融合多传感器数据的发动机剩余寿命预测方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23312

Abstract

Abstract: For remaining useful life prediction method based on single sensor data, there is a problem of low data utilization and low prediction accuracy. This paper proposes a method for predicting the remaining useful life of an engine that combines multi-sensors data. Firstly, multiple sensors data are fused into a composite health index to characterize the degraded performance of the engine. The linear Wiener process is used to model the composite health index. The model parameters are determined by the maximum likelihood estimation method, and then the predicted life of the engine is obtained. In order to determine the fusion coefficient, a method for minimizing the predicted mean square error between the actual life and the predicted life is proposed. After the fusion coefficient is determined, based on the historical life data of the training engine, the offline estimation value of the model parameters is determined. Then, using the Bayesian formula, combined with the real-time monitoring data of the engine and the prior distribution of the parameters, the model parameters are updated in real time, and the probability distribution of the remaining useful life is derived based on the first hitting time, thereby realizing the online prediction of the remaining useful life of the engine. Finally, the commercial modular aero-propulsion system simulation data set is selected for numerical simulation experiments. The results show that compared with the single sensor-based method, the proposed method can improve the accuracy of the remaining useful life prediction, and the relative mean square error of remaining useful life prediction is reduced by about 2%.

Key words: composite health index, linear Wiener process, maximum likelihood estimation, Bayesian parameter update, remaining useful life prediction

CLC Number:

V239

REN Ziqiang, SI Xiaosheng, HU Changhua, WANG Xi. Remaining useful life prediction method for engine combining multi-sensors data[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(12): 223312-223312.

References 23

[1]	HUANG Z, XU Z, WANG W, et al. Remaining useful life prediction for a nonlinear heterogeneous wiener process model with an adaptive drift[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2015, 64(2):687-700.
[2]	周东华, 魏慕恒, 司小胜. 工业过程异常检测、寿命预测与维修决策的研究进展[J]. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(6):711-722. ZHOU D H, WEI M H, SI X S. A survey on anomaly detection, life prediction and maintenance decision for industrial processes[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(6):711-722(in Chinese).
[3]	孔祥芬, 蔡峻青,张利寒,等. 大数据在航空系统的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12):8-23. KONG X F, CAI J Q, ZHANG L H, et al. Research status and development trend of big data in aviation system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12):8-23(in Chinese).
[4]	银越千, 金海良,陈璇. 涡轴/涡桨发动机压气机流动特点与发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(9):35-50. YIN Y Q, JIN H L, CHEN X. Flow feature and developing trends of compressor in turboshaft/turboprop engine[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(9):35-50(in Chinese).
[5]	赵广社, 吴思思, 荣海军. 多源统计数据驱动的航空发动机剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2017, 51(11):150-155. ZHAO G S, WU S S, RONG H J. A multi-source statistics data-driven method for remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2017, 51(11):150-155(in Chinese).
[6]	唐王. 数据驱动的航空发动机余寿预测方法[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2018:1-20. TANG W. Data-driven aero-engine remaining useful life prediction method[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018:1-20(in Chinese).
[7]	CHEHADE A, SONG C, LIU K, et al. A data-level fusion approach for degradation modeling and prognostic analysis under multiple failure modes[J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 2018,50(2):150-165.
[8]	周经伦, 厉海涛, 刘学敏, 等. 维纳过程寿命预测的一种自助法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011,31(8):1588-1592. ZHOU J L, LI H T, LIU X M, et al. A bootstrap method of life prediction based on Wiener process[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2011, 31(8):1588-1592(in Chinese).
[9]	施权, 胡昌华, 司小胜, 等. 考虑执行器性能退化的控制系统剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(5):941-952. SHI Q, HU C H, SI X S, et al. Remaining useful lifetime prediction method of controlled systems considering performance degradation of actuator[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(5):941-952(in Chinese).
[10]	CAESARENDRA W, WIDODO A, THOM P H, et al. Combined probability approach and indirect data-driven method for bearing degradation prognostics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2011,60(1):14-20.
[11]	GEBRAEEL N Z, LAWLEY M A, LI R, et al. Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals:A Bayesian approach[J]. IIE Transactions, 2005, 37(6):543-557.
[12]	SAXENA A, GOEBEL K, SIMON D, et al. Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation[C]//International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2008:1-9.
[13]	LIU K, GEBRAEEL N Z, SHI J. A data-level fusion model for developing composite health indices for degradation modeling and prognostic analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013,10(3):652-664.
[14]	YAN H, LIU K, ZHANG X, et al. Multiple sensor data fusion for degradation modeling and prognostics under multiple operational conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2016,65(3):1416-1426.
[15]	SONG C, LIU K, ZHANG X. Integration of data-level fusion model and kernel methods for degradation modeling and prognostic analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2018, 67(2):640-650.
[16]	LIU K, HUANG S. Integration of data fusion methodology and degradation modeling process to improve prognostics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2016,13(1):344-354.
[17]	LIU K, CHEHADE A, SONG C. Optimize the signal quality of the composite health index via data fusion for degradation modeling and prognostic analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2017,14(3):1504-1514.
[18]	FANG X, PAYNABAR K, GEBRAEEL N. Multistream sensor fusion-based prognostics model for systems with single failure modes[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017,159:322-331.
[19]	SI X, WANG W, CHEN M, et al. A degradation path-dependent approach for remaining useful life estimation with an exact and closed-form solution[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 226(1):53-66.
[20]	SI X, WANG W, HU C, et al. Remaining useful life estimation based on a nonlinear diffusion degradation process[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2012, 61(1):50-67.
[21]	司小胜, 胡昌华. 数据驱动的设备剩余寿命预测理论及应用[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2016:122-123. SI X S, HU C H. Data-driven remaining useful life prediction theory and applications for equipment[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2016:122-123(in Chinese).
[22]	SAXENA A,GOEBEL. C-MAPSS data set(2019-07-20)[2019-07-23]. https://www.dssz.com/2148128.html.
[23]	ZHANG Y, XIONG R, HE H, et al. Lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction with Box-Cox transformation and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability Industrial Electronics, 2018, 1(1):1-8.

