头型对射弹高速入水稳定性的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28437

Abstract

Abstract:

Cavitation evolution characteristics and water entry stability of projectiles with different nose shapes during high-speed oblique water entry impact and underwater navigation phases with cavitation are studied to provide a theoretical basis for high-speed projectiles， air-dropped torpedoes and other trans-medium weapons to attack targets with high accuracy. Combined with high-speed full flow field visualization experiments technology and numerical simulation analysis， influence of projectile nose shapes on water entry cavitation shapes， cavitation size， movement speed， pitch angle and water entry stability is emphatically discussed by comparing the high-speed oblique water entry process of projectiles with three different nose shapes. Comparison involves cylindrical flat nose， hemispherical nose and 90° cone nose.Results show that although the process of water entry and underwater navigation with cavitation of the three projectiles are the same， the nose shape has a significant influence on water entry cavitation characteristics and water entry stability of projectiles during high-speed oblique water entry. In the water entry phase， the water entry cavitation diameter of the cylinder flat nosed projectile is the largest， followed by the 90° cone nosed projectile， and the smallest being the hemispherical nosed projectile. The water entry impact load decreases in the order of cylindrical flat nosed projectile， hemispherical nosed projectile and 90° cone nosed projectile. During the underwater navigation phase with cavitation， the maximum length-to-diameter ratio of the water entry cavitation of the cylindrical flat nosed projectile reaches 7.187， which is large in diameter and short in length； on the contrary， the maximum length-to-diameter ratio of the water entry cavitation of the hemispherical nosed projectile is as high as 10.864， and the cavitation shows a slender shape. However， the cavitation shape of the 90° cone nosed projectile is extremely unstable due to the destruction of the cavitation wall. In the whole water entry process， the hemispherical nosed projectile has the best water entry stability， followed by the cylindrical flat nosed projectile， and the 90° cone nosed projectile has the worst water entry stability.

Key words: water entry stability, projectile nose shape, water entry impact, water entry cavitation, high-speed water entry, computational fluid dynamics

CLC Number:

V211.1⁺7

Sihua LIU, Zhanying WANG, Lijian LI, Mindi ZHANG. Influence of nose shapes on high-speed water entry stability of projectile[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(21): 528437-528437.

