多滑翔飞行器时间协同轨迹快速规划

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24497

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

多滑翔飞行器时间协同轨迹快速规划

刘哲¹, 陆浩然², 郑伟¹, 闻国光³, 王奕迪¹, 周祥¹

1. 国防科技大学空天科学学院, 长沙 410073;
2. 北京宇航系统工程研究所, 北京 100076;
3. 北京交通大学理学院, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2020-07-04 修回日期:2020-07-26 发布日期:2020-09-14
通讯作者: 郑伟 E-mail:zhengwei@nudt.edu.cn

Rapid time-coordination trajectory planning method for multi-glide vehicles

LIU Zhe¹, LU Haoran², ZHENG Wei¹, WEN Guoguang³, WANG Yidi¹, ZHOU Xiang¹

1. College of Aerospace Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China;
2. Beijing Institute of Astronautical Systems Engineering, Beijing 100076, China;
3. College of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2020-07-04 Revised:2020-07-26 Published:2020-09-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从高超声速飞行器集群"探测-打击-评估"一体化任务需求出发，针对多滑翔飞行器时间协同再入轨迹规划问题进行研究，提出集群再入的协同形式及轨迹规划方案，基于改进序列凸化算法解决了再入总飞行时间的精确控制问题，从而实现滑翔段时间协同。首先，给出了滑翔飞行器集群的协同策略，将求解模型转化为协同时间的确定、协同时间约束下的轨迹规划子问题。将模型中的时间项误差等加入罚函数，提高了协同轨迹求解可行性。引入飞行路径角预设剖面作为软约束，并通过罚函数与信赖域自适应调整，以避免轨迹求解时的振荡问题，提高了序列凸化算法的收敛性。以CAV-H飞行器模型为例验证了算法的有效性，仿真结果表明，所提算法对初值的敏感性低，求解得到的再入总时间可调范围与伪谱法一致，轨迹规划结果的平滑性及计算时间均优于伪谱法。

关键词: 再入轨迹规划, 时间协同, 凸优化, 罚函数, 信赖域

Abstract: Based on the requirement of "detection-attack-assessment" integrated mission of the hypersonic vehicle cluster, this paper studies the time-coordination reentry trajectory planning of multi-glide vehicles, proposes the cooperative form and planning scheme of the reentry cluster, and solves the precise control problem of the total reentry flight time based on the improved sequential convex programming algorithm, thereby realizing the time-coordination of the glide cluster. The cooperative scheme of the glide cluster is firstly presented, and the solution model transformed into the sub problems of the determination of coordinated time and trajectory planning with the coordinated time constraint. The terminal time error is added to the penalty function to improve the calculation feasibility of the cooperative trajectory. The flight path angle preset profile is introduced as a soft constraint, with the penalty function and trust region adaptively adjusted to avoid the oscillation problem of trajectory solution and improve the convergence of sequential convex programming algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by the CAV-H model. The simulation results show that the adjustable range of the total reentry time obtained by the convex algorithm is consistent with the pseudospectral method, and the smoothness and calculation time of the trajectory planning results are better than those of the pseudospectral method.

Key words: reentry trajectory planning, time coordination, convex optimization, penalty function, trust region

中图分类号:

V412.44

刘哲, 陆浩然, 郑伟, 闻国光, 王奕迪, 周祥. 多滑翔飞行器时间协同轨迹快速规划[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524497-524497.

LIU Zhe, LU Haoran, ZHENG Wei, WEN Guoguang, WANG Yidi, ZHOU Xiang. Rapid time-coordination trajectory planning method for multi-glide vehicles[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(11): 524497-524497.

