NACA4412翼型低速绕流数值计算中湍流模型对比

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.721515

Abstract

Abstract:

Numerical simulation of the flow around the NACA4412 airfoil is implemented based on Spalart-Allmaras (S-A), SST k-ω and Gao-Yong turbulence models. In our procedures, convection terms and diffusion terms are calculated using Roe scheme and center difference scheme respectively. The Runge-Kutta time marching method is employed to solve space discrete control equations. The flow relaxation effect at the NACA4412 airfoil trailing edge is analyzed with the models. The pressure distribution on the wall surface, velocity profile distribution and Reynolds stress distribution obtained with the three models are compared. The numerical results obtained using the three turbulence models agree with the experimental data well in general. SST k-ω turbulence model gets the best flow details and lift coefficient. The Gao-Yong turbulence model can simulate most accurately for mean velocity profiles and Reynolds shear stress.

Key words: turbulence model, computational fluid dynamics, numerical simulation, flow around airfoil, relaxation effect

CLC Number:

V211.3

YAN Wenhui, XUE Ranran. Comparison of turbulence models for numerical simulation of low-speed flow around NACA4412 airfoil[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(S1): 721515-721515.

References

[1] 褚洪杰, 马晖扬. 应用于翼型绕流的线性/非线性湍流模型的研究[J]. 空气动力学学报,2005, 23(2): 237-242. CHU H J, MA H Y. Linear and nonlinear turbulence models for simulation of the flows around airfoil[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2005, 23(2): 237-242 (in Chinese).
[2] 李仁年, 袁尚科, 赵子琴. 尾缘改型对风力机翼型性能的影响研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2012, 30(5): 646-652. LI R N, YUAN S K, ZHAO Z Q. Research on the effect of trail-edge improvement on airfoils performance for wind turbine[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(5): 646-652 (in Chinese).
[3] 梁赟, 刘火星, 邹正平. 尾迹对低压涡轮边界层稳定性的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(4): 886-893. LIANG Y, LIU H X, ZOU Z P. Influence of wakes on boundary layer stability in low-pressure turbines[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2016, 31(4): 886-893 (in Chinese).
[4] COLES D, WADCOCK A. Flying-hot-wire study of two-dimensional mean flow past an NACA4412 airfoil at maximum lift:AIAA-1978-1196[R]. Reston, VA: AIAA, 1978.
[5] SPALART P R, ALLMARAS S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows: AIAA-1992-0439[R]. Reston, VA: AIAA,1992.
[6] MENTER F, RUMSEY C. Assessment of two-equation turbulence models for transonic flows: AIAA-1994-2343[R]. Reston, VA: AIAA, 1994.
[7] GAO G, YONG Y. Partial-average-based equations of incompressible turbulent flow [J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2004, 39(9): 1407-1419.
[8] GAO G, YONG Y. On incompressible turbulent flow: Partial average based theory and applications[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2005, 43(4): 399-407.
[9] 高歌. Gao-Yong理性湍流方程[J]. 推进技术,2010, 31(6): 666-675. GAO G. A review on the research development of Gao-Yong equations of turbulent flows[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(6): 666-675(in Chinese).
[10] 闫文辉, 张常贤, 陈宁宁,等. 用Gao-Yong湍流方程组数值模拟高雷诺数顶盖驱动方腔流[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(3): 149-154. YAN W H, ZHANG C X, CHEN N N, et al. Numerical simulation high Reynolds number lid-driven cavity flow using Gao-Yong turbulence equations[J]. Journal of Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(3):149-154(in Chinese).
[11] 闫文辉, 高歌, YONG Y. 应用GAO-YONG湍流模式数值模拟三维激波/湍流边界层干扰[J].航空动力学报, 2009, 24(10):2193-2200. YAN W H, GAO G, YONG Y. Numerical simulation of 3-D shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction using GAO-YONG turbulence model[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(10):2193-2200(in Chinese).
[12] 闫文辉, 吴小虹, 徐悦. 数值模拟入射斜激波/平板湍流边界层干扰流动[J]. 空军工程大学学报(自然版), 2012, 13(2): 11-15. YAN W H, WU X H, XU Y. Numerical simulation of incident oblique shock-wave flat plate turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. Journal of Airforce Engineering University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 13(2): 11-15(in Chinese).
[13] 任鑫, 高歌. 使用GAO-YONG湍流方程组对翼型绕流的计算[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(S1): 28-34. REN X, GAO G. The calculation of airfoil flows using GAO-YONG turbulence equations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(S1): 28-34(in Chinese).
[14] 闫文辉, 高歌. Sajben 跨声速扩压器分离流动中湍流模型数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(9): 1631-1637. YAN W H, GAO G. Numerical study of turbulence models in Sajben diffuser transonic separation flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(9): 1631-1637(in Chinese).
[15] GROSS A, FASEL H F. Hybrid turbulence model simulations of partially stalled airfoil flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(4): 1-15.
[16] 周铸, 黄江涛, 黄勇, 等. CFD 技术在航空工程领域的应用、挑战与发展[J]. 航空学报,2017, 38(3): 020891. ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, HUANG Y, et al. CFD technology in aeronautic engineering field: Applications,challenges and development[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(3): 020891 (in Chinese).
[17] 杨金广, 王春雪, 王大磊, 等. 基于时间推进的通流计算方法:现状及展望[J]. 航空学报,2016, 37(1): 1-13. YANG J G, WANG C X, WANG D L, et al. Time marching based through flow method: Current status and future development[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1): 1-13(in Chinese).
[18] 涂国华,燕振国,赵晓慧,等.SA和SST湍流模型对高超声速边界层强制转捩的适应性[J]. 航空学报,2015, 36(5): 1471-1479. TU G H, YAN Z G, ZHAO X H, et al. SA and SST turbulence models for hypersonic forced boundary layer transition[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(5): 1471-1479(in Chinese).
[19] WRAY T J, AGARWAL R K. A new low Reynolds number one-equation turbulence model based on a k-ω closure:AIAA-2014-2208[R]. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2014.
[20] GAN J Y, SHEN Y Q, ZHA G C. Comparison of drag prediction using RANS models and DDES for the DLR-F6 configuration using high order schemes: AIAA -2016-0553 [R]. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2016.

