碳纤维复合材料胶铆混合修理结构静载拉伸失效

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28676

Abstract

Abstract:

The experimental research was conducted on the intact composite plate and the composite bonded-rivet hybrid repairing structure， aiming at the tensile failure of carbon fiber composite bonded-rivet hybrid repairing structure. The load bearing ability and strain distribution mode during stretching and failure were analyzed. Through finite element simulation， the initiation and propagation of damage in the adhesive layer and mother board of the composite bonded-rivet hybrid repairing structure were studied. Load division research was carried out on different positions in the hybrid repairing structure to analyze its load bearing mode and load transmission route， further revealing its failure mode. The results show that under tensile load， the adhesive layer starts to fail first and expands inward along two edges of the load direction due to peeling stress caused by patch warping resulting from eccentric loading during stretching. After most of the adhesive layer fails， failure of the mother board begins from 90° layers outside row rivet holes and expands perpendicular to the load direction. Subsequently， ±45° and 0° layers exhibit similar damage patterns. During stretching， part of the tensile load can be transmitted to the patch through both adhesive layer and rivets， thereby improving mechanical properties ofthe hybrid repairing structure.

Key words: composite materials, adhesive-rivet hybrid repair, finite element analysis, failure mode, tensile strength

CLC Number:

V258⁺.3

Liping LIU, Yuyang QI, Yueguo LIN, Rui BAO, Jianxin XU, Zhenyu FENG, Guanghui QING. Tensile failure of carbon fiber composite material bonded-rivet hybrid repaired structure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(24): 428676-428676.

Figures/Tables 24

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Table 3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Table 5

