软式空中加油对接约束力不确定性分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24517

Abstract

Abstract: In the process of hose-drogue aerial refueling, the maximum binding force between the drogue and probe can cause detachment of the docking point and fracture of the hose, and even lead to safety accidents. In this paper, to study the dynamic characteristics of the hose-drogue assembly in the oil transportation process, a multi-body dynamic model of the rigid-flexible-liquid coupling of the refueling system is established by using the ALE-ANCF fluid transportation pipeline model as well as the multi-body modeling method. To quantify the expected range of the binding force under the condition of parameter uncertainty, a fast uncertainty analysis method that combines the polynomial chaos method and the dynamic model is proposed. The expected range of docking constraint force is obtained when the flight speed, length of hose, and relative velocity of two aircraft are uncertain at different altitudes. Numerical simulation results show that when there is relative motion between the receiver and the tanker, the expected maximum pressure, shear force, and bending moment at the specific section of the probe greatly increase by 50%, 272%, and 772%, respectively.

Key words: aerial refueling, multi-body system dynamics, absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF), hose whipping phenomenon, polynomial chaos

CLC Number:

V212.1

ZHANG Guobin, ZHANG Qingbin, FENG Zhiwei, CHEN Qingquan, YANG Tao. Uncertainty analysis on binding force of hose-drogue aerial refueling[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224517-224517.

