基于量子行为鸽群优化的无人机紧密编队控制

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23722

Abstract

Abstract: UAV tight formation refers to the formation whose lateral distance between the UAVs is within one to two times of the wingspan. It has attracted considerable attention because of its effective improvement in the aerodynamic performance of UAVs in formation. In this paper, the aerodynamic coupling effect of the UAVs in tight formation is studied, and the state-space equation in three-dimensional space is established to describe the relative motion of two UAVs. The optimal formation configuration of two UAVs in close formation is deduced, where the combination of the artificial potential field method and formation control is used as the indirect control loop in the control system, and the basic pigeon inspired opbimization algorithm is calculated. The optimization defect of the algorithm is improved by quantum behavior rules. The improved opbimization pigeon inspired algorithm and the UAV control variables are combined as the direct control loop in the control system. Finally, the effectiveness of the control system is verified by simulation comparisons.

Key words: UAV, tight formation, aerodynamic coupling, artificial potential field, improved pigeon inspired opbimization

CLC Number:

V249.12

XU Bo, ZHANG Dalong. Tight formation flight control of UAVs based on pigeon inspired algorithm optimization by quantum behavior[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(8): 323722-323722.

References 23

[1]	JENNIFER L H, JAMES E M, NORMA V C. The NASA Dryden flight test approach to an aerial refueling system:NASA/TM-2005-212859[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2015.
[2]	BANGASH Z, SANCHEZ R, AHMED A, et al. Aerodynamics of formation flight[C]//42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2004.
[3]	BUZOGANY L E, PACHTER M, AZZO J J D. Automated control of aircraft in formation flight[C]//Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Reston:AIAA, 1992.
[4]	PROUD A W, MEIR P, JOHN J D A. Close formation flight control:AIAA-1999-4207[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1999:1231-1246.
[5]	PACHTER M, D'SZZO J J, PROUD A W. Tight formation flight control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamic, 2001, 24(2):246-254.
[6]	ZHANG Q R, LIU H H T. Robust nonlinear control of close formation flight[EB/OL]. (2019-04-16)[2019-12-01].https:arxiv.org/abs/1094.07479v1.
[7]	YU Z, QU Y, ZHANG Y. Safe control of trailing UAV in close formation flight against actuator fault and wake vortex effect[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77(6):189-205.
[8]	牟勇飚. 无人机编队中的气动耦合问题研究[D]. 西安:西北工业大学, 2006:30-45. MOU Y B. Research on aerodynamic coupling in UAV formation[D]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2006:30-45(in Chinese).
[9]	赵锋, 杨伟, 杨朝旭. 无人机紧密编队飞行控制仿真研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2012(5):18-21. ZHAO F, YANG W, YANG C X. Close formation flight control of UAVs[J]. Aeronautical Science Technology, 2012(5):18-21(in Chinese).
[10]	刘成功. 无人机仿生紧密编队飞行控制技术研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2009:21-33. LIU C G. Research on biomimetic close formation flight control of UAVs[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009:21-33(in Chinese).
[11]	万婧. 无人机自主编队飞行控制系统设计方法及应用研究[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2009:39-63. WAN J. Research on design method and application of UAV autonomous formation flight control system[D]. Shanghai:Fudan University, 2009:39-63(in Chinese).
[12]	ENGELBRECHT A, 谭营. 计算群体智能基础[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2009:1-15. ENGELBRECHT A, TAN Y. Fundamentals of computational swarm intelligence[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2009:1-15(in Chinese).
[13]	LIU C G, YAN X H, LIU C Y, et al. The wolf colony algorithm and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2011, 20(2):210-216.
[14]	PAN W T. A new fruit fly optimization algorithm:Taking the financial distress model as an example[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 26:69-74.
[15]	KARABOGA D. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization[D]. Erciyes:Erciyes University,2005.
[16]	DUAN H B, QIAO P. Pigeon-inspired optimization:A new swarm intelligence optimizer for air robot path planning[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Computing & Cybernetics, 2014, 7:24-37.
[17]	段海滨, 邱华鑫, 范彦铭. 基于捕食逃逸鸽群优化的无人机紧密编队协同控制[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2015, 45(6):559-572. DUAN H B, QIU H X, FAN Y M. Unmanned aerial vehicle close formation cooperative control based onpredatory escaping pigeon-inspired optimization[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2015, 45(6):559-572(in Chinese).
[18]	王晶, 顾维博, 窦立亚. 基于Leader-Follower的多无人机编队轨迹跟踪设计[J].航空学报,2020,41(S1):723728. WANG J, GU W B, DOU L Y. Leader-Follower formation control of multiple UAVs with trajectory tracking design[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2020,41(S1):723728(in Chinese).
[19]	张民, 夏卫政, 黄坤, 等. 基于Leader-Follower编队的无人机协同跟踪地面目标制导律设计[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2):321497. ZHANG M, XIA W Z, HUANG K, et al. Guidance law for cooperative tracking of a ground target based on leader-follower formation of UAVs[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(2):321497(in Chinese).
[20]	杨宇. 多机器人编队群集运动控制的研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2007:21-40. YANG Y. Research on formation and flocking control of multiple robots[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2007:21-40(in Chinese).
[21]	孙俊. 量子行为粒子群优化:原理及其应用[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2011:31-51. SUN J. Quantum-behaved PSO:Principles and applications[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2011:31-51(in Chinese).
[22]	周雨鹏. 基于鸽群算法的函数优化问题求解[D]. 长春:东北师范大学, 2016:6-23. ZHOU Y P. A pigeon-inspired algorithm for function optimization problems[D]. Changchun:Northeast Normal University, 2016:6-23(in Chinese).
[23]	郭瑞, 赵汝鑫, 吴海舟, 等. 具有收缩因子的自适应鸽群算法用于函数优化问题[J]. 物联网技术, 2017(5):91-94. GUO R, ZHAO R X, WU H Z, et al. Adaptive pigeon group algorithm with contraction factor for function optimization[J]. Internet of Things Technologies, 2017(5):91-94(in Chinese).

