亚跨声速边界层增长因子输运模式研究进展

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26734

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the linear stability theory, the e^N method is one of the most reliable transition prediction techniques for aerospace vehicles. However, the complexity of traditional linear stability theory increases the difficulty in its application to the flows over complex aerodynamic configurations. With the rapid development of the local-variable-based transition model in recent years, modeling the process of the traditional linear stability theory, that is, transforming the linear stability theory analysis into a CFD problem, has become a research hotspot. The key idea is to analyze the linear stability of a large number of similarity solutions of laminar boundary layers, followed by obtaining the relationship between the envelope of the amplification factor and the characteristic variables of the mean laminar flow. After that, the amplification factor transport model using the integral characteristics of the transport equation is constructed. The non-local variables in the model are solved locally and the new transport equations are coupled with the turbulence model to form a new transition-turbulence transport model. Verifications show that the current developed streamwise N_TS transport model and crossflow N_CF transport model have achieved high prediction accuracy in a wide range of numerical examples, despite improvements yet to be made in some aspects.

Key words: linear stability theory, transition model, turbulence model, amplification factor, e^N method

CLC Number:

V211

XU Jiakuan, WANG Yuxuan, ZHANG Yang, QIAO Lei, LIU Jianxin, BAI Junqiang. Progress in amplification factor transport models in subsonic and transonic boundary layers[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526734-526734.

