基于小波熵的救生伞高速空投最大开伞动载不确定性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23627

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于小波熵的救生伞高速空投最大开伞动载不确定性

刘丹阳^1,2, 柯鹏³, 杨春信⁴, 马坤昌^5,6, 戚晓玲^5,6

1. 北京航空航天大学生物医学工程高精尖创新中心, 北京 100083;
2. 北京航空航天大学生物与医学工程学院, 北京 100083;
3. 北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;
4. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;
5. 航空防护救生技术航空科技重点实验室, 襄阳 441003;
6. 航字救生装备有限公司, 襄阳 441003

收稿日期:2019-11-04 修回日期:2020-02-19 出版日期:2020-08-15 发布日期:2020-02-27
通讯作者: 柯鹏 E-mail:08622@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
航空科学基金（20172951021）

Maximum opening overload uncertainty of high speed airdrop of life-saving parachutes based on wavelet entropy

LIU Danyang^1,2, KE Peng³, YANG Chunxin⁴, MA Kunchang^5,6, QI Xiaoling^5,6

1. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
3. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
4. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
5. Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Life-support Technology, Xiangyang 441003, China;
6. Aerospace Life-Support Industries, Xiangyang 441003, China

Received:2019-11-04 Revised:2020-02-19 Online:2020-08-15 Published:2020-02-27
Supported by:
Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20172951021)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对高速空投试验最大开伞动载测量值离散性大的问题，采用小波熵对试验数据和仿真数据进行对比分析。假人姿态差异大是导致试验测量值重复性差的直接原因，而从空投开始到拉直开伞时刻假人姿态的不确定性是问题的主要来源。试验数据和仿真结果得到的小波熵随空投速度和空投系统质量的变化趋势相同，并且与空投系统的物理本质相符；在考察救生伞开伞动载的试验研究中，仅考虑最大开伞动载的测量值，而忽略系统不确定性是不合理的，因此建议对拉直之前的假人姿态加以控制。

关键词: 救生伞, 高速空投, 开伞动载, 小波熵, 不确定性

Abstract: To solve the discreteness problem of maximum overload measurements in high speed airdrop tests, wavelet entropy is used to compare and analyze the test data and simulation data. Results show that the large attitude difference of the dummy directly causes the poor repeatability of test measurements, while the attitude uncertainty of the dummy from the start of the airdrop to the parachute straightening moment is the main source of the problem. The wavelet entropy obtained from the experimental data and simulation results is consistent with the physical nature of the airdrop system, exhibiting the same variation trend as that of the airdrop speed and the airdrop system mass. Therefore, it is unreasonable to consider only the measurement value of the maximum overload and ignore the system uncertainty in the experimental study of the life-saving parachute open load. Hence, it is suggested to control the dummy posture before straightening of the parachute.

Key words: life-saving parachute, high speed airdrop, opening overload, wavelet entropy, uncertainty

中图分类号:

V217⁺.39

刘丹阳, 柯鹏, 杨春信, 马坤昌, 戚晓玲. 基于小波熵的救生伞高速空投最大开伞动载不确定性[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(8): 123627-123627.

LIU Danyang, KE Peng, YANG Chunxin, MA Kunchang, QI Xiaoling. Maximum opening overload uncertainty of high speed airdrop of life-saving parachutes based on wavelet entropy[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(8): 123627-123627.

