Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 631183.doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.31183
• special column • Previous Articles
Jinhua LOU1,2, Rongqian CHEN1(
), Jiaqi LIU1, Yue BAO1, Hao WU1, Yancheng YOU1
Received:2024-09-10
Revised:2024-10-12
Accepted:2024-11-15
Online:2024-12-02
Published:2024-11-29
Contact:
Rongqian CHEN
E-mail:rqchen@xmu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Jinhua LOU, Rongqian CHEN, Jiaqi LIU, Yue BAO, Hao WU, Yancheng YOU. Aircraft aerodynamic performance prediction and inverse design based on a gated diffusion model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(10): 631183.
Table 1
Prior model network parameters
| 网络层 | 输入,输出 | 激活 函数 | 乘法量 | 总计(任务) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 隐藏层1 | ((2+8),64) | SELU | 10×64+64 | 124 678 (正设计) |
| 隐藏层2 | (64,256) | SELU | 64×256+256 | |
| 隐藏层3 | (256,256) | SELU | 256×256+256 | |
| 隐藏层4 | (256,128) | SELU | 256×128+128 | |
| 隐藏层5 | (128,64) | SELU | 128×64+64 | |
| 输出层 | (64,6) | 64×6+6 | ||
| 隐藏层1 | ((2+6),64) | SELU | 8×64+64 | 124 680 (反设计) |
| 隐藏层2 | (64,256) | SELU | 64×256+256 | |
| 隐藏层3 | (256,256) | SELU | 256×256+256 | |
| 隐藏层4 | (256,128) | SELU | 256×128+128 | |
| 隐藏层5 | (128,64) | SELU | 128×64+64 | |
| 输出层 | (64,8) | 64×8+8 |
Table 3
Comparison of error for aerodynamic performance prediction using various methods
| 数据集 | 气动参数 | MAE/ | 相对误差/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配置1 | 配置2 | 配置3 | 配置4 | 配置5 | 配置1 | 配置2 | 配置3 | 配置4 | 配置5 | ||
| 训练集 | 8.81 | 7.54 | 5.02 | 4.78 | 6.58 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.61 | |
| 3.36 | 2.66 | 1.27 | 1.09 | 2.22 | 5.84 | 4.38 | 2.12 | 1.77 | 2.92 | ||
| 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.18 | ||
| 9.42 | 7.46 | 4.91 | 4.58 | 6.40 | 0.91 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.61 | ||
| 1.50 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.95 | 1.23 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.31 | ||
| 3.47 | 2.06 | 1.31 | 1.10 | 1.41 | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.28 | ||
| 测试集 | 9.02 | 7.71 | 5.50 | 5.35 | 6.73 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.63 | |
| 3.45 | 2.74 | 1.45 | 1.23 | 2.41 | 5.60 | 4.38 | 2.46 | 1.94 | 3.43 | ||
| 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.20 | ||
| 9.85 | 8.02 | 5.36 | 5.16 | 6.75 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.64 | ||
| 1.53 | 1.33 | 1.44 | 2.02 | 1.32 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.33 | ||
| 3.48 | 2.09 | 1.50 | 1.21 | 1.55 | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.31 | ||
Table 4
Comparison of inverse design geometric shape parameter error for various methods
| 数据集 | 外形参数 | MAE/ | 相对误差/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配置1 | 配置2 | 配置3 | 配置4 | 配置5 | 配置1 | 配置2 | 配置3 | 配置4 | 配置5 | ||
| 训练集 | 15.30 | 14.20 | 12.30 | 11.90 | 9.80 | 1.04 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.66 | |
| 8.34 | 8.58 | 6.55 | 5.99 | 4.93 | 3.86 | 3.95 | 2.88 | 2.66 | 2.20 | ||
| 2.39 | 2.36 | 2.38 | 2.04 | 1.55 | 12.40 | 11.90 | 11.10 | 10.20 | 7.59 | ||
| 5.36 | 5.37 | 2.85 | 2.49 | 2.00 | 2.79 | 2.79 | 1.45 | 1.27 | 1.01 | ||
| 6.17 | 5.87 | 6.23 | 5.10 | 3.78 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.12 | ||
| 7.71 | 8.11 | 6.78 | 6.08 | 4.24 | 3.29 | 3.49 | 2.79 | 2.53 | 1.75 | ||
| 7.03 | 6.88 | 5.66 | 5.45 | 3.95 | 19.30 | 18.40 | 13.80 | 13.70 | 9.68 | ||
| 5.27 | 5.33 | 2.82 | 2.51 | 1.61 | 2.87 | 2.90 | 1.49 | 1.33 | 0.86 | ||
| 测试集 | 21.80 | 21.30 | 19.20 | 17.20 | 16.10 | 1.51 | 1.47 | 1.32 | 1.18 | 1.10 | |
| 11.40 | 11.70 | 9.58 | 8.60 | 8.02 | 5.13 | 5.29 | 4.09 | 3.71 | 3.49 | ||
| 3.51 | 3.52 | 3.32 | 2.96 | 2.46 | 17.60 | 17.8 | 14.70 | 13.70 | 11.90 | ||
| 5.77 | 5.82 | 3.45 | 3.09 | 2.68 | 3.01 | 3.03 | 1.73 | 1.56 | 1.35 | ||
| 8.64 | 8.55 | 8.41 | 7.38 | 5.93 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.19 | ||
| 10.60 | 10.80 | 9.28 | 8.22 | 6.36 | 4.72 | 4.74 | 3.93 | 3.51 | 2.74 | ||
| 9.19 | 9.02 | 7.66 | 7.30 | 6.28 | 25.40 | 24.20 | 19.20 | 17.30 | 16.30 | ||
| 5.99 | 6.11 | 3.42 | 2.97 | 2.34 | 3.23 | 3.28 | 1.78 | 1.56 | 1.22 | ||
Table 5
Comparison of aerodynamic performance error of shapes generated by various inverse design methods
