一种基于Kriging和Monte Carlo的主动学习可靠度算法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0361

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

一种基于Kriging和Monte Carlo的主动学习可靠度算法

佟操¹, 孙志礼¹, 杨丽^1,2, 孙安邦¹

1. 东北大学机械工程与自动化学院, 沈阳 110819;
2. 沈阳理工大学装备工程学院, 沈阳 110159

收稿日期:2014-10-21 修回日期:2014-12-28 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-01-07
通讯作者: 孙志礼男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 机械可靠性工程, 摩檫学设计理论及应用。 Tel: 024-83679346 E-mail: zhlsun@mail.neu.edu.cn E-mail:zhlsun@mail.neu.edu.cn
作者简介:佟操男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 结构可靠性分析, 齿轮系统动力学。 E-mail: tongcao19@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项 (2013ZX04011-011)

An active learning reliability method based on Kriging and Monte Carlo

TONG Cao¹, SUN Zhili¹, YANG Li^1,2, SUN Anbang¹

1. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China;
2. School of Equipment Engineering, Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang 110159, China

Received:2014-10-21 Revised:2014-12-28 Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-01-07
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Major Project (2013ZX04011-011)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

机械结构可靠性分析时,常常会采用代理模型拟合隐式功能函数来解决计算量大的问题,但由于试验设计方案需要同时考虑代理模型的拟合精度和可靠度计算精度的问题。因此,为了能够充分使用较少的样本信息,最大化可靠度计算精度,本文充分发挥Kriging预测的随机特性,提出一种主动学习可靠度计算方法。首先,类似于优化问题中改善函数的选点方式,提出一种基于Kriging预测的学习函数,基于Monte Carlo法生成大量的候选样本点,找出学习函数最小值对应的样本点作为最佳取样点。其次,推导和提出了一种学习停止的条件,保证了Monte Carlo样本点预测符号的正确性且学习次数明显减小。最后,通过2个数值算例分析结果表明,该算法相比其他方法需要更少的样本数量,得到的可靠度计算精度更高,验证了本文算法的正确性和高效性。

关键词: 可靠性, Monte Carlo, Kriging模型, 主动学习, 失效概率

Abstract:

In structural reliability analysis, surrogate models are usually used to approximate implicit performance function in order to solve the problem of large computation. However, selection of the design of numerical experiments should consider the accuracy of fitting surrogate model and the precision of calculating reliability simultaneously. Therefore, in order to make full use of the few sample information as little as possible and to maximize the accuracy of reliability calculation, an active learning reliability calculation method is proposed. Firstly, a learning function based on Kriging prediction is proposed similar to the improved function determining the selection of point in the optimization problem. And the best sampling point corresponding to the minimum of learning function is selected from the Monte Carlo population. Secondly, an iterative stopping criterion is proposed to ensure the correctness of Monte Carlo sample points' sign, and the iterations decrease dramatically. Finally, the correctness and efficiency of the proposed method are proved by two academic examples from literature; it is shown that the proposed method requires fewer calls to the performance function than other methods and the failure probability obtained from the proposed method is more accurate.

Key words: reliability, Monte Carlo, Kriging model, active learning, failure probability

中图分类号:

佟操, 孙志礼, 杨丽, 孙安邦. 一种基于Kriging和Monte Carlo的主动学习可靠度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9): 2992-3001.

TONG Cao, SUN Zhili, YANG Li, SUN Anbang. An active learning reliability method based on Kriging and Monte Carlo[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(9): 2992-3001.

