基于随机抽样与距离判别的GARTEUR模型修正与确认研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0327

Abstract

Abstract:

A stochastic model updating (SMU) method using distance discrimination analysis and random sampling technique is proposed and subsequently applied to the updating process of the GARTEUR benchmark structure. In contrast to the traditional deterministic model updating procedure in which parameters are calibrated by sensitivity and optimization analysis, the proposed SMU method takes into consideration uncertainties which are general in the modeling as well as test processes. Uncertainty propagation is performed by Monte Carlo sampling method in which a large scale stochastic sampling process is proposed to describe uncertainties from parameters to features. Distance discrimination analysis is presented to quantify the degree of similarity and dissimilarity between analytical and test data. Input parameters are calibrated to the test data through an iterative procedure integrating the above uncertainty propagation and quantification methods. In order to reduce calculation cost, a metamodel is constructed using radial basis function with an acceptable precision. The relative PCL program of MSC.Patran is employed to submit multiple finite element (FE) analyses and to extract information for subsequent analysis. An application is performed on the GARTEUR structure and the updating results are assessed by the widely accepted 3-steps validation criteria. The updating and validation results show the proposed SMU method is valid and effective in engineering application.

Key words: model updating, model validation, uncertainty, Monte Carlo method, distance discrimination analysis, GARTEUR

CLC Number:

V214
TB12

BI Sifeng, DENG Zhongmin. Stochastic Model Updating and Validation of the GARTEUR Structure Based on Random Sampling and Distance Discrimination[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(12): 2757-2767.

References

[1] Mares C, Mottershead J E, Friswell M I. Stochastic model updating: Part 1－theory and simulated example. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1674-1695.

[2] Zhang L M. Computer simulation & model validation with application to srtength and environment engineering. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2002, 29(2): 42-47. (in Chinese) 张令弥. 计算仿真与模型确认及在结构环境与强度中的应用. 强度与环境, 2002, 29(2): 42-47.

[3] Ding J F, Ma X R, Han Z Y, et al. Three-step model updating method in structure dynamics and its application. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31(3): 546-552. (in Chinese) 丁继峰, 马兴瑞, 韩增尧, 等. 结构动力学模型修正的三步策略及其实践. 航空学报, 2010, 31(3): 546-552.

[4] Mottershead J E, Link M, Friswell M I. The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(7): 2275-2296.

[5] Calvi A. Uncertainty-based loads analysis for spacecraft: finite element model validation and dynamic responses. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(14): 1103-1112.

[6] Xia R W. Engineering optimization theory and algorithm. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2003. (in Chinese) 夏人伟. 工程优化理论与算法. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2003.

[7] Bi S, Deng Z, Chen Z. Stochastic validation of structural FE-models based on hierarchical cluster analysis and advanced Monte Carlo simulation. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2013, 67: 22-33.

[8] Doebling S W, Hemez F M, Schultze J F, et al. Overview of structural dynamics model validation activities at Los Alamos National Laboratory. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2002.

[9] Thomas L, Red-Horse J. Structural dynamics challenge problem: summary. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(29): 2660-2665.

[10] Zang C, Schwingshackl C W, Ewins D J. Model validation for structural dynamic analysis: an approach to the Sandia structural dynamics challenge. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(30): 2645-2659.

[11] Link M, Friswell M I. Working Group 1: generation of validated structural dynamiv models: results of a benchmark study utilising the GARTEUR SM-AG19 test-bed. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2003, 17(1): 9-21.

[12] Szekely G S, Pradlwarter H J, Schueller G I, et al. A detailed scatter analysis of the structural response of spacecraft. European Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials & Mechanical Testing, 2001: 605-610.

[13] Hurtado J E, Barbat A H. Monte Carlo techniques in computational stochastic mechanics. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1998, 5(1): 3-29.

[14] Mei C L, Zhou J L. Applied statistical methods. Beijing: Science Press, 2002: 218-245. (in Chinese) 梅长林, 周家良. 实用统计方法. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 218-245.

[15] Dou Y F, Liu F, Zhang W H. Research on comparative analysis of response surface methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 2007, 14(5): 359-363. (in Chinese) 窦毅芳, 刘飞, 张为华. 响应面建模方法的比较分析. 工程设计学报, 2007, 14(5): 359-363.

[16] Ni L. Research on classified validation of complex structure model. Nanjing: College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009. (in Chinese) 倪磊. 复杂结构有限元模型分级确认研究. 南京: 南京航空航天大学航空宇航学院, 2009.

[17] Jiang Y Q. Study on the RBF implicit surface and its application. Chengdu: School of Information Science & Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011. (in Chinese) 江永全. 径向基函数隐式曲面的研究及应用. 成都: 西南交通大学信息科学与技术学院, 2011.

[18] Degener M, Hermes M. Ground vibration test and finite element analysis of the GARTEUR SM-AG19 testbed. DLR Report, IB 232-96 J08, 1996.

Stochastic Model Updating and Validation of the GARTEUR Structure Based on Random Sampling and Distance Discrimination

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHEN Zhiyuan, LI Luyi. Efficient methods for reliability sensitivity analysis of inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[2]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[3]	LI Xiaoyang, TAO Zhao, ZHANG Wei. Reliability modelling for fatigue based on uncertain differential equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225820-225820.
[4]	LUO Jiaqi, FU Wenhao, ZENG Xian, XIA Zhiheng. Uncertainty impact of Reynolds number on flow losses of high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125427-125427.
[5]	WANG Ding, YIN Jiexin, GAO Lu, YANG Bin. A novel method for TDOA localization in presence of synchronization clock bias and sensor position uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 325405-325405.
[6]	LI Jinsheng, ZHUANG Ling, SONG Jiahong, LU Baogang, SU Wei, WU Qiao. Aircraft aerodynamic characteristic correction framework for engineering data [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 125157-125157.
[7]	LI Ning, LIU Zhiyong, WANG Na, YANG Lei. Simulation on antenna servo control system based on DUEA [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 324986-324986.
[8]	ZHAO Huan, GAO Zhenghong, XIA Lu. Efficient robust aerodynamic design optimization method for high-speed NLF airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124894-124894.
[9]	CHEN Jiangtao, ZHANG Chao, WU Xiaojun, ZHAO Wei. Quantification of turbulence model-selection uncertainties considering discretization errors [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625741-625741.
[10]	WANG Li'nan, CAI Chuhan, LIU Guosheng, MA Bang, MA Xianjie. Electro-optical countermeasure simulation of fighter terminal based on effectiveness evaluation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525834-525834.
[11]	DU Yufeng, LIN Jun, WANG Xunnian, XIONG Neng. Analysis of modes of disturbances in compressible fluid in subsonic wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124424-124424.
[12]	JIA Qingxuan, DUAN Jiaqi, CHEN Gang. Uncalibrated visual servo of space robots performing on-orbit assembly alignment task [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 424063-424063.
[13]	WEI Kepeng, HU Jian, YAO Jianyong, XING Haochen, LE Guigao. Fast terminal sliding mode control of neural networks for aeromechanical actuators [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 624540-624540.
[14]	DONG Leiting, ZHOU Xuan, ZHAO Fubin, HE Shuangxin, LU Zhiyuan, FENG Jianmin. Key technologies for modeling and simulation of airframe digital twin [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(3): 23981-023981.
[15]	ZHONG Yun, WAN Lujun, ZHANG Jieyong. Optimized selection method for air combat course of action with interval uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 324282-324282.