基于稀疏多项式混沌方法的不确定性量化分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23382

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于稀疏多项式混沌方法的不确定性量化分析

陈江涛, 章超, 刘骁, 赵辉, 胡星志, 吴晓军

中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2019-08-14 修回日期:2019-11-08 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2019-11-07
通讯作者: 吴晓军 E-mail:huang7766@sina.com
基金资助:
国家数值风洞工程项目；装备预先研究项目（41406030102）

Uncertainty quantification analysis with sparse polynomial chaos method

CHEN Jiangtao, ZHANG Chao, LIU Xiao, ZHAO Hui, HU Xingzhi, WU Xiaojun

Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2019-08-14 Revised:2019-11-08 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2019-11-07
Supported by:
National Numerical Windtunnel Project; Equipment Pre-Research Project(41406030102)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在工程复杂外形的数值模拟过程中存在着多种来源的不确定性输入。量化模拟结果的不确定性对于工程外形的性能评估和优化设计非常重要。在多变量不确定性量化问题中，传统的分析方法需要大量的样本点，计算开销巨大，因此急需发展更加高效的工具。本文发展了非嵌入式稀疏多项式混沌方法，研究了湍流模型系数的不确定性对RAE2822翼型跨声速绕流模拟的影响和材料物性参数的不确定性对烧蚀热响应预测的影响。通过求解P1优化问题，在样本点数目小于展开多项式自由度的情况下，能够比较准确地还原量级较大的若干个自由度，捕捉到输出的主要特征，也能够合理预测输出的统计信息，包括平均值、方差和每个输入变量的全局敏感性指标等。这为工程中多变量不确定性量化问题提供了很好的解决方案。

关键词: 不确定性量化, 多项式混沌, 压缩感知, 验证与确认, 稀疏性

Abstract: Various sources of uncertainty exist in numerical simulations of industry relevant geometries. Uncertainty quantification plays an important role during the design and assessment process. The computational cost increases dramatically with the number of stochastic input variables. Therefore, more efficient approaches are necessary. This paper develops a non-intrusive sparse polynomial chaos method and investigates the effects of uncertainty in turbulence model closure coefficients on the simulation of flow over RAE2822 airfoil and the effects of uncertainty in material properties on the prediction of charring ablator thermal response are investigated. It is proved that the method is capable of recovering the freedoms of several most important bases under the condition of under-determined system by solving P1 programming problem. The prediction of system response, including mean value, variance, and the relative contribution of each closure coefficient to the variation of the output quantities, is reasonable compared with full polynomial chaos. The method provides an efficient solution to the uncertainty quantification problems in industry applications.

Key words: uncertainty quantification, polynomial chaos, compressed sensing, verification and validation, sparsity

中图分类号:

V211.3

陈江涛, 章超, 刘骁, 赵辉, 胡星志, 吴晓军. 基于稀疏多项式混沌方法的不确定性量化分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 123382-123382.

CHEN Jiangtao, ZHANG Chao, LIU Xiao, ZHAO Hui, HU Xingzhi, WU Xiaojun. Uncertainty quantification analysis with sparse polynomial chaos method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 123382-123382.