References

[1] SMITH A, GAMBERONI N. Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory:ES-26388[R]. Long Beach:Douglas Aircraft Company, 1956.
[2] VAN INGEN J. A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region[R]. Delft:Delft University of Technology, 1956.
[3] MALIK M R. COSAL:A black-box compressible stability analysis code for transition prediction in three-dimensional boundary layers:NASA-CR-155952[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1982.
[4] ARNAL D, CASALIS G. Laminar-turbulent transition prediction in three-dimensional flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, 36(2):173-191.
[5] CEBECI T. Stability and transition:Theory and application[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2004.
[6] 苏彩虹. 高超音速圆锥边界层的转捩预测及e-N方法的改进[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2008. SU C H. The transition prediction of boundary layers on a hypersonic cone and the improvement of the e-N method[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2008(in Chinese).
[7] ZHAO L, YU G T, LUO J S. Extension of e^N method to general three-dimensional boundary layers[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 38(7):1007-1018.
[8] SARIC W S, REED H L, WHITE E B. Stability and transition of three-dimensional boundary layers[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 35(1):413-440.
[9] OBREMSKI H, MORKOVIN M, LANDAHL M, et al. A portfolio of stability characteristics of incompressible boundary layers:AGARD-No.134[R]. Brussels:NATO, 1969.
[10] KLEBANOFF P S, TIDSTROM K D, SARGENT L M. The three-dimensional nature of boundary-layer instability[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1962, 12(1):1-34.
[11] DEYHLE H, HOHLER G, BIPPES H. Experimental investigation of instability wave propagation in a three-dimensional boundary-layer flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31(4):637-645.
[12] RADEZTSKY R H, REIBERT M S, SARIC W S. Development of stationary crossflow vortices on a swept wing:AIAA-1994-2373[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1994.
[13] WASSERMANN P, KLOKER M. Mechanisms and passive control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition in a three-dimensional boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 456:49-84.
[14] 徐国亮, 符松. 可压缩横流失稳及其控制[J]. 力学进展, 2012, 42(3):262-273. XU G L, FU S. The instability and control of compressible cross flows[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2012, 42(3):262-273(in Chinese).
[15] RADEZTSKY JR R H, REIBERT M, SARIC W, et al. Effect of micron-sized roughness on transition in swept-wing flows:AIAA-1993-0076[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1993.
[16] MALIK M. Boundary-layer transition prediction toolkit:AIAA-1997-1904[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1997.
[17] CHANG C L. Langley stability and transition analysis code (LASTRAC) version 1.2 user manual:NASA TM-2004-2133233[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2004.
[18] BOIKO A V, NECHEPURENKO Y M, ZHUCHKOV R N, et al. Laminar-turbulent transition prediction module for LOGOS package[J]. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2014, 21(2):191-210.
[19] PINNA F. VESTA toolkit:A software to compute transition and stability of boundary layers:AIAA-2013-2616[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[20] 黄章峰, 逯学志, 于高通. 机翼边界层的横流稳定性分析和转捩预测[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2014, 32(1):14-20. HUANG Z F, LU X Z, YU G T. Cross-flow instability analysis and transition prediction of airfoil boundary layer[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(1):14-20(in Chinese).
[21] 宋文萍, 吴猛猛, 朱震, 等. 面向层流减阻设计的转捩预测方法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(2):213-228. SONG W P, WU M M, ZHU Z, et al. Transition prediction methods towards significant drag reduction via laminar flow technology[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2):213-228(in Chinese).
[22] SHI Y Y, GROSS R, MADER C A, et al. Transition prediction in a RANS solver based on linear stability theory for complex three-dimensional configurations:AIAA-2018-0819[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2018.
[23] PERRAUD J, ARNAL D, CASALIS G, et al. Automatic transition predictions using simplified methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(11):2676-2684.
[24] BÉGOU G, DENIAU H, VERMEERSCH O, et al. Database approach for laminar-turbulent transition prediction:Navier-Stokes compatible reformulation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(11):3648-3660.
[25] KRUMBEIN A. e^N transition prediction for 3D wing configurations using database methods and a local, linear stability code[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2008, 12(8):592-598.
[26] ELIASSON P, HANIFI A, PENG S H. Influence of transition on high-lift prediction with the NASA trap wing model:AIAA-2011-3009[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[27] DRELA M, GILES M B. Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils[J]. AIAA Journal, 1987, 25(10):1347-1355.
[28] CODER J, MAUGHMER M D. A CFD-compatible transition model using an amplification factor transport equation:AIAA-2013-0253[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[29] CODER J G, MAUGHMER M D. Computational fluid dynamics compatible transition modeling using an amplification factor transport equation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(11):2506-2512.
[30] CODER J G, MAUGHMER M D. Application of the amplification factor transport transition model to the shear stress transport model:AIAA-2015-0588[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[31] CODER J G. Enhancement of the amplification factor transport transition modeling framework:AIAA-2017-1709[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2017.
[32] CODER J G. Further development of the amplification factor transport transition model for aerodynamic flows:AIAA-2019-0039[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2019.
[33] XU J K, BAI J Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Transition study of 3D aerodynamic configures using improved transport equations modeling[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(4):874-881.
[34] XU J K, HAN X, QIAO L, et al. Fully local amplification factor transport equation for stationary crossflow instabilities[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(7):2682-2693.
[35] XU J K, QIAO L, BAI J Q. Improved local amplification factor transport equation for stationary crossflow instability in subsonic and transonic flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(12):3073-3081.
[36] 王玉轩, 徐家宽, 张扬, 等. 横流驻波增长因子模式在跨声速边界层的应用[J/OL]. 空气动力学学报, (2021-12-21)[2021-12-31]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1192.TK.20211220.1139.010.html. WANG Y X, XU J K, ZHANG Y, et al. Applications of transition model based on amplification factor of stationary crossflow waves in transonic boundary layers[J/OL]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, (2021-12-21)[2021-12-31]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1192.TK.20211220.1139.010.html (in Chinese).
[37] XU J K, QIAO L, BAI J Q. A CFD-compatible amplification factor transport equation for oblique Tollmien-Schlichting waves in supersonic boundary layers[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020, 2020:3945463.
[38] XU J K. Linear amplification factor transport equation for stationary crossflow instabilities in supersonic boundary layers[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021, 235(6):703-717.
[39] XU J K, BAI J Q, QIAO L, et al. Fully local formulation of a transition closure model for transitional flow simulations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10):3015-3023.
[40] MACK L. Transition prediction and linear stability theory[R]. Paris:AGARD, 1977.
[41] 史亚云, 白俊强, 华俊, 等. 基于放大因子与Spalart-Allmaras湍流模型的转捩预测[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(7):1670-1677. SHI Y Y, BAI J Q, HUA J, et al. Transition prediction based on amplification factor and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(7):1670-1677(in Chinese).
[42] 徐家宽, 白俊强. 基于边界层相似性解的放大因子输运模型[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4):1103-1113. XU J K, BAI J Q. Amplification factor transport model based on boundary layer similarity solution[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(4):1103-1113(in Chinese).
[43] LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12):2894-2906.
[44] MENTER F R, SMIRNOV P E, LIU T, et al. A one-equation local correlation-based transition model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2015, 95(4):583-619.
[45] LANGTRY R. Extending the γ-Re_θt correlation based transition model for crossflow effects:AIAA-2015-2474[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[46] VENKATACHARI B S, PAREDES P, DERLAGA J M, et al. Assessment of transition modeling capability in OVERFLOW with emphasis on swept-wing configurations:AIAA-2020-1034[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2020.
[47] PAREDES P, VENKATACHARI B, CHOUDHARI M M, et al. Toward a practical method for hypersonic transition prediction based on stability correlations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(10):4475-4484.
[48] VENKATACHARI B S, PAREDES P, DERLAGA J M, et al. Assessment of RANS-based transition models based on experimental data of the common research model with natural laminar flow:AIAA-2021-1430[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2021.
[49] MVLLER C, HERBST F. Modelling of crossflow induced transition based on local variables[C]//6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI), 2014:6358-6369.
[50] GRABE C, NIE S Y, KRUMBEIN A. Transition transport modeling for the prediction of crossflow transition:AIAA-2016-3572[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2016.
[51] XU J K, BAI J Q, FU Z Y, et al. Parallel compatible transition closure model for high-speed transitional flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(9):3040-3050.
[52] QIAO L, XU J K, BAI J Q, et al. Fully local transition closure model for hypersonic boundary layers considering crossflow effects[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(5):1692-1706.
[53] CROUCH J D, NG L L. Variable N-factor method for transition prediction in three-dimensional boundary layers[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(2):211-216.