Tight formation flight control of UAVs based on pigeon inspired algorithm optimization by quantum behavior

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Qilei GUO, Weimin SANG, Junjie NIU, Ye YUAN. UAV flight strategy considering icing risk under complex meteorological conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627518-627518.
[2]	HU Yangxiu, ZHAO Changchun, JIA Chenglong, QIAN Zhouyuan, HU Tao. Synchronous path formation control of UAV swarm based on robot operating system (ROS) [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726914-726914.
[3]	SU Lingfei, HUA Yongzhao, DONG Xiwang, REN Zhang. Human-UAV swarm multi-modal intelligent interaction methods [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 727001-727001.
[4]	WANG Xiaoyue, WANG Xun, WANG Yongzhen, FEI Teng, LIU Dawei. Evaluation method for combat effectiveness of task-based simulated UAV swarm system [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726937-726937.
[5]	LIU Lei, LIU Dawei, WANG Xiaoguang, CHEN Junnan, LIU Dongxing. Development status and outlook of UAV clusters and anti-UAV clusters [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726908-726908.
[6]	YANG Mingyue, SHOU Yingxin, TANG Yong, LIU Chang, XU Bin. Multi-quadrotor UAVs formation maintenance and collision avoidance control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726913-726913.
[7]	ZHOU Wei, MA Peiyang, GUO Zheng, WANG Daoping, ZHOU Ruisun. Research of combined fixed-wing UAV based on wingtip chained [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325946-325946.
[8]	LI Hui, LONG Teng, SUN Jingliang, XU Guangtong. Adaptive line-of-sight method for 3D path following of UAVs [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 326105-326105.
[9]	LU Fangxu, MI Zhichao, MA Jun, LI Aijing, WANG Hai. Optimal 3D placement of multi-QoS UAV base station based on potential game for communications [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 326137-326137.
[10]	ZHAO Liangyu, LI Dan, ZHAO Chenyue, JIANG Fei. Some achievements on detection methods of UAV autonomous landing markers [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 25882-025882.
[11]	ZHANG Zhouyu, CAO Yunfeng, FAN Yanming. Research progress of vision based aerospace conflict sensing technologies for small unmanned aerial vehicle in low altitude [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25645-025645.
[12]	WANG Rui, ZHOU Zhou, GUO Ronghua, HUANG Yuechen. Multi-body dynamics simulation and experiment of solar-powered UAV parachute landing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225721-225721.
[13]	TANG Li, HAO Peng, REN Peige, ZHANG Zuyao, HE Xiang, ZHANG Xuejun. UAV abnormal behavior detection based on improved iForest algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 326789-326789.
[14]	ZHANG Honghong, GAN Xusheng, SUN Jingjuan, ZHAO Guhao, HAN Baohua. Analysis of low altitude UAV conflict resolution safety based on STPA-TOPAZ [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 325354-325354.
[15]	LIU Fang, SUN Yanan. UAV target tracking algorithm based on adaptive fusion network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 325522-325522.