远场假设对喷流噪声预测中格林函数求解的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0127

Abstract

Abstract:

To simplify the solution procedure of Green's function, most popular Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based jet noise prediction methods suggest to make the assumption that the jet flow is parallel and the observers are located at the infinity farfield. With the development of the solution method of Green's function, the effect of parallel flow assumption on calculation of the Green's function has been studied recently. However, the effect of farfield assumption on calculation of the Green's function has not yet been studied. To study the effect of farfield assumption, the adjoint method is used to calculate the Green's function in this paper. For actual observer 90°-150°and assumed farfield observer, the adjoint Green's functions are solved separately by a computational aeroacoustics (CAA) method. Comparison of calculation results of Green's function for actual observer and for assumed farfield observer are given in this paper. It is found that for different observation angle, the calculated deviation caused by farfield assumption is different. It is also found that there is a greater derivation of calculation results of Green's function to the point farther away from the nozzle exit. For the observer at 150°, the deviations of calculation results of Green's function caused by farfield assumption at some point are as large as -15 dB. Consequently, for observers close to the jet axis, calculation of adjoint Green's function should avoid farfield assumption to reduce the prediction error.

Key words: aeroacoustics, shear flow, refraction waves, Green's function, adjoint technique, computational fluid dynamics, computational aeroacoustics

CLC Number:

V231.1

XU Xihai, LI Xiaodong. Effect of farfield assumption on calculation of Green's function for predicting jet noise[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(9): 2699-2710.

References

[1] LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1952, 211: 564-587.
[2] LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically. Part II. Turbulence as a source of sound[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1954, 222: 1-34.
[3] PRIDMORE-BROWN D C. Sound propagation in a fluid flowing through an attenuating duct[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 4(4): 393-406.
[4] PHILLIPS O M. The intensity of aeolian tones[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1956, 1(6): 607-624.
[5] MANI R. The influence of flow on jet noise[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 73: 753-793.
[6] GOLDSTEIN M E. The low frequency sound from multiple sources in axisymmetric shear flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 70: 595-604.
[7] BALSA T F. The farfield of high frequency convected singularities in sheared flows with anapplication to jet noise prediction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 74(2): 193-208.
[8] GOLDSTEIN M E. High frequency sound emission from moving point multiple sources embedded in arbitrary transversely sheared mean flows[J]. Journal of Sound Vibration, 1982, 80: 499-522.
[9] SCHUBERT L K. Numerical study of sound refraction by a jet flow. I. Rayacoustics[J]. Journal Acoustic Society of America, 1972, 51: 439-446.
[10] DURBIN P A. High frequency Green's function for aerodynamic noise in movingmedia[J]. Journal of Sound Vibration, 1983, 91(4): 519-525.
[11] KHAVARAN A. Refraction and shielding of noise in non-axisymmetric jet: AIAA-1996-1780[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1996.
[12] KHAVARAN A, KREJSA E A. Propagation of high frequency jet noise using geometric acoustics: AIAA-1993-0147[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1993.
[13] KHAVARAN A, KREJSA E A. Refraction of high frequency noise in an arbitrary jet flow: AIAA-1994-0139[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1994.
[14] KHAVARAN A, KREJSA E A. On the role of anisotropy in turbulent mixing noise: AIAA-1998-2289[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1998.
[15] TAM C K W, AURIAULT L.Mean flow refraction effects on sound radiated from localized sources in a jet[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 370: 149-174.
[16] TAM C K W, AURIAULT L. Jetmixing noise from fine-scale turbulence[J]. AIAA Journal, 1999, 37(2): 145-153.
[17] TAM C K W, PASTOUCHENKO N N. Noise from fine-scale turbulence of nonaxisymmetric jets[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(3): 456-464.
[18] FRATE F, KHAVARAN A. Anaerodynamic and acoustic assessment of convergent-divergent nozzles with chevrons: AIAA-2011-0976[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[19] CHEUNG L, PASTOUCHENKO N, MANI R, et al. Fine-scale turbulent noise predictions from non-axisymmetric jet: AIAA-2013-2037[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2013.
[20] SIMMONS S P, HENDERSONAND B, ABBAS KHAVARAN A. Flow field and acoustic predictions for three-stream jets: AIAA-2014-3741[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2014.
[21] XU X H, HE J Y, LI X D,et al. 3-D jet noise prediction for separate flow nozzles with pylon interaction: AIAA-2015-0512[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015.
[22] KARABASOV S A, BOGEY C, HYNES T P. Computation of noise of initially laminar jets using a statistical approach for the acoustic analogy: Application and discussion: AIAA-2011-2929[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[23] GOLDSTEIN M E, ADRIAN S, AFSAR M Z. Effect of non-parallel mean flow on the Green's function for predicting the low-frequency sound from turbulent air jets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 695: 199-234.
[24] THIES A T, TAM C K W. Computation of turbulent axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric jet flows using the K-e model[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(2): 309-316.
[25] POPE S B. An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/plane-jet anomaly[J]. AIAA Journal, 1978, 16(3): 279-281.
[26] SARKAR S, LAKSHMANAN B. Application of a Reynolds stress turbulence model to the compressible shear layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29(5): 743-749.
[27] SARKAR S, ERLEBACHER G, HUSSAINI M Y,et al. The analysis and modeling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence: NASA CR181959[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1989.
[28] HU F Q. A stable perfectly matched layer for linearized Euler equations in unsplit physical variables[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 173(2): 455-480.
[29] TAM C K W, WEBB J C.Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993, 107(2): 262-281.
[30] HU F Q, HUSSAINI M Y, MANTHEY J L. Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 124(1): 177-191.