References

[1] 陆宇平, 杨朝星, 刘洋洋. 空中加油系统的建模与控制技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(9):2375-2389. LU Y P, YANG C X, LIU Y Y. A survey of modeling and control technologies for aerial refueling system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(9):2375-2389(in Chinese).
[2] 费伦, 段海滨, 徐小斌, 等. 基于变权重变异鸽群优化的无人机空中加油自抗扰控制器设计[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1):323490. FEI L, DUAN H B, XU X B, et al. ADRC controller design for UAV based on variable weighted mutant pigeon inspired optimization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(1):323490(in Chinese).
[3] BOLKCOM C. Air force aerial refueling methods:Flying boom versus hose and drogue:CRS Report for Congress RL32910[R]. Washington, D.C.:The Library of Congress, 2006.
[4] VASSBERG J, YEH D, BLAIR A, et al. Dynamic characteristics of a KC-10 wing-pod refueling hose by numerical simulation[C]//20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2002:2712.
[5] 胡孟权, 柳平, 聂鑫, 等. 大气紊流对空中加油软管锥套运动的影响[J]. 飞行力学, 2010, 28(5):20-23. HU M Q, LIU P, NIE X, et al. Influence of air turbulence on the movement of hose-drogue[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2010, 28(5):20-23(in Chinese).
[6] RO K, KAMMAN J W. Modeling and simulation of hose-paradrogue aerial refueling systems[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(1):53-63.
[7] WANG H T, DONG X M, XUE J P, et al. Dynamic modeling of a hose-drogue aerial refueling system and integral sliding mode backstepping control for the hose whipping phenomenon[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27(4):930-946.
[8] 王海涛, 董新民, 郭军, 等. 空中加油软管锥套组合体甩鞭现象动力学建模与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9):3116-3127. WANG H T, DONG X M, GUO J, et al. Dynamics modeling and analysis of hose whipping phenomenon of aerial refueling hose-drogue assembly[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9):3116-3127(in Chinese).
[9] LIU Z J, LIU J K, HE W. Modeling and vibration control of a flexible aerial refueling hose with variable lengths and input constraint[J].Automatica, 2017, 77:302-310.
[10] LIU Z J, HE X Y, ZHAO Z J, et al. Vibration control for spatial aerial refueling hoses with bounded actuators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(5):4209-4217.
[11] ZHU Z H, MEGUID S A.Elastodynamic analysis of aerial refueling hose using curved beam element[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(6):1317-1324.
[12] 刘钒. 飞行器拖曳系统气动特性数值模拟研究[D]. 绵阳:中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2014:9-33. LIU F. Numerical simulation research on the aerodynamic characteristics of aerial towed cable system[D].Mianyang:China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, 2014:9-33(in Chinese).
[13] SHABANA A A, HUSSIEN H A, ESCALONA J L. Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to large rotation and large deformation problems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1998, 120(2):188-195.
[14] 田强, 张云清, 陈立平, 等. 柔性多体系统动力学绝对节点坐标方法研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2010, 40(2):189-202. TIAN Q, ZHANG Y Q, CHEN L P, et al.Advances in the absolute nodal coordinate method for the flexible multibody dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2010, 40(2):189-202(in Chinese).
[15] 洪迪峰. 一维移动介质的多体动力学建模方法研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2011:48-53. HONG D F. Multibody dynamic modeling of the linear moving medium[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2011:48-53(in Chinese).
[16] SANDU A, SANDU C, AHMADIAN M. Modeling multibody systems with uncertainties. part I:Theoretical and computational aspects[J]. Multibody System Dynamics, 2006, 15(4):369-391.
[17] GERSTMAYR J, SHABANA A A. Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2006, 45(1-2):109-130.
[18] 徐芝纶. 弹性力学[M]. 4版. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:63-67. XU Z L.Elastic mechanics[M].4th. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006:63-67(in Chinese).
[19] ESCALONA J L, HUSSIEN H A, SHABANA A A. Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to multibody system dynamics[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, 214(5):833-851.
[20] 孙加亮, 田强, 胡海岩. 多柔体系统动力学建模与优化研究进展[J]. 力学学报, 2019, 51(6):1565-1586. SUN J L, TIAN Q, HU H Y. Advances in dynamic modeling and optimization of flexible multibody systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2019, 51(6):1565-1586(in Chinese).
[21] 田强, 张云清, 陈立平, 等. 柔性多体系统动力学绝对节点坐标方法研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2010, 40(2):189-202. TIAN Q, ZHANG Y Q, CHEN L P, et al. Advances in the absolute nodal coordinate method for the flexible multibody dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2010, 40(2):189-202(in Chinese).
[22] CHOROBA P. Comprehensive study of the wake vortex phenomena to the assessment of its incorporation to ATM for safety and capacity improvements[D]. Zilina:University of Zilina, 2006:1-184.
[23] 张庆宇. 飞机尾涡的多普勒激光雷达识别方法研究[D]. 广汉:中国民用航空飞行学院, 2019:12-15. ZHANG Q Y. Aircraft wake vortex recognition method based on Doppler lidar[D].Guanghan:Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2019:12-15(in Chinese).
[24] DOGAN A, LEWIS T A, BLAKE W. Flight data analysis and simulation of wind effects during aerial refueling[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(6):2036-2048.
[25] 陈远鑫. 锥套式空中加油管收放动力学仿真[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学, 2016:46-47. CHEN Y X. Numerical simulation of hose-drogue release and retraction dynamics[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology, 2016:46-47(in Chinese).
[26] DELISI D, GREENE G, ROBINS R, et al. Aircraft wake vortex core size measurements[C]//21 st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2003:3811.
[27] 彭程. 空中加油软管收放过程中动态特性研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2018:27-28. PENG C. Research on dynamic characteristics of aerial refueling hose in deployment and retrieval process[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018:27-28(in Chinese).
[28] BLOY A W, KHAN M M. Modelling of the hose and drogue in air-to-air refuelling[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2002, 106(1055):17-26.
[29] 颜庆津. 数值分析[M]. 3版. 北京:北京航空航天大学出版社, 2006:164-174. YAN Q J.Numerical analysis[M]. 3rd.Beijing:Beihang University, 2006:164-174(in Chinese).
[30] 刘延柱, 潘振宽, 戈新生. 多体系统动力学[M]. 2版. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2014. LIU Y Z, PAN Z K, GE X S. Dynamics of multibody systems[M].2nd.Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2014(in Chinese).
[31] PENCE B L, FATHY H K, STEIN J L. Recursive maximum likelihood parameter estimation for state space systems using polynomial chaos theory[J].Automatica, 2011, 47(11):2420-2424.
[32] 凌锋. 基于多项式混沌方法的汽车悬架系统不确定性研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2013:15-22. LING F. Uncertainty analysis of vehicle suspension systems based on polynomial chaos methods[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2013:15-22(in Chinese).
[33] 邰永敢. 基于多项式混沌展开的桥梁结构动力特性不确定性量化[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2019. TAI Y G. Uncertainty quantification of dynamic characteristics of bridge structures based on polynomial chaos expansion[D]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology, 2019(in Chinese).
[34] 皮霆, 张云清, 吴景铼. 基于多项式混沌方法的柔性多体系统不确定性分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(19):2341-2343, 2348. PI T, ZHANG Y Q, WU J L. Uncertainty analysis of flexible multibody systems using polynomial chaos methods[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 22(19):2341-2343, 2348(in Chinese).
[35] HERZOG M, GILG A, PAFFRATH M, et al.Intrusive versus non-intrusive methods for stochastic finite elements, from nano to space[M]. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008:161-174.

