大型运输类飞机典型机身框段坠撞特性分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27512

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the crashworthiness characteristics and failure mode of large transport aircraft and develop the finite element modeling and crashworthiness simulation technology of fuselage structures， a three-frame and two-span full-scale fuselage section with two sets of triple seats installed and four FAA Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Devices （ATD） placed is firstly designed and manufactured； the crash deformation and response characteristics are then obtained by carrying out a drop test of the typical fuselage section； Finally， a finite element model of fuselage section is established and verified by the drop test results， and the crashworthiness characteristics are evaluated when hitting different grounds （concrete ground and soft grounds）. The results show that at the vertical impact velocity of 6.02 m/s， the upper area of the cabin floor remains basically intact， and the sub-cabin structures are significantly deformed and damaged， resulting in three plastic hinges； the cargo floor beam breaks on one side where it joins the fuselage frame， resulting in a significantly faster peak acceleration of the cabin floor on the same side than on the other side， and the maximum acceleration peak value and impact force are 427.7 m/s² and 290.8 kN， respectively. The finite element model can accurately simulate the three plastic hinges and the failure of the connection between the cargo floor beam and the fuselage frame， and it is in good agreement with the test results in terms of impact velocity and acceleration. The fuselage frame is the main energy-absorbing component， accounting for 40.7% of the total absorbed energy； when hitting different grounds， the partial impact energy is absorbed by the soft ground， resulting in slightly different failure modes of the fuselage section and a reduction in the peak acceleration transmitted to the occupants.

Key words: fuselage section, crashworthiness characteristics, failure mode, drop test, transport aircraft

CLC Number:

V223

Haolei MOU, Jiang XIE, Zhenyu FENG, Kun CHENG, Yi LIU. Crashworthiness characteristics analysis of typical fuselage section of large transport aircraft[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 227512-227512.