Figures/Tables 22

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

References 30

1	冯金富，胡俊华，齐铎. 水空跨介质航行器发展需求及其关键技术［J］. 空军工程大学学报（自然科学版）， 2019， 20（3）： 8-13.
	FENG J F， HU J H， QI D. Study on development needs and key technologies of air-water trans-media vehicle［J］. Journal of Air Force Engineering University （Natural Science Edition）， 2019， 20（3）： 8-13 （in Chinese）.
2	HRUBES J D. High-speed imaging of supercavitating underwater projectiles［J］.Experiments in Fluids， 2001， 30（1）： 57-64.
3	THORODDSEN S T， ETOH T G， TAKEHARA K， et al. Impact jetting by a solid sphere［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2004， 499： 139-148.
4	TRUSCOTT T T， EPPS B P， BELDEN J. Water entry of projectiles［J］. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 46： 355-378.
5	王永虎，石秀华. 入水冲击问题研究的现状与进展［J］. 爆炸与冲击， 2008， 28（3）： 276-282.
	WANG Y H， SHI X H. Review on research and development of water-entry impact problem［J］. Explosion and Shock Waves， 2008， 28（3）： 276-282 （in Chinese）.
6	秦洪德，赵林岳，申静. 入水冲击问题综述［J］. 哈尔滨工业大学学报， 2011， 43（）： 152-157.
	QIN H D， ZHAO L Y， SHEN J. Review of water entry problem［J］. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology， 2011， 43（S1）： 152-157 （in Chinese）.
7	王瑞，赵博伟，刘珂，等. 高速射弹入水稳定性研究现状与分析［J］. 火炮发射与控制学报， 2018， 39（2）： 99-104.
	WANG R， ZHAO B W， LIU K， et al. Research status of the stability of high-speed projectile’s water-entry process and its analysis［J］. Journal of Gun Launch and Control， 2018， 39（2）：99-104 （in Chinese）.
8	WORTHINGTON A M， COLE R S. Impact with a liquid surface， studied by the aid of instantaneous photography［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A： Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character， 1897， 189： 137-148.
9	WORTHINGTON A M. A study of splashes［M］. London： Longmans， Green， and Co.， 1908.
10	MAY A， WOODHULL J C. Drag coefficients of steel spheres entering water vertically［J］. Journal of Applied Physics， 1948， 19（12）： 1109-1121.
11	MAY A. Effect of surface condition of a sphere on its water-entry cavity［J］. Journal of Applied Physics， 1951， 22（10）： 1219-1222.
12	MAY A， WOODHULL J C. The virtual mass of a sphere entering water vertically［J］. Journal of Applied Physics， 1950， 21（12）： 1285-1289.
13	MAY A. Vertical entry of missiles into water［J］. Journal of Applied Physics， 1952， 23（12）： 1362-1372.
14	GILBARG D， ANDERSON R A. Influence of atmospheric pressure on the phenomena accompanying the entry of spheres into water［J］. Journal of Applied Physics， 1948， 19（2）： 127-139.
15	ABELSON H I. A prediction of water-entry cavity shape［J］. Journal of Basic Engineering， 1971， 93（4）： 501-503.
16	SHI H H， ITOH M， TAKAMI T. Optical observation of the supercavitation induced by high-speed water entry［J］. Journal of Fluids Engineering， 2000， 122（4）： 806-810.
17	SHI H H， MAKOTO K. Underwater acoustics and cavitating flow of water entry［J］.Acta Mechanica Sinica， 2004， 20（4）： 374-382.
18	SHI H H， TAKAMI T. Hydrodynamic behavior of an underwater moving body after water entry［J］.Acta Mechanica Sinica， 2001， 17（1）： 35-44.
19	BODILY K G， CARLSON S J， TRUSCOTT T T. The water entry of slender axisymmetric bodies［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2014， 26（7）： 72108.
20	王瑞琦，黄振贵，郭则庆，等. 不同头型弹丸低速垂直入水实验研究［J］. 兵器装备工程学报， 2017， 38（11）：45-50.
	WANG R Q， HUANG Z G， GUO Z Q， et al. Experimental study of low speed vertical water entry with different head shape projectiles［J］. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance， 2017， 38（11）： 45-50 （in Chinese）.
21	路丽睿，魏英杰，王聪，等. 不同头型射弹低速倾斜入水空泡及弹道特性试验研究［J］. 兵工学报， 2018， 39（7）：1364-1371.
	LU L R， WEI Y J， WANG C， et al. Experimental investigation into the cavity and ballistic characteristics of low-speed oblique water entry of revolution body［J］. Acta Armamentarii， 2018， 39（7）：1364-1371 （in Chinese）.
22	李利剑，张敏弟，王占莹，等. 入水角度对球体高速入水空泡特性影响研究［J］. 装备环境工程， 2023， 20（3）： 1-14.
	LI L J， ZHANG M D， WANG Z Y， et al. Effects of water entry angle on cavity characteristics of high-speed sphere［J］. Equipment Environmental Engineering， 2023， 20（3）： 1-14 （in Chinese）.
23	BATTISTIN D， IAFRATI A. Hydrodynamic loads during water entry of two-dimensional and axisymmetric bodies［J］. Journal of Fluids and Structures， 2003， 17（5）： 643-664.
24	JOHN ABRAHAM T S. Velocity and density effect on impact force during water entry of sphere［J］. Journal of Geophysics and Remote Sensing， 2014， 3（3）： 1000129.
25	BELDEN J， HURD R C， JANDRON M A， et al. Elastic spheres can walk on water［J］. Nature Communications， 2016， 7： 10551.
26	宋武超，王聪，魏英杰，等. 不同头型回转体低速倾斜入水过程流场特性数值模拟［J］. 北京理工大学学报， 2017， 37（7）： 661-666， 671.
	SONG W C， WANG C， WEI Y J， et al. Numerical simulation of the flow field characteristics of low speed oblique water entry of revolution body［J］. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology， 2017， 37（7）： 661-666， 671 （in Chinese）.
27	宋武超，王聪，魏英杰，等. 回转体倾斜入水空泡及弹道特性实验［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2016， 42（11）： 2386-2394.
	SONG W C， WANG C， WEI Y J， et al. Experiment of cavity and trajectory characteristics of oblique water entry of revolution bodies［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2016， 42（11）： 2386-2394 （in Chinese）.
28	方城林，魏英杰，王聪，等. 不同头型高速射弹垂直入水数值模拟［J］. 哈尔滨工业大学学报， 2016， 48（10）： 77-82.
	FANG C L， WEI Y J， WANG C， et al. Numerical simulation of vertical high-speed water entry process of projectiles with different heads［J］. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology， 2016， 48（10）： 77-82 （in Chinese）.
29	张佳悦，李达钦，吴钦，等. 航行体回收垂直入水空泡流场及水动力特性研究［J］. 力学学报， 2019， 51（3）：803-812.
	ZHANG J Y， LI D Q， WU Q， et al. Numerical investigation on cavity structures and hyrodynamics of the vehicle during vertical water-entry［J］. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics， 2019， 51（3）：803-812 （in Chinese）.
30	MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications［J］. AIAA Journal， 1994， 32（8）： 1598-1605.

