1.2 m高速风洞双天平支撑试验技术

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26794

Abstract

Abstract: The test technology of twin-sting supports uses twin balances to measure the aerodynamic forces and moments of the full model. The twin-sting supports under wings, with little interference to the flow around the rear fuselage, are desirable for accurate measurements of the rear fuselage and the support interference evaluation test. In addition, for the support difficulty in high-speed wind tunnel tests of twin-body aircraft (laminar configuration verifier), the twin-sting supports can inherit the advantages of single tail supports to the largest extent, and have capabilities of longitudinal and horizontal tests within a wide range. Based on the principle of twin balances measurement, we develop the twin-sting supports test technology for 1.2 m high speed wind tunnels, and validate it by combined loading tests and wind tunnel tests. The test results of the twin-sting supports are reasonable and reliable, and the accuracy of the repetitive data meets the national military standard. This paper describes the twin-sting supports system under the wing of 1.2 m high speed wind tunnels, and introduces the application of its test technology to the 1.2 m high speed wind tunnel.

Key words: twin-sting supports, support interference, twin-body aircraft, laminar configuration verifier, wind tunnel test

CLC Number:

V211.73

YI Bingli, LIU Boyu, WANG Zhengqu, ZHANG Tiejun, LU Dan, ZHAO Yan. Test technology of twin-sting supports in 1.2 m high speed wind tunnel[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526794-526794.

References

[1] 秦永明,张江.双发战斗机跨超声速测力试验方案设想[C]//第二届近代实验空气动力学会议论文集.哈尔滨:中国空气动力学会,2009:243-247. QIN Y M, ZHANG J. Assumption of transonic and supersonic force measurement test scheme for twin engine fighter[C]//Proceedings of the Second Modern Experimental Aerodynamics Conference. Harbin:Chinese Aerodynamics Research Society, 2009:243-247(in Chinese).
[2] JIIRGEN Q, MARTIN C N W, HEINZ H. First measurement on an airbus high lift configuration at ETW up to flight Reynolds number:AIAA-2002-0423[R].Reston:AIAA,2002.
[3] PIAT J, ESTōVE N. Recent experiments with new twin-sting supports in ONERA's large wind tunnels:AIAA-2002-2921[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2002.
[4] QUEST J, ROLSTON S, UK A. Investigation of a modern transonic transport aircraft configuration over a large range of Reynolds numbers:AIAA-2002-0422[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2002.
[5] LYONNET M,PIAT J F,ROUX B. Model support interference assessment using a metric rear fuselage and a twin-sting at ONERA S2MA wind tunnel:TP 1994-125 E[R].1994.
[6] GROSS N. ETW analytical approach to assess the wing twist of pressure plotted wind tunnel models:AIAA-2002-0310[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2002.
[7] KOHZAI M, UENO M, KOGA S, et al. Wall and support interference corrections of NASA common research model wind tunnel tests in JAXA:AIAA-2013-0963[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[8] 熊能, 林俊, 贺中, 等. 大飞机布局模型跨声速风洞实验尾支撑干扰研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2012, 26(2):51-55. XIONG N, LIN J, HE Z, et al. Study on the rear sting support interference for large transports configuration model in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 26(2):51-55(in Chinese).
[9] 王玉花, 刘伟, 王超, 等. 翼尖支撑双天平校准技术研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2013, 27(6):99-102. WANG Y H, LIU W, WANG C, et al. Research on calibration technique of twin balances for the wing-tip support[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(6):99-102(in Chinese).
[10] 王超,彭鑫,刘大伟,等.面向风洞支撑干扰修正的随动假支杆布局测力方法研究[C]//第八届近代实验空气动力学会议论文集.珠海:中国空气动力学会,2021:1244-1248. WANG C, PENG X, LIU D W,et al. Study on force measurement method of wind tunnel support interference correction with follow-up dummy tail layout[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth Modern Experimental Aerodynamics Conference. Zhuhai:Chinese Aerodynamics Research Society, 2021:1244-1248(in Chinese).
[11] 马海,张颖,王强,等.FL-62风洞民机标模支撑干扰与弹性变形影响计算研究[C]//第八届近代实验空气动力学会议论文集.珠海:中国空气动力学会,2021:166-171. MA H, ZHANG Y,WANG Q,et al. Analysis on the influence of interference and elastic deformation of standard die support of FL-62 wind tunnel[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth Modern Experimental Aerodynamics Conference. Zhuhai:Chinese Aerodynamics Research Society, 2021:166-171(in Chinese).
[12] QUEST J, SCHIMANSKI D. Tools & techniques for high Reynolds number testing-status & recent improvements at ETW:AIAA-2003-0755[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2003.
[13] CURNES C, HARTLEY C, CARROLL J. Design, calibration and performance of a tandem sting support system with offset balances for high speed wind tunnel testing:AIAA-2008-1656[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[14] ALONS H J, WRIGHT M. Two cryogenic NLR balances for the ETW twin sting rig:NRL-TP-2004-149[R]. 2004.
[15] 唐松祥,李杰,张恒,等.某层流验证机中央翼段高速巡航气动性能优化设计研究[J].航空学报,2021,43(8):622353. TANG S X,LI J,ZHANG H,et al. Research on aerodynamic performance optimization design of the middle wing section of a special laminar unmanned flight under high-speed cruise condition[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 43(8):622353(in Chinese).
[16] FLORES R, ORTEGA E, ON~ATE E. Numerical investigation of wind-tunnel model deformations caused by the twin-sting support system[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(2):708-714.
[17] GATLIN G, RIVERS M, GOODLIFF S, et al. Experimental investigation of the DLR-F6 transport configuration in the national transonic facility (invited):AIAA-2008-6917[R].Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[18] RUDNIK R, SITZMANN M, GODARD J L, et al. Experimental investigation of the wing-body juncture flow on the DLR-F6 configuration in the ONERA S2MA facility:AIAA-2009-4113[R].Reston:AIAA, 2009.
[19] BURNER A, GOAD W, MASSEY E, et al. Wing deformation measurements of the DLR-F6 transport configuration in the national transonic facility (invited):AIAA-2008-6921[R].Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[20] MELISSA B R, CRAIG A H, GREGORY M G. Support system effects on the DLR-F6 transport configuration in the national transonic facility:AIAA-2009-4115[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2009.