Figures/Tables 26

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

Table 4

Fig. 19

Fig. 20

Fig. 21

Fig. 22

References 34

1	GUIDA M， MARULO F， ABRATE S. Advances in crash dynamics for aircraft safety［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2018， 98： 106-123.
2	牟浩蕾，解江，冯振宇. 民机机身结构适坠性研究［J］. 交通运输工程学报， 2020， 20（3）： 17-39.
	MOU H L， XIE J， FENG Z Y. Research on crashworthiness of civil aircraft fuselage structures［J］. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering， 2020， 20（3）： 17-39 （in Chinese）.
3	MOU H L， XIE J， FENG Z Y. Research status and future development of crashworthiness of civil aircraft fuselage structures： An overview［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2020， 119： 100644.
4	WILLIAMS M S， HAYDUK R J. Vertical drop test of a transport fuselage section located forward of the wing［R］. Washington D. C. ： NASA， 1983.
5	FASANELLA E L， ALFARO-BOU E. Vertical drop test of a transport fuselage section located aft of the wing［R］. Washington D. C. ： NASA， 1986.
6	ABRAMOWITZ A， SMITH T G， VU T. Vertical drop test of a narrow-body transport fuselage section with a conformable auxiliary fuel tank onboard ［R］. Washington D. C. ： FAA， 2000.
7	JACKSON K， LITTELL J， ANNETT M， et al. Finite element simulations of two vertical drop tests of F-28 fuselage sections［R］. Washington D. C. ： NASA， 2018.
8	LITTELL J. A summary of results from two full-scale Fokker F28 fuselage section drop tests［R］. Washington， D. C. ： NASA， 2018.
9	RASSAIAN M. Virtual test & simulation ［C］∥ AIAA Complex Aerospace Systems Exchange. Reston： AIAA， 2013.
10	OLIVARES G. Crashworthiness certification by analysis ［C］∥JAMS 2018 Technical Review Meeting. Washington D. C. ： JAMS， 2018.
11	HASHEMI S M R， WALTON A C. A systematic approach to aircraft crashworthiness and impact surface material models［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part G： Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2000， 214（5）： 265-280.
12	RICCIO A， SAPUTO S， SELLITTO A， et al. An insight on the crashworthiness behavior of a full-scale composite fuselage section at different impact angles［J］. Aerospace， 2019， 6（6）： 72.
13	DI PALMA L， DI CAPRIO F， CHIARIELLO A， et al. Vertical drop test of composite fuselage section of a regional aircraft［J］. AIAA Journal， 2019， 58（1）： 474-487.
14	KUMAKURA I， MINEGISHI M， IWASAKI K， et al. Summary of vertical drop tests of YS-11 transport fuselage sections［R］. New York： SAE International， 2003.
15	刘小川，郭军，孙侠生，等. 民机机身段和舱内设施坠撞试验及结构适坠性评估［J］. 航空学报， 2013， 34（9）： 2130-2140.
	LIU X C， GUO J， SUN X S， et al. Drop test and structure crashworthiness evaluation of civil airplane fuselage section with cabin interiors［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2013， 34（9）： 2130-2140 （in Chinese）.
16	LIU X C， GUO J， BAI C Y， et al. Drop test and crash simulation of a civil airplane fuselage section［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2015， 28（2）： 447-456.
17	刘小川，白春玉，惠旭龙，等. 民机机身结构耐撞性研究的进展与挑战［J］. 固体力学学报， 2020， 41（4）： 293-323.
	LIU X C， BAI C Y， XI X L， et al. Progress and challenge of research on crashworthiness of civil airplane fuselage structures［J］. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics， 2020， 41（4）： 293-323 （in Chinese）.
18	张欣玥，惠旭龙，刘小川，等. 典型金属民机机身结构坠撞特性试验研究［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（6）： 526234.
	ZHANG X Y， XI X L， LIU X C， et al. Experimental study on crash characteristics of typical metal civil aircraft fuselage structure［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（6）： 526234 （in Chinese）.
19	ABRAMOWITZ A， SMITH T G， VU T， et al. Vertical drop test of an ATR42-300 airplane ［R］. Washington D. C. ： FAA， 2006.
20	PAZ MENDEZ J， DÍAZ GARCIA J， ROMERA RODRIGUEZ L E， et al. Crashworthiness study on hybrid energy absorbers as vertical struts in civil aircraft fuselage designs［J］. International Journal of Crashworthiness， 2020， 25（4）： 430-446.
21	RICCIO A， SAPUTO S， SELLITTO A， et al. A numerical assessment on the influences of material toughness on the crashworthiness of a composite fuselage barrel［J］. Applied Sciences， 2020， 10（6）： 2019.
22	REN Y R， XIANG J W， ZHENG J Q， et al. Crashworthiness analysis of aircraft fuselage with sine-wave beam structure［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2016， 29（2）： 403-410.
23	任毅如，向锦武，罗漳平，等. 客舱地板斜撑杆对民机典型机身段耐撞性能的影响［J］. 航空学报， 2010， 31（2）： 271-276.
	REN Y R， XIANG J W， LUO Z P， et al. Effect of cabin-floor oblique strut on crashworthiness of typical civil aircraft fuselage section［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2010， 31（2）： 271-276 （in Chinese）.
24	MOU H L， ZOU T C， FENG Z Y， et al. Crashworthiness analysis and evaluation of fuselage section with sub-floor composite sinusoidal specimens［J］. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures， 2016， 13（6）： 1186-1202.
25	THOMAS M A， CHITTY D， GILDEA M L， et al. Constitutive soil properties for cuddeback lake， California and Carson sink， Nevada［R］. Washington D. C. ： NASA， 2008.
26	THOMAS M A， CHITTY D. Constitutive soil properties for mason sand and kennedy space center［R］. Washington D. C. ： NASA， 2011.
27	DING M L， BINIENDA W K. Numerical approach to a reverse problem using LS-DYNA3D analysis： Collision of an aeroplane door with the ground［J］. International Journal of Crashworthiness， 2020， 25（2）： 147-163.
28	EVANS W， JONSON D， WALKER M. An Eulerian approach to soil impact analysis for crashworthiness applications［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering， 2016， 91： 14-24.
29	冯振宇，李恒晖，刘义，等. 中低应变率下7075-T7351铝合金本构与失效模型对比［J］. 材料导报， 2020， 34（12）： 12088-12093.
	FENG Z Y， LI H H， LIU Y， et al. Comparison of constitutive and failure models of 7075-T7351 alloy at intermediate and low strain rates［J］. Materials Reports， 2020， 34（12）： 12088-12093 （in Chinese）.
30	冯振宇，解江，李恒晖，等. 大飞机货舱地板下部结构有限元建模与适坠性分析［J］. 航空学报， 2019， 40（2）： 522394.
	FENG Z Y， XIE J， LI H H， et al. Finite element modeling and crashworthiness analysis of large aeroplane sub-cargo structure［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2019， 40（2）： 522394 （in Chinese）.
31	冯振宇，程坤，赵一帆，等. 运输类飞机典型货舱地板下部结构冲击吸能特性［J］. 航空学报， 2019， 40（9）： 222907.
	FENG Z Y， CHENG K， ZHAO Y F， et al. Energy-absorbing characteristics of a typical sub-cargo fuselage section of a transport category aircraft［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2019， 40（9）： 222907 （in Chinese）.
32	MOU H L， XIE J， LIU Y， et al. Impact test and numerical simulation of typical sub-cargo fuselage section of civil aircraft［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2020， 107： 106305.
33	解江，牟浩蕾，冯振宇，等. 大飞机典型货舱下部结构冲击试验及数值模拟［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（6）： 525890.
	XIE J， MOU H L， FENG Z Y， et al. Impact characteristics of typical sub-cargo structure of large aircraft： Tests and numerical simulation［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（6）： 525890 （in Chinese）.
34	EIBAND A. Human tolerance to rapidly applied accelerations： A summary of the literature［R］. Washington D. C. ： NASA， 1959.

