零质量射流对开式空腔气动噪声抑制效果分析

doi:CNKI:11-1929/V.20110324.1201.007

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

零质量射流对开式空腔气动噪声抑制效果分析

杨党国, 吴继飞, 罗新福

中国空气动力研究与发展中心空气动力学国家重点实验室, 四川绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2010-07-16 修回日期:2010-10-19 出版日期:2011-06-25 发布日期:2011-06-24
通讯作者: Tel.: 0816-2462268 E-mail: yangdg-cardc@163.com E-mail:yangdg-cardc@163.com
作者简介:杨党国(1980- ) 男,博士,助理研究员。主要研究方向:气动声学与流动控制。 Tel: 0816-2462268 E-mail: yangdg-cardc@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(10972233)

Investigation on Suppression Effect of Zero-net-mass-flux Jet on Aerodynamic Noise Inside Open Cavities

YANG Dangguo, WU Jifei, LUO Xinfu

State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2010-07-16 Revised:2010-10-19 Online:2011-06-25 Published:2011-06-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高速开式空腔流动,腔内存在较复杂的流场结构,在一定条件下腔内存在较为严重的压力、速度等脉动,诱发强烈噪声,声压级(SPL)甚至可高达170 dB,对腔内的储藏物与空腔自身结构安全构成较大威胁,因此开式空腔噪声抑制方法成为争相研究的热点。为此,对跨、超声速流动条件(马赫数Ma＝0.9,1.5)下有、无零质量射流时开式空腔(长深比L/D=6)气动声学特性进行了较详细地分析,并通过综合对比分析空腔底面中心线上的声压级分布和不同测点的声压频谱(SPFS)特性,探讨了不同零质量射流方式对空腔气动噪声的抑制效果。研究结果表明,跨声速(Ma＝0.9)条件下,采用的零质量射流对空腔内噪声有一定抑制效果,使得空腔前部区域声压级降低幅度比后部区域大,射流出口位于腔前壁上(射流方向平行来流)的射流方式对腔内噪声抑制效果要比射流出口位于腔前壁前(射流方向垂直来流)的射流方式好;超声速(Ma＝1.5)条件下,采用的零质量射流对空腔内气动声学特性影响很小,对腔内噪声几乎无抑制效果。

关键词: 空腔, 零质量射流, 气动噪声, 抑制方法, 声压级, 声压频谱

Abstract: Complex unsteady flow characteristics and flow-field structures occur in a high speed flow past open cavities, such as fluctuating pressure and velocity. Some sound pressure level (SPL) inside the cavities can reach 170 dB, which may damage certain installed apparatuses inside the cavity and its structural components. Noise suppression for open cavities is therefore a focus of research. This paper presents an analysis of the aero-acoustic characteristics inside an open cavity of a length-depth ratio (L/D) of 6 with or without a zero-net-mass-flux jet at Mach numbers of 0.9 and 1.5. The suppression effects of different zero-net-mass-flux jets on aerodynamic noise are discussed by analyzing the sound pressure level distribution on the centerline of the cavity floor and the sound pressure frequency spectrum (SPFS) characteristics at different measurement points. The results indicate that the jet can suppress aerodynamic noise inside the cavity, and that, at a Mach number of 0.9, it is more effective in SPL reduction in the front range of the cavity than in the rear. The suppression effect of the jet on the aerodynamic noise within the cavity is better when its exit is on the cavity-fore-face, with its direction parallel to the free-stream, than when its exit is in front of the cavity-fore-face with its direction vertical to the free-stream. The jet has little effect at a Mach number of 1.5.

Key words: cavity, zero-net-mass-flux jet, aerodynamic noise, suppression method, sound pressure level, sound pressure frequency spectrum

中图分类号:

V211
TB84

杨党国, 吴继飞, 罗新福. 零质量射流对开式空腔气动噪声抑制效果分析[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6): 1007-1014.

YANG Dangguo, WU Jifei, LUO Xinfu. Investigation on Suppression Effect of Zero-net-mass-flux Jet on Aerodynamic Noise Inside Open Cavities[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2011, 32(6): 1007-1014.

参考文献

[1] Heller H H, Bliss D B. Aerodynamically induced pressure oscillations in cavities-physical mechanisms and suppression concepts. AFFDL-TR-74-133, 1975.

[2] Meganathan A J, Vakili A D. An experimental study of open cavity flows at low subsonic speeds. AIAA-2002-0280, 2002.

[3] Hamed A, Basu D, Das K. Detached eddy simulations of supersonic flow over cavity. AIAA-2003-549, 2003.

[4] Ashcroft G B, Takeda K, Zhang X. A numerical investigation of the noise radiated by a turbulent flow over a cavity[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 265(1): 43-60.

[5] Chang K S, Park S O. Hybrid RANS/LES simulation of deep cavity flow. AIAA-2004-53, 2004.

[6] Hamed A, Das K, Basu D. Numerical simulations of fluidic control for transonic cavity flows. AIAA-2004-429, 2004.

[7] Bertier N, Courbet B, Dutoya D, et al. Large-eddy simulation of a subsonic flow over a cavity on general unstructured grids. AIAA-2004-679, 2004.

[8] Rowley C W, Juttijudata V, Williams D R. Cavity flow control simulations and experiments. AIAA-2005-0292, 2005.

[9] Rubio G, de Roeck W. Numerical study of noise generation mechanisms in rectangular cavities//Proceedings of the Euromech Colloquium 467 Turbulent Flow and Noise Generation. 2005.

