湍流控制屏声学校准及校准精度影响因素

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23943

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

湍流控制屏声学校准及校准精度影响因素

许玮健, 杨明绥, 武卉, 王萌, 梁宝逵

中国航发沈阳发动机研究所, 沈阳 110015

收稿日期:2020-03-07 修回日期:2020-04-10 发布日期:2020-04-30
通讯作者: 杨明绥 E-mail:yangmingsui@126.com

Acoustic calibration of turbulence control screen and influencing factors of calibration

XU Weijian, YANG Mingsui, WU Hui, WANG Meng, LIANG Baokui

AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China

Received:2020-03-07 Revised:2020-04-10 Published:2020-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 湍流控制屏（TCS）是航空发动机风扇噪声试验必备的试验设施。由于湍流控制屏的作用，风扇前传噪声向远场传播时会产生传递损失。通过对湍流控制屏的声学校准，可以获取湍流控制屏的声学修正量，从而实现对风扇前传噪声的修正。本文结合实际工程应用条件，分析了湍流控制屏重复安装的位置精度、校准声源重复性、稳定性、校准声源位置偏差、温湿度修正等因素对湍流控制屏声学修正量精度的影响；结合上述影响因素，对湍流控制屏160 Hz~40 kHz的声学修正量的特征进行分析，总结工程应用中湍流控制屏高精度声学校准的注意事项，提出湍流控制屏的声学校准应包含测量不确定度。

关键词: 湍流控制屏, 声学特性, 影响因素, 修正值, 测量不确定度

Abstract: The Turbulence Control Screen (TCS), being a necessary facility for acoustic testing of fans, will cause transmission loss when the noise propagates to the far field. The noise can be corrected through calibration of TCS. Based on practical engineering application conditions, this paper examines factors influencing the calibration, such as acoustic source deviation and temperature and humidity modifications. According to the above factors, characteristics of TCS calibration from 160 Hz to 40 kHz are analyzed, announcements in practical engineering applications summarized, and the uncertainty of TCS calibration presented.

Key words: Turbulence Control Screen (TCS), acoustic characteristics, influencing factors, calibration data, calibration uncertainty

中图分类号:

V239

许玮健, 杨明绥, 武卉, 王萌, 梁宝逵. 湍流控制屏声学校准及校准精度影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 123943-123943.

XU Weijian, YANG Mingsui, WU Hui, WANG Meng, LIANG Baokui. Acoustic calibration of turbulence control screen and influencing factors of calibration[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(12): 123943-123943.

