桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25264

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升

张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云

南京航空航天大学航空学院, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2021-01-14 修回日期:2021-02-21 发布日期:2021-03-26
通讯作者: 韩东 E-mail:donghan@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11972181）；旋翼空气动力学重点实验室开放基金（RAL20200104）；江苏省第十五批"六大人才高峰"高层次人才项目（GDZB-013）；江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目（PAPD）；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划（KYCX21-0228）

Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist

ZHANG Yuhang, HAN Dong, WAN Haoyun

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2021-01-14 Revised:2021-02-21 Published:2021-03-26
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(11972181); the Open Research Foundation of the Key Aerodynamics Laboratory(RAL20200104); the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province(GDZB-013); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institute(PAPD); Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX21-0228)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究桨叶沿展向不同位置的负扭转对直升机旋翼性能的影响，以各向异性复合材料中等变形梁模型为基础建立旋翼性能计算模型，实现在不同速度前飞时直升机旋翼需用功率的预测。理论预测与试飞数据对比一致，验证了本文分析模型的有效性。以UH-60直升机为样例，按翼型将桨叶沿展向分为内、中、外3段，从迎角和升阻比分布入手研究各段负扭对旋翼需用功率的影响效果和机理。整体上，直升机前飞速度越高，桨叶负扭的影响越明显。其中，内段负扭对旋翼性能有负面影响，但影响较小；中段负扭对桨盘上气流环境的改善起决定性作用，高速前飞时可使旋翼需用功率降低10%以上；外段负扭有利于降低需用功率，作用效果一般。通过遍历法得到了一组分段线性桨叶扭转方案，在各飞行状态时都优于线性负扭方案。

关键词: 直升机, 桨叶扭转, 旋翼性能, 性能优化, 功率, 迎角, 升阻比

Abstract: To investigate the effect of the blade twist on helicopter rotor performance, a rotor performance calculation model, based on anisotropic composite medium deformation beam model, is derived to predict the power required of a helicopter rotor at any flight speed. The theoretical prediction is consistent with the flight test data, which verifies the effectiveness of the analysis model. According to airfoil distribution of the UH-60 helicopter, the blade is divided into three segments, which are inner, middle and outer segment respectively. And the effect and its mechanism of the three segments on the required power are studied based on the distribution of angle of attack and the lift-drag ratio over the rotor disk. Overall, the faster the helicopter flies forward, the greater the effect of blade twist is. The twist of the inner segment has a negative effect on the rotor performance, but the effect is small. The twist of the middle segment plays a decisive role in improving the airflow environment over the rotor disk, and can reduce the required power by more than 10% in high-speed forward flight. The outer segment is beneficial to power reduction, and the effect is average. A set of piecewise linear twist schemes for each flight velocity are obtained by traversal method, which is better than linear twist scheme in any flight state.

Key words: helicopter, blade twist, rotor performance, performance optimization, power, angle of attack, lift drag ratio

中图分类号:

V211.52

张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云. 桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225264.

ZHANG Yuhang, HAN Dong, WAN Haoyun. Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225264.