[10] 罗柏华. 二维高亚声速空腔流激振荡的数值模拟研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2002, 20(1): 84-88. Luo Baihua. Numerical simulation of 2D high subsonic cavity flow oscillation[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2002, 20(1): 84-88. (in Chinese)

[11] 侯中喜, 易仕和, 王承尧. 超声速开式空腔流动的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2001, 22(5): 400-403. Hou Zhongxi, Yi Shihe, Wang Chengyao. Numerical analysis of supersonic open cavity[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2001, 22(5): 400-403. (in Chinese)

[12] 李晓东, 刘靖东, 高军辉. 空腔流激振荡发声的数值模拟研究[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38(5): 599-604. Li Xiaodong, Liu Jingdong, Gao Junhui. Numerical simulation of flow-induced oscillation and sound generation in a cavity[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38(5): 599-604. (in Chinese)

[13] 杨党国, 范召林, 李建强, 等. 弹舱流动特性数值模拟及风洞试验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2009, 27(3): 378-383. Yang Dangguo, Fan Zhaolin, Li Jianqiang, et al. Studies on flow characteristics of cavity by numerical simulation and wind tunnel test[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2009, 27(3): 378-383. (in Chinese)

[14] Wilcox F J. Experimental investigation of porous-floor effects on cavity flow fields at supersonic speeds. NASA-TP-3032, 1990.

[15] Taborda N, Bray D, Knowles K. Passive control of cavity resonances in tandem configurations. AIAA-2001-2770, 2001.

[16] Zhang J, Morishita E, Okunuki T, et al. Experimental and computational investigation of supersonic cavity flows. AIAA-2001-1755, 2001.

[17] Rona A, Brooksbank E J. Injection parameters for an effective passive control of cavity flow instability. AIAA-2002-0119, 2002.

[18] Meganathan A J, Vakili A D. Upstream mass-injection effects on cavity flow oscillations(PIV measurements and numerical simulations). AIAA-2003-0224, 2003.

[19] Rona A. Control of transonic cavity flow instability by streamwise air injection. AIAA-2004-682, 2004.

[20] Sahoo D, Annaswamy A, Zhuang N, et al. Control of cavity tones in supersonic flow. AIAA-2005-793, 2005.

[21] Lada C, Kontis K. Fluidic control of cavity configurations at subsonic and supersonic speeds. AIAA-2005-1298, 2005.

[22] Smith B R, Welterlen T J, Maines B H, et al. Weapons bay acoustic suppression from rod spoilers. AIAA-2002-0662, 2002.

[23] Arunajatesan S, Shipman J D, Sinha N, et al. Mechanisms in high-frequency control of cavity flows. AIAA-2003-0005, 2003.

[24] Ukeiley L S, Ponton M K, Seiner J M, et al. Suppression of pressure loads in cavity flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(1): 70-79.

[25] Williams D R, Drazen F, Morrow J. Experiments on controlling multiple acoustic modes in cavities. AIAA-2000-1903, 2000.

[26] Amitay M, Smith D R, Kibens V, et al. Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(3): 361-370.

[27] Rowley C W, Williams D R. Control of forced and self-sustained oscillations in the flow past a cavity. AIAA-2003-0008, 2003.

[28] Debiasi M, Yan P, Little J, et al. An experimental study of subsonic cavity flow-physical understanding and control. AIAA-2004-2123, 2004.

[29] Efe M O, Debiasi M, Yan P, et al. Control of subsonic cavity flows by neural networks-analytical models and experimental validation. AIAA-2005-294, 2005.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

零质量射流对开式空腔气动噪声抑制效果分析

Investigation on Suppression Effect of Zero-net-mass-flux Jet on Aerodynamic Noise Inside Open Cavities

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马锦超, 陆洋, 王亮权, 宋奎辉. 基于高阶谐波控制的倾转旋翼近场气动噪声主动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528602-528602.
[2]	刘琦, 史勇杰, 胡志远, 徐国华. 共轴刚性旋翼气动及噪声特性的参数影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528856-528856.
[3]	刘俊, 罗新福, 王显圣. 前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[4]	鄢荣, 何逸文, 李凯翔, 李鹏, 牟让科, 史爱明. 起落架开舱构型自激振荡预测公式改进与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 226140-226140.
[5]	刘远强, 王艳冰, 项松, 王梦琪. 面向电动飞机应用的不同叶尖螺旋桨噪声特性[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 624567-624567.
[6]	谢露, 张彦军, 侯银珠, 刘伟, 雷武涛. 亚声速武器舱空腔流动压力特性及其控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 123961-123961.
[7]	梁勇, 陈迎春, 赵鲲, 孙静, 卢翔宇, 赵昱. 锯齿单元对起落架/舱体耦合噪声抑制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 122932-122932.
[8]	陆维爽, 刘沛清, 郭昊. 前缘下垂远场低频宽频噪声特性[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 123152-123152.
[9]	张绎典, 黄江涛, 高正红. 基于增广Burgers方程的音爆远场计算及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(7): 122039-122039.
[10]	周方奇, 杨党国, 王显圣, 刘俊, 施傲. 前缘直板扰流对高速空腔的降噪效果分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4): 121812-121812.
[11]	刘俊, 蔡晋生, 杨党国, 施傲, 路波. 超声速空腔流动波系演化及噪声控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(11): 22366-022366.
[12]	王显圣, 杨党国, 刘俊, 施傲, 周方奇, 吕彬彬. 弹性空腔流致噪声/结构振动特性试验[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7): 120873-120873.
[13]	王骁原, 郭昊, 邢宇, 刘沛清. LAGOON起落架缩比模型机轮空腔发声机理试验[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(5): 120549-120549.
[14]	周铸, 黄江涛, 黄勇, 刘刚, 陈作斌, 王运涛, 江雄. CFD技术在航空工程领域的应用、挑战与发展[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(3): 20891-020891.
[15]	吴飞, 邵万仁, 何敬玉, 李晓东, 王德友. 分开排气式喷管喷流噪声预测及试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6): 1790-1797.