基于CFD-DEM耦合数值模拟的全尺寸直升机沙盲形成机理

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23363

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于CFD-DEM耦合数值模拟的全尺寸直升机沙盲形成机理

胡健平¹, 徐国华¹, 史勇杰¹, 吴林波²

1. 南京航空航天大学直升机旋翼动力学国家级重点实验室, 南京 210016;
2. 中国直升机设计研究所, 景德镇 333000

收稿日期:2019-08-09 修回日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2019-10-17
通讯作者: 徐国华 E-mail:ghxu@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
江苏省科研与实践创新计划项目（KYCX19_0200）

Formation mechanism of brownout in full-scale helicopter based on CFD-DEM couplings numerical simulation

HU Jianping¹, XU Guohua¹, SHI Yongjie¹, WU Linbo²

1. National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Rotorcraft Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2. China Helicopter Research and Development Institute, Jingdezhen 333000, China

Received:2019-08-09 Revised:2019-10-21 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2019-10-17
Supported by:
Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX19_0200)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究直升机发生沙盲时沙尘云在悬停流场中的状态和分布规律，采用基于雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程和Menter 剪切应力输运（SST）k-ω湍流模型的数值模型，通过应用程序编程接口耦合基于Hertz-Mindlin （No Slip）碰撞接触模型的离散元模型，并基于"多球法"构建了更加真实的非球形沙尘颗粒，计算了沙尘颗粒在流场中的运动和分布状态。与可得到的试验结果进行对比，验证了数值方法的有效性，并进行了地效状态旋翼拉力系数、桨尖涡位置以及沙尘云形成的宏观轮廓图的计算。应用所建立的方法，对不同悬停高度的直升机地效流场进行了计算，给出了流场的涡量以及速度云图，着重对比了不同悬停高度下沙尘云中沙尘颗粒速度和分布情况，分析了地效流场对沙尘颗粒状态的影响及沙尘云的形成机理，并计算出了沙尘云宏观分布图。结果表明：流场中大部分沙尘颗粒只能在地表随流场扩散而并不能形成沙尘云；沙尘云中外层空间的沙尘浓度比内层高；位于桨盘平面下层区域的沙尘颗粒以径向运动为主，切向速度较小，而位于桨盘平面上层的沙尘颗粒速度方向各异，速度大小接近。

关键词: 地面效应, 沙盲, 计算流体动力学, 直升机, 耦合离散单元法

Abstract: To study the state and distribution of dust cloud in the hovering flow field of helicopter brownout, a numerical model based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω turbulence model and a discrete element model based on Hertz-Mindlin (No Slip) contact model are coupled through the application programming interface. A more realistic model is constructed based on the multi-sphere method, and non-spherical dust particles are used to calculate the motion and distribution in the flow field. The effectiveness of the approach is verified by comparing the numerical results with the available experimental results. The drag coefficient of the rotor in the in-ground effect, the position of the tip vortices and the macroscopic outline of the dust cloud are calculated. By using the established method, the in-ground effect flow field of helicopters at different hovering altitudes is calculated. The vorticity and velocity contour of the flow field are obtained. The velocity and distribution of dust particles in dust clouds at different hovering altitudes are compared. The influence of ground effect flow field on the state of dust particles and the formation mechanism of dust clouds are analyzed. The macroscopic distribution of dust clouds are also obtained. The results show that most of the dust particles in the flow field can only diffuse with the flow field on the ground, but can not form dust clouds. The concentration of dust in outer space is higher than that in inner space. The dust particles located in the lower region of the rotor disk move mainly in the radial direction with smaller tangential velocity, while the velocity of the dust particles located in the upper region of the rotor disk are different in direction and close in magnitude.

Key words: ground effect, brownout, CFD, helicopter, coupling discrete element method

中图分类号:

V211.52

胡健平, 徐国华, 史勇杰, 吴林波. 基于CFD-DEM耦合数值模拟的全尺寸直升机沙盲形成机理[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 123363-123363.

HU Jianping, XU Guohua, SHI Yongjie, WU Linbo. Formation mechanism of brownout in full-scale helicopter based on CFD-DEM couplings numerical simulation[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 123363-123363.