参考文献 41

[1]	王晓东, 康顺. 多项式混沌方法在随机方腔流动模拟中的应用[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2011,41(6):790-798. WANG X D, KANG S. Application of polynomial chaos on numerical simulation of stochastic cavity flow[J]. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011,41(6):790-798 (in Chinese).
[2]	刘智益, 王晓东, 康顺. 多元多项式混沌法在随机方腔流动模拟中的应用[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2012, 33(3):419-422. LIU Z Y, WANG X D, KANG S. Application of multidimensional polynomial chaos on numerical simulations of stochastic cavity flow[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2012, 33(3):419-422 (in Chinese).
[3]	FISHMAN G. Monte Carlo:Concepts, algorithms and applications[M]. New York:Springer, 1996.
[4]	GHANEM R, SPANOS P. Stochastic finite elements:A spectral approach[M]. New York:Springer, 1938.
[5]	XIU D, KARNIADAKIS G. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations[J]. SIAM Journal of Science Computer, 2002, 24(2):619-644.
[6]	NAJM H N. Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 41:35-52.
[7]	WIENER N. The homogeneous chaos[J]. American Journal of Mathematics, 1938, 60:897-936.
[8]	GHANEM R G, SPANOS P D. Stochastic finite elements:A spectral approach[M]. Revised edition. New York:Dover Publications, 2003.
[9]	XIU D, KARNIADAKIS G E. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 187:137-167.
[10]	LE MAITRE O P, KNIO O, HABIB N N, et al. A stochastic projection method for fluid flow I. Basic formulation[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 173:481-511.
[11]	LACOR C, SMIRNOV S. Uncertainty propagation in the solution of compressible Navier-Stokes equations using polynomial chaos decomposition[C]//NATO RTO AVF-147 Symposium on Computational Uncertainty in Military Vehide Design, 2007.
[12]	王晓东, 康顺. 多项式混沌法求解随机Burgers 方程[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2010, 31(6):393-398. WANG X D, KANG S. Solving sochastic Burgers equation using polynomial chaos decomposition[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2010, 31(6):393-398 (in Chinese).
[13]	ELDRED M S. Recent advances in non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty analysis and design:AIAA-2009-2274[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2009.
[14]	HOSDER S, WALTERS R W, BALCH M. Point-collocation nonintrusive polynomial chaos method for stochastic computational fluid dynamics[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(12):2721-2730.
[15]	张伟, 王小永, 于剑, 等. 来流导致的高超声速气动热不确定性量化分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(5):1102-1109. ZHANG W, WANG X Y, YU J, et al. Uncertainty quantification analysis in hypersonic aerothermodynamics due to freestream[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(5):1102-1109 (in Chinese).
[16]	刘全, 王瑞利, 林忠, 等. 爆轰计算JWL状态方程参数不确定性研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013,33(6):647-654. LIU Q, WANG R L, LIN Z, et al. Uncertainty quantification for JWL EOS parameters in explosive numerical simulation[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6):647-654 (in Chinese).
[17]	LUCOR D, KARNIADAKIS G E. Adaptive generalized polynomial chaos for nonlinear random oscillators[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2004, 26(2):720-735.
[18]	WAN X, KARNIADAKIS G E. An adaptive multi-element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physicss, 2005, 209(2):617-642.
[19]	BLATMAN G, SUDRET B. An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis[J]. Probability Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 25(2):183-97.
[20]	BLATMAN G, SUDRET B. Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230(6):2345-2367.
[21]	BLATMAN G, SUDRET B. Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95(11):1216-1229.
[22]	NAIR P B, KEANE A J. Stochastic reduced basis methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(8):1653-1664.
[23]	RAISEE M, KUMAR D, LACOR C. A non-intrusive model reduction approach for polynomial chaos expansion using proper orthogonal decomposition[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2015, 103(4):293-312.
[24]	TODOR R A, SCHWAB C. Convergence rates for sparse chaos approximations of elliptic problems with stochastic coefficients[J]. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 2007, 27(2):232.
[25]	BIERI M, SCHWAB C. Sparse high order FEM for elliptic spdes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 198(1314):1149-1170.
[26]	DOOSTAN A, OWHADI H. A non-adapted sparse approximation of PDEs with stochastic inputs[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230(8):3015-3034.
[27]	MATHELIN L, GALLIVAN K. A compressed sensing approach for partial differential equations with random input data[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2012, 12(4):919-954.
[28]	YANG X, KARNIADAKIS G E. Reweighted 1 minimization method for stochastic elliptic differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 248:87-108.
[29]	PENG J, HAMPTON J, DOOSTAN A. A weighted 1-minimization approach for sparse polynomial chaos expansions[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 267:92-111.
[30]	SARGSYAN K, SAFTA C, NAJM H N, et al. Dimensionality reduction for complex models via bayesian compressive sensing[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty Quantify, 2014, 4(1):63-93.
[31]	HAMPTON J, DOOSTAN A. Compressive sampling of polynomial chaos expansions:Convergence analysis and sampling strategies[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 280:363-386.
[32]	JAKEMAN J D, ELDRED M S, SARGSYAN K. Enhancing 1-minimization estimates of polynomial chaos expansions using basis selection[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 289:18-34.
[33]	SAEED S, MEHRDAD R, MICHEL J C, et al. Efficient uncertainty quantification of stochastic CFD problems using sparse polynomial chaos and compressed sensing[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2017, 157:296-321.
[34]	CHEN J T, ZHANG Y B, ZHOU N C, et al. Numerical investigations of the high-lift configuration with Mflow solver[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(4):1051-1062.
[35]	COOK P H, MCDONALD M A, FIRMIN M C P. Aerofoil RAE2822 pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements, experimental data base for computer program assessment:AGARD-1979-0138[R]. Paris:AGARD, 1979.
[36]	SPALART P R, ALLMARAS S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flowst:AIAA-1992-0439[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1992.
[37]	赵辉,胡星志,张健,等. 湍流模型系数的不确定度对翼型绕流模拟的影响[J].航空学报, 2019, 40 (6):122581. ZHAO H, HU X Z, ZHANG J, et al. Effects of the uncertainty in turbulence model closure coefficients on the simulation of flow over airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(6):122581(in Chinese).
[38]	SOBOL I. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models[J]. Mathematical Modeling and Computational, Experiment,1993(1):407-414.
[39]	胡军,张树道,基于多项式混沌的全局敏感度分析[J]. 计算物理,2016, 33(1):1-13. HU J, ZHANG S D. Global sensitivity analysis based on polynomial chaos[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Phsics, 2016, 33(1):1-13 (in Chinese).
[40]	LACHAUD J, LAUB B. Ablation workshop test case[C]//4th Ablation Workshop, 2011:1-3.
[41]	刘骁, 国义军. 碳化材料三维烧蚀热响应有限元计算研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2016, 37(9):1150-1156. LIU X, GUO Y J. Numerical simulation research on three-dimensional ablative thermal response of charring ablators[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37(9):1150-1156 (in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于稀疏多项式混沌方法的不确定性量化分析