参考文献 20

[1]	国防科学技术工业委员会.人体脊柱对开伞冲击力的耐受强度:GJB232-87[S]. 北京:国防科工委军标出版发行部, 1987:1-4. The Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense of the PRC. The tolerance of human spine to impact resulted from opening of parachute:GJB232-87[S]. Beijing:Military Standard Publishing Department of Commission of Science Technology and Industry for National Defense, 1987:1-4(in Chinese).
[2]	RAISZADEH B, QUEEN E M. MARS exploration rover terminal descent mission modeling and simulation:AAS 04-271[R].2004.
[3]	RAISZADEH B, QUEEN E M, Partial validation of multibody program to optimize simulated trajectories Ⅱ (POST Ⅱ) parachute simulation with interacting forces:NASA/TM-2002-211634[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2002.
[4]	高兴龙,唐乾刚,张青斌,等. 开缝伞充气过程流固耦合数值研究[J]. 航空学报,2013, 34(10):2265-2276. GAO X L, TANG Q G, ZHANG Q B, et al. Numberical study on fluid-structure interaction of slot-parachute's inflation process[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(10):2265-2276(in Chinese).
[5]	龚文轩. 降落伞附加质量与开伞动载[J]. 航空学报,1995, 16(1):85-87. GONG W X. Parachute added mass and opening forces[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1995, 16(1):85-87(in Chinese).
[6]	余莉,张新华,李水生. 降落伞伞衣载荷的性能试验[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2007, 33(10):1178-1181. YU L, ZHANG X H, LI S S. Experimental on canopy pay-load performance of parachute[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007, 33(10):1178-1181(in Chinese).
[7]	余莉,明晓,胡斌.降落伞开伞过程的试验研究[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 38(2):176-180. YU L, MING X, HU B. Experimental investigation in parachute opening process[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 38(2):176-180(in Chinese).
[8]	LEE C K. Experimental investigation of full scale and model parachute opening[C]//AIAA 8th Aerodynamic & Balloon Technology Conference. Reston:AIAA, 1984:215-223.
[9]	JOHNSON, YAKIMEOKO O, KAMINER L, et al. On the development and pre-flight testing of the affordable guided airdrop system for G-12 cargo parachute:AIAA-2001-2060[R]. Reston:AIAA,2001.
[10]	LIU D Y, JIA Y H, YANG C X, et al. Experimental research in opening overload of life-saving parachute and dummy high-speed airdrop[C]//23th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[11]	刘丹阳,贾月红,杨春信,等. 救生伞假人高速投开伞动载试验[J].航空学报,2014, 35(6):1623-1632. LIU D Y, JIA Y H, YANG C X, et al. Experiment in parachute-opening shock of life-saving parachute and dummy high-speed airdrop[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(6):1623-1632(in Chinese).
[12]	RICHARD E B, JAMES G W, FOSTER H R. Investigation and evaluation of a replacement parachute for the SJU-5/A escape system[C]//Proceeding of Safe 37th Annual Symposium, 1998:72-82.
[13]	JIA Y H, WANG Y W, YANG C X et al. Simulation of trunk dummy separation in parachute opening shock test[C]//22th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[14]	HAN YH, LIU D Y, JIA Y H, et al. Simulation research in measurement of opening overload of life-saving parachute in dummy high-speed airdrop[C]//23th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[15]	CLAUSIUS R. On a mechanical theorem applicable to heat[J]. Phylosophical Magazine Series 4, 1870, 40(1):122-127.
[16]	SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27:379-423.
[17]	ROSSO O A, BLANCO S, YORDANOVA J, et al. Wavelet entropy:A new tool for analysis of short duration brain electical signals[J]. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2001, 105:65-75.
[18]	QUIROGA R Q, ROSSO O A, BASAR E. Wavelet entropy in evevt-ralated potential:A new method shows ordering of EEG ocscillations[J]. Biological Cybernetics, 2001, 84(4):291-299.
[19]	ROSSO O A, MAIRAL M L. Characterization of time dynamical evolution of electroencephalographic epileptic records[J]. Physica A, 2002, 312(3-4):469-504.
[20]	ROSSO O A, MARTIN M T, PLASTINO A. Brain electrical activity analysis using wavelet based information tools[J]. Physica A, 2002, 313(3-4):587-608.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于小波熵的救生伞高速空投最大开伞动载不确定性

Maximum opening overload uncertainty of high speed airdrop of life-saving parachutes based on wavelet entropy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵春晖, 刘安萌, 吕洋, 潘泉. 无人机韧性自主定位技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 28839-028839.
[2]	杨梓霄, 李世尧, 魏晨, 李湛, 朱波. 基于低阶干扰估计器的欠驱动三自由度直升机鲁棒控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 629056-629056.
[3]	刘坤达, 刘雪明, 朱波, 张清瑞. 面向狭窄通道穿越的多机编队安全鲁棒控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729768-729768.
[4]	陈艺夫, 马宇航, 蓝庆生, 孙卫平, 史亚云, 杨体浩, 白俊强. 基于多项式混沌法的翼型不确定性分析及梯度优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127446-127446.
[5]	郑新前, 王钧莹, 黄维娜, 伏宇, 程荣辉, 熊洪洋. 航空发动机不确定性设计体系探讨[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 27099-027099.
[6]	罗佳奇, 陈泽帅, 邹正平, 曾飞, 杜鹏程. 低压涡轮铸造叶片几何不确定性统计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 427203-427203.
[7]	于汀, 李璐祎, 刘昱杉, 常泽明. 观测不确定性下的高效贝叶斯更新方法及其在机翼结构中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(24): 228592-228592.
[8]	杨乐昌, 汪晨星. 基于多源异构信息的航空发动机转子参数校准与可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 228575-228575.
[9]	熊芬芬, 李泽贤, 刘宇, 夏侯唐凡. 基于数值模拟的工程设计中参数不确定性表征方法研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(22): 28611-028611.
[10]	闫循良, 王培臣, 王舒眉, 杨宇轩, 王宽. 基于混沌多项式的RBCC飞行器上升段鲁棒轨迹快速优化[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528349-528349.
[11]	胡汉铎, 宋彦萍, 俞建阳, 刘瑶, 陈浮, 高文秀. 翼型不确定性量化中正交匹配追踪的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 128327-128327.
[12]	王浩浩, 高丽敏, 杨光, 吴宝海. 一种鲁棒的数据驱动不确定性量化方法及在压气机叶栅中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(17): 128169-128169.
[13]	陈志远, 李璐祎. 参数不确定性下高效的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[14]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[15]	李晓阳, 陶昭, 张慰. 基于不确定微分方程的疲劳可靠性建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225820-225820.