低压涡轮的气动-声学三维数值优化: 倾斜导叶策略

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0028

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

低压涡轮的气动-声学三维数值优化: 倾斜导叶策略

赵磊¹, 乔渭阳¹, 谭洪川^1,2

1. 西北工业大学动力与能源学院, 陕西西安 710072;
2. 中国燃气涡轮研究院, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2012-03-05 修回日期:2012-06-26 出版日期:2013-02-25 发布日期:2012-07-03
通讯作者: 乔渭阳 E-mail:qiaowy@nwpu.edu.cn
作者简介:赵磊,男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:低压涡轮气动声学一体化研究。E-mail:zhaolei0810@tom.com;乔渭阳,男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:叶轮机气体动力学,发动机气动声学。Tel:029-88492195,E-mail:qiaowy@nwpu.edu.cn

Aerodynamic-acoustic Three-dimensional Numerical Optimization of Low Pressure Turbine: Lean Vane Strategy

ZHAO Lei¹, QIAO Weiyang¹, TAN Hongchuan^1,2

1. School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China;
2. China Gas Turbine Establishment, Chengdu 610500, China

Received:2012-03-05 Revised:2012-06-26 Online:2013-02-25 Published:2012-07-03
Contact: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0028 E-mail:qiaowy@nwpu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

低压涡轮既是飞机进场着陆时发动机的重要声源,也是发动机中对效率要求很高的部件之一,为了实现低压涡轮低噪声的设计目标必须同时兼顾气动性能指标。研究给出了高效低噪声低压涡轮气动-声学三维优化的思路,即首先通过计算流体力学(CFD)定常计算评估三维设计变化对气动性能的影响;然后利用非定常CFD方法与三平面压力模态匹配(TPP)方法的结合来评估其降噪的效果与非定常气动影响;最后确定最佳的设计方案。以GE-E³(Energy Efficient Engine)低压涡轮末级为算例,数值模拟了导叶倾斜作为低压涡轮降噪措施的潜力。计算结果表明,正倾斜导叶角度小于19°时单级涡轮气动性能较直列叶栅要好,效率最大提高了0.3%。对单音噪声级的评估指出,正倾斜由于改变了导叶的尾迹特征,涡轮级噪声水平是增大的,因此不能作为有效的降噪策略。数值研究的结果表明CFD方法能够同时反映出叶片三维设计的细节变化对气动和噪声级的影响,可以作为三维气动-声学优化的手段。

关键词: 低压涡轮, 气动, 声学, 倾斜, 单音噪声

Abstract:

The low pressure turbine of an aircraft is an important engine noise source at approach power, and there is a high requirement on its aerodynamic efficiency. The noise level of a low pressure turbine must be considered together with its aerodynamic performance to achieve a significantly quiet low pressure turbine design. In this paper some insights are presented on three-dimensional aerodynamic-acousitc optimization for a high performance and low noise level turbine. First, a steady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation is made to evaluate the aerodynamic performance with three-dimensional design variations. Then the unsteady aerodynamic effects and tonal noise level are obtained using unsteady CFD calculation combined with a triple-plane pressure (TPP) matching strategy. Finally an optimal design plan is selected. Taking as an example the calculation of the last stage of a GE-E³ (Energy Efficient Engine) low pressure turbine, the potential of using lean vanes as a turbine tonal noise reduction strategy is numerically simulated. The results show that when the positive lean angle is smaller than 19° the single stage turbine performance is improved, with a maximum enhancement of efficiency of 0.3%. Evaluation of tonal noise shows that positive lean increases the noise level, for it changes the characteristics of vane wakes, which means this method cannot be employed for noise reduction. The numerical simulation indicates that this three-dimensional optimization method can reflect simultaneously the effects of detailed three-dimensional changes of a blade on its aerodynamic and acoustic performance, and it can be effectively used in the aerodynamic-acousitc optimization process.

Key words: low pressure turbine, aerodynamics, acoustics, lean, tonal noise

中图分类号:

V231

赵磊, 乔渭阳, 谭洪川. 低压涡轮的气动-声学三维数值优化: 倾斜导叶策略[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(2): 246-254.

ZHAO Lei, QIAO Weiyang, TAN Hongchuan. Aerodynamic-acoustic Three-dimensional Numerical Optimization of Low Pressure Turbine: Lean Vane Strategy[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(2): 246-254.

参考文献

[1] Qiao W Y. Aero-engine aeroacousitcs. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2010: 1-8. (in Chinese) 乔渭阳. 航空发动机气动声学. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2010: 1-8.

[2] Howell R J. Wake-separation bubble interactions in low Reynolds number turbomachinery. Cambridge, UK: Engineering Department Cambridge University, 1999.

[3] Smith M J T, Bushell K W. Turbine noise-its signification in the civil aircraft noise problem. ASME Paper, 69-WA/GT-12, 1969.

[4] Krejsa E A, Valerino M F. Interim prediction for turbine noise. NASA TM X-73566, 1976.

[5] Kurbatskii K A, Mankbadi R R. Review of computational aeroacoustics algorithms. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2004, 18(6): 533-546.

[6] Ferrecchia A, Dawes W N, Dhanasekaran P C. Compressor rotor wakes and tone noise study. 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 2003.

[7] Polacsek C, Burguburu S, Redonnet S, et al. Numerical simulations of fan interaction noise using a hybrid approach. 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (26th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2005.

[8] Grace S M, Sondak D L, Eversman W, et al. Hybrid prediction of fan tonal noise. 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2008.

