桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25264

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升

张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云

南京航空航天大学航空学院, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2021-01-14 修回日期:2021-02-21 发布日期:2021-03-26
通讯作者: 韩东 E-mail:donghan@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11972181）；旋翼空气动力学重点实验室开放基金（RAL20200104）；江苏省第十五批"六大人才高峰"高层次人才项目（GDZB-013）；江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目（PAPD）；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划（KYCX21-0228）

Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist

ZHANG Yuhang, HAN Dong, WAN Haoyun

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2021-01-14 Revised:2021-02-21 Published:2021-03-26
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(11972181); the Open Research Foundation of the Key Aerodynamics Laboratory(RAL20200104); the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province(GDZB-013); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institute(PAPD); Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX21-0228)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究桨叶沿展向不同位置的负扭转对直升机旋翼性能的影响，以各向异性复合材料中等变形梁模型为基础建立旋翼性能计算模型，实现在不同速度前飞时直升机旋翼需用功率的预测。理论预测与试飞数据对比一致，验证了本文分析模型的有效性。以UH-60直升机为样例，按翼型将桨叶沿展向分为内、中、外3段，从迎角和升阻比分布入手研究各段负扭对旋翼需用功率的影响效果和机理。整体上，直升机前飞速度越高，桨叶负扭的影响越明显。其中，内段负扭对旋翼性能有负面影响，但影响较小；中段负扭对桨盘上气流环境的改善起决定性作用，高速前飞时可使旋翼需用功率降低10%以上；外段负扭有利于降低需用功率，作用效果一般。通过遍历法得到了一组分段线性桨叶扭转方案，在各飞行状态时都优于线性负扭方案。

关键词: 直升机, 桨叶扭转, 旋翼性能, 性能优化, 功率, 迎角, 升阻比

Abstract: To investigate the effect of the blade twist on helicopter rotor performance, a rotor performance calculation model, based on anisotropic composite medium deformation beam model, is derived to predict the power required of a helicopter rotor at any flight speed. The theoretical prediction is consistent with the flight test data, which verifies the effectiveness of the analysis model. According to airfoil distribution of the UH-60 helicopter, the blade is divided into three segments, which are inner, middle and outer segment respectively. And the effect and its mechanism of the three segments on the required power are studied based on the distribution of angle of attack and the lift-drag ratio over the rotor disk. Overall, the faster the helicopter flies forward, the greater the effect of blade twist is. The twist of the inner segment has a negative effect on the rotor performance, but the effect is small. The twist of the middle segment plays a decisive role in improving the airflow environment over the rotor disk, and can reduce the required power by more than 10% in high-speed forward flight. The outer segment is beneficial to power reduction, and the effect is average. A set of piecewise linear twist schemes for each flight velocity are obtained by traversal method, which is better than linear twist scheme in any flight state.

Key words: helicopter, blade twist, rotor performance, performance optimization, power, angle of attack, lift drag ratio

中图分类号:

V211.52

张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云. 桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225264-225264.

ZHANG Yuhang, HAN Dong, WAN Haoyun. Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225264-225264.