Test technology of twin-sting supports in 1.2 m high speed wind tunnel

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Shanjie XU, Hongqiang LYU, Zhongchen LIU, Yan LENG, Xuejun LIU. Data analysis of sonic boom test based on probability model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[2]	Zhongchen LIU, Zhansen QIAN, Xuefei LI, Yan LENG, Dapeng GUO. Wind tunnel test techniques for exhaust nozzle plume effects on near-field sonic boom [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[3]	Jun SHU, Dongguang XU, Zhirong HAN, Si LI, Xiong HUANG. Hybrid wing design of icing wind tunnel supercooled large droplet icing test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[4]	LIU Chuanzhen, MENG Xufei, LIU Rongjian, BAI Peng. Experimental and numerical investigation of hypersonic performance of double swept waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[5]	LIU Jun, LUO Xinfu, WANG Xiansheng. Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[6]	ZHANG Zhenkai, JIA Sijia, SONG Chen, YANG Chao. Optimum design of wind tunnel test model for compliant morphing trailing edge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[7]	HOU Yingyu, LI Qi, JI Chen, LIU Ziqiang. Experimental design of aeroelastic load with supersonic low frequency and large buffeting [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626454-626454.
[8]	ZENG Kaichun, KOU Xiping, YANG Xinghua, YU Li, ZHA Jun. Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.
[9]	YANG Zhao, LI Jie, NIU Xiaotian. Analysis and correction of Reynolds number effect of a flight verification platform with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527287-527287.
[10]	GENG Yansheng, AI Mengqi, WANG Wei, GENG Jianzhong, ZHAO Yan. Efficient design and experimental verification of laminar airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526798-526798.
[11]	ZHAO Yan, DUAN Zhuoyi, DING Xingzhi, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng. Optimization design of hybrid laminar flow control wing for flight test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527539-527539.
[12]	DENG Yiju, DUAN Zhuoyi, AI Mengqi. Status and development of laminar flow wing design technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526778-526778.
[13]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[14]	CHEN Yifu, WANG Yiwen, DENG Yiju, WANG Bo, BAI Junqiang, LU Lei. Experiment and numerical simulation of natural laminar flow wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526793-526793.
[15]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.