[9] Rumsey C L. Computation of acoustic waves through sliding-zone interfaces. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(2): 263- 268.

[10] Zhao L, Qiao W Y. Effect of numerical dissipation and extended-grid on sound propagation in computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 25(12): 2716-2720.(in Chinese) 赵磊, 乔渭阳. CFD中数值耗散和延伸边界对声传播的影响. 航空动力学报, 2010, 25(12): 2716-2720.

[11] Wilson A G. A method for deriving tone noise information from CFD calculations on the aeroengine fan stage. NATO RTO-AVT Symposium on Developments in Computational Aero-And Hydro Acoustics, 2001.

[12] Ovenden N C, Rienstra S W. Mode-matching streategies in slowly varying engine ducts. 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 2003.

[13] Rienstra S W. Sound transmission in slowly varying circular and annular lined ducts with flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 380(1): 279-296.

[14] Weckmüeller C, Guerin S, Ashcroft G. CFD-CAA coupling applied to DLR UHBR-fan: comparison to experimental data. 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2009.

[15] Steger M, Michel U, Ashcroft G, et al. Tone noise reduction of a turbofan engine by additional aerodynamical blade forces. 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2010.

[16] Zhao L, Qiao W Y, Mu Z Q, et al. The simulation of turbomachinery tone noise based on in-duct mode matching methodX. 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2010.

[17] Woodward R P, Elliott D M, Hughes C E, et al. Benefits of swept and leaned stators for fan noise reduction. 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 1999.

[18] Envia E, Nallasamy M. Design selection and analysis of a swept and leaned stator concept. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, 228(4): 793-836.

[19] Elhadidi B, Atassi H M. Passive noise control by blade lean and sweep. 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroaoustics Conference, 2004.

[20] Cooper A J, Peake N. Rotor-stator interaction noise in swirling flow: stator sweep and lean effects. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(5): 981-991.

[21] Wang Z Q, Zheng Y. Research status and development of the bowed-twisted blade for turbomachines. Engineering Science, 2000, 2(6): 40-48. (in Chinese) 王仲奇, 郑严. 叶轮机械弯扭叶片的研究现状及发展趋势. 中国工程科学, 2000, 2(6): 40-48.

[22] Chen H S, Tan C Q, Atsumasa Y, et al. Experimental investigation on the effects of positive blade bowing in turbine stator cascades with low aspect ratio. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2005, 41(2): 65-70, 76. (in Chinese) 陈海生, 谭春青, Atsumasa Yamamoto, 等. 低展弦比涡轮静叶栅叶片正弯曲作用的试验研究. 机械工程学报, 2005, 41(2): 65-70, 76.

[23] Cherry D G, Gay C H, Lenahan D T. Energy efficient engine. Low pressure turbine test hardware detailed design report. NASA CR-167956, 1982.

[24] Tyler J M, Sofrin T G. Axial flow compressor noise studies. SAE Trans, 1962, 70: 309-332.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

低压涡轮的气动-声学三维数值优化: 倾斜导叶策略

Aerodynamic-acoustic Three-dimensional Numerical Optimization of Low Pressure Turbine: Lean Vane Strategy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马锦超, 陆洋, 王亮权, 宋奎辉. 基于高阶谐波控制的倾转旋翼近场气动噪声主动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528602-528602.
[2]	王海峰, 刘坤澎, 江泓鑫, 杜晨曦. 螺旋桨多设计点气动优化方法和变桨距角策略[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528831-528831.
[3]	刘琦, 史勇杰, 胡志远, 徐国华. 共轴刚性旋翼气动及噪声特性的参数影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528856-528856.
[4]	孙大智, 陈希, 鲍为成, 卞威, 招启军. 高速直升机机身干扰对推力桨气动与噪声源特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529142-529142.
[5]	柳家齐, 陈荣钱, 楼锦华, 韩旭, 吴昊, 尤延铖. 基于深度学习的高速直升机旋翼翼型气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529828-529828.
[6]	张卫国, 唐敏, 武杰, 彭先敏, 章贵川, 聂博文, 王亮权, 李超群. 倾转旋翼机风洞试验综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 530114-530114.
[7]	孙朋朋, 刘平安, 樊枫, 曾伟. 悬停状态共轴刚性旋翼机身气动干扰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529284-529284.
[8]	孟钰博, 史经纬, 周莉, 张诣, 王占学. 异型喷口的多维偏转S弯喷管设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 128930-128930.
[9]	杨华, 陈树生, 高正红, 姜权峰, 张伟. 基于贝叶斯框架的旋翼气动力数据融合[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 128960-128960.
[10]	代雨柔, 李健, 薛晓鹏, 荣伟. 超声速下盘缝带伞不同收口方式的气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128811-128811.
[11]	戴今钊, 陈海昕. 流场波系引导的三维消波翼优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 628942-628942.
[12]	王晓乐, 孙萍, 顾鑫, 赵春宇, 黄震宇. 直升机声学超材料舱壁的低频多带隙降噪特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 428901-428901.
[13]	安朝, 霍贵玺, 孟杨, 谢长川, 杨超. 翼尖铰接组合式无人机气动建模方法及布局参数影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629587-629587.
[14]	刘柳, 向先宏, 张宇飞, 陈海昕, 魏闯, 朱剑, 杨普. 一种高升阻比非常规翼身融合燕尾气动布局[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629630-629630.
[15]	童晟翔, 史志伟, 耿玺, 王力爽, 孙志坤, 陈其昌. 组合式仿枫树子飞行器与空中分体技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629590-629590.