参考文献

[1] PRABHAKAR T, GANDHI F, STEINER J, el al. A centrifugal force actuated variable span morphing helicopter rotor[C]//63rd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 2007.
[2] BOWEN-DAVIES G M, CHOPRA I. Aeromechanics of a slowed rotor[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2015, 60(3):1-13.
[3] GESSOW A. Effect of rotor-tip speed on helicopter hovering performance and maximum forward speed:NACA-ARR-L6A16[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA,1946.
[4] BINGHAM G J. The aerodynamic influences of rotor blade airfoils, twist, taper and solidity on hover and forward flight performance[C]//37th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, 1981:37-50.
[5] RAMANUJAM R, ABHISHEK A. Performance optimization of variable-speed and variable-geometry rotor concept[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2016, 54(2):476-489.
[6] WALSH J L, LAMARSH W J II, ADELMAN H M. Fully integrated aerodynamic/dynamic optimization of helicopter rotor blades[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1993, 18(3-4):53-72.
[7] GUSTAFSON F B, GESSOW A. Analysis of flight-performance measurements on a twisted, plywood-covered helicopter rotor in various flight conditions:NACA-TN-1595[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA, 1948.
[8] GESSOW A. Flight investigation of effects of rotor-blade twist on helicopter performance in the high-speed and vertical-autorotative-descent conditions:NACA-TN-1666[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA, 1948.
[9] QUACKENBUSH T R, WACHSPRESS D A, KAUFMAN A E. Optimization of rotor performance in hover using a free wake analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1991, 28(3):200-207.
[10] GUSTAFSON F B, MYERS G C. Stalling of helicopter blades:NACA-TR-840[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1946.
[11] CHAE S, YEE K, YANG C, et al. Helicopter rotor shape optimization for the improvement ofaeroacoustic performance in hover[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(5):1770-1783.
[12] KEYS C, TARZANIN F, MCHUGH F. Effect of twist on helicopter performance and vibratory loads[C]//Thirteenth European Rotorcraft Forum, 1987.
[13] VU N A, LEE J W. Aerodynamic design optimization of helicopter rotor blades including airfoil shape for forward flight[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 42:106-117.
[14] GESSOW A. Effect of rotor-blade twist and plan-form taper on helicopter hovering performance:NACA-TN-1542[R]. Washington, D.C.:NACA, 1948.
[15] WALSH J L, BINGHAM G J, RILEY M F. Optimization methods applied to the aerodynamic design of helicopter rotor blades[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1987, 32(4):39-44.
[16] LEISHMANN J G. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2000:290-292.
[17] HARRISON R, STACEY S, HANSFORD B. BERP Ⅳ-the design, development and testing of an advanced rotor blade[C]//Proceedings of the 64th Annual Forum of AHS International, 2008:2524-2543.
[18] PAUL W, ZINCONE R. Advanced technology to the UH-60A and S-76 Helicopters[C]//Third European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Symposium, AIX-EN-PROVENCE, 1977.
[19] STRAUB F K, CALLAHAN C B, CULP J D. Rotor design optimization using a multidisciplinary approach[J]. Structural Optimization, 1992, 5(1-2):70-75.
[20] 王博, 招启军, 徐国华. 悬停状态直升机桨叶扭转分布的优化数值计算[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(7):1163-1172. WANG B, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical optimization of helicopter rotor twist distribution in hover[J]. ActaAeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(7):1163-1172(in Chinese).
[21] ZHANG X C, WAN Z Q, YANG C, et al. Variable twistblade with piecewise linear twist control for rotor power reduction[C]//AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston:AIAA, 2019.
[22] HODGES D H, DOWELL E H. Nonlinear equations of motion for the elastic bending and torsion of twisted non-uniform blades:NASA-TN-D7818[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1974.
[23] HOSGES D H. Nonlinear composite beam theory[M]. Reston:AIAA Inc., 2006:39-42.
[24] PETERS D A, HAQUANG N. Technical note:Dynamic inflow for practical applications[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1988, 33(4):64-68.
[25] SIVANERI N T, CHOPRA I. Finite element analysis forbearingless rotor blade aeroelasticity[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1984, 29(2):42-51.
[26] OWEN D R J, HINTON E. Finite elements in plasticity:Theory and practice[M]. Swansea:Pineridge Press, 1980:431-436.
[27] 董晨, 韩东, 杨克龙. 独立桨距控制对直升机飞行性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(10):222075. DONG C, HAN D, YANG K L. Effect of individual blade pitch control on flight performance of helicopters[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(10):222075(in Chinese).
[28] HILBERT K B. A mathematical model of the UH-60 helicopter:NASA-TM-85890[R]. Washington D.C.:NASA, 1984.
[29] DAVIDS S J. Predesign study for a modern 4-bladed rotor for the RSRA:NASA-TM-CR-166155[R]. Washington D.C.:NASA, 1981.
[30] YEO H, BOUSMAN W G, JOHNSON W. Performance analysis of a utility helicopter with standard and advanced rotors[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2004, 49(3):250-270.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升

Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘传振, 孟旭飞, 刘荣健, 白鹏. 双后掠乘波体高超声速试验与数值分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[2]	曾国宏, 董玉昆, 吴学智, 罗晓, 赵敏如. 双绕组永磁同步电机的模块化对等控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 325488-325488.
[3]	孙灿飞, 黄林然, 沈勇. 复杂工况下的直升机行星传动轮系故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625480-625480.
[4]	费钟阳, 蒋相闻, 招启军. 基于动态RCS特征相似的直升机靶机旋翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125465-125465.
[5]	吉洪蕾, 苏俊杰, 陈仁良, 孔卫红. 适于直升机飞行仿真的高原大气紊流模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 126564-126564.
[6]	查建平, 王风娇, 郭俊贤, 李明强. 直升机主减速器噪声源控制技术概述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526123-526123.
[7]	刘知辉, 牛军川, 贾睿昊. 热梯度环境下梁高频振动的能量流模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 425336-425336.
[8]	高华敏, 张卓然, 王晨, 薛涵, 刘业. 电推进飞机新型高功率密度轴向磁场永磁电机对比与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 325229-325229.
[9]	万浩云, 韩东, 张宇杭. 被动变弦长提升变转速尾桨性能[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224981-224981.
[10]	耿延升, 艾梦琪, 王伟, 耿建中, 赵彦. 高效层流翼型设计及试验验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526798-526798.
[11]	桂幸民, 金东海, 张健成, 宋满祥, 赵洋, 胡大权. 计及叶片前缘周向不均匀源项的弯掠叶片流动机理[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527371-527371.
[12]	靳标, 邝晓飞, 彭宇, 张贞凯. 基于合作博弈的组网雷达分布式功率分配方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 324776-324776.
[13]	熊国淼, 李云鹏, 李鹏蛟, 陈超. 基于PNFM-LFM复合调制的探测干扰共享波形设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525821-525821.
[14]	刘海港, 刘亮, 王鹏, 周维. 基于模型的多电飞机能源优化特性仿真分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525801-525801.
[15]	王延灵, 卜忱, 杨文, 沈彦杰, 冯帅. 小展弦比飞翼大迎角状态空间气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124539-124539.