参考文献

[1] 王萌,梅繁,杨明绥. 航空发动机噪声测试及进气湍流控制技术分析[J].测控技术, 2015, 34:175-181. WANG M, MEI F, YANG M S. Analysis of aero engine acoustic measurement and inflow turbulence control technology[J]. Measurement and Control Technology, 2015, 34:175-181(in Chinese).
[2] HEIDMANN M F, DIETRICH D A. Simulation of flight-type engine fan noise in the NASA-Lewis 9x5 anechoic wind tunnel:A77-44456[R].Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1976.
[3] HANSON D B. Measurements of static inlet turbulence:AIAA-1975-0467[R].Reston:AIAA, 1975.
[4] SHAW L M, WOODWARD R P,GLASER F W, et al. Inlet turbulence and fan noise measured in an anechoic wind tunnel and statically with an inlet flow control device:AIAA-1977-1345[R].Reston:AIAA, 1977.
[5] KOEHLER W. The influence of the TCS on the circumferential mode distribution in the inlet of a fanrig(UFFA):GT2012-69762[R].New York:ASME, 2012.
[6] JONES W L, MCARDLE J G, HOMYAK L. Evaluation of two inflow control devices for flight simulation of fan noise using a JT15D engine:AIAA-1979-0654[R].Reston:AIAA, 1979.
[7] MCARDLE J G, JONES W L. Comparison of several inflow control devices for flight simulation of fan tone noise using a JT15D-1 engine:AIAA-1980-1025[R].Reston:AIAA, 1980.
[8] MCARDLE J G, HOMYAK L, CHRULSKI D D. Turbomachinery noise studies of the AiResearch QCGAT engine with inflow control:AIAA-1981-48621[R].Reston:AIAA, 1981.
[9] WOODWARD R P, WAZYNIAK J A, SHAW L M,et al. Effectiveness of an inlet flow turbulence control devices to simulate flight fan noise in an anechoic chamber:NASA TM-73855[R].Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1977.
[10] WOODWARD R P, GLASER F W. Effect of inflow control on inlet noise of a cut-on fan:AIAA-1980-1049[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1980.
[11] CHESTNUTT D. Flight effects of fan noise:NASA CP-2242[R]. Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1982.
[12] HOMYAK L, MCARDLE J G, HEIDELBERG L J. A compact inflow control device for simulating flight fan noise:AIAA-1983-0680[R].Reston:AIAA, 1983.
[13] WOODWARD R P, BALOMBIN J R. Tone generation by rotor-downstream strut interaction:AIAA-1983-0767[R].Reston:AIAA, 1983.
[14] SAE International. Measurement of far field noise fron gas turbine engines during static operation:ARP1846A[S].Warrendale:SAE International, 1984.
[15] ICAO. Environmental technical manual on the use of procedures in the noise certification of aircraft[S]. Montreal:ICAO, 2004.
[16] GENOULAZ N, JULLIARD J. RACE aero acoustic test facility:Fan forward and reward 3D noise measurements:AIAA-2006-2551[R].Reston:AIAA,2006.
[17] MUELLER D, HANS-JUERGEN S,ZITOUNU G, et al. Europe's largest aero acoustic test facility for aero engine fans-The development and operation of the anecom aerotest anechoic chamber:AIAA-2005-3050[R].Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[18] HOMYAK L, MCARDLE J G, HEIDELBERG L J, et. al. A compact inflow control device for simulating flight fan noise: AIAA-1983-0680[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1983.
[19] SAE International. Standard values of atmospheric absorption as a function of temperature and humidity:ARP886A[S]. Warrendale:SAE International,1964.
[20] 叶德培,宋振国,汪贤至.测量不确定度的表示及评定:GJB 3756-1999[S].北京:中国人民解放军总装备部军标出版发行部,1999:9-11. YEI D P, SONG Z G, WANG X Z. Expression and evaluation of uncertainty in measurement:GJB 3756-1999[S].Beijing:The General Reserve Department of PLA, 1994:9-11(in Chinese).
[21] 牛锋,何龙标,白滢,等.多通道声分析仪校准规范:JJF 1288-2011[S]. 北京:中国计量出版社,2011:20-24. NIU F, HE L B, BAI Y, et al. Calibration specification for multi-channels sound analyzers:JJF 1288-2011[S].Beijing:Chinese Metrology Press, 2011:20-24(in Chinese).
[22] 许欢,牛锋,裘剑敏.工作标准传声器(静电激励器法):JJG 175-2015[S]. 北京:中国计量出版社,2011:20-24. XU H, NIU F, QIU J M.Working standard microphones(Electrostatic actuator method):JJG 175-2015[S].Beijing:Chinese Metrology Press, 2011:20-24.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

湍流控制屏声学校准及校准精度影响因素

Acoustic calibration of turbulence control screen and influencing factors of calibration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨鹤森, 赵光银, 梁华, 王博. 翼型动态失速影响因素及流动控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(8): 23605-023605.
[2]	张海滨, 白博峰. 横流中空心锥形喷雾的扩散特性与影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 123927-123927.
[3]	孟晓轩, 白俊强, 张美红, 王美黎, 何小龙, 汪辉. 基于双e^N方法的短舱层流转捩影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(11): 123040-123040.
[4]	方传波, 夏智勋, 胡建新, 王德全. 强迫对流下硼颗粒燃烧特性影响因素研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 492-500.
[5]	李杰锋, 沈星, 陈金金. 零泊松比胞状结构的单胞面内等效模量分析及其影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(11): 3616-3629.
[6]	孟松鹤, 金华, 王国林, 杨强, 陈红波. 热防护材料表面催化特性研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(2): 287-302.
[7]	李清英, 朱春玲, 白天. 电脉冲除冰系统除冰激励的简化与影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(8): 1384-1393.
[8]	杨红兵;周建江;汪飞;张贞凯;陈益邻. 飞机射频隐身表征参量及其影响因素分析[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(10): 2040-2045.
[9]	李曙林;杨森;孙冬. 军用飞机环境适应性评价模型[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(6): 1053-1057.
[10]	王乃超;康锐. 备件需求产生、传播及解析算法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1163-1167.
[11]	林艳;杨合;李恒;詹梅. 薄壁管数控弯曲过程中失稳起皱的主要影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2003, 24(5): 456-461.
[12]	凌云沛;张华;刘坚. 新一代引射式跨音速风洞（IDT）高要求指标的研究[J]. 航空学报, 1989, 10(2): 9-14.
[13]	曾春华;邓蓉英;杜金声;伍义生. 变幅载荷下疲劳寿命的估算与影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 1979, 00(3): 23-31.