高超声速可变形双翼气动特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.121352

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the aerodynamic performance of the morphing biplane under different angles of attack and different Mach numbers, as well as the difficulty in selecting the deflection angle of rudder with given angle of attack and Mach number, this paper combines dichotomy, genetic algorithm and Gauss-Newton algorithm to determine the deflection angle of rudder of the morphing biplane under different angles of attack and different Mach numbers. The aerodynamic characteristics of the morphing biplane and the influence of the deflection angle of rudder on the aerodynamic characteristics are analyzed. It is shown that as the Mach number is 5, and the angle of attack ranges from 1°to 8°, the lift-drag ratio of the morphing biplane is obviously greater (up to 4.2 times) than that of Busemann biplane. When the angle of attack is 3°, and the Mach number ranges from 0.5 to 5, the lift-drag ratio of the morphing biplane can be up to 3.4 times than that of Busemann biplane. These results indicate that the morphing biplane can maintain a high lift-drag ratio at large angle of attack and high speed range, and has better applicability and prospects in hypersonic flight.

Key words: hypersonic, morphing biplane, deflection angle of rudder, lift-drag ratio, angle of attack, Mach number

CLC Number:

V211.3

LIU Shuhan, ZHU Zhanxia. Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic morphing biplane[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(9): 121352-121352.

References

[1] SZIROCZAK D, SMITH H. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016, 84(7): 1-28.
[2] BUSEMANN A. Aerodynamic lift at supersonic speeds[C]//The 5th Volta Aerodynamic Conference, 1935.
[3] BUSEMANN A. The relation between minimized drag and noise at supersonic speed[C]//The High-Speed Aeronautics Conference, 1955.
[4] LICHER R M. Optimum two-dimensional multiplanes in supersonic flow[C]//Douglass Aircraft Conference, 1955.
[5] 华如豪, 叶正寅. 基于Busemann双翼构型的超音速导弹减阻技术研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2012, 29(5): 536-540. HUA R H, YE Z Y. Drag reduction method for supersonic missile based on Busemann biplane concept[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2012, 29(5): 536-540 (in Chinese).
[6] PATIDAR V K, YADAV R, JOSHI S. Numerical investigation of the effect of stagger on the aerodynamic characteristics of a Busemann biplane[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2016, 55(8): 252-263.
[7] YAMASHITA H, KURATANI N, YONEZAWA M, et al. Wind tunnel testing on start/unstart characteristics of finite supersonic biplane wing[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2013(6): 1-10.
[8] MARUYAMA D, MATSUSHIMA K, KUSUNOSE K, et al. Three-dimensional aerodynamic design of low-wave-drag supersonic biplane using inverse problem method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 46(6): 1906-1918.
[9] YONEZAWA M, OBAYASHI S. Aerodynamic performance of the three-dimensional lifting supersonic biplane[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 47(3): 983-991.
[10] DAN I, ARAD E. A parametric study of an axisymetric Busemann biplane configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 46(6): 1930-1937.
[11] MARUYAMA D, KUSUNOSE K, MATSUSHIMA K, et al. Aerodynamic analysis and design of Busemann biplane: Towards efficient supersonic flight[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 226(2): 217-238.
[12] 李占科, 张翔宇, 冯晓强, 等. 超声速双层翼翼型的阻力特性研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2014(4): 483-488. LI Z K, ZHANG X Y, FENG X Q, et al. The study on the drag characteristic of supersonic biplane[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014(4): 483-488 (in Chinese).
[13] XU Y Z, XU Z Q, LI S G, et al. A hypersonic lift mechanism with decoupled lift and drag surfaces[J]. Science China: Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2013, 56(5): 981-988.
[14] HU R, JAMESON A, WANG Q Q. Adjoint-based aerodynamic optimization of supersonic biplane airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(3): 802-814.
[15] HU R. Supersonic biplane design via adjoint method[D]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2009.
[16] KUSUNOSE K. A fundamental study for the development of boomless supersonic transport aircraft[C]//The 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2006.
[17] MATSUSHIMA K, TAKANASHI S. An inverse design method for wings using integral equations and its recent progress[C]//Proceedings of Lectures and Workshop International Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Technology and Modeling, 2008.
[18] KUSUNOSE K, MATSUSHIMA K, MARUYAMA D. Supersonic biplane-A review[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(1): 53-87.
[19] YAMASHITA H, YONEZAWA M, OBAYASHI S, et al. A study of Busemann-type biplane for avoiding choked flow[C]//The 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2007.
[20] 赵承熙, 叶正寅, 华如豪. 新型目标压力分布下的Licher双翼反设计方法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(5): 610-616. ZHAO C X, YE Z Y, HUA R H. Inverse design method for the Licher biplane with a new target pressure distributio[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 610-616 (in Chinese).
[21] TIAN Y, AGARWAL R K. Shape optimization of Busemann-type biplane airfoil for drag reduction under non-lifting and lifting conditions using genetic algorithms[C]//Optimization Algorithms-Methods and Applications, 2015.
[22] HUANG L, HUANG G, LEBEAU R P, et al. Optimization of aifoil flow control using a genetic algorithm with diversity control[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 44(4): 1337-1349.
[23] GURUSWAMY G. Dynamic stability analysis of hypersonic transport during reentry[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(11): 3374-3381.
[24] CROSSLEY W A, LAANANEN D H. Conceptual design of helicopters via genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 33(6): 1062-1070.
[25] MINOT A, LU Y M, LI N. A distributed Gauss-Newton method for power system state estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 31(5): 3804-3815.
[26] BAO J F, LI C, SHEN W P, et al. Approximate Gauss-Newton methods for solving underdetermined nonlinear least squares problems[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2017, 111(1): 92-110.

Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic morphing biplane

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Zhikun SUN, Zhiwei SHI, Weilin ZHANG, Zheng LI, Qijie SUN. Effect of plasma actuator on lift-drag characteristics of high-speed airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[2]	Weizhuo HUA, Ling GAO, Ge CHEN, Yiwen LI, Geng GONG, Yantao WANG, Biao WEI. Experimental magneto-hydrodynamic system based on plasma torch [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 1-7.
[3]	Yifeng HUANG, Shuhua ZENG, Zhongzheng JIANG, Weifang CHEN. Numerical study on high-altitude lateral jet based on nonlinear coupled constitutive relation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 8-22.
[4]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[5]	Xudong ZHANG, Zheng LI, Hao DONG, Siyuan GAO, Zubi JI, Kaixin LI, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[6]	Shouchao HU, Yu ZHUANG, Xian LI, Tao JIANG. Hypersonic aero-heating environment research model HyHERM-I: Experiment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 233-248.
[7]	Haoge LI, Hua YANG, Yuxin YANG, Weifang CHEN. Refinement optimization design for heat reduction on windward surface of hypersonic lifting body [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[8]	Dong WU, Hong YANG, Wenfeng ZHAO, Yue LUO. High temperature strain measurement of hypersonic aircraft carbon-based composite material structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 160-169.
[9]	Chunsheng NIE, Ye YUAN, Wei MA, Zhanwei CAO, Mingxing YU. Effect of active ejection gas parameters on thermal environment of plate and air rudder [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 170-179.
[10]	Zhengxue MA, Zhenbing LUO, Aihong ZHAO, Yan ZHOU, Wei XIE, Qiang LIU, Yinxin ZHU, Wenqiang PENG. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[11]	LIU Chuanzhen, MENG Xufei, LIU Rongjian, BAI Peng. Experimental and numerical investigation of hypersonic performance of double swept waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[12]	LI Jun, WANG Junfeng, ZHAO Yatian, LUO Shibin. Research on combinational configuration of spike and multi-jets in off-design regimes [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 125949-125949.
[13]	WANG Yi, XU Shangcheng, ZHOU Yunfan, FAN Xiaoqiang, WANG Zhenguo. Multi-objective design and analysis of cowl lip angle for hypersonic inlet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125698-125698.
[14]	ZHENG Hui, QIU Lei, YUAN Shenfang, YANG Xiaofei, LU Xulong, XUE Zhaopeng. Experimental method of guided wave monitoring for high temperature airflow damage of C/C thermal protection structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225659-225659.
[15]	LIU Qingyang, LEI Juanmian, LIU Zhou, SHI Lei, ZHOU Weijiang. γ-Re_θt-f_Re transition model for compressible flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125794-125794.