面向时间协同的多无人机队形变换最优效率模型

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22599

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

面向时间协同的多无人机队形变换最优效率模型

顾伟, 汤俊, 白亮, 老松杨

国防科技大学系统工程学院, 长沙 410073

收稿日期:2018-08-13 修回日期:2018-09-22 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2018-11-23
通讯作者: 汤俊 E-mail:jun.tang@e-campus.uab.cat
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71601181）

Time synergistic optimal efficiency model for formation transformation of multiple UAVs

GU Wei, TANG Jun, BAI Liang, LAO Songyang

College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received:2018-08-13 Revised:2018-09-22 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2018-11-23
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71601181)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对无人机（UAV）的编队集结、编队保持和编队重构等队形变换问题，从航迹规划的角度提出了一种面向时间协同的多无人机队形变换模型。在时间协同的条件下，选择队形变换的能源消耗与完成时间作为效率衡量指标，对编队集结、编队保持和编队重构进行规划，给出队形变换的最优空间位置。首先，分析了指定队形、无指定位置的编队集结问题，然后，将编队保持问题视为编队整体运动，最后，利用运动分解将编队重构问题分解为编队集结和编队整体运动。基于编队集结、编队保持和编队重构的不同特点，给出了这些具体队形变换下的最优效率计算公式，并进行了仿真实验，实验结果表明本模型可以实现预期的最优效率队形变换。

关键词: 无人机, 编队, 队形变换, 最优效率, 时间协同

Abstract: Aiming at the formation transformation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle(UAV), including formation assembly, formation maintenance, and formation reconstruction, this paper proposes a multi-UAV formation transformation model which subjects to time coordination from the perspective of track planning. Based on the condition of time synergy, the energy consumption and completion time of the formation transformation are selected as the efficiency measurement indicators. Then the formation assembly, formation maintenance, and formation reconstruction are planned and the optimal spatial position of the formation transformation is given. This paper first analyzes the formation assembly problem with the specified formation and no specified position, then analyzes the formation maintenance problem as the overall movement of the formation. Finally, the motion decomposition is used to decompose the formation reconstruction problem into formation assembly and formation movement. Based on the different characteristics of formation assembly, formation maintenance, and formation reconstruction, the optimal efficiency calculation formulas of these specific formation transformations are given. Finally the simulation experiments are carried out. The experimental results show that the model can achieve the expected optimal efficiency formation transformation.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle, formation, formation transformation, optimal efficiency, time synergy

中图分类号:

V279

顾伟, 汤俊, 白亮, 老松杨. 面向时间协同的多无人机队形变换最优效率模型[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6): 322599-322599.

GU Wei, TANG Jun, BAI Liang, LAO Songyang. Time synergistic optimal efficiency model for formation transformation of multiple UAVs[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(6): 322599-322599.

