基于改进模拟退火的航空器起飞质量估算方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.28090

Abstract

Abstract:

Aircraft takeoff mass， an important parameter of aircraft performance， has significant effect on the accuracy of departure trajectory prediction. Aircraft mass is airline commercial operation data， and is difficult to obtain through public accesses. In this paper， a method for aircraft takeoff mass estimation is proposed based on historical trajectory data. Using the total energy model and considering the effect of wind， an iterative model of aircraft takeoff mass is established based on the Base of Aircraft Data（BADA） performance model. Combining the taboo table function in the taboo search algorithm and the simulated annealing algorithm， the improved algorithm is applied to solve the model efficiently. The result of a typical sample flight shows that the relative error between the estimated takeoff mass and the real mass is 2.91%. Compared with the BADA reference mass， the accuracy of trajectory prediction using estimated takeoff mass is effectively improved. Takeoff mass estimation of 15 types of aircraft and 26 724 flights is conducted. The average relative error value of the estimated mass of all flights is 3.45%. The absolute value of relative error of 97.67% of all flights is within 10%， demonstrating accurate estimation results. The proposed method for aircraft takeoff mass estimation can be applied to batch flights and can provide technical support for high-precision trajectory simulation and prediction.

Key words: air traffic management, takeoff mass estimation, BADA performance model, trajectory prediction, simulated annealing algorithm

CLC Number:

V355

Bing WANG, Runyuan ZOU, Zhening CHANG. Aircraft takeoff mass estimation method based on improved simulated annealing algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(16): 328090-328090.