| 数据集 | 气动参数 | MAE/ | 相对误差/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配置1 | 配置2 | 配置3 | 配置4 | 配置5 | 配置1 | 配置2 | 配置3 | 配置4 | 配置5 | ||
| 训练集 | 25.80 | 26.00 | 13.70 | 10.00 | 6.86 | 2.34 | 2.37 | 1.25 | 0.91 | 0.61 | |
| 7.68 | 7.76 | 3.43 | 3.30 | 2.20 | 21.40 | 21.50 | 8.80 | 8.47 | 5.77 | ||
| 2.31 | 2.31 | 1.29 | 0.89 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.20 | ||
| 25.50 | 25.70 | 13.50 | 9.92 | 6.79 | 2.38 | 2.40 | 1.27 | 0.92 | 0.62 | ||
| 4.55 | 4.57 | 2.45 | 1.70 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.29 | ||
| 6.92 | 7.00 | 3.14 | 2.96 | 1.90 | 1.43 | 1.45 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.39 | ||
| 测试集 | 27.80 | 27.80 | 14.10 | 11.20 | 8.20 | 2.52 | 2.53 | 1.27 | 1.00 | 0.73 | |
| 8.38 | 8.56 | 3.67 | 3.62 | 2.60 | 20.70 | 19.90 | 8.29 | 8.28 | 5.72 | ||
| 2.47 | 2.47 | 1.38 | 0.96 | 0.66 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.22 | ||
| 27.40 | 27.50 | 14.00 | 11.10 | 8.12 | 2.56 | 2.57 | 1.29 | 1.01 | 0.75 | ||
| 4.90 | 4.92 | 2.57 | 1.85 | 1.32 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.33 | ||
| 7.63 | 7.81 | 3.28 | 3.24 | 2.25 | 1.59 | 1.63 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.46 | ||
| 1 | 王清, 招启军. 基于遗传算法的旋翼翼型综合气动优化设计[J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(6): 1486-1495. |
| WANG Q, ZHAO Q J. Synthetical optimization design of rotor airfoil by genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(6): 1486-1495 (in Chinese). | |
| 2 | 张淼, 刘铁军, 马涂亮, 等. 基于CFD方法的大型客机高速气动设计[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 244-254. |
| ZHANG M, LIU T J, MA T L, et al. High speed aerodynamic design of large civil transporter based on CFD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1): 244-254 (in Chinese). | |
| 3 | 赵童, 张宇飞, 陈海昕, 等. 面向三维机翼性能的超临界翼型优化设计方法[J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学, 2015, 45(10): 89-101. |
| ZHAO T, ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X, et al. Aerodynamic optimization method of supercritical airfoil geared to the performance of swept and tapered wing[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 2015, 45(10): 89-101 (in Chinese). | |
| 4 | 李焦赞, 高正红, 詹浩. 基于目标压力分布优化的翼型反设计方法研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2008, 28(1): 187-190. |
| LI J Z, GAO Z H, ZHAN H. Study on inverse design method of airfoil based on optimizati on of target pressure distribution[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2008, 28(1): 187-190 (in Chinese). | |
| 5 | DULIKRAVICH G. Shape inverse design and optimization for three-dimensional aerodynamics[C]∥ 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 1995: 695. |
| 6 | YU Y, LYU Z J, XU Z L, et al. On the influence of optimization algorithm and initial design on wing aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 75: 183-199. |
| 7 | 吴明雨, 陈志华, 邱志明, 等. 条件生成对抗网络的翼型反设计方法[J]. 宇航学报, 2023, 44(10): 1512-1521. |
| WU M Y, CHEN Z H, QIU Z M, et al. An inverse design method of airfoil using conditional generative adversarial network[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2023, 44(10): 1512-1521 (in Chinese). | |
| 8 | 陈树生, 冯聪, 张兆康, 等. 基于全局/梯度优化方法的宽速域乘波-机翼布局气动设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629596. |
| CHEN S S, FENG C, ZHANG Z K, et al. Aerodynamic design of wide-speed-range waverider-wing configuration based on global & gradient optimization method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 629596 (in Chinese). | |
| 9 | LI J C, DU X S, MARTINS J R R A. Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2022, 134: 100849. |
| 10 | 陈海昕, 邓凯文, 李润泽. 机器学习技术在气动优化中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522480. |
| CHEN H X, DENG K W, LI R Z. Utilization of machine learning technology in aerodynamic optimization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(1): 522480 (in Chinese). | |
| 11 | 张伟伟, 寇家庆, 刘溢浪. 智能赋能流体力学展望[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524689. |
| ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, LIU Y L. Prospect of artificial intelligence empowered fluid mechanics[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524689 (in Chinese). | |
| 12 | 孙刚, 王聪, 王立悦, 等. 人工智能在气动设计中的应用与展望[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2021(3): 1-9, 147. |