参考文献

[1] JEON I S, LEE J I, TAHK M J. Homing guidance law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(1):275-280.
[2] 张友安, 马国欣, 王兴平. 多导弹时间协同制导:一种领弹-被领弹策略[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(6):1109-1118. ZHANG Y A, MA G X,WANG X P. Time-cooperative guidance for multi-missiles:A leader-follower strategy[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(6):1109-1118(in Chinese).
[3] 赵世钰, 周锐. 基于协调变量的多导弹协同制导[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(6):1605-1611. ZHAO S Y, ZHOU R. Multi-missile cooperative guidance using coordination variables[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(6):1605-1611(in Chinese).
[4] 赵启伦, 陈建, 李清东, 等. 高超武器与常规导弹协同攻击策略可行域研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7):2291-2300. ZHAO Q L, CHEN J, LI Q D, et al. Feasible region of hypersonic and ballistic missiles' cooperative attack strategy[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(7):2291-2300(in Chinese).
[5] LIANG Z X, YU J L, REN Z, et al. Trajectory planning for cooperative flight of two hypersonic entry vehicles[C]//21 st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2017:2251.
[6] 方科, 张庆振, 倪昆, 等. 高超声速飞行器时间协同再入制导[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5):321958. FANG K, ZHANG Q Z, NI K, et al. Time-coordinated reentry guidance law for hypersonic vehicle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(5):321958(in Chinese).
[7] YU W B, CHEN W C, JIANG Z G, et al. Analytical entry guidance for coordinated flight with multiple no-fly-zone constraints[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 84:273-290.
[8] LI Z H, HE B, WANG M H, et al. Time-coordination entry guidance for multi-hypersonic vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 89:123-135.
[9] CHU H Y, LI J, DONG Y, et al. Improved MPSP method-based cooperative Re-entry guidance for hypersonic gliding vehicles[M]//MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017, 114:01002.
[10] WANG X F, ZHANG Y W, LIU D Z, et al. Three-dimensional cooperative guidance and control law for multiple reentry missiles with time-varying velocities[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 80:127-143.
[11] WANG J W, ZHANG R. Terminal guidance for a hypersonic vehicle with impact time control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41(8):1790-1798.
[12] PADHI R, KOTHARI M. Model predictive static programming:A computationally efficient technique for suboptimal control design[J]. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information, and Control, 2009,5(2):399-411.
[13] OZA H B, PADHI R. Impact-angle-constrained suboptimal model predictive static programming guidance of air-to-ground missiles[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(1):153-164.
[14] LIU X F, SHEN Z J, LU P. Entry trajectory optimization by second-order cone programming[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 39(2):227-241.
[15] JIANG H, AN Z, YU Y N, et al. Cooperative guidance with multiple constraints using convex optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 79:426-440.
[16] 李俊, 江振宇. 一种高超声速滑翔再入在线轨迹规划算法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(3):579-587. LI J, JIANG Z Y. Online trajectory planning algorithm for hypersonic glide re-entry problem[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(3):579-587(in Chinese).
[17] 安泽, 熊芬芬, 梁卓楠. 基于偏置比例导引与凸优化的火箭垂直着陆制导[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5):323606. AN Z, XIONG F F, LIANG Z N. Landing-phase guidance of rocket using bias proportional guidance and convex optimization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5):323606(in Chinese).
[18] MAO Y Q, SZMUK M, ACIKMESE B. Successive convexification of non-convex optimal control problems and its convergence properties[C]//2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2016:3636-3641.
[19] 王祝, 刘莉, 龙腾, 等. 基于罚函数序列凸规划的多无人机轨迹规划[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(10):3149-3158. WANG Z, LIU L, LONG T, et al. Trajectory planning for multi-UAVs using penalty sequential convex pro-gramming[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(10):3149-3158(in Chinese).
[20] 宗群, 李智禹, 叶林奇, 等. 变信赖域序列凸规划RLV再入轨迹在线重构[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020, 52(3):147-155. ZONG Q, LI Z Y, YE L Q, et al. Variable trust region sequential convex programming for RLV online reentry trajectory reconstruction[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020, 52(3):147-155(in Chinese).
[21] WANG J B, CUI N G, WEI C Z. Rapid trajectory optimization for hypersonic entry using a pseudospectral-convex algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019, 233(14):5227-5238.
[22] SZMUK M, EREN U, ACIKMESE B. Successive convexification for Mars 6-DoF powered descent landing guidance[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2017:1500.
[23] LIU X F, SHEN Z J. Rapid smooth entry trajectory planning for high lift/drag hypersonic glide vehicles[J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2016, 168(3):917-943.
[24] LIU X F, SHEN Z J, LU P. Solving the maximum-crossrange problem via successive second-order cone programming with a line search[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 47:10-20.
[25] WANG Z B, GRANT M J. Constrained trajectory optimization for planetary entry via sequential convex programming[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(10):2603-2615.
[26] PHILLIPS T H.A common aero vehicle (CAV) model, escription, and employment guide[EB/OL].[2013-12-12]. http://www.dtic.Mil/matrics/sbir/sbir041/srch/af031a.doc.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

多滑翔飞行器时间协同轨迹快速规划

Rapid time-coordination trajectory planning method for multi-glide vehicles

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何智川, 王江, 范世鹏, 王鹏, 侯淼. 事件触发机制下具有视场约束的三维协同制导[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 328687-328687.
[2]	刘哲, 张羲格, 韦常柱, 崔乃刚. 亚轨道飞行器再入轨迹高精度自适应凸规划[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729430-729430.
[3]	何信, 石宗英, 钟宜生. 基于速度障碍的多无人船协同避碰[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729758-729758.
[4]	闫循良, 王培臣, 王舒眉, 杨宇轩, 王宽. 基于混沌多项式的RBCC飞行器上升段鲁棒轨迹快速优化[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528349-528349.
[5]	陆传雨, 陆铭慧, 刘浩宇, 徐喜浩. 基于改进式SL0算法的超声混叠信号分离[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 425419-425419.
[6]	张宏伟, 达新宇, 胡航, 倪磊, 潘钰. 基于多机协作的认知无人机网络能效联合优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324548-324548.
[7]	邓云山, 夏元清, 孙中奇, 沈刚辉. 扰动环境下火星精确着陆自主轨迹规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524834-524834.
[8]	安泽, 熊芬芬, 梁卓楠. 基于偏置比例导引与凸优化的火箭垂直着陆制导[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 323606-323606.
[9]	贾宝惠, 邓婉怡, 王毅强. 三层三级民机修理级别经济性分析模型的改进[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 323468-323468.
[10]	周祥, 张洪波, 何睿智, 汤国建, 包为民. 基于凸优化的再入轨迹三维剖面规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 623842-623842.
[11]	顾伟, 汤俊, 白亮, 老松杨. 面向时间协同的多无人机队形变换最优效率模型[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6): 322599-322599.
[12]	王肖, 郭杰, 唐胜景, 祁帅. 基于解析剖面的时间协同再入制导[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(3): 322565-322565.
[13]	杨垠, 盛卫星, 韩玉兵, 马晓峰. 基于阵元激励幅度分档的赋形波束方向图综合[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4): 321653-321653.
[14]	吕腾, 吕跃勇, 李传江, 郭延宁. 带空间协同的多导弹时间协同制导律[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(10): 322115-322115.
[15]	虞翔, 李旦, 张建秋. 鲁棒成形极化敏感阵列波束的方法及极化估计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 320752-320752.