参考文献 25

[1]	POLZIN J W, GUNTUPALLI K, RAJAGOPALAN R G. Discrete blade model for rotorcraft brownout[C]//29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2011.
[2]	SYAL M, LEISHMAN J G. Comparisons of predicted brownout dust clouds with photogrammetry measurements[C]//67th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 2011.
[3]	SYAL M, LEISHMAN J G. Modeling of bombardment ejections in the rotorcraft brownout problem[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(4):849-866.
[4]	WONG O D, TANNER P E. Photogrammetric measurements of an EH-60L brownout cloud[C]//American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum Proceedings, 2010.
[5]	叶靓, 招启军, 徐国华. 基于非结构嵌套网格方法的旋翼地面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5):780-786. YE L, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical simulation on flowfield of rotor in ground effect based on unstructured embedded grid method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(5):780-786 (in Chinese).
[6]	朱明勇, 招启军, 王博. 基于CFD和混合配平算法的直升机旋翼地面效应模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551. ZHU M Y, ZHAO Q J, WANG B. Simulation of helicopter rotor in ground effect based on CFD method and hybrid trim algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551 (in Chinese).
[7]	GANESH B, KOMERATH N. Study of ground vortex structure of rotorcraft in ground effect at low advance ratios[C]//24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2006.
[8]	LEE T E, LEISHMAN J G, RAMASAMY M. Fluid dynamics of interacting blade tip vortices with a ground plane[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2010, 55(2):022005.
[9]	MILLUZZO J I. Effects of blade tip shape on rotor in-ground-effect aerodynamics[D]. Maryland:University of Maryland, 2012:39-83.
[10]	HANCE B T. Effects of body shapes on rotor in-ground-effect aerodynamics[D]. Maryland:University of Maryland, 2012:42-66.
[11]	WHITEHOUSE G R, WACHSPRESS D A, QUACKENBUSH T R, et al. Exploring aerodynamic methods for mitigating brownout[C]//American Helicopter Society 65th Annual Forum, 2009.
[12]	WHITEHOUSE G R, WACHSPRESS D A, QUACKENBUSH T R. Aerodynamic design of helicopter rotors for reduced brownout[C]//International Powered Lift Conference, 2010.
[13]	THOMAS S, AMIRAUX M, BAEDER J D. Modeling the two-phase flowfield beneath a hovering rotor on graphics processing units using a FVM-RANS hybrid methodology[C]//21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2013.
[14]	YU H M, CHENG W M, WU L R, et al. Mechanisms of dust diffuse pollution under forced-exhaust ventilation in fully-mechanized excavation faces by CFD-DEM[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 317:31-47.
[15]	HOU X Y, DING T X, DENG Z Q, et al. Study of the creeping of irregularly shaped Martian dust particles based on DEM-CFD[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 328:184-198.
[16]	魏可可, 高霄鹏. 基于STAR-CCM+对5415船模的阻力预报[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2016,37(9):157-161. WEI K K, GAO X P. Resistance prediction of 5415 ship model based on STAR-CCM+[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2016, 37(9):157-161 (in Chinese).
[17]	DUBUC L, CANTARITI F, WOODGATE M, et al. Solution of the unsteady Euler equations using an implicit dual-time method[J]. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(8):1417-1424.
[18]	QU Q L, WANG W, LIU P Q, et al. Airfoil aerodynamics in ground effect for wide range of angles of attack[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(4):1048-1061.
[19]	QIN Y P, LIU P Q, QU Q L, et al. Numerical study of aerodynamic forces and flow physics of a delta wing in dynamic ground effect[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2016, 51:152-221.
[20]	QIN Y P, LIU P Q, QU Q L, et al. Wing/canard interference of a close-coupled canard configuration in static ground effect[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2017, 69:60-75.
[21]	KUMAR M, MURTHY V. Analysis of flow around multibladed rotor using CFD in the frequency region[C]//25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2007.
[22]	NOROUZI H R, ZARGHAMI R, SOTUDEH-GHAREBAGH R, et al. Coupled CFD-DEM modeling (formulation, implementation and application to multiphase flows)CFD-DEM applications to multiphase flow[M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2016:256-265.
[23]	杜俊. 基于CFD-DEM方法的希相气力输送数值模拟研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2015:20-21. DU J. Simulation of dilute pneumatic conveying by CFD-DEM[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2015:20-21 (in Chinese).
[24]	LIGHT J S. Tip vortex geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor in ground effect[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1993, 38(2):34-42.
[25]	KUTZ B M, KOWARSCH U, KEßLER M, et al. Numerical investigation of helicopter rotors in ground effect[C]//30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2012.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于CFD-DEM耦合数值模拟的全尺寸直升机沙盲形成机理

Formation mechanism of brownout in full-scale helicopter based on CFD-DEM couplings numerical simulation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙灿飞, 黄林然, 沈勇. 复杂工况下的直升机行星传动轮系故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625480-625480.
[2]	谭剑锋, 何龙, 于领军, 周国臣. 基于黏性涡粒子/沙粒DEM的直升机沙盲建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125536-125536.
[3]	费钟阳, 蒋相闻, 招启军. 基于动态RCS特征相似的直升机靶机旋翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125465-125465.
[4]	吉洪蕾, 苏俊杰, 陈仁良, 孔卫红. 适于直升机飞行仿真的高原大气紊流模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 126564-126564.
[5]	查建平, 王风娇, 郭俊贤, 李明强. 直升机主减速器噪声源控制技术概述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526123-526123.
[6]	张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云. 桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225264-225264.
[7]	陈宪, 陈诚, 黄江涛, 陈其盛, 余龙舟, 钟世东. 腹部襟翼对飞翼布局飞行器起降气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 125028-125028.
[8]	万浩云, 韩东, 张宇杭. 被动变弦长提升变转速尾桨性能[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224981-224981.
[9]	杨宗耀, 张靖周, 单勇. 一体化红外抑制器后机身狭缝进口布置对气流组织和红外辐射特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124445-124445.
[10]	陈亚萍, 喻溅鉴, 胡磊, 王宇堂. 直升机旋翼轴弯矩特征及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524168-524168.
[11]	李言青, 宣益民. 直升机热管理与红外辐射特性耦合分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 124270-124270.
[12]	王洛烽, 陈仁良. 重型直升机飞行动力学刚弹耦合建模及空中共振稳定性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 124634-124634.
[13]	周金龙, 董凌华, 杨卫东. 直升机后缘襟翼驱动器迟滞现象仿真与抑制[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(4): 223384-223384.
[14]	蒋坤宏, 张靖周, 单勇, 郑禛, 杨宗耀. 一体化红外抑制器遮挡和出口修型对后机身表面温度和红外辐射特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(2): 123497-123497.
[15]	王小东, 秦一凡, 季宏丽, 陆洋, 裘进浩. 基于声学黑洞效应的直升机驾驶舱宽带降噪[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(10): 223831-223831.