| SUN G, WANG C, WANG L Y, et al. Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in aerodynamic design[J]. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2021(3): 1-9, 147 (in Chinese). | |
| 13 | 柳家齐, 陈荣钱, 楼锦华, 等. 基于深度学习的高速直升机旋翼翼型气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529828. |
| LIU J Q, CHEN R Q, LOU J H, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of high-speed helicopter rotor airfoil based on deep learning[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529828 (in Chinese). | |
| 14 | 赵欢, 高正红, 夏露. 基于新型高维代理模型的气动外形设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 136-152. |
| ZHAO H, GAO Z H, XIA L. Aerodynamic shape design optimization method based on novel high-dimensional surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(5): 136-152 (in Chinese). | |
| 15 | WANG Y Q, LIU T Y, ZHANG D, et al. Dual-convolutional neural network based aerodynamic prediction and multi-objective optimization of a compact turbine rotor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 116: 106869. |
| 16 | 王超杰, 何磊, 李川, 等. 基于注意力机制的翼型反设计方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(1): 20230106. |
| WANG C J, HE L, LI C,et al. Airfoil reverse design method based on self-attention mechanism[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(1): 20230106 (in Chinese). | |
| 17 | SEKAR V, ZHANG M Q, SHU C, et al. Inverse design of airfoil using a deep convolutional neural network[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(3): 993-1003. |
| 18 | CHEN S S, QIU J Y, YANG H, et al. Deep learning for inverse design of low-boom supersonic configurations[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2023, 5(1): 13. |
| 19 | KUMAR A, VADLAMANI N R. Inverse design of airfoils using convolutional neural network and deep neural network[C]∥ASME 2021 Gas Turbine India Conference. New York: ASME 2021. |
| 20 | TYAN M, CHOI C K, NGUYEN T A, et al. Rapid airfoil inverse design method with a deep neural network and hyperparameter selection[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2023, 24(1): 33-46. |
| 21 | WU H Z, LIU X J, AN W, et al. A generative deep learning framework for airfoil flow field prediction with sparse data[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(1): 470-484. |
| 22 | YANG Y J, LI R Z, ZHANG Y F, et al. Flowfield prediction of airfoil off-design conditions based on a modified variational autoencoder[J]. AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(10): 5805-5820. |
| 23 | WANG Y Y, SHIMADA K, BARATI FARIMANI A. Airfoil GAN: Encoding and synthesizing airfoils for aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2023, 10(4): 1350-1362. |
| 24 | HO J, JAIN A, ABBEEL P, et al. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models[C]∥Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. New York: ACM, 2020: 6840-6851. |
| 25 | HO J, SAHARIA C, CHAN W, et al. Cascaded diffusion models for high fidelity image generation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2022, 23(1): 2249-2281. |
| 26 | XIA B, ZHANG Y L, WANG S Y, et al. DiffIR: efficient diffusion model for image restoration[C]∥2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2023: 13049-13059. |
| 27 | YANG H, JUNPENG Z, CHUNYU G, et al. A flow field super-resolution reconstruction method based on diffusion model[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(10): 2309-2320. |
| 28 | SHU D L, LI Z J, BARATI FARIMANI A. A physics-informed diffusion model for high-fidelity flow field reconstruction[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2023, 478: 111972. |
| 29 | 徐志昂, 骆嘉晨, 丁相贵, 等. 基于扩散模型的高阶拓扑绝缘体实时设计[J]. 力学学报, 2024, 56(7): 1840-1848. |
| XU Z A, LUO J C, DING X G, et al. Real-time design of higher-order topological insulators by diffusion model[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(7): 1840-1848 (in Chinese). | |
| 30 | VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]∥Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. New York: ACM, 2017: 6000- 6010. |
| 31 | SOOY T J, SCHMIDT R Z. Aerodynamic predictions, comparisons, and validations using missile DATCOM (97) and aeroprediction 98 (AP98)[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2005, 42(2): 257-265. |
| 32 | YAN X H, ZHU J H, KUANG M C, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization using a novel optimizer based on machine learning techniques[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 86: 826-835. |
| 33 | WU P, YUAN W Y, JI L L, et al. Missile aerodynamic shape optimization design using deep neural networks[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 126: 107640. |
| 34 | PAN S J, YANG Q. A survey on transfer learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2010, 22(10): 1345-1359. |
| [1] | . Design Space Geometric Filtering and Manifold Reconstruction-enhanced Gradient Optimization Design Method for Laminar Flow Wing [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 0, (): 1-0. |
| [2] | . Transition Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis of Self-developed Benchmark Models for Supersonic Laminar Wings [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 0, (): 1-0. |
| [3] | Xiangying GUO, Jie XU, Yongchang HUANG. Characteristic analysis of large-scale wavelength protuberances wings near critical angle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(S1): 730557-730557. |
| [4] | Shusheng CHEN, Muliang JIA, Yanxu LIU, Zhenghong GAO, Xinghao XIANG. Deformation modes and key technologies of aerodynamic layout design for morphing aircraft: Review [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 629595-629595. |
| [5] | Liu LIU, Xianhong XIANG, Yufei ZHANG, Haixin CHEN, Chuang WEI, Jian ZHU, Pu YANG. A high lift-to-drag ratio unconventional blended-wing-body aerodynamic configuration with swallow tail [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 629630-629630. |
| [6] | CHANG Min, SUN Yang, BAI Junqiang, MENG Xiaoxuan. Aerodynamic design optimization of twice folding wing for tube-launched UAV constrained by flat-angle rotation mechanism [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526331-526331. |
| [7] | CAO Fan, ZHANG Meifang, HU Xiao, TANG Zhili. Natural laminar flow optimization and transition sensitivity analysis of axisymmetric nacelle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527330-527330. |
| [8] | GUO Xiangdong, LIU Qinglin, LIU Senyun, WANG Zixu, LI Ming. Numerical study of supercooled large droplet cloud evolution characteristics in icing wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(8): 123655-123655. |
| [9] | LI Chunna, ZHANG Yangkang. An efficient adaptive global optimization method suitable for aerodynamic optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623352-623352. |
| [10] | LI Zhengzhou, GAO Chang, XIAO Tianhang, MA Zicheng, XIAO Jiliang, ZHU Jianhui. Extremely efficient prediction technique of dynamic derivatives for super/hypersonic flight vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 123545-123545. |
| [11] | . Research on extremely efficient prediction technique of dynamic stability derivatives for high-speed flight vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0. |
| [12] | GUO Xiangdong, WANG Zixu, LI Ming, LIU Bei. Numerical investigation of phase transition effects of droplet in icing wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(3): 121586-121586. |
| [13] | GUO Xiangdong, WANG Zixu, LI Ming, XIAO Chunhua. Numerical study of supercooling characteristics of droplet in icing wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(10): 121254-121254. |
| [14] | QI Zhongyang, WANG Yankui, WANG Lei, SHA Yongxiang. Effects of nose and afterbody of blunt body on side force [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(9): 121117-121117. |
| [15] | JU Shengjun, YAN Chao, YE Zhifei. Genevalization and validation of γ-Reθt-CF transition modeling in combination with Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(4): 120383-120383. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Address: No.238, Baiyan Buiding, Beisihuan Zhonglu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
Postal code : 100083
E-mail:hkxb@buaa.edu.cn
Total visits: 6658907 Today visits: 1341All copyright © editorial office of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
All copyright © editorial office of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Total visits: 6658907 Today visits: 1341