Remaining useful life prediction method for engine combining multi-sensors data

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Jiaxin YANG, Shengjin TANG, Liang LI, Xiaoyan SUN, Shuai QI, Xiaosheng SI. Remaining useful life prediction of implicit nonlinear Wiener degradation process based on multi-source information [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(12): 227662-227662.
[2]	ZHANG Shengfei, LI Tianmei, HU Changhua, DU Dangbo, SI Xiaosheng. Missing data generation method and its application in remaining useful life prediction based on deep convolutional generative adversarial network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225708-225708.
[3]	MU Hanxiao, ZHENG Jianfei, HU Changhua, ZHAO Ruixing, DONG Qing. Remaining useful life prediction of multivariate degradation equipment based on CDBN and BiLSTM [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 325403-325403.
[4]	XING Huaixi, ZHANG Yuhui, CHEN You, ZHOU Yipeng, HE Wenbo. Single station passive localization with phase difference change rate based on MCIS technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(3): 324278-324278.
[5]	WANG Ding, YIN Jiexin, WU Zhidong, LIU Ruirui. Direct localization method for constant modulus source based on Doppler frequency shifts [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(9): 321084-321084.
[6]	CHEN Lu, BI Daping, CUI Rui, HAN Jiahui. DOA estimation algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation for nested array [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(11): 321212-321212.
[7]	ZHANG Tao, FAN Shiwei, XUE Yonghong, DING Yonghe. Trajectory estimation method of missile in boost phase using optimal knots spline [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(9): 3027-3033.
[8]	YU Fei, TAO Jianwu, QIAN Lilin. Airspeed measurement method based on propagation time estimation of acoustic waves [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(4): 1285-1298.
[9]	TDOA and FDOA measurements ZHOU Cheng, HUANG Gaoming, SHAN Hongchang, GAO Jun. Bias compensation algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation for passive localization using TDOA and FDOA measurements [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(3): 979-986.
[10]	TANG Bo, ZHANG Yu, LI Ke. Adaptive Clutter Suppression Research Based on Priori Knowledge and Its Accuracy Evaluation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(5): 1174-1180.
[11]	ZHOU Lin, PAN Quan, LIANG Yan. Estimation Method for Sensor System Error Based on Markov Stochastic Jump System [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, (6): 1070-1076.
[12]	GU Xinfeng, JIAN Tao, HE You, HAO Xiaolin. Blind Integrator of Range-spread Target in Non-Gaussian Clutter [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(12): 2261-2267.
[13]	JIA Xingjiang;GUO Fucheng;Zhou Yiyu. Passive Localization Based on Short Time TDOA Sequence [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2011, 32(2): 291-298.
[14]	YANG Mou-cun;NIE Hong. Advanced Method of Determining Generic Parameters of EIFS Distribution [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2006, 27(6): 1107-1112.
[15]	WANG Tong;ZHANG Ling-mi. Frequency Domain Multiple Input / Output Modal Parameters Identification with Consideration of Stochastic Noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2004, 25(6): 560-564.