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig. 19

References 23

1	YOO J S， TRUONG V H， PARK M Y， et al. Parametric study on static and fatigue strength recovery of scarf-patch-repaired composite laminates［J］. Composite Structures， 2016， 140： 417-432.
2	LIU B， XU F， FENG W， et al. Experiment and design methods of composite scarf repair for primary-load bearing structures［J］. Composites Part A： Applied Science and Manufacturing， 2016， 88： 27-38.
3	KATNAM K B， SILVA L F M DA， YOUNG T M. Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures： A review of scientific challenges and opportunities［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2013， 61： 26-42.
4	张子健. 民机复合材料层合板结构损伤修理技术研究［D］. 沈阳：沈阳航空航天大学，2019.
	ZHANG Z J. Study on structural damage repair technology of civil aircraft composite laminates［D］. Shenyang： Shenyang Aerospace University， 2019 （in Chinese）.
5	聂恒昌，徐吉峰，关志东，等. 复合材料胶接修理层合板拉伸性能及影响参数［J］. 材料工程， 2017， 45（10）：124-131.
	NIE H C， XU J F， GUAN Z D， et al. Tensile property and influence parameters of bonded repaired composite laminates［J］. Journal of Materials Engineering， 2017， 45（10）：124-131 （in Chinese）.
6	RIDHA M， TAN V B C， TAY T E. Traction-separation laws for progressive failure of bonded scarf repair of composite panel［J］. Composite Structures， 2011， 93（4）： 1239-1245.
7	王跃全. 飞机复合材料结构修理设计渐进损伤分析［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2010.
	WANG Y Q. Progressive damage analysis of aircraft composite structure repair design［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2010 （in Chinese）.
8	喻健，张腾，何宇廷，等. 胶铆混合修补铝合金板的疲劳性能研究［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2021， 47（11）：2399-2406.
	YU J， ZHANG T， HE Y T， et al. Fatigue performance of adhesive-rivet hybrid repair of aluminum alloy plate［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2021， 47（11）： 2399-2406 （in Chinese）.
9	聂恒昌，谭日明，郭霞，等. 复合材料层合板机械连接修理拉伸性能［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2016， 42（2）：318-327.
	NIE H C， TAN R M， GUO X， et al. Tensile performances of mechanically fastened repairs of composite laminates［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2016， 42（2）：318-327 （in Chinese）.
10	邹维杰. 复合材料层合板机械修理研究［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2018.
	ZOU W J. Study on mechanical repair of composite laminates［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2018 （in Chinese）.
11	YUN J H， CHOI J H， KWEON J H. A study on the strength improvement of the multi-bolted joint［J］. Composite Structures， 2014， 108： 409-416.
12	ZHANG J Y， LIU F R， ZHAO L B， et al. A progressive damage analysis based characteristic length method for multi-bolt composite joints［J］. Composite Structures， 2014， 108： 915-923.
13	彭新未. 复合材料层合板胶接修理强度研究［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2016.
	PENG X W. Study on adhesive repair strength of composite laminates［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2016 （in Chinese）.
14	刘礼平，王宇灿，原志翔，等. 复合材料胶铆混合修理的拉伸性能研究［J］. 机械强度， 2021， 43（1）： 63-70.
	LIU L P， WANG Y C， YUAN Z X， et al. Study on the tensile properties of adhesive-rivet hybrid repair structure of composite laminates［J］. Journal of Mechanical Strength， 2021， 43（1）： 63-70 （in Chinese）.
15	原志翔. 复合材料胶铆混合修理损伤特性实验研究［D］. 天津：中国民航大学， 2020.
	YUAN Z X. Experimental study on damage characteristics of composite materials repaired by bonding and riveting［D］. Tianjin： Civil Aviation University of China， 2020 （in Chinese）.
16	LOPEZ-CRUZ P， LALIBERTÉ J， LESSARD L. Investigation of bolted/bonded composite joint behaviour using design of experiments［J］. Composite Structures， 2017， 170： 192-201.
17	SADOWSKI T， GOLEWSKI P， ZARZEKA-RACZKOWSKA E. Damage and failure processes of hybrid joints： Adhesive bonded aluminium plates reinforced by rivets［J］. Computational Materials Science， 2011， 50（4）： 1256-1262.
18	CHEN Y W， YANG X J， LI M J， et al. Mechanical behavior and progressive failure analysis of riveted， bonded and hybrid joints with CFRP-aluminum dissimilar materials［J］. Thin-Walled Structures， 2019， 139： 271-280.
19	CHOWDHURY N M， WANG J， CHIU W K， et al. Static and fatigue testing bolted， bonded and hybrid step lap joints of thick carbon fibre/epoxy laminates used on aircraft structures［J］. Composite Structures， 2016， 142： 96-106.
20	刘礼平，段科好，徐卓，等. 碳纤维增强树脂基复合材料层合板胶螺混合连接失效机制［J］. 复合材料学报， 2023， 40（1）： 590-600.
	LIU L P， DUAN K H， XU Z， et al. Failure mechanism of carbon fiber reinforced polymer bonded-bolted hybrid connection［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica， 2023， 40（1）： 590-600 （in Chinese）.
21	贾利勇，贺高，把余炜. 三维渐进失效模型在层压板失效分析中的应用［C］∥ 第17届全国复合材料学术会议（复合材料力学分论坛）论文集. 北京：中国航空学会， 2012： 7.
	JIA L Y， HE G， BA Y W. 3D progressive failure model for composite laminates failure analysis［C］∥ 17th National Conference on Composites （Composites Mechnices Forum） Proceeding. Beijing： Chinese society of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2012： 7 （in Chinese）.
22	寇剑锋，徐绯，郭家平，等. 黏聚力模型破坏准则及其参数选取［J］. 机械强度， 2011， 33（5）： 714-718.
	KOU J F， XU F， GUO J P， et al. Damage laws of cohesive zone model and selection of the parameters［J］. Journal of Mechanical Strength， 2011， 33（5）：714-718 （in Chinese）.
23	AL-MANSOUR ALI，程小全，寇长河. 单面贴补修理后层合板的拉伸性能［J］. 复合材料学报， 2005， 22（3）：140-144.
	AL-MANSOUR A， CHENG X Q， KOU C H. Tensile behavior of composite laminates with one-side bonded repair［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica， 2005， 22（3）：140-144 （in Chinese）.

T700/BA9916材料性能	数值
11方向上的弹性模量E₁₁/GPa	121.0
22/33方向上的弹性模量E₂₂=E₃₃/GPa	8.7
12/13方向上的剪切模量G₁₂=G₁₃/GPa	4.16
23方向上的剪切模量G₂₃/GPa	3.00
12/13方向上的泊松比ν₁₂=ν₁₃	0.30
23方向上的泊松比ν₂₃	0.45
x方向的拉伸强度极限X_T/MPa	2 395
x方向的压缩强度极限X_C/MPa	1 209
y/z方向的拉伸强度极限Y_T=Z_T/MPa	62.5
y/z方向的压缩强度极限Y_C=Z_C/MPa	207.0
12/13方向的剪切强度极限S₁₂=S₁₃/MPa	134.6
23方向的剪切强度极限S₂₃/MPa	97.0

J116B胶粘剂性能	数值
法向弹性模量E_nn/GPa	1.00
切向弹性模量E_ss=E_tt/GPa	1.74
法向极限应力σ_0，n/MPa	14.6
切向极限应力σ_0，s=σ_0，t/MPa	27.5
法向、切向剪切模量 G_c，n=G_c，s=G_c，t/（N·mm^-1）	1.0

层合板类型	修理方式	组号	试验件编号	补片长度/mm
30 mm损伤板	胶铆修理	H30	1~3	157.5
60 mm损伤板	胶铆修理	H60	4~6	187.5
完好板	无修理	W	7~9	无补片

组号	平均失效载荷/kN	拉伸强度恢复率/%
H30	140.06	77.33
H60	129.39	71.44
W	181.12	无拉伸

组号	最大失效载荷/N		误差/%
组号	仿真	实验	误差/%
H30	158 077	140 060	12.86
H60	118 353	129 390	-8.53

Tensile failure of carbon fiber composite material bonded-rivet hybrid repaired structure

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 24

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Zhiting GAO, Zhuang MA, Yanbo LIU. Effect of CVD-SiC array structure on ablation resistance of ZrB₂/SiC coatings [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(3): 428842-428842.
[2]	Qian YANG, Yanzhe WANG, Di YANG, Zezhong LI, Weiwei QU. Prediction and planning of automatic laying speed for fiber reinforced composite materials based on data⁃driven model [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 429313-429313.
[3]	Haolei MOU, Jiang XIE, Zhenyu FENG, Kun CHENG, Yi LIU. Crashworthiness characteristics analysis of typical fuselage section of large transport aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 227512-227512.
[4]	Jian HAN, Shiyong SUN, Bin NIU, Rui YANG, Dongjiang WU. Progress in manufacturing technologies of resin⁃based composite lattice structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 628255-628255.
[5]	YU Yuxi, ZHANG Weibin, SUN Yi, CONG Minghui, ZHU Jian, SONG Jingyuan. Simulation analysis of deformation behavior and resilience of Ni-based alloy canted coil spring for dynamic seal [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 425527-425527.
[6]	CAO Yi, MENG Gang, JU Yongjian, XU Weisheng. Large-stroke compliant micro-positioning stage considering parasitic rotation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 425498-425498.
[7]	WAN Aoshuang. Probabilistic assessment on damage tolerance of composite helicopter horizontal tail structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 525557-525557.
[8]	CAO Yong, ZHANG Chao. Impact damage behavior of thin-ply composites: A review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 525323-525323.
[9]	FENG Zhenyu, CHI Qilin, CUI Huaitian, XIE Jiang, MU Haolei. Comparison of ballistic impact behaviors between plain woven and 2.5D woven fabric composite plates [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 425116-425116.
[10]	YU Chengyue, LIU Bo, LI Chuanzheng, XUE Chuang. Analytical research on connecting structure of composite material satellite bearing cylinder [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 225161-225161.
[11]	YANG Xiawei, PENG Chong, MA Tiejun, WEN Guodong, WANG Yanying, CHAI Xiaoxia, XU Yaxin, LI Wenya. Finite element analysis of fatigue crack growth of linear friction welded superalloy joints [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 625004-625004.
[12]	PENG Jinfeng, WU Dongrun, CUI Weiyun, CAI Deng'an, ZHOU Guangming. Design and analysis of simulated ice with 3D printed sandwich composite material [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224536-224536.
[13]	LUO Chuyang, JIANG Shengda, CHEN Mengxiong, ZHANG Peng, XIA Xufeng, CAI Peipei. Preparation and evaluation of carbon fiber/polyimide composite attaching collars based on high temperature resin transfer mould process [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 625438-625438.
[14]	ZHANG Junrui, ZHENG Xitao, YUAN Lin, ZHONG Guiyong, LI Guochen. Fatigue life prediction method for hybrid multi-bolted joints based on damage weight [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(5): 524306-524306.
[15]	GUO Yidong, MA Yu'e, LI Peiyao. Low velocity impact response of additively manufactured titanium alloy micro-truss sandwich panels [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 423820-423820.