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.7

References 26

1	BENAVIDES J V， KANESHIGE J， SHARMA S， et al. Implementation of a trajectory prediction function for trajectory based operations： AIAA-2014-2198［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2014.
2	张洪海，汤一文，许炎. TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（7）： 323844.
	ZHANG H H， TANG Y W， XU Y. Optimizing arrival traffic flow in airport terminal airspace under trajectory based operations［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（7）： 323844 （in Chinese）.
3	杨磊，李文博，刘芳子，等. 柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（2）： 324157.
	YANG L， LI W B， LIU F Z， et al. Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（2）： 324157 （in Chinese）.
4	张军峰，蒋海行，武晓光，等. 基于BADA及航空器意图的四维航迹预测［J］. 西南交通大学学报， 2014， 49（3）： 553-558.
	ZHANG J F， JIANG H H， WU X G， et al. 4D trajectory prediction based on BADA and aircraft intent［J］. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University， 2014， 49（3）： 553-558 （in Chinese）.
5	Coppenbarger R A， Kanning G， Salcido R. Real-time data link of aircraft parameters to the center-TRACON automation system （CTAS）［C］∥4th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar. Stamford： ATM， 2001： 1-11.
6	WICKRAMASINGHE N K， BROWN M， MIYAMOTO Y， et al. Effects of aircraft mass and weather data errors on trajectory optimization and benefits estimation： AIAA-2016-0166［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2016.
7	THIPPHAVONG D P， SCHULTZ C A， LEE A， et al. Adaptive algorithm to improve trajectory prediction accuracy of climbing aircraft［J］. Journal of Guidance， Control， and Dynamics， 2012， 36（1）： 15-24.
8	吕波，王超. 改进的扩展卡尔曼滤波在航空器4D航迹预测算法中的应用［J］. 计算机应用， 2021， 41（S1）： 277-282.
	LYU B， WANG C. Application of improved extended Kalman filtering in aircraft 4D trajectory prediction algorithm［J］. Journal of Computer Applications， 2021， 41（S1）： 277-282 （in Chinese）.
9	康南，韩孝兰，胡杨，等. 基于质量估算策略的离场飞机高度剖面预测［J］. 中国民航大学学报， 2019， 37（3）： 11-16.
	KANG N， HAN X L， HU Y， et al. Departure aircraft altitude profile prediction based on aircraft mass estimation strategy［J］. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China， 2019， 37（3）： 11-16 （in Chinese）.
10	SCHULTZ C， THIPPHAVONG D， ERZBERGER H， et al. Adaptive trajectory prediction algorithm for climbing flights： AIAA-2012-4931［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2012.
11	ALLIGIER R， GIANAZZA D， HAMED M G， et al. Comparison of two ground-based mass estimation methods on real data （regular paper）： hal-0100240［R］. Stamford： ATM， 2014.
12	SUN J Z， ELLERBROEK J， HOEKSTRA J M. Aircraft initial mass estimation using Bayesian inference method［J］. Transportation Research Part C： Emerging Technologies， 2018， 90： 59-73.
13	CHATI Y S， BALAKRISHNAN H. Modeling of aircraft takeoff weight using Gaussian processes［J］. Journal of Air Transportation， 2018， 26（2）： 70-79.
14	ALLIGIER R， GIANAZZA D， DURAND N. Machine learning and mass estimation methods for ground-based aircraft climb prediction［J］. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems， 2015， 16（6）： 3138-3149.
15	ALLIGIER R， GIANAZZA D. Learning aircraft operational factors to improve aircraft climb prediction： A large scale multi-airport study［J］. Transportation Research Part C： Emerging Technologies， 2018， 96： 72-95.
16	SEMKE W， ALLEN N， TABASSUM A， et al. Analysis of radar and ADS-B influences on aircraft detect and avoid （DAA） systems［J］. Aerospace， 2017， 4（3）： 49.
17	ALI B S， TAIB N A. A study on geometric and barometric altitude data in automatic dependent surveillance broadcast （ADS-B） messages［J］. Journal of Navigation， 2019， 72（5）： 1140-1158.
18	Zhang M， Huang Q W， Liu S H， et al. Fuel consumption model of the climbing phase of departure aircraft based on flight data analysis［J］. Sustainability， 2019， 11（16）： 4362.
19	赵军，唐弋棣. 基于QAR数据的民航发动机性能分析［J］. 计算机仿真， 2020， 37（7）： 107-112.
	ZHAO J， TANG Y D. Performance analysis of civil aviation engine based on QAR data［J］. Computer Simulation， 2020， 37（7）： 107-112 （in Chinese）.
20	王兵，张颖，谢华，等. 一种基于机载数据的民用航空器飞行阶段划分方法［J］. 交通运输工程学报， 2022， 22（1）： 216-228.
	WANG B， ZHANG Y， XIE H， et al. A flight phase identification method based on airborne data of civil aircraft［J］. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering， 2022， 22（1）： 216-228 （in Chinese）.
21	王兵. ADS-B历史飞行轨迹数据清洗方法［J］. 交通运输工程学报， 2020， 20（4）： 217-226.
	WANG B. Data cleaning method of ADS-B historical flight trajectories［J］. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering， 2020， 20（4）： 217-226 （in Chinese）.
22	COURCHELLE V， SOLER M， GONZÁLEZ-ARRIBAS D， et al. A simulated annealing approach to 3D strategic aircraft deconfliction based on en-route speed changes under wind and temperature uncertainties［J］. Transportation Research Part C： Emerging Technologies， 2019， 103： 194-210.
23	BAKLACIOGLU T. Modeling the fuel flow-rate of transport aircraft during flight phases using genetic algorithm-optimized neural networks［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2016， 49： 52-62.
24	MURRIETA-MENDOZA A， HAMY A， BOTEZ R M. Four- and three-dimensional aircraft reference trajectory optimization inspired by ant colony optimization［J］. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems， 2017， 14（11）： 597-616.
25	BI J， WU Z， WANG L， et al. A tabu search-based algorithm for airport gate assignment： A case study in Kunming， China［J］. Journal of Advanced Transportation， 2020， 2020： 1-13.
26	温瑞英，李璐，魏志强. 基于遗传算法的分段多参气动阻力研究［J］. 飞行力学， 2021， 39（2）： 27-32， 44.
	WEN R Y， LI L， WEI Z Q. Research on piecewise multi-parameter aerodynamic resistance based on genetic algorithm［J］. Flight Dynamics， 2021， 39（2）： 27-32， 44 （in Chinese）.

字段名	全称	描述
TIME	Time stamp	时间戳
PA	Pressure altitude	气压高度
IAS	Indicated air speed	表速
TAS	True air speed	真空速
Mach	Mach number	马赫数
GW	Gross weight	航空器总重
TAT	Total air temperature	总温
MH	Magnetic heading	磁航向
FF	Fuel flow	燃油流量
ROLL	Roll	滚转角
WIN_DIR	Wind direction	风向
WIN_SPD	Wind speed	风速

参数	数值	参数	数值
初始温度	100	邻域解个数	10
降温系数	0.99	最大迭代次数	1 000
终止温度	0.1	最大权重系数	0.9
禁忌表长度	［5， 11］之间的随机整数	最小权重系数	0.4

算法对比	SA	TS-SA
平均起飞质量/kg	69 872	69 257
估算质量平均相对误差/%	3.83	2.91
算法运行时间/s	20.69	13.81