Effect of farfield assumption on calculation of Green's function for predicting jet noise

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Fangcheng SHI, Zhenxun GAO, Yuyan TIAN, Chongwen JIANG, Tiantian WANG, Chun-Hian LEE. Large eddy simulation of ideally expanded supersonic jet noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[2]	Jianling QIAO, Zhonghua HAN, Yulin DING, Wenping SONG, Bifeng SONG. Effects of stratified atmospheric turbulence on farfield sonic boom propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[3]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[4]	CHEN Guangqiang, DOU Guohui, WEI Haogong, ZOU Xin, LI Qi, LIU Zhou, ZHOU Weijiang. Air data sensing technology of Mars probe [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[5]	YI Jianmiao, DENG Feng, QIN Ning, LIU Xueqiang. Fast prediction of transonic flow field using deep learning method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[6]	WANG Di, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.
[7]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[8]	CHEN Jianqiang, WU Xiaojun, ZHANG Jian, LI Bin, JIA Hongyin, ZHOU Naichun. FlowStar: General unstructured-grid CFD software for National Numerical Windtunnel (NNW) Project [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[9]	LI Zuobiao, WEN Fengbo, TANG Xiaolei, SU Liangjun, WANG Songtao. Prediction of single-row hole film cooling performance based on deep learning [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524331-524331.
[10]	YANG Xiaofeng, LI Qin, DU Yanxia, LIU Lei, GUI Yewei. Progress in numerical research on interface heterogeneous catalysis of hypersonic vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 625908-625908.
[11]	CHANG Siyuan, BAI Xiaozheng, LIU Jun. A two-dimensional shock wave pattern recognition algorithm based on cluster analysis [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(8): 123626-123626.
[12]	HAN Zhonghua, XU Chenzhou, QIAO Jianling, LIU Fei, CHI Jiangbo, MENG Guanyu, ZHANG Keshi, SONG Wenping. Recent progress of efficient global aerodynamic shape optimization using surrogate-based approach [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623344-623344.
[13]	CHANG Siyuan, BAI Xiaozheng, CUI Xiaoqiang, LIU Jun. An improved unsteady shock-fitting algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(2): 123498-123498.
[14]	YANG Chunling, ZHANG Zhendong, ZHANG Tongyiyu. Infrared decoy modeling method based on enhanced discrete phase model and chemical combustion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(12): 123682-123682.
[15]	LU Fengxia, WANG Meng, WANG Chunlei, LI Yuzhe, ZHU Rupeng. Analysis and optimization method for flow field of intermediate gearbox splash lubrication in helicopters [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(11): 123659-123659.