参考文献

[1] PRABHAKAR T, GANDHI F, STEINER J, el al. A centrifugal force actuated variable span morphing helicopter rotor[C]//63rd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 2007.
[2] BOWEN-DAVIES G M, CHOPRA I. Aeromechanics of a slowed rotor[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2015, 60(3):1-13.
[3] GESSOW A. Effect of rotor-tip speed on helicopter hovering performance and maximum forward speed:NACA-ARR-L6A16[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA,1946.
[4] BINGHAM G J. The aerodynamic influences of rotor blade airfoils, twist, taper and solidity on hover and forward flight performance[C]//37th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, 1981:37-50.
[5] RAMANUJAM R, ABHISHEK A. Performance optimization of variable-speed and variable-geometry rotor concept[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2016, 54(2):476-489.
[6] WALSH J L, LAMARSH W J II, ADELMAN H M. Fully integrated aerodynamic/dynamic optimization of helicopter rotor blades[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1993, 18(3-4):53-72.
[7] GUSTAFSON F B, GESSOW A. Analysis of flight-performance measurements on a twisted, plywood-covered helicopter rotor in various flight conditions:NACA-TN-1595[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA, 1948.
[8] GESSOW A. Flight investigation of effects of rotor-blade twist on helicopter performance in the high-speed and vertical-autorotative-descent conditions:NACA-TN-1666[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA, 1948.
[9] QUACKENBUSH T R, WACHSPRESS D A, KAUFMAN A E. Optimization of rotor performance in hover using a free wake analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1991, 28(3):200-207.
[10] GUSTAFSON F B, MYERS G C. Stalling of helicopter blades:NACA-TR-840[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1946.
[11] CHAE S, YEE K, YANG C, et al. Helicopter rotor shape optimization for the improvement ofaeroacoustic performance in hover[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(5):1770-1783.
[12] KEYS C, TARZANIN F, MCHUGH F. Effect of twist on helicopter performance and vibratory loads[C]//Thirteenth European Rotorcraft Forum, 1987.
[13] VU N A, LEE J W. Aerodynamic design optimization of helicopter rotor blades including airfoil shape for forward flight[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 42:106-117.
[14] GESSOW A. Effect of rotor-blade twist and plan-form taper on helicopter hovering performance:NACA-TN-1542[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA, 1948.
[15] WALSH J L, BINGHAM G J, RILEY M F. Optimization methods applied to the aerodynamic design of helicopter rotor blades[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1987, 32(4):39-44.
[16] LEISHMANN J G. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2000:290-292.
[17] HARRISON R, STACEY S, HANSFORD B. BERP Ⅳ-the design, development and testing of an advanced rotor blade[C]//Proceedings of the 64th Annual Forum of AHS International, 2008:2524-2543.
[18] PAUL W, ZINCONE R. Advanced technology to the UH-60A and S-76 Helicopters[C]//Third European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Symposium, AIX-EN-PROVENCE, 1977.
[19] STRAUB F K, CALLAHAN C B, CULP J D. Rotor design optimization using a multidisciplinary approach[J]. Structural Optimization, 1992, 5(1-2):70-75.
[20] 王博, 招启军, 徐国华. 悬停状态直升机桨叶扭转分布的优化数值计算[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(7):1163-1172. WANG B, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical optimization of helicopter rotor twist distribution in hover[J]. ActaAeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(7):1163-1172(in Chinese).
[21] ZHANG X C, WAN Z Q, YANG C, et al. Variable twistblade with piecewise linear twist control for rotor power reduction[C]//AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston:AIAA, 2019.
[22] HODGES D H, DOWELL E H. Nonlinear equations of motion for the elastic bending and torsion of twisted non-uniform blades:NASA-TN-D7818[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1974.
[23] HOSGES D H. Nonlinear composite beam theory[M]. Reston:AIAA Inc., 2006:39-42.
[24] PETERS D A, HAQUANG N. Technical note:Dynamic inflow for practical applications[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1988, 33(4):64-68.
[25] SIVANERI N T, CHOPRA I. Finite element analysis forbearingless rotor blade aeroelasticity[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1984, 29(2):42-51.
[26] OWEN D R J, HINTON E. Finite elements in plasticity:Theory and practice[M]. Swansea:Pineridge Press, 1980:431-436.
[27] 董晨, 韩东, 杨克龙. 独立桨距控制对直升机飞行性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(10):222075. DONG C, HAN D, YANG K L. Effect of individual blade pitch control on flight performance of helicopters[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(10):222075(in Chinese).
[28] HILBERT K B. A mathematical model of the UH-60 helicopter:NASA-TM-85890[R]. Washington D.C.:NASA, 1984.
[29] DAVIDS S J. Predesign study for a modern 4-bladed rotor for the RSRA:NASA-TM-CR-166155[R]. Washington D.C.:NASA, 1981.
[30] YEO H, BOUSMAN W G, JOHNSON W. Performance analysis of a utility helicopter with standard and advanced rotors[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2004, 49(3):250-270.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升

Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李博, 王潇. 共轴双旋翼/尾推桨/传动耦合系统动力学建模与固有特性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528945-528945.
[2]	刘琦, 史勇杰, 胡志远, 徐国华. 共轴刚性旋翼气动及噪声特性的参数影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528856-528856.
[3]	刘昌昊, 曹义华, 梅晓萌, 汪茂胜, 张广林. 高速直升机运输效能评估[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 530182-530182.
[4]	仇钰清, 李俨, 郎金溪, 刘育衔, 王重. 高速直升机过渡模态鲁棒自适应姿态控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529927-529927.
[5]	曾怡兰, 韩东, 刘壮壮, 周鑫. 高速飞行复合式直升机旋翼受上洗时的驱转特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529061-529061.
[6]	韩少强, 宋文萍, 韩忠华, 许建华. 高速共轴刚性旋翼非定常流动高精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529064-529064.
[7]	王梓旭, 李攀, 鲁可, 朱振华, 陈仁良. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机配平策略优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529069-529069.
[8]	邓景辉. 高速直升机关键技术与发展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529085-529085.
[9]	聂博文, 王亮权, 黄志银, 何龙, 杨仕鹏, 颜鸿涛, 章贵川. 复合式高速无人直升机飞行动力学建模与控制策略设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529848-529848.
[10]	王雪鹤, 柴春硕, 邢世龙, 樊枫, 黄水林. 共轴高速直升机反流区翼型设计及减阻机理[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529960-529960.
[11]	郑峰婴, 沈志敏, 李雅琴, 徐楷钊, 王新华. 共轴高速直升机增益自适应多模式切换控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529088-529088.
[12]	崔壮壮, 原昕, 赵国庆, 井思梦, 招启军. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机前飞性能操纵策略影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529256-529256.
[13]	孙大智, 陈希, 鲍为成, 卞威, 招启军. 高速直升机机身干扰对推力桨气动与噪声源特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529142-529142.
[14]	戴今钊, 陈海昕. 流场波系引导的三维消波翼优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 628942-628942.
[15]	王晓乐, 孙萍, 顾鑫, 赵春宇, 黄震宇. 直升机声学超材料舱壁的低频多带隙降噪特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 428901-428901.