序号	国家或地区	试验对象	试验年份	撞击速度/ （m·s^-1）	撞击面
1	美国	707机身框段	1980	6.10	刚硬地面
2	美国	707机身框段（含辅助油箱）	1993	9.14	刚硬地面
3	欧盟	A320机身框段	1993	7.00	刚硬地面
4	欧盟	A320机身框段	1995	6.70	刚硬地面
5	美国	737-200机身框段（含辅助油箱）	1999	9.14	刚硬地面
6	欧盟	A320机身框段	1999	6.78	刚硬地面
7	美国	737-100机身框段（含货舱货物）	2000	9.14	刚硬地面
8	美国	F-28机身框段	2001	9.20	刚硬地面
9	日本	YS-11机身框段	2001	6.10	刚硬地面
10	日本	YS-11机身框段（含货舱货物）	2002	7.40	刚硬地面
11	美国	波音787机身框段	2007	9.14	刚硬地面
12	中国	支线客机机身框段	2012	6.85	刚硬地面
13	美国	F-28机身框段（机身翼盒）	2017	8.90	砂石土面
14	美国	F-28机身框段（含货舱货物）	2017	8.87	软土地面
15	美国	Hawker 4000机身框段	2017	9.14	刚硬地面
16	欧盟	复合材料飞机机身框段	2017	9.14	刚硬地面
17	中国	大型运输类飞机机身框段	2019	6.02	刚硬地面
18	中国	典型金属民机机身框段	2020	5.91	刚硬地面
19	美国	挑战者601机身框段（中央翼盒段）	2021	9.14	刚硬地面

部件	材料	密度 ρ /（10^-6 kg·mm^-3）	弹性模量 E /GPa	泊松比 μ	屈服应力 σ_y /MPa	极限应变 ε
机身框（含剪切角片）	2024-T42	2.67	72.4	0.33	275.000	0.18
长桁	2099-T83	2.63	78.6	0.31	475.755	0.10
蒙皮	2024-T3	2.67	72.4	0.33	324.065	0.16
货舱纵梁	2196-T8511	2.63	76.5	0.31	510.230	0.10
地板连接角片，立柱	7075-T7351	2.70	72.4	0.33	623.000	0.10
上部桁架	钢	7.80	210.0	0.30