参数	圆柱平头射弹	半球头射弹	90°锥头射弹
直径D₀/mm	9	9	9
长度L₀/mm	36	36	36
质量m/g	10.684	9.940	9.196
质心位置（距弹头距离）L₁/mm	13.664	14.603	15.603

[1]	Jiong REN, Gang WANG, Guodong HU, Xiaolu SHI. Adaptive finite volume method with Walsh basis functions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 127444-127444.
[2]	Wenbo CAO, Yilang LIU, Weiwei ZHANG. Accelerated convergence method for fluid dynamics solvers based on reduced⁃order model and gradient optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 127090-127090.
[3]	Jianling QIAO, Zhonghua HAN, Yulin DING, Wenping SONG, Bifeng SONG. Effects of stratified atmospheric turbulence on farfield sonic boom propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[4]	Shengye WANG, Xiaogang DENG, Yidao DONG, Dongfang WANG, Jiahong CAI. High-order numerical methods for engineering turbulence simulation [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(15): 528728-528728.
[5]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[6]	CHEN Guangqiang, DOU Guohui, WEI Haogong, ZOU Xin, LI Qi, LIU Zhou, ZHOU Weijiang. Air data sensing technology of Mars probe [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[7]	YI Jianmiao, DENG Feng, QIN Ning, LIU Xueqiang. Fast prediction of transonic flow field using deep learning method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[8]	WANG Di, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.
[9]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[10]	CHEN Jianqiang, WU Xiaojun, ZHANG Jian, LI Bin, JIA Hongyin, ZHOU Naichun. FlowStar: General unstructured-grid CFD software for National Numerical Windtunnel (NNW) Project [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[11]	LI Zuobiao, WEN Fengbo, TANG Xiaolei, SU Liangjun, WANG Songtao. Prediction of single-row hole film cooling performance based on deep learning [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524331-524331.
[12]	YANG Xiaofeng, LI Qin, DU Yanxia, LIU Lei, GUI Yewei. Progress in numerical research on interface heterogeneous catalysis of hypersonic vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 625908-625908.
[13]	CHANG Siyuan, BAI Xiaozheng, LIU Jun. A two-dimensional shock wave pattern recognition algorithm based on cluster analysis [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(8): 123626-123626.
[14]	HAN Zhonghua, XU Chenzhou, QIAO Jianling, LIU Fei, CHI Jiangbo, MENG Guanyu, ZHANG Keshi, SONG Wenping. Recent progress of efficient global aerodynamic shape optimization using surrogate-based approach [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623344-623344.
[15]	CHANG Siyuan, BAI Xiaozheng, CUI Xiaoqiang, LIU Jun. An improved unsteady shock-fitting algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(2): 123498-123498.

Influence of nose shapes on high-speed water entry stability of projectile

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments