunneland CFD results[C]//AIAA 2nd Flight Testing Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1983.

[15] Plyashechnik V I. Investigation of the influence of parameter on the aerodynamic characteristics of a body of revolution with the contour generatrix break at hypersonic velocities, SPC94-4009[R]. Moscow: Central Aerodynamics Institute, 1998.

Criterion of selective simulation parameters for hypersonic aerodynamic test

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Shanjie XU, Hongqiang LYU, Zhongchen LIU, Yan LENG, Xuejun LIU. Data analysis of sonic boom test based on probability model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[2]	Zhongchen LIU, Zhansen QIAN, Xuefei LI, Yan LENG, Dapeng GUO. Wind tunnel test techniques for exhaust nozzle plume effects on near-field sonic boom [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[3]	Jun SHU, Dongguang XU, Zhirong HAN, Si LI, Xiong HUANG. Hybrid wing design of icing wind tunnel supercooled large droplet icing test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[4]	Zhikun SUN, Zhiwei SHI, Weilin ZHANG, Zheng LI, Qijie SUN. Effect of plasma actuator on lift-drag characteristics of high-speed airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[5]	Weizhuo HUA, Ling GAO, Ge CHEN, Yiwen LI, Geng GONG, Yantao WANG, Biao WEI. Experimental magneto-hydrodynamic system based on plasma torch [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 1-7.
[6]	Yifeng HUANG, Shuhua ZENG, Zhongzheng JIANG, Weifang CHEN. Numerical study on high-altitude lateral jet based on nonlinear coupled constitutive relation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 8-22.
[7]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[8]	Xudong ZHANG, Zheng LI, Hao DONG, Siyuan GAO, Zubi JI, Kaixin LI, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[9]	Shouchao HU, Yu ZHUANG, Xian LI, Tao JIANG. Hypersonic aero-heating environment research model HyHERM-I: Experiment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 233-248.
[10]	Haoge LI, Hua YANG, Yuxin YANG, Weifang CHEN. Refinement optimization design for heat reduction on windward surface of hypersonic lifting body [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[11]	Dong WU, Hong YANG, Wenfeng ZHAO, Yue LUO. High temperature strain measurement of hypersonic aircraft carbon-based composite material structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 160-169.
[12]	Chunsheng NIE, Ye YUAN, Wei MA, Zhanwei CAO, Mingxing YU. Effect of active ejection gas parameters on thermal environment of plate and air rudder [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 170-179.
[13]	Zhengxue MA, Zhenbing LUO, Aihong ZHAO, Yan ZHOU, Wei XIE, Qiang LIU, Yinxin ZHU, Wenqiang PENG. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[14]	LI Jun, WANG Junfeng, ZHAO Yatian, LUO Shibin. Research on combinational configuration of spike and multi-jets in off-design regimes [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 125949-125949.
[15]	LIU Chuanzhen, MENG Xufei, LIU Rongjian, BAI Peng. Experimental and numerical investigation of hypersonic performance of double swept waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.