牌号	材料	密度 ρ /（10^-6 kg·mm^-3）	弹性模量 E /GPa	泊松比 μ	屈服应力 σ_y /MPa	极限拉伸载荷 T_u /N	极限剪切载荷 N_u /N
MS20470AD5-6	7050-T73	2.82	72.4	0.33	441.3	5 093	3 738
NAS1097KE5-6	7050-T73	2.82	72.4	0.33	441.3	3 665	5 051
MS20470E5-6	2017-T4	2.70	72.4	0.33	379.2	6 300	4 389
NAS1465-03	合金钢	7.80	210.0	0.33	500.0	7 702	9 359
CFBL1001AG5-2	钛合金	4.50	117.0	0.33
CFBL1002AG5-2	钛合金	4.50	117.0	0.33
CFBL1003AG5-2	钛合金	4.50	117.0	0.33

地面类型	HWS	LDD	SOIL B	HDI
密度/（10^-9t·mm^-3）	1.46	1.28	1.29	1.60
剪切模量G/MPa	1.84	1.39	3.17	3.25
卸载模量K/MPa	68.95	224.00	168.00	110.87
常数 a₀/MPa²	0	0	6.18×10^-6	6.52×10^-5
常数 a₁/MPa	0	0	5.14×10^-3	1.29×10^-2
常数 a₂	0.300 0	0.504 2	1.068 0	0.636 8

[1]	ZHANG Xinyue, XI Xulong, LIU Xiaochuan, BAI Chunyu. Experimental study on crash characteristics of typical metal civil aircraft fuselage structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526234-526234.
[2]	FENG Zhenyu, CHI Qilin, CUI Huaitian, XIE Jiang, MU Haolei. Comparison of ballistic impact behaviors between plain woven and 2.5D woven fabric composite plates [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 425116-425116.
[3]	SONG Wei, ZHANG Ning, ZHU Jian, DONG Lei, JIANG Zenghui. Research status and application of wind tunnel drop test technology: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 24417-024417.
[4]	GUO Yidong, MA Yu'e, LI Peiyao. Low velocity impact response of additively manufactured titanium alloy micro-truss sandwich panels [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 423820-423820.
[5]	AI Bangcheng, SONG Wei, DONG Lei, JIANG Zenghui. Review of aircraft-store separation compatibility of internal weapons [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(10): 23809-023809.
[6]	FENG Zhenyu, CHENG Kun, ZHAO Yifan, LI Henghui, XIE Jiang, MOU Haolei, WANG Yafeng, Ge Yujing. Energy-absorbing characteristics of a typical sub-cargo fuselage section of a transport category aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 222907-222907.
[7]	FENG Wenchun, ZHU Yongfeng. Respiration model and test analysis of continuous oxygen supply system for members in large transport aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522212-522212.
[8]	FENG Zhenyu, XIE Jiang, LI Henghui, CHENG Kun, MA Congyao, MOU Haolei. Finite element modeling and crashworthiness analysis of large aeroplane sub-cargo structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522394-522394.
[9]	WANG Cunxian, GAO Haomai, GONG Xu, SUO Tao, LI Yulong, TANG Zhongbin, XUE Pu, HOU Liang, LIN Jiajian. Impact responses of aeronautic riveting structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(1): 522484-522484.
[10]	WANG Yuntao. An overview of HiLiftPW-1 to HiLiftPW-3 numerical simulation technologies [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(7): 21997-021997.
[11]	DU Jinzhu, MENG Fanxing, LU Xuefeng. Criteria for evaluation of landing gear drop test based on energy method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(4): 221375-221375.
[12]	ZHAO Qibing, LIU Yong. Analysis of degree of controllability with multi-rotor aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(S1): 721561-721561.
[13]	ZENG Xian'ang, PU Lidong, LI Junjie, TAN Shen'gang, XIE Huaiqiang. Wind-tunnel test of maneuver load control based overdetermined trim [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(5): 120596-120596.
[14]	ZHENG Wuji, LI Yinghui, QU Liang, XU Haojun, YUAN Guoqiang. Nonlinear stability region of icing aircraft during landing phase based on normal form method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(2): 520714-520724.
[15]	LIANG Yu, SHAN Xiaowen. Aerodynamic analysis and optimization design for variable camber airfoil of civil transport jet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(3): 790-798.

Crashworthiness characteristics analysis of typical fuselage section of large transport aircraft

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 26

References 34

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments