考虑调运时间的舰载机备件供应系统模糊优化

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.321234

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

考虑调运时间的舰载机备件供应系统模糊优化

夏国清¹, 栾添添¹, 孙明晓¹, 仲伟东², 刘彦文¹

1. 哈尔滨工程大学自动化学院, 哈尔滨 150001;
2. 中国船舶工业集团公司第708研究所, 上海 200001

收稿日期:2017-03-13 修回日期:2017-06-02 出版日期:2017-12-15 发布日期:2017-06-02
通讯作者: 栾添添 E-mail:luantiantian1988@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61304076）；中央高校基本科研业务费（HEUCF0415）

Fuzzy optimization for parts supply system of carrier aircraft considering transporting time

XIA Guoqing¹, LUAN Tiantian¹, SUN Mingxiao¹, ZHONG Weidong², LIU Yanwen¹

1. College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China;
2. 708 th Institute of China State Shipbuilding Corporation, Shanghai 200001, China

Received:2017-03-13 Revised:2017-06-02 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2017-06-02
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61304076); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(HEUCF0415)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不合理的备件供应严重制约舰载机的完好率，调运时间和供应量扰动是影响舰载机备件供应系统的关键因素。因此，针对备件供应系统的非线性和不确定性问题，利用备件生产和调运策略的模糊规则，建立模糊备件供应系统。考虑调运时间对供应造成的延迟效果和供应量的扰动约束，设计基于交叉模糊的鲁棒控制策略。以"尼米兹"号航母高潮演习为例，与常规鲁棒控制策略进行对比仿真。结果表明：基于交叉模糊的鲁棒控制能减少供应量扰动和备件供应调运时间引起的备件储存数量及总成本代价的波动，具有良好的有效性和快速性。

关键词: 舰载机, 备件供应系统, 模糊优化, 鲁棒控制, 调运时间, 不确定干扰

Abstract: Untimely parts supply will restrict readiness rate of carrier aircraft. The transporting time and supply disturbance are the main uncertain factors in the parts supply system of carrier aircraft. Considering nonlinearity and uncertainty in the parts supply system of carrier aircraft, a fuzzy system for the parts supply is established using fuzzy rules of production and transportation strategy. A robust control strategy is designed based on overlapping fuzzy partition. The data of "Nimiz" aircraft carrier are used in simulation. A comparison with the conventional robust control strategy illustrates that the proposed method can reduce the fluctuations of parts quantity and the total cost induced by supply disturbance and supply transporting time. Moreover, the robust stability of fuzzy parts supply system can be ensured, and the carrier aircraft parts can be supplied in time at a certain cost. Simulation also illustrates the usefulness and quickness of the improved robust control method based on the fuzzy system.

Key words: carrier aircraft, parts supply system, fuzzy optimization, robust control, transporting time, uncertain disturbance

中图分类号:

V448.2

夏国清, 栾添添, 孙明晓, 仲伟东, 刘彦文. 考虑调运时间的舰载机备件供应系统模糊优化[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12): 321234-321234.

XIA Guoqing, LUAN Tiantian, SUN Mingxiao, ZHONG Weidong, LIU Yanwen. Fuzzy optimization for parts supply system of carrier aircraft considering transporting time[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(12): 321234-321234.

参考文献

[1] ANGELYN J, MAUREEN A W, COLLEEN M K G, et al. USS nimitz and carrier airwing nine surge demonstration[M]. Alexandria:Center for Naval Analyses, 1998:102-110.[2] XIA G Q, LUAN T T, SUN M X, et al. Dynamic analysis of catapult availability based on CBM[J]. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 2016, 9(10):31-42.[3] XIA G Q, LUAN T T, SUN M X. Research on uncertain and nonlinear dynamic weapons dispatching system using fuzzy robust control[C]//2016 International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2016:1038-1043.[4] XIA G Q, LUAN T T, SUN M X. Evaluation analysis for sortie generation of carrier aircrafts based on nonlinear fuzzy matter-element method[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 31(6):3055-3066.[5] XIA G Q, LUAN T T, SUN M X, et al. Research on modeling of parallel closed-loop support process for carrier aircraft based on system dynamics[J]. International Journal of Control and Automation, 2016, 9(11):259-270.[6] 周亮, 李庆民, 彭英武, 等. 串件拼修对策下K/N(G)结构系统可用度评估建模[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(4):118-127. ZHOU L, LI Q M, PENG Y W, LI H. Evaluation of System Availability for K/N(G) Structural with Cannibalization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(4):118-127(in Chinese).[7] 周亮, 李庆民, 彭英武, 等. 动态保障结构下多级多层备件配置优化建模[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(11):320822-1-13. ZHOU L, LI Q M, PENG Y W, LI H. Optimization Model of Multi Level and Multi Echelon Spare Parts Allocation under Dynamic Support Structure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(11):320822-1-13(in Chinese).[8] 罗祎, 阮旻智, 袁志勇. 多级维修供应下可修复备件库存建模与优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(10):2624-2630. LUO W, RUAN M Z, YUAN Z Y. Modeling and optimization of repairable spare parts under the multi-echelon maintenance supply[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(10):2624-2630(in Chinese).[9] 孟祥辉, 徐宗昌, 程连民. 基于系统动力学的备件供应保障过程分析与建模[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(21):6721-6724. MENG X H, XU Z C, CHENG L M. Spares supply support process analyzing and modeling based on system dynamics[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, 21(21):6721-6724(in Chinese).[10] 王蕴, 王乃超, 马麟, 等. 考虑备件约束的多部件串联系统使用可用度计算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4):1195-1201. WANG Y, WANG N C, MA L, et al. Operational availability calculation methods of various series systems under the constraint of spare parts[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1195-1201(in Chinese).[11] 徐立, 李庆民, 李华. 考虑多类维修优先权的多级维修供应系统库存控制[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4):1185-1194. XU L, LI Q M, LI H. Inventory control of multi-echelon maintenance supply system with multiple repair priorities.[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1185-1194(in Chinese).[12] PISHVAEE M S, RABBANI M, TORABI S A. A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35:637-649.[13] PAN F, NAGI R. Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2010, 37:668-683.[14] MOHSENI S, PISHVAEE M S. A robust programming approach towards design and optimization of microalgae-based biofuel supply chain[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 100:58-71.[15] JABBARZADEH A, FAHIMNIA B, SHEU J B. An enhanced robustness approach for managing supply and demand uncertainties[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017,183:620-631.[16] BOGATAJ D, AVER B, BOGATAJ M. Supply chain risk at simultaneous robust perturbations[J]. Internation Journal of Production Economics, 2016,181:68-78.[17] YUE D J, YOU F Q. Optimal supply chain design and operations under multi-scale uncertainties:Nested stochastic robust optimization modeling framework and solution algorithm[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2016, 62(9):3041-3055.[18] BAI X J, LIU Y K. Robust optimization of supply chain network design in fuzzy decision system[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2016, 27:1131-1149.[19] LAUMANNS M, LEFEBER E. Robust optimal control of material flows in request-driven supply networks[J]. Physica A, 2006, 363(1):24-31.[20] HUANG X Y, YAN N N, QIU R Z. Dynamic models of closed-loop supply chain and robust H_∞ control strategies[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2009, 47(9):2279-2300.[21] BASTEN R J, SCHUTTEN J M J, HEIJDEN V D M C. Anefficient model formulation for level of repair analysis[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2009, 172(1):119-142.[22] YOON K B, SOHN S Y. Finding the optimal CSP inventory level for multi-echelon system in Air Force using random effects regression model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 180(3):1076-1085.[23] GUTINA G, RAFIEVA A, YEO A. Level of repair analysis and minimum cost homomorphisms of graphs[J]. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2006, 154(6):881-889.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

考虑调运时间的舰载机备件供应系统模糊优化

Fuzzy optimization for parts supply system of carrier aircraft considering transporting time

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨晓伟, 葛曜文, 邓文翔, 姚建勇, 周宁. 航空发动机导叶控制机构作动筒主动容错控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625464-625464.
[2]	万兵, 苏析超, 郭放, 韩维, 梁勇. 不确定性工时下甲板作业的前摄性鲁棒调度[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 325971-325971.
[3]	王霄, 程健慧, 沈天荣, 许保成, 孟轩. 舰面飞机尾喷流对进气道温度场影响的仿真分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525795-525795.
[4]	陈跃良, 陈亮, 卞贵学, 杨翔宁, 管宇, 张勇, 何刚. 先进舰载战斗机腐蚀防护控制与日历寿命设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525786-525786.
[5]	刘东, 吴家仁, 周一舟, 刘振祥, 李瑜, 王铭泽. 舰载机综合保障技术实践及发展展望[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525802-525802.
[6]	王永庆. 固定翼舰载战斗机关键技术与未来发展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525859-525859.
[7]	王永庆, 于浩, 施岩. 舰载机滑跃起飞动力学与运动学特性[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525853-525853.
[8]	刘德元, 刘昊, Frank L LEWIS. 尾座式无人飞行器鲁棒容错编队控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 324296-324296.
[9]	刘昊, 王巍, 金伟, 牛文超, 杨智春. 垂尾抖振响应的鲁棒-FxLMS主动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 224090-224090.
[10]	刘付成, 朱东方. 考虑连接非线性的大型桁架天线分散协调控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524890-524890.
[11]	郭建国, 鲁宁波, 周军. 高超声速飞行器有限时间耦合模糊控制[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 623838-623838.
[12]	刘洁, 韩维, 徐卫国, 刘纯, 袁培龙, 陈志刚, 彭海军. 基于滚动时域的舰载机甲板运动轨迹跟踪最优控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 322842-322842.
[13]	张声伟, 段卓毅, 耿建中, 王立波. 阻拦索断裂对螺旋桨舰载机着舰安全影响数值分析[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4): 622293-622293.
[14]	杨绚, 魏小勇, 崔德龙. 舰载机飞行控制系统总线接口策略[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4): 622283-622283.
[15]	段卓毅, 王伟, 耿建中, 何大全, 马坤. 舰载机人工进场着舰精确轨迹控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4): 622328-622328.