参考文献

[1] 周绍磊, 祁亚辉, 张雷, 等. 切换拓扑下无人机集群系统时变编队控制[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(4):259-267. ZHOU S L, QI Y H, ZHANG L, et al. Time-varying formation control of UAV swarm systems with switching topologies[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(4):259-267(in Chinese).
[2] NIGAM N, BIENIAWSKI S, KROO I, et al. Control of multiple UAVs for persistent surveillance:Algorithm and flight test results[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(5):1236-1251.
[3] 沈林成, 牛轶峰, 朱华勇. 多无人机自主协同控制理论与方法[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2013:1-9. SHEN L C, NIU Y F, ZHU H Y. Theories and methods of autonomous cooperative control for multiple UAVs[M]. Beijing:National Defence Industry Press, 2013:1-9(in Chinese).
[4] 李文皓, 张珩. 无人机编队飞行技术的研究现状与展望[J]. 飞行力学, 2007, 25(1):9-11. LI W H, ZHANG H. Reviews on unmanned aerial vehicle formation-flight[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2007, 25(1):9-11(in Chinese).
[5] DARRAH M, NILAND W, STOLARIK B. Multiple UAV dynamic task allocation using mixed integer linear programming in a SEAD mission[C]//InfoTech at Aerospace:Advancing Contemporary Aerospace Technologies and Their Integration. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2005:2324-2334.
[6] BANGASH Z A, SANCHEZ R P, AHMED A, et al. Aerodynamics of formation flight[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 43(43):907-912.
[7] FURUKAWA T, DURRANT-WHYTE H F, BOURGAULT F, et al. Time-optimal coordinated control of the relative formation of multiple vehicles[C]//IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2003:259-264.
[8] 华思亮, 陈宗基, 袁利平. 基于模型预测控制的无人机编队自主重构研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009(20):383-386. HUA S L, CHEN Z J, YUAN L P. Study on UAVs formation autonomous reconfiguration based on MPC[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2009(20):383-386(in Chinese).
[9] 熊伟, 陈宗基, 周锐. 运用混合遗传算法的多机编队重构优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(S1):209-214. XIONG W, CHEN Z J, ZHOU R. Optimization of multiple flight vehicle formation reconfiguration using hybrid genetic algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(S1):209-214(in Chinese).
[10] 王祝, 刘莉, 龙腾, 等. 基于罚函数序列凸规划的多无人机轨迹规划[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(10):3149-3158. WANG Z, LIU L, LONG T, et al. Trajectory planning for muti-UAVs using penalty sequential convex pro-gramming[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(10):3149-3158(in Chinese).
[11] AJORLOU A, MOEZZI K, AGHDAM A G, et al. Two-stage time-optimal formation reconfiguration strategy under acceleration and velocity constraints[C]//Decision and Control. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2010:7455-7460.
[12] AJORLOU A, MOEZZI K, AGHDAM A G, et al. Two-stage energy-optimal formation reconfiguration strategy[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2012, 48(10):2587-2591.
[13] 邓婉, 王新民, 王晓燕, 等. 无人机编队队形保持变换控制器设计[J]. 计算机仿真, 2011, 28(10):73-77. DENG W, WANG X M, WANG X Y, et al. Controller design of UAVs formation keep and change[J]. Computer Simulation, 2011, 28(10):73-77(in Chinese).
[14] MOTZKIN T S, WALSH J L. Polynomials of best approximation on a real finite point set. I[J]. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1959, 91(2):231-245.
[15] LAWSON C L. Contributions to the theory of linear least maximum approximation[D]. Los Angeles:University of California, 1961:10-25.
[16] DUAN H, LUO Q, SHI Y, et al. Hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for multi-UAV formation reconfiguration[J]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2013, 8(3):16-27.
[17] DOGAN A, VENKATARAMANAN S. Nonlinear control for reconfiguration of unmanned-aerial-vehicle formation[J]. Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 2005, 28(4):667-678.
[18] SULTAN C, SEEREERAM S, MEHRA R K, et al. Energy optimal reconfiguration for large scale formation flying[C]//American Control Conference. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2005:2986-2991.
[19] NAVARAVONG L, KAN Z, SHEA J M, et al. Formation reconfiguration for mobile robots with network connectivity constraints[J]. Network IEEE, 2012, 26(4):18-24.
[20] ZHANG X Y, DUAN H B. Differential evolution-based receding horizon control design for multi-UVAs formation reconfiguration[J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement & Control, 2012, 32(1):165-183.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

面向时间协同的多无人机队形变换最优效率模型

Time synergistic optimal efficiency model for formation transformation of multiple UAVs

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王海峰, 刘坤澎, 江泓鑫, 杜晨曦. 螺旋桨多设计点气动优化方法和变桨距角策略[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528831-528831.
[2]	赵春晖, 刘安萌, 吕洋, 潘泉. 无人机韧性自主定位技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 28839-028839.
[3]	张薇, 何若俊. 面向物联网数据收集的无人机自主路径规划[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 329054-329054-1.
[4]	赵靖, 宋丹. 无人机GNSS/IMU组合导航系统完好性监测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 328943-328943.
[5]	王传云, 苏阳, 王琳霖, 王田, 王静静, 高骞. 面向反制无人机集群的多目标连续鲁棒跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 329017-329017.
[6]	尹洪玉, 吴宇, 梁天骄. 固定翼无人机巡逻覆盖协同路径规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 328944-328944.
[7]	安朝, 霍贵玺, 孟杨, 谢长川, 杨超. 翼尖铰接组合式无人机气动建模方法及布局参数影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629587-629587.
[8]	罗旭东, 吴一全, 陈金林. 无人机航拍影像目标检测与语义分割的深度学习方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 28822-028822.
[9]	李广佳, 王红波, 张凯, 仪志胜. 临近空间太阳能无人机增升减阻技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529644-529644.
[10]	蔡云鹏, 周大鹏, 丁江川. 具有防撞安全约束的无人机集群智能协同控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529683-529683.
[11]	王祝, 张梦通, 张振鹏, 徐广通. 基于多指标动态优先级的无人机协同路径规划[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 328816-328816.
[12]	郑高杰, 何小明, 李东坡, 谭慧俊, 汪昆, 吴祯龙, 王德鹏. 尾部推进无人机双90°偏折进气道/蜗壳耦合流动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 128782-128782.
[13]	何智川, 王江, 范世鹏, 王鹏, 侯淼. 事件触发机制下具有视场约束的三维协同制导[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 328687-328687.
[14]	杨加秀, 李新凯, 张宏立, 王昊. 切换拓扑下异构集群的强化学习时变编队控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 329166-329166.
[15]	张清瑞, 刘赟韵, 孙慧杰, 朱波. 固定翼无人机紧密编队的鲁棒协同跟踪控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 629233-629233.