高度/（10³ft）	真实航迹所需时间/s	参考质量下起飞		估算质量下起飞
高度/（10³ft）	真实航迹所需时间/s	时间/s	误差/%	时间/s	误差/%
5	154.98	125.84	18.80	138.60	10.57
10	268.64	232.53	13.44	258.47	3.79
15	462.24	406.50	12.06	446.89	3.32
20	645.65	572.65	11.31	634.43	1.74
25	866.40	750.24	13.41	837.16	3.37
30	1 075.56	948.64	11.80	1 068.95	0.61
34	1 340.12	1 166.53	12.95	1 330.71	0.70

机型	BADA参考质量/（10³kg）	总航班数	估算RE≤5%		估算RE≤10%		估算质量 MRE/%	参考质量 MRE/%
机型	BADA参考质量/（10³kg）	总航班数	航班数	航班占比/%	航班数	航班占比/%	估算质量 MRE/%	参考质量 MRE/%
A320	64	4 370	3 457	79.11	4 300	98.40	3.18	4.51
A332	190	874	697	79.75	853	97.60	3.18	11.62
A321	72	4 897	3 860	78.82	4 773	97.47	3.25	5.57
B788	189.11	267	203	76.30	263	98.50	3.31	14.92
A333	174	1 980	1 556	78.59	1 937	97.83	3.26	9.33
A388	482	132	102	77.27	130	98.48	3.26	35.37
A319	60	1 435	1 138	79.30	1 424	99.23	3.37	4.38
B738	65.3	7 194	5 261	73.13	7 010	97.44	3.47	4.31
E190	32	851	709	83.31	795	93.42	3.50	26.40
A20N	68	900	615	68.33	860	95.56	3.85	3.01
B77L	280.01	354	234	66.10	346	97.74	3.85	14.29
A21N	83	1 668	1 135	68.05	1 644	98.56	3.88	8.06
B789	201.69	414	282	68.12	406	98.07	4.08	16.67
B737	60	942	579	61.46	916	97.24	4.34	2.90
B77W	290.3	446	296	66.37	443	99.33	4.52	21.08
总计		26 724	20 124	75.30	26 100	97.67	3.45	6.90

Aircraft takeoff mass estimation method based on improved simulated annealing algorithm

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 26

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Baichuan ZHANG, Wenhao BI, An ZHANG, Zeming MAO, Mi YANG. Transformer-based error compensation method for air combat aircraft trajectory prediction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 327413-327413.
[2]	Guohua WU, Tianyu WANG. Large-scale constellation TT&C resource scheduling algorithm based on adaptive simulated annealing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(12): 327759-327759.
[3]	WANG Fei, HAN Xiangyu. Short-term prediction of air traffic flow based on fractal interpolation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325585-325585.
[4]	XIE Hua, LI Zihong, YANG Lei, ZHU Yongwen, LIU Fangzi. Optimization of four-dimensional trajectory of city pair with limited capacity [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 325581-325581.
[5]	ZHAO Yifei, WANG Mengqi. Important theories and critical scientific technology of air traffic engineering [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 26537-026537.
[6]	LUO Qing, ZHANG Tao, SHAN Peng, ZHANG Wentao, LIU Zihao. Generating reconfiguration blueprints for IMA systems based on improved Q-learning [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525792-525792.
[7]	ZHANG Junfeng, YOU Lubao, YANG Chunwei, HU Rong. Arrival sequencing and scheduling based on multi-objective Imperialist competitive algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 324439-324439.
[8]	CHEN Zhijie, TANG Jinhui, WANG Chong, CHENG Jizeng, CAO Shan, SHAO Xin. Using artificial intelligence in airspace system to improve airspace hierarchical governance capability [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 525018-525018.
[9]	YANG Lei, LI Wenbo, LIU Fangzi, CHEN Yutong, ZHAO Zheng. Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 324157-324157.
[10]	CHEN Yutong, HU Minghua, YANG Lei, ZHANG Haoran, ZHAO Zheng. Autonomous trajectory planning and conflict management technology in restricted airspace [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(9): 324045-324045.
[11]	ZHANG Honghai, TANG Yiwen, XU Yan. Optimizing arrival traffic flow in airport terminal airspace under trajectory based operations [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 323844-323844.
[12]	PAN Chengsheng, XING Guixuan, QI Yaowen, YANG Li. Topological generation and optimization method in multi-state space information network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 323546-323546.
[13]	WANG Miao, XIAO Gang, WANG Guoqing. Single pilot operation mode technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 323541-323541.
[14]	XI Zhifei, XU An, KOU Yingxin, LI Zhanwu, YANG Aiwu. Target maneuver trajectory prediction based on Volterra series identified by improved particle swarm algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(12): 324183-324183.
[15]	YE Bojia, BAO Xu, LIU Bo, TIAN Yong. Machine learning for aircraft approach time prediction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(10): 324136-324136.