Uncertainty quantification analysis with sparse polynomial chaos method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈艺夫, 马宇航, 蓝庆生, 孙卫平, 史亚云, 杨体浩, 白俊强. 基于多项式混沌法的翼型不确定性分析及梯度优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127446-127446.
[2]	胡汉铎, 宋彦萍, 俞建阳, 刘瑶, 陈浮, 高文秀. 翼型不确定性量化中正交匹配追踪的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 128327-128327.
[3]	王浩浩, 高丽敏, 杨光, 吴宝海. 一种鲁棒的数据驱动不确定性量化方法及在压气机叶栅中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(17): 128169-128169.
[4]	舒博文, 黄江涛, 高正红, 刘刚, 何成军, 夏露. 二元激波矢量喷管矢量性能敏感性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(13): 127831-127831.
[5]	贾金伟, 刘利民, 韩壮志, 解辉. 基于压缩感知的抗SDIF分选射频隐身信号设计及回波信号处理[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(13): 327934-327934.
[6]	赵欢, 高正红, 夏露. 高速自然层流翼型高效气动稳健优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124894-124894.
[7]	张国斌, 张青斌, 丰志伟, 陈青全, 杨涛. 软式空中加油对接约束力不确定性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224517-224517.
[8]	许敬晖, 乔百杰, 滕光蓉, 杨志勃, 陈雪峰. 基于压缩感知的叶端定时信号参数辨识方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524229-524229.
[9]	赵剑, 黄悦琛, 李海阳, 何湘粤. 垂直起降运载火箭返回轨迹不确定性优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524829-524829.
[10]	刘劲, 韩雪侠, 宁晓琳, 陈晓, 康志伟. 基于EMD-CS的脉冲星周期超快速估计[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(8): 623486-623486.
[11]	焦敬品, 李海平, 翟顺成, 何存富, 吴斌. 基于压缩感知的金属加筋板兰姆波健康监测技术[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(7): 422695-422695.
[12]	赵辉, 胡星志, 张健, 陈江涛, 马明生. 湍流模型系数不确定度对翼型绕流模拟的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6): 122581-122581.
[13]	朱晓秀, 胡文华, 马俊涛, 郭宝锋, 薛东方. 双基地角时变下的ISAR稀疏孔径自聚焦成像[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(8): 322059-322059.
[14]	宁方立, 张超, 潘峰, 刘勇, 韦娟. 飞机起落架噪声源定位的压缩感知算法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5): 121810-121810.
[15]	宋赋强, 阎超, 马宝峰, 鞠胜军. 锥导乘波体构型的气动特性不确定度分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 121519-121519.