Progress in amplification factor transport models in subsonic and transonic boundary layers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Deyang TIAN, Yi PING, Yesi CHEN, Weifang CHEN. Influence of physical and chemical models on electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics of flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 214-224.
[2]	LIU Qingyang, LEI Juanmian, LIU Zhou, SHI Lei, ZHOU Weijiang. γ-Re_θt-f_Re transition model for compressible flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125794-125794.
[3]	ZHANG Haoyuan, SUN Dong, QIU Bo, ZHU Yandan, WANG Anling. Influence of turbulent kinetic energy on shock wave/boundary layer interaction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125504-125504.
[4]	ZHU Zhibin, SHANG Qing, SHEN Qing. Crossflow modification of transition model for hypersonic boundary layer and its application [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125685-125685.
[5]	NIE Han, SONG Wenping, HAN Zhonghua, CHEN Jianqiang, DUAN Maochang, WAN Bingbing. Automatic transition prediction for natural-laminar-flow wing design of supersonic transports [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526342-526342.
[6]	SHU Bowen, DU Yiming, GAO Zhenghong, XIA Lu, CHEN Shusheng. Numerical simulation of Reynolds stress model of typical aerospace separated flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526385-526385.
[7]	CHEN Yifu, WANG Yiwen, DENG Yiju, WANG Bo, BAI Junqiang, LU Lei. Experiment and numerical simulation of natural laminar flow wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526793-526793.
[8]	NIU Xiaotian, LI Jie, ZHOU Zhipeng, YANG Zhao, CHANG Mochen. Sensitivity analysis of transonic laminar flow characteristics of an aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526771-526771.
[9]	TANG Songxiang, LI Jie, ZHANG Heng, NIU Xiaotian. Aerodynamic performance optimization design of middle wing section of a special laminar unmanned flight in high-speed cruise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526766-526766.
[10]	XIE Chenyue, WANG Jianchun, WAN Minping, CHEN Shiyi. Artificial neural network model for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulence [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625723-625723.
[11]	CHEN Jiangtao, ZHANG Chao, WU Xiaojun, ZHAO Wei. Quantification of turbulence model-selection uncertainties considering discretization errors [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625741-625741.
[12]	XIANG Xinghao, ZHANG Yifeng, YUAN Xianxu, TU Guohua, WAN Bingbing, CHEN Jianqiang. C-γ-Re_θ model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625711-625711.
[13]	CHEN Jianqiang, TU Guohua, WAN Bingbing, YUAN Xianxu, YANG Qiang, ZHUANG Yu, XIANG Xinghao. Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124317-124317.
[14]	YAN Chongyang, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Haixin. Application of field inversion based on discrete adjoint method in turbulence modeling [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524695-524695.
[15]	ZHANG Weiwei, KOU Jiaqing, LIU Yilang. Prospect of artificial intelligence empowered fluid mechanics [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524689-524689.