Uncertainty analysis on binding force of hose-drogue aerial refueling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yifu CHEN, Yuhang MA, Qingsheng LAN, Weiping SUN, Yayun SHI, Tihao YANG, Junqiang BAI. Uncertainty analysis and gradient optimization design of airfoil based on polynomial chaos expansion method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 127446-127446.
[2]	Yong XU, Hongtao YAN, Tao JIA, Yue MA, Zehua DENG, Duoneng LIU. Aerial simulation docking technology of fixed-wing clustering UAVs [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 326539-326539.
[3]	Xunliang YAN, Peichen WANG, Shumei WANG, Yuxuan YANG, Kuan WANG. Rapid robust trajectory optimization for RBCC vehicle ascent based on polynomial chaos [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(21): 528349-528349.
[4]	Fan LIU, Xia HUANG, Shuai MA, Lu ZHANG, Xingda CUI, Xinbiao BAO. Simulation framework for hose-drogue aerial refueling system based on MBD-CFD method [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 628408-628408.
[5]	Yifang FU, Xinyue HU, Yulu HUANG, Ban WANG, Jiangtao HUANG. A binocular vision⁃based autonomous aerial docking system design for UAVs [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 628884-628884.
[6]	Xin DU, Zhe ZHU, Fangfang HU, Jiangtao HUANG, Gang LIU, Sheng ZHANG, Enguang SHAN, Jigang TANG. Guidance, navigation and control for airborne docking of autonomous aerial refueling [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 628827-628827.
[7]	Tongyan WU, Mengzhen HUO, Haibin DUAN, Yimin DENG. Biologically eagle-eye and midbrain mechanism-based saliency detection of UAV aerial refueling targets [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 628492-628492.
[8]	Xinyu ZHANG, Siyu XIE, Yang TAO, Gun LI. A robust control method for close formation of aerial-refueling UAVs [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 628425-628425.
[9]	Handuo HU, Yanping SONG, Jianyang YU, Yao LIU, Fu CHEN, Wenxiu GAO. Application of orthogonal matching pursuit to airfoil uncertainty quantification [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(18): 128327-128327.
[10]	Bo LIU, Zhongjie MENG. Tanker/UAV formation tracking control with hose connection constraints [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(17): 328210-328210.
[11]	Bowen SHU, Jiangtao HUANG, Zhenghong GAO, Gang LIU, Chengjun HE, Lu XIA. Sensitivity analysis of vector performance of two⁃dimensional shock vector control nozzle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(13): 127831-127831.
[12]	WU Cihang, YAN Jianguo, QIAN Xianyun, GUO Yiming, QU Yaohong. Predefined-time attitude stabilization control of receiver aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 324996-324996.
[13]	ZHAO Huan, GAO Zhenghong, XIA Lu. Efficient robust aerodynamic design optimization method for high-speed NLF airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124894-124894.
[14]	ZHAO Jian, HUANG Yuechen, LI Haiyang, HE Xiangyue. Uncertainty optimization for return trajectory of vertical takeoff and vertical landing launch vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(11): 524829-524829.
[15]	CHEN Jiangtao, ZHANG Chao, LIU Xiao, ZHAO Hui, HU Xingzhi, WU Xiaojun. Uncertainty quantification analysis with sparse polynomial chaos method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 123382-123382.