参考文献

[1] Ditlevsen O, Madsen H O. Structural reliability methods[M]. New York: Wiley, 1996: 87-109.
[2] Melchers R E. Structural reliability analysis and predictions[M]. New York: Wiley, 1999: 124-156.
[3] Nowak A S, Collins K R. Reliability of structures[M]. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000: 32-35.
[4] Zhang M. Structural reliability analysis: methods and procedures[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 143-174 (in Chinese). 张明. 结构可靠度分析: 方法与程序[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 143-174.
[5] Jones D R, Schonlau M, Welch W J. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1998, 13(4): 455-492.
[6] Huang D, Allen T T, Notz W I, et al. Global optimization of stochastic black-box systems via sequential kriging meta-models[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2006, 34(3): 441-466.
[7] Ranjan P, Bingham D, Michailidis G. Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes[J]. Technometrics, 2008, 50(4): 527-541.
[8] Bichon B J, Eldred M S, Swiler L P, et al. Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(10): 2459-2468.
[9] Xu J K, Bai J Q, Huang J T, et al. Aerodynamic optimization design of wing under the interaction of propeller slipstream[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(11): 2910-2920 (in Chinese). 徐家宽, 白俊强, 黄江涛, 等. 考虑螺旋桨滑流影响的机翼气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(11): 2910-2920.
[10] Chang M, Zhou Z, Wang R, et al. Primary parameters determination for year- round solar-powered aircraft of wing-sail type at higher latitudes[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(6): 1592-1603 (in Chinese). 昌敏, 周洲, 王睿, 等. 基于机翼-帆尾的高纬度跨年驻留太阳能飞机总体参数设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(6): 1592-1603.
[11] Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M. AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Structural Safety, 2011, 33(2): 145-154.
[12] Xie Y M, Yu H P, Chen J, et al. The reliability estimation nased on Kriging model[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007, 41(2): 177-180 (in Chinese). 谢延敏, 于沪平, 陈军, 等. 基于Kriging模型的可靠度计算[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2007, 41(2): 177-180.
[13] Chen Z Y, Ren Y, Bai G C, et al. Particle swarm optimized Kriging approximate model and its application to reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(7): 1522-1530 (in Chinese). 陈志英, 任远, 白广忱, 等. 粒子群优化的Kriging近似模型及其在可靠性分析中的应用[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(7): 1522-1530.
[14] Liu Z, Zhang J G, Wang C C, et al. Hybrid structure reliability method combining optimized Kriging model and importance sampling[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(6): 1347-1355 (in Chinese). 刘瞻, 张建国, 王灿灿, 等. 基于优化Kriging模型和重要抽样法的结构可靠度混合算法[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(6): 1347-1355.
[15] Matheron G. The intrinsic random functions and their applications[J]. Advances in Applied Probability, 1973, 5(3): 439-468.
[16] Sacks J, Welch W J, Mitchell T J, et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments[J]. Statistical Science, 1989, 4(4): 409-435.
[17] Lophaven S N, Nielsen H B, Sndergaard J. Surrogate modeling by Kriging[R]. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, 2003.
[18] Schueremans L, Gemert D V. Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 2005, 27(3): 246-261.
[19] Rajashekhar M R, Ellingwood B R. A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 1993, 12(3): 205-220.
[20] Gayton N, Bourinet J M, Lemaire M. CQ2RS: A new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 2003, 25(1): 99-121.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

一种基于Kriging和Monte Carlo的主动学习可靠度算法

An active learning reliability method based on Kriging and Monte Carlo

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王梓旭, 李攀, 鲁可, 朱振华, 陈仁良. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机配平策略优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529069-529069.
[2]	龚煜廉, 张建国, 吴志刚, 褚光远, 范晓铎, 黄赢. 主动学习基自适应PC⁃Kriging模型的复合材料结构可靠度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 228982-228982.
[3]	张帆, 程伯晗, 王鹏, 董磊. 二元共载系统退化相关的两阶段退化模型及可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 229046-229046.
[4]	薛小锋, 赵淼龑, 杜倩宜, 冯蕴雯, 樊俊铃, 焦婷. 基于人员和环境因素定量化的检测可靠性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 228859-228859.
[5]	郑新前, 王钧莹, 黄维娜, 伏宇, 程荣辉, 熊洪洋. 航空发动机不确定性设计体系探讨[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 27099-027099.
[6]	孙本奇, 杨强, 孙志礼, 李树军, 马宏坤, 王若男. 平面约束变胞机构构态切换能力的概率评估模型[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 426843-426843.
[7]	张帆, 孙紫荆, 肖国松, 刘嘉琛, 王鹏. 基于直觉模糊贝叶斯网络的HUD系统多阶段任务可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 226853-226853.
[8]	顾孟奇, 朱家才, 郭万林, 薛松. 可重复使用运载火箭结构疲劳耐久性与可靠性展望[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 628299-628299.
[9]	杨乐昌, 汪晨星. 基于多源异构信息的航空发动机转子参数校准与可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 228575-228575.
[10]	冯蕴雯, 唐家强, 冯成慧, 陈先民, 薛小锋. 基于载荷共享理论的多传力路径耳片可靠性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 228528-228528.
[11]	姜峰, 李华聪, 符江锋, 洪林雄. 基于RBF和主动学习的非概率可靠度求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[12]	冯蕴雯, 林心怡, 薛小锋, 杨祥, 刘佳奇. 高可靠单向爆破的民机防爆结构设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 228297-228297.
[13]	郭庆, 关德明. 民机维修任务分析的人因可靠性预测模型[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 228051-228051.
[14]	宋凯, 张弛, 晏晨辉, 宁宁, 樊俊铃, 王荣彪. 基于双参数表征的航空发动机轮盘模型辅助涡流检测可靠性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(13): 227866-227866.
[15]	员婉莹, 吕震宙. 参数可靠性全局灵敏度高效分析的代理模型法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(12): 227670-227670.