Comparison of turbulence models for numerical simulation of low-speed flow around NACA4412 airfoil

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Jianling QIAO, Zhonghua HAN, Yulin DING, Wenping SONG, Bifeng SONG. Effects of stratified atmospheric turbulence on farfield sonic boom propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[2]	Deyang TIAN, Yi PING, Yesi CHEN, Weifang CHEN. Influence of physical and chemical models on electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics of flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 214-224.
[3]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[4]	ZHANG Haoyuan, SUN Dong, QIU Bo, ZHU Yandan, WANG Anling. Influence of turbulent kinetic energy on shock wave/boundary layer interaction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125504-125504.
[5]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[6]	CHEN Guangqiang, DOU Guohui, WEI Haogong, ZOU Xin, LI Qi, LIU Zhou, ZHOU Weijiang. Air data sensing technology of Mars probe [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[7]	XU Jiakuan, WANG Yuxuan, ZHANG Yang, QIAO Lei, LIU Jianxin, BAI Junqiang. Progress in amplification factor transport models in subsonic and transonic boundary layers [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526734-526734.
[8]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[9]	YI Jianmiao, DENG Feng, QIN Ning, LIU Xueqiang. Fast prediction of transonic flow field using deep learning method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[10]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[11]	ZHAN Qingliang, BAI Chunjin, ZHANG Ning, GE Yaojun. Feature extraction method of flow around airfoil based on time-history convolutional autoencoder [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526531-526531.
[12]	SHU Bowen, DU Yiming, GAO Zhenghong, XIA Lu, CHEN Shusheng. Numerical simulation of Reynolds stress model of typical aerospace separated flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526385-526385.
[13]	SHEN Pengfei, LIU Pengxin, SUN Dong, YUAN Xianxu. Statistical characteristics of skin friction of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[14]	WANG Di, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.
[15]	DUAN Junyi, TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, LIU Hongwei. Decomposition of mean friction drag